• Each day, more than 40,000 harmful and/or lethal medical errors occur in the U.S., and preventable medical errors kill around 440,000 patients each year, making medical mistakes the third leading cause of death

• One in 25 patients end up acquiring an infection while in the hospital, and 75,000 people per year die as a result

• Since 1983, 132 newborns have been abducted from U.S. health care facilities, and hundreds of individuals have been caught posing as doctors when, in fact, they did not have a medical degree

• Misdiagnoses may occur in 10 percent of all cases, and 30 million prescriptions are improperly dispensed each year in U.S. pharmacies

• Two in 10,000 surgical patients come out of surgery with a surgical instrument left inside, and an estimated seven patients undergo surgery on the wrong body part each and every day

Hospitals are typically thought of as places where lives are saved, but statistics show they’re actually one of the most dangerous places you could possibly enter. Each day, more than 40,000 harmful and/or lethal medical errors occur, placing the patient in a worse situation than what they came in with.

According to a 2013 study, preventable medical errors kill around 440,000 patients each year — more than 10 times the number of deaths caused by motor vehicle crashes. A 2016 study⁶ calculated the annual death toll to be around 250,000.

Medical Mistakes Are the Third Leading Cause of Death in the US

Either way, medical mistakes are the third leading cause of death in the U.S., and have been since at least 2000, when the late Dr. Barbara Starfield published her shocking conclusion that doctors kill 225,000 patients each year. Her findings were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Ironically, Starfield ended up a statistic herself.

She died suddenly in June 2011, a death her husband attributed to the adverse effects of the blood thinner Plavix taken in combination with aspirin. Her death certificate, however, makes no mention of this possibility. Indeed, one of the reasons why many are still surprised by these statistics is due to fundamental flaws in the tracking of medical errors, which has shielded the reality of the situation and kept it out of the public eye.

While there are codes that capture iatrogenic causes of death, published mortality statistics do not take them into account. They only look at the condition that led the individual to seek medical treatment in the first place. As a result, even if a doctor lists medical errors in the death certificate, they are not included in the CDC's mortality statistics, and without that data, medical mistakes remain a largely hidden problem.

Hospitals Are Hotbeds for Lethal Infections

Hospitals have become particularly notorious for spreading lethal infections. According to 2014 statistics by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1 in 25 patients end up with a hospital-acquired infection, and 75,000 people per year die as a result.

Earlier research has suggested as many as 1 in 10 patients will contract a nosocomial infection, defined as an infection contracted within 48 hours of hospital admission, or within three days of discharge, or within 30 days of an operation. Medicare patients appear to be at greatest risk. According to the 2011 Health Grades Hospital Quality in America Study, 1 in 9 Medicare patients developed a hospital-acquired infection.

The video above features the Discovery Channel documentary, “Shocking Medical Mistakes: The Empowered Patient,” originally aired in 2016. In it, medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen investigates medical mistakes and missed diagnoses, including some of her own experiences as a patient, and what you can do to become an empowered patient and reduce your risk when a hospital stay is necessary.

25 Most Shocking Medical Mistakes

As mentioned in the video, medical mistakes occur every single day, and some are more serious than others. Cohen reveals 25 of the most shocking in the following countdown, and how you can protect yourself from becoming a statistic:

25. Baby security breach

Since 1983, 132 newborns have been abducted from U.S. health care facilities.

Safety tip: Make sure a parent or nurse is present with the child at all times while in the hospital.

24. Fake doctors, aka “prestige fraud”

Believe it or not, hundreds of individuals have been caught posing as doctors when, in fact, they did not have a medical degree.

Safety tip: Make sure your doctor is a licensed physician in your state. For help, see CertificationMatters.org.

23. Treating the wrong patient

This mistake typically happens when patients have similar names and the doctor or nurse fails to double-check all of the patient’s data before administering treatment.

Safety tip: Before every procedure, including drug administration, make sure the staff checks your full name, date of birth and the barcode on your wrist band, to ensure correct treatment.

22. Pharmacy mix-ups

According to the National Patient Safety Foundation, 30 million prescriptions are improperly dispensed each year in U.S. pharmacies.

Safety tip: Before you leave the pharmacy, ask the pharmacist to confirm that the medication is the correct one, especially if you’re unfamiliar with the look of the pills, and that you’ve received the correct dosage. Also verify that the label has your name on it.

21. Botched plastic surgery

Any number of things can go wrong when you go under the knife, and death is a potential side effect even of plastic surgery.

Safety tip: Make sure your surgeon is certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. You may also want to check whether your surgeon has any malpractice suits filed against him or her. Most state medical boards provide this information free of charge.

You can find a list of state medical boards on the Federation of State Medical Boards website. Another source is the Administrators in Medicine, a nonprofit organization that compiles licensing and disciplinary information from each state’s medical board.

20. Incorrect drug dosages

One of the most frequent mistakes occur in pediatrics. A child given an adult dose of a medication can have life-threatening consequences. According to the Joint Commission, hospital personnel stock medication in the wrong places 4 percent of the time, which can lead to incorrect dosage or drug being administered if the nurse or doctor fails to carefully inspect the package before administration.

Safety tip: Ask for a daily list of medication and dosages that you are supposed to receive during your hospital stay, and double-check each medication before taking it or allowing it to be administered.

19. Toxic transplants

As noted by transplant surgeon Dr. Lloyd Ratner, any given organ donor could be a carrier of one of several thousands of pathogens. The case highlighted in the video is that of an 18-year-old kidney recipient who died of rabies. It turns out the organ donor had been bitten by an infected bat. All of the organ recipients contracted rabies from the infected organs and died. In the U.S., more than 100 organ recipients have died from toxic transplants.

Safety tip: If you become sicker after receiving a transplant, ask if other recipients are also getting ill. Early diagnosis and treatment may save your life.

18. Improper or careless discharge

A man having just undergone brain surgery is packed into a cab, which drops him off in an unfamiliar neighborhood on a rainy day wearing nothing but a hospital gown and socks. When he was too confused to remember his own address, two Samaritans eventually got him home safely.

Safety tip: If you’re scheduled for surgery, find out when you’re scheduled for discharge ahead of time and make sure someone you know is there to take you home.

17. Ambulance errors

Any number of errors can occur on the way to the hospital, but first the ambulance must actually get to you. Patients have died due to the ambulance being dispatched to an incorrect address.

Safety tip: When calling for an ambulance, if possible, slowly and clearly state and spell the street address.

16. Lost patients

This typically occurs in nursing home facilities, where dementia patients may wander off the premises. One in 5 nursing home patients is prone to wandering. In one case, an elderly woman with Alzheimer’s was found after a four-day-long manhunt, locked inside a storage closet on the premises. She died shortly thereafter from dehydration.

Safety tip: If you have a loved one who is prone to wander, get them a GPS bracelet so you can track their whereabouts.

15. Surgical “souvenirs”

Surgical sponges, steel clamps and surgical retractors are but a few of the items that have been left inside patients undergoing surgery. According to one estimate, 2 in 10,000 surgical patients come out of surgery with a “souvenir” left inside.

Safety tip: Before surgery, remind hospital staff to count the number of items used, to make sure all surgical items are accounted for before you’re stitched up. Should you experience unexpected fever, pain or swelling following your surgery, ask your doctor to double-check if equipment has accidentally been left inside you.

14. Babies accidentally switched after birth

As with patients receiving the wrong treatment, this mistake typically occurs if two mothers have the same or similar name.

Safety tip: When a nurse brings your baby, ask him or her to match the baby’s identification bracelet to yours.

13. Deadly air bubbles

A young man dies when a nurse fails to follow proper procedure for removal of a central line tube in his chest, allowing air to enter his bloodstream. In one hospital intensive care unit, improperly removed central lines caused 10 air embolisms in a single year.

Safety tip: If you have a central line, before removal, confirm the proper procedure is about to be followed. A copy of the nursing protocol for the removal of central lines can be found on ctsnet.org. Standard procedure protocols for central line removal in adults and pediatrics can also be found on health.ucsd.edu.

12. Misdiagnosis

Research suggests misdiagnoses may occur in 10 percent of all cases.

Safety tip: Trust your instincts. If you believe your doctor has missed something or misdiagnosed you, get a second opinion.

11. Receiving the wrong blood type during transfusion

During surgery, you will typically need a blood transfusion. The blood you receive — A, B or O, positive or negative — must match yours, as your body will interpret mismatched blood as a foreign invader. One of every 19,000 units of blood is incorrectly administered in the U.S.

Safety tip: Know your blood type and, if possible, verify that the blood bags you’re about to receive are a match. If you cannot see the bags ahead of time, ask hospital staff to verify they have your blood type correct prior to surgery.

10. Surgical equipment causing internal burns

A malfunction in the monitoring cable inserted through the heart during a routine bypass surgery causes the cable to heat up, cooking part of the patient’s heart, causing irreparable damage.

It sounds unbelievable, but it happened. The patient had to receive a full heart transplant. Lasers and flammable gases used in surgery can also cause unexpected burns. These kinds of errors are typically the result of multiple mistakes, not just one. Still, some 240 surgical fires are reported in American hospitals each year.

Safety tip: If undergoing surgery, ask what type of equipment will be used, and how you will be protected from lasers, cables and flammable gases.

9. Medical tube mix-ups

Feeding tubes and central line tubes look a lot alike, but knowing which is which is absolutely crucial when it comes time to administer nutrients or medication through the feeding tube. In the example shown in the video, medication meant for a young child’s stomach was administered into her vein, via the central line. The child died. Sixteen percent of doctors and nurses report being aware of tube mix-ups happening at their hospitals.

Safety tip: If you have more than one tube, ask medical staff to trace the tube back to its site of origin, each and every time a medication is administered to ensure the correct one is being used.

8. Switched biopsies

As many as 1 in 1,000 lab specimens is mislabeled. One 35-year-old woman got a double mastectomy due to her biopsy being switched with another woman’s. She got a second opinion, but the error was not caught because the second doctor simply based his findings on the original, mixed-up lab work.

Safety tip: If in doubt, ask to have the biopsy repeated and/or get a second (or third) opinion.

7. Receiving the wrong eggs in fertility treatment

Women undergoing fertility treatment face the unusual possibility of receiving the wrong woman’s eggs. In one case, eggs from two women with the same last name were accidentally switched. In this instance, the woman carried the baby to term, then adopted the baby boy out to his real parents.

Safety tip: Be very careful in your selection of a fertility clinic. Make sure the clinic is accredited by the College of American Pathologists.

6. Operating on the wrong body part

In the U.S., an estimated seven patients undergo surgery on the wrong body part each and every day.

Safety tip: Before surgery, confirm the correct location of the surgery — both body part and side — with the nurse and surgeon. Also make sure the surgeon has clearly marked the correct site. Considering the frequency at which this mistake occurs, do not be shy about doing this.

5. Unsafe radiation

Incorrectly programmed and calibrated CT scans can deliver an unsafe dose of radiation. The video shows three patients whose CT scans resulted in the loss of hair in a ring around their head. It turns out the machine was incorrectly calibrated, delivering eight times the normal dose of radiation. These patients now also face the possibility of getting brain cancer at some point in the future.

Safety tip: Whenever possible, opt for an ultrasound or MRI instead of a CT scan, as they do not use ionizing radiation to produce the image.

4. Hospital-acquired infections

Not only will 1 in 25 hospital patients contract an infection, many of these infectious pathogens are now resistant to all antibiotics. Antibiotic overuse, especially in agriculture, has led to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Hospital-acquired infections kill 75,000 patients each year in the U.S. — a death toll that could be significantly reduced simply by following proper handwashing protocols. Doctors and nurses should wash their hands and/or change gloves between each patient. Patients should also wash their hands frequently.

Safety tip: Each time hospital staff enters your room, ask them to wash their hands and change gloves. Bacteria can spread from their hands to tables, bed rails, bedding, wound dressings, catheters and, of course, your skin if they touch you. You may then contract the bacteria if you touch a contaminated area.

3. Metal in the MRI room

An MRI machine is an exceptionally powerful magnet, which is why no metals are allowed to be brought into the room. In one case, a hospital worker walks into the MRI room carrying an oxygen tank while a young boy is getting scanned. The tank flies across the room, delivering a lethal blow to the boy’s head. While exceedingly rare, an investigation reveals it is not the sole case on record.

Safety tip: When getting an MRI, make sure there is no metal on, in or around you, anywhere in the room. Metal implants must be reported prior to getting an MRI.

2. Excessive emergency room wait times

Emergency rooms are normally busy places, and personnel must make hundreds if not thousands of potentially critical decisions each day. It can be easy to miss the signs of critical illness, especially if the condition is rare.

In one case, a five-hour wait resulted in a baby girl requiring amputation of both hands and legs, as personnel failed to realize the critical nature of her condition. It turns out her body was being ravaged by flesh-eating bacteria. According to the CDC, the average emergency room wait time is 49 minutes.

Safety tip: If you suspect you or a loved one is in critical condition and need immediate attention, call your family physician before or on the way to the hospital, and ask him or her to call the emergency room on your behalf. This way, the staff know you’re on your way and that it’s truly serious.

1. Waking up during surgery (anesthesia awareness)

Last but not least, a nightmare come true: You wake up during surgery and feel every poke, prod and cut, but cannot move or make a sound.

“Anesthesia awareness,” the technical term for waking up during surgery, happens when you receive an inadequate dose of anesthesia, allowing your brain to remain aware while paralyzing your muscles. Here, the statistics are discouraging: 1 in 1,000 patients reportedly suffer anesthesia awareness. Fortunately, most of these do not feel pain.

Safety tip: If you need surgery, ask your surgeon if you really need anesthesia or if a local anesthetic would be sufficient.

Safeguarding Your Care While Hospitalized

Once you’re hospitalized, you’re immediately at risk for medical errors, so one of the best safeguards is to have someone there with you. Dr. Andrew Saul has written an entire book on the issue of safeguarding your health while hospitalized. Frequently, you’re going to be relatively debilitated, especially post-op when you’re under the influence of anesthesia, and you won’t have the opportunity to see the types of processes that are going on. This is particularly important for pediatric patients and the elderly.

It’s important to have a personal advocate present to ask questions and take notes. For every medication given in the hospital, ask questions such as: “What is this medication? What is it for? What’s the dose?” Most people, doctors and nurses included, are more apt to go through that extra step of due diligence to make sure they’re getting it right if they know they’ll be questioned about it.

Courtesy: Dr. Mercola

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

The Pope’s Audience Hall building at the Vatican was designed to look exactly like a giant reptile inside and out. When the pope addresses an audience there the effect is that he is speaking from the mouth of a giant reptile. Why on earth would he want to do that?

Let me just start this by saying that, no, I am not signed off on just about any of the various reptilian incursion conspiracy theories floating around the Internet. Most of them are quite silly, though usually amusing. But if you want to talk Bible, where there is a real reptile that presents itself as a dragon with 7 heads and 10 horns, now I’m interested.

“So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” Revelation 17:3-5 (KJV)

And as fate would have it, that dragon, that ‘scarlet coloured beast’ of Bible prophecy is 100% connected with the Vatican, the pope and the Catholic Church. With that in mind, the fact that the Vatican created a building in the shape of a giant reptile and the pope gives speeches from the beast’s mouth is off-the-charts interesting.

Let’s start with the history and construction of the Papal Audience Hall

FROM ARCVISION PRIZE: Commissioned by Pope Paul VI in 1963, the Papal Audience Hall in Vatican City was inaugurated in 1971. Shortly thereafter, both the hall and the architect achieved such a worldwide fame that the auditorium came to be called familiarly Aula Nervi. It is one of the last great works of Pier Luigi Nervi, an engineer by training as well as a skilled entrepreneur and unsurpassed interpreter of cement as form and structure for architectural and infrastructural works, where it is impossible to distinguish the design project from structural computation.

The complex is located near St. Peter’s Basilica in an area between Italy and Vatican City. The large auditorium, which can accommodate up to twelve thousand people, is covered by a double curving parabolic vault that, thanks to its slender bearing structures, makes the big vault as suspended in air and powered by invisible anti-gravity forces.

In order to facilitate the view of the papal throne, even the floor has a double convex curvature. A refined and innovative system for air circulation was installed, consisting of nine channels and placed under the floor, to dissipate the intense heat output of the communication equipment like the lighting systems of TV cameras. The auditorium was built with extensive use of reinforced concrete and a special concrete mix with white marble dust and grit provided by Italcementi. It is characterised by special brightness, both for the ellipsoidal glass wall (built by John Hajnal) and for the vault consisting of variable-length corrugated structures and large openings creating an extraordinary luminescent plot. READ MORE

Now let’s look at how dark and sinister the whole thing is

Have a look at the image below and compare its shape to the image of a snake beside it. Note the overall shape — wide back, narrow, rounded front, eyes in the middle, nostril at the front, and curved top. So even from the outside and viewed from the sky, the entire building is a dead-ringer for a snake’s head.

When the building is viewed from the inside, the unmistakable resemblance to a reptile hits you like a ton of bricks. A ton of dark, evil and very sinister bricks.

Just when you thought it couldn’t possible get much worse, it does. Way worse. Right behind the pope’s throne, they installed a statue created by Pericle Fazzini in 1977 that purports to show Jesus Christ rising up from an ‘atomic apocalypse’, and looking for all the world like a scene from ‘Night Of The Living Dead’ zombie movie. And if you look closely at the top of the “Jesus” head, you will see something quite interesting indeed.

You will notice that the “head of Jesus” has his hair blowing in the breeze or some such thing, but if you look closer it is more than that. The head of Jesus is turning into…(anyone care to hazard a guess here?)…a reptile. What is the importance of that? Well, you read this verse and then you tell me what it means.

“And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” Genesis 3:14,15 (KJV)

In the Bible, Satan is pictured as a reptile who will have a coming war with King Jesus at the Battle of Armageddon at the Second Coming. Revelation shows us that the Genesis serpent had an ‘upgrade’ along the way and now is a giant, red-headed multi-headed dragon, though still a reptile.

The disgusting statue by Fazzini, mocking entitled ‘The Resurrection‘, actually shows Jesus Christ becoming a reptile, and thus re-writing the biblical prophecy made by God that Satan loses to Jesus at the Second Coming. And just to further drive the point home, the exact height of the abomination is exactly 66 feet.

This is where Satan’s seat is

Take a good look at this video and all these photos, and really meditate on what you are seeing. You are seeing a building called the Papal Audience Hall, in the undeniable shape of a serpent, from which the pope addresses his followers from a ‘throne’ place in front of a demonic image of Jesus turning into a reptile.

ADDED BONUS:

This is perhaps the best short video explaining the very intricate and ofttimes confusing hierarchy that is the Vatican. In it you will learn, among other things, that Vatican City is it’s own country over which the reigning pope is also the king. What is the Vatican? It’s a country, it’s a kingdom, it’s a corporation, and it’s anything but a church. Certainly not the actual Church that Jesus on the cross shed His own blood to create. Enjoy!

If you learn something from reading this article or if it assists your research even slightly, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to help us continue and expand our work.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

The Big Three have collectively engaged in a medical conspiracy for the better part of 70 years to influence legislative bodies on both the state and federal levels to create regulations that promote the use of drug medicine while simultaneously creating restrictive, controlling mechanisms (licensing, government approval, etc) designed to limit and stifle the availability of non-drug, alternative modalities. The conspiracy to limit and eliminate competition from non-drug therapies began with the Flexner Report of 1910.

Abraham Flexner was engaged by John D. Rockefeller to run around the country and 'evaluate' the effectiveness of therapies taught in medical schools and other institutions of the healing arts. Rockefeller wanted to dominate control over petroleum, petrochemicals, and pharmaceuticals (which are derived from 'coal tars' or crude oil). He arranged for his company, Standard Oil of New Jersey to obtain a controlling interest in a huge German drug cartel called I. G. Farben. He pulled in his stronger competitors like Andrew Carnegie and JP Morgan as partners, while making other, less powerful players, stockholders in Standard Oil. Those who would not come into the fold "were crushed" according to a Rockefeller biographer (W. Hoffman, David: Report on a Rockefeller {New York: Lyle Stuart, Inc., 1971}page 24.)

The report Flexner submitted to The Carnegie Foundation was titled “Medical Education in the United States and Canada”. Page 22 of the report said: “The privileges of the medical school can no longer be open to casual strollers from the highway. It is necessary to install a doorkeeper who will, by critical scrutiny, ascertain the fitness of the applicant, a necessity suggested, in the first place, but consideration for the candidate, whose time and talents will serve him better in some other vocation, if he be unfit for this, and in the second, by consideration for a public entitled to protection from those whom the very boldness of modern medical strategy equips with instruments that, tremendously effective for good when rightly used, are all the more terrible for harm if ignorantly or incompetently employed”.

All too often, politicians are prepared to enact laws that rob citizens of yet another constitutional freedom under the banner of “public protection”. Needless to say, Congress swallowed the recommendations of this report hook, line, and sinker. It was decided that the American Medical Association (AMA), would be the “doorkeeper”. The AMA was now empowered to certify or de-certify any medical school in the country on the grounds of whether that school met the AMA’s standards of “approved” medicine.

The AMA came into existence in 1847. It is a private organization of allopathic physicians that serves the interests of its members, especially when it comes to influencing favorable legislation. It functions in every sense of the word as a union, although its members wear white collars instead of blue. Giving the AMA the power over the certification of medical schools is the equivalent of giving the Teamsters Union the exclusive right to decide on the laws of interstate commerce and transportation. Is it any wonder that the total number of medical schools in the United States went from 160 in 1906 (before the Flexner Report) to 85 in 1920 and further down to 69 schools in 1944? A little like putting the fox in charge of the hen house, no?

Not surprisingly, Flexner found that any discipline that didn’t use drugs to help cure the patient was tantamount to quackery and charlatanism. Medical schools that offered courses in bioelectric medicine, homeopathy, or Eastern Medicine, for example, were told to either drop these courses from their curriculum or lose their accreditation and underwriting support. A few schools resisted for a time, but eventually most schools cooperated (or were closed down). A similar scenario was played out in Canada. It was attempted in England against Homeopathy, but it failed due to the personal intervention of the Royal Family, who had received much relief and healing at the hands of Homeopathic healers in the 19th century. By the way, the AMA was found guilty of conspiracy against chiropractors in 1987 by a federal judge and fined a couple of million dollars. Here in America, a relentless campaign of misinformation, fraud, deception, and suppression of alternative therapies and healers has been in place for the better part of this century in order to keep highly effective alternative therapies from reaching any significant plateau of public awareness. Control is exerted through “news items” and propaganda from pro-establishment organizations like The American Medical Association, The American Cancer Society, The Diabetes Foundation, etc.; local medical boards; and government agencies like the FDA, The National Institute of Health (NIH), and The National Cancer Institute (NCI), The National Academy of Science, etc. with the full cooperation of main-stream media of course.

Over the past decades, hundreds of caring, concerned, and conscientious alternative healers have been jailed and abused like common criminals for the “crime” of curing people of life-threatening diseases in an “unapproved” manner by heavy-handed government agents who swoop down on clinics with drawn guns, flax jackets, and Gestapo manners. All the while, these same agents and agencies posture themselves before TV cameras and the public under the ludicrous pretense of being servants of the people and protectors of the common good.

The medico-drug cartel was summed up by J.W Hodge, M.D., of Niagara Falls, N.Y., in these words:

At long last, however, the public's consciousness seems to have finally reached a critical mass and is now beginning to seriously question the efficacy and appropriateness of using orthodox therapies and allopathic medicine in general. Thank God. It's been too long overdue.

Understanding the Nature of Ill Health and Disease

The entire approach and foundation of Orthodox Medicine is based on Luis Pasteur’s Germ Theory, a flawed concept. A disease condition is viewed by the orthodoxy as an isolated event, confined to the area in which it manifests itself (e.g., an ear infection, eye infection, gum infection, lung cancer, skin cancer, etc. ). Under this theory, for unknown reasons, microbes or tumors indiscriminately grow in the patient and must be cut (surgery), burned (radiation), or poisoned (drugs) out of the body. In the orthodox model, the solution is sought through mechanical and chemical means. Seeking to understand WHY the infection or disease condition appeared in the first place is not seriously explored. The quick fix with a prescription for drugs to smother the symptoms is the typical orthodox ‘answer’.

A contemporary of Pasteur, Antoine Bechamp, had a different opinion as to why disease conditions ‘took hold’. Bechamp felt that the ENVIRONMENT, or the ECOLOGY of the blood, played the critical role in deciding whether disease conditions would manifest or not.

Alternative medicine explores the stressors (environmental, biological, chemical, psychological, and emotional) in a patient’s life that cause a weakening of a particular energy field, which in turn allows the manifestation of a disease condition in a weakened area. In order to maintain a state of health, all energy systems within the body need to exist in a state of balance or equilibrium. Imbalance leads to conditions of discomfort (dis-ease), which eventually spirals into ill health if not corrected. The Chinese and Indians (Ayurvedic medicine) had worked all of this out thousands of years ago.

Orthodox or Allopathic Medicine utilizes poisonous substances (drugs) in non-lethal dosages in order to suppress symptoms in an affected area. This approach neither addresses the cause of the disease condition nor is it responsible for healing the patient. Rather, the use of drugs often will temporarily mask the outer manifestations of the malady, while at the same time, drive the disease deeper into the body...only to reappear at a later date, as a more serious, and chronic health threat. One of the many flaws of the orthodox approach is that it focuses on the disease condition itself, rather than the patient. The term wholistic (or holistic) originally sprang up to distinguish those physicians whose diagnostic gestalt considers all of the physical, emotional, and spiritual energies interacting with the patient.

Do not assume that the only difference between allopathic and alternative medicine, however, is an honest difference of opinion in the philosophies and views on the origin of disease states. Hardly!. There is, in truth, a concerted, organized agenda -concocted, planned, and contrived by the international pharmaceutical companies and organized medicine to suppress any and every alternative, non-drug therapy that WORKS. Why?

Because they want people to keep on coming back for more treatments and more drugs.

A cured patient is a lost source of income. A sick patient who is marginally “improved” is a manageable patient.

Managing patients means routine office visits and renewing drug prescriptions. Therefore, a manageable patient is a continuing source of income; a cash cow, if you will. Multiply that by a few hundred million people and you get an idea of why this deceit is being put upon you. The profits from the so-called “health-care” industry are staggering!

The thrust of the orthodox pharmaceutical agenda is to provide temporary relief, while never addressing the cause of the disease condition. This agenda ensures regular visits to the doctor’s office and requires the patient to routinely return to the pharmacy to refill his prescriptions. This is what the game is all about, folks, plain and simple. Deny it or Deal with it,...Stick with it or Get Out of it! ... your choice.

Natural Healing

The patient’s immune system and the immune system alone are responsible for healing and recovery from ill health. The use of drugs and vaccines represents an assault on the immune system. In some cases, the use of a particular drug might be a wise choice to speed healing and recovery for the patient, but the use of natural, orthomolecular therapies and substances (substances normally found in Nature) that can more effectively address the cause of the disease should be considered first because natural substances work in harmony with Nature. They aid and stimulate the body to truly cure itself, without the terrible millstone of drug side effects.

The human body is predisposed to heal itself and to exist as a healthy, thriving organism. We inhibit that process by ingesting unhealthy foods, fouling our inner environment with toxins, and relying upon poisonous substances to treat disease conditions.

Unlike ‘miracle drugs’ and other ‘drug breakthroughs’, you will never see or hear anything from mainstream media about most of the therapies described here. The Big Three see to that, but you can still glean this information from the alternative health press, books, websites, and at health expos. Some of these alternative therapies require high-tech equipment and specialized knowledge, but many, many others can be done at home without third party intervention or supervision. It’s amazing, but true, that many of the most effective healing therapies (even for grave, life-threatening disease conditions) are simple things that you can do for yourself at home. You simply have to educate yourself and take responsibility for your own health.

The following is a brief overview of some alternative therapies that have demonstrated themselves to be effective and readily obtainable, usually at a low to modest cost. This list is far from complete. As time permits, the description and scope of these and other therapies will be added to and expanded upon.

Oxidative Therapies

MMS1, MMS2, & CDS Water

Mix equal parts (drops) of 28% Sodium Chlorite solution and 50% Citric Acid solution and you get "activated" MMS (Miracle Mineral Solution, a name coined by Jim Humble), an incredibly effective and powerful germicidal solution and curative therapy. A very simple, but powerful, oxidizing molecule called Chlorine Dioxide gas is released when MMS is activated. The chlorine atom is able to pull out FIVE electrons from the outer orbit of the membranes of ALL pathogenic organisms. This causes the immediate death of the organism, but has NO adverse effect on normal bodily tissue.

Oxygen therapies encompass more than the application of regular oxygen (O2), although regular oxygen can speed and assist healing, especially when used in higher-than-normal concentrations and under pressure, such as used in Hyperbaric Oxygen Chambers. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) has been traditionally used for rapid detoxification in acute situations, but it has also been shown to be extremely efficacious for new stroke victims. It has been found that almost all of the usual conditions (paralysis, slurred/ no speech, etc.) associated with a stroke can be minimized or eliminated entirely by subjecting the patient to a hyperbaric oxygen treatment within the first 36 hours of a stroke. The quicker the patient can be treated from the onset of the stroke, the better the results. Even cases started a few days or even weeks after a stroke have shown remarkable results. HBOT has also proven helpful in cases involving other forms of brain damage as well.

Singlet Oxygen Therapies

Oxygen atoms can be configured into certain quasi-stable arrangements that will allow a single oxygen atom to be released. This atom is called a singlet oxygen (O1). For therapeutic purposes, single atoms of oxygen can be released from hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which breaks down to water (H2O) and a singlet oxygen (O1), and also from ozone (O3), which reduces to oxygen (O2) and a singlet oxygen. When a singlet oxygen atom is released within the body, it is highly reactive and will oxidize (reduce or break down) the molecular structure of undesirable and harmful organisms (bacteria, foreign proteins, etc.) and diseased tissue (e.g., cancer cells). This high-energy form of oxygen (O1) possesses a greatly enhanced healing capacity than that exhibited by regular oxygen (O2).

Hydrogen Peroxide

A bottle of 3½ % Hydrogen Peroxide is available in any pharmacy for under a dollar and can be used daily to keep the mouth and gums germ-free (always use full strength and try to retain it in the mouth as long as possible). It should also be conscientiously applied to disinfect any type of oral infection, cut, sore, or wound that one may encounter. For external use, the drug store variety of hydrogen peroxide is OK, but it does have some low levels of contaminants in it. For internal use, it’s wiser to use Food-grade hydrogen peroxide. You can make your own 3½ % hydrogen peroxide by diluting 35% food-grade hydrogen peroxide by a ratio of 10:1 with distilled water. However, that should not stop you from using pharmacy-grade hydrogen peroxide externally- if you are in normal health. People trying to recover from serious diseases such as AIDS or cancer need to be more concerned about ingesting contaminants. 35% Food-Grade Hydrogen Peroxide is available at many farm supply outlets and by mail order. Since it’s more concentrated, 35% hydrogen peroxide can produce spectacular results when intelligently applied. Hydrogen peroxide can also be applied either internally as injections (directly into a cancerous tumor, for example) or intravenously into the bloodstream. If properly diluted, hydrogen peroxide can also be ingested.

Medical Cartel Sponsored ‘Studies’
Of course, you have to know what you’re doing. At higher concentrations, H2O2 is powerful and can burn tissue, but look to the alternative health press for information from practitioners who are actually using this therapy. Don’t expect an honest assessment from the allopathic crowd. Like most cheap, unpatentable natural solutions, the pharmaceutical/organized medicine cartel will try to frighten you off from using these therapies with scare stories of exaggerated dangers, omission of relevant data, and insertion of misleading statements.

For example, they will point to rat studies that show increased stomach cancers from ingesting H2O2. By promoting this ‘study’, the cartel wants you to draw the conclusion that you will get stomach cancer from ingesting hydrogen peroxide without actually saying it. No additional details, such as the concentration of the peroxide administered, frequency of dosage, quantity given vis-à-vis body weight, etc., are provided about the ‘study’ in these press reports, only the bottom line conclusion:

Of course, most knowledgeable researchers know that rat studies don’t equate to people studies. Rat studies, in fact, have an extremely limited range of applicability for purposes of human extrapolation. In addition, most studies are funded by pharmaceuticals or government agencies and they have an agenda that has nothing to do with sincere scientific inquiry. Ralph Moss and Linus Pauling are two individuals who come to mind who looked at different cartel-sponsored ‘studies’ and clearly demonstrated that the Big Boys can and will skew a ‘study’ in any direction they wish it to go. Scientific honesty among cartel-sponsored investigative groups is a myth. All medical schools, teaching universities, and government health organizations such as the National Institute of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute, National Academy of Science, etc., etc., are all under the cartel’s propaganda umbrella.

Ozone

Ozone (O3) is composed of three atoms of oxygen lightly bound together. One of those atoms can easily break away and form regular oxygen (O2) and a singlet oxygen atom (O1). Through oxidation, the singlet oxygen atom is capable of producing amazing healing results. Ozone can be produced with a hot or "cold" spark, with ultraviolet light, or with a method invented by Nikola Tesla called cold plasma ozone production. The cold plasma method produces much larger quantities of ozone and is the preferred means of production for therapeutic purposes. Larger, cold plasma ozone machines can only be legally purchased outside of the United States, but there are underground 'suitcase' size units being manufactured clandestinely in the U.S. Smaller cold plasma ozone generators, however, are legally available in the U.S. as water purifiers.

All cold plasma ozone generators can easily produce high-quality Ozonated Water, which can be ingested as often as desired. The effects of drinking ozonated water on a regular basis can be very healthful. People with serious disease conditions will notice more pronounced effects in a shorter space of time than those who are in good health, but the benefits of ozonated water are realized by all who use it, whether you have a serious health concern or not. The ozone from the ozonated water passes into the bloodstream via the stomach/small intestines and provides the benefits of ozone without the need for expensive equipment. Some people notice a very slight sensation of lightheadedness the first time they drink ozone water. It’s temporary and usually only happens the first time- if at all. The reaction is due to slightly more oxygen reaching the brain than normal. Ingested daily, ozone water will progressively send ozone into deeper tissues of the body, oxidizing non-organic drug residues and hidden, dormant pathogens. You might be surprised to learn that the virus that gave you chicken pox as a child or herpes as a young adult is still hidden deep within the body, such as in the nerve ganglion at the base of the spine. Your immune system developed antibodies, which normally hold these residual bugs in check, but that doesn’t mean that the bugs are gone, as any person who suffers recurrent bouts of herpes will attest. But if you hit them long enough and hard enough with ozone (or certain other alternative therapies), they will be gone for good.

Another useful product that can be applied topically is called Ozonated Olive Oil. It is made by bubbling ozone through olive oil for a considerable period of time (weeks) until the olive oil eventually becomes saturated with the ozone molecules and becomes much thicker. Afterwards, the product can be applied as a balm to infected areas and will often greatly promote and/or speed healing.

Methods of Ozone Application
Medically, ozone can be applied in different ways. One of the oldest methods, used in Germany for over 60 years, is called Autohemotherapy. This technique involves removing about a pint of blood, ozonating it, and returning it intravenously to the patient. It works, but it’s rather limited in the amount of ozone applied.

Another method has the patient hooked up to a dialysis-type machine with blood coming out one arm, going through the machine for ozonation, and returned via tubes hooked up to the other arm. You get a lot more ozone into the body with this technique, but the pumping mechanisms used to push the blood around can damage the membranes of the red blood cells somewhat.

A third technique is called Ozone Injection. As its name implies, the ozone is carefully and slowly injected into the patient. Ozone, remember, is composed of oxygen atoms. Oxygen dissolves into the blood; it does not form bubbles in the bloodstream like air, which is composed of oxygen and 80% nitrogen. Many ozone specialist prefer this latter method, but each of these ozone techniques have their advocates.

Alkaline pH Therapy

Read more

Disney’s “Hocus Pocus 2” is a complete reversal of the original 1993 movie “Hocus Pocus”. In the original, the devil-worshipping, child-eating witches are the villains. In “Hocus Pocus 2”, they are celebrated as empowered women … even if they keep wanting to LURE AND EAT CHILDREN.

Once upon a time, on a brisk October evening, a family is looking for a movie to watch on Disney+. All of a sudden, Hocus Pocus 2 appears on the screen and fills everyone with joy! The children are intrigued by the colorful thumbnail image while the parents are nostalgic about the original Hocus Pocus.

So the family pops some corn, sits on the couch, and puts on this spooky (but children-friendly) movie – one that is sure to put everyone in the Halloween spirit.

Then, it happens: HARDCORE INDOCTRINATION.

Indeed, Hocus Pocus 2 was not made to simply entertain: It drills children on important social agendas. It mixes the concepts of feminism and sisterhood with satanism and witchcraft in an unholy stew that is served to unsuspecting children worldwide.

In many ways, Hocus Pocus 2 is the exact opposite of the original Hocus Pocus. In the 1993 movie, the witches are, without a doubt, the villains. Why? Because they worship the devil and eat children. That’s reason enough right? Then, they wreak havoc on modern-day Salem in their unique and silly way. While they’re entertaining, the witches still need to be banished forever because, like, they keep LURING AND EATING CHILDREN.

In Hocus Pocus 2, things are way more complicated. The witches still worship the devil and eat children … but they have valid reasons to do so. They’re not cursed, depraved hags anymore, they’re strong and empowered women who are misunderstood.

In short, Hocus Pocus 2 wants you to side with the witches. To do so, Hocus Pocus 2 starts with an origin story that makes the witches sympathetic to the viewers.

The Witches’ Origin Story

At the beginning of the original Hocus Pocus, the old, creepy witches kill a young girl by sucking away her life force. As the witches regain their youthful looks, they cackle away like harpies, clearly indicating to the viewers that these wretched characters are the villains.

In Hocus Pocus 2, it’s the complete opposite.

Hocus Pocus 2 begins in 1653 Salem with a young version of the Sanderson sisters.

At the beginning of Hocus Pocus 2, a young Winifred Sanderson celebrates her 16th birthday with her two sisters. However, the festivities are cut short when the reverend of the village knocks on their door and orders Winifred to marry some guy she doesn’t like.

When Winifred refuses, the reverend orders the sisters to be separated.

The reverend is depicted as an oppressive and ignorant figure. He represents Christianity to the viewers.

Right from the opening scenes, the viewers are made to side with the witches against the reverend and the Church in general. Everything that follows continues on the same “left-handed path”.

When the three sisters flee to the woods, they hear the creepy song the witches sing to lure children:

“Come little children, I take thee away into a land of enchantment”.

That’s the theme song of the occult elite.

Then, the Mother Witch appears.

In the original Hocus Pocus, the witches are ugly and grotesque. In Hocus Pocus 2, the first witch we see is a glamorous, empowered woman. Also, she has an All-Seeing Eye on her dress, indicating her allegiance with the occult elite.

After attempting to poison and eat the sisters, the Mother Witch realizes that the girls are actually potential witches. So she gives Winifred a birthday gift.

A spellbook bound by human skin and handed down by the Devil himself. Of course, there’s a single eye on the book.

As the three sisters browse through the wide array of powerful spells contained in that book, they realize that they can now exact revenge on the village that banished them. This is when they realize that Satan is cool.

Then, the Mother Witch tells the sisters:

“One day, Salem will belong to us.”

Throughout the movie, there are mentions of the witches “taking back” Salem. That’s because, in real life, Salem was the site of the infamous witch trials.

The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts between February 1692 and May 1693. More than 200 people were accused. Thirty people were found guilty, 19 of whom were executed by hanging (14 women and five men).

As we’ll see, this movie is actually about witches retaking Salem. And doing great PR for them.

At one point, the Mother Witch wonders why the world is “not too fond of witches”. Young Mary answers:

“Perhaps because thou eateth the children?”

The Mother Witch promptly responds:

“How else does one stay young and ridiculously beautiful?”

With this answer, the Mother Witch’s cannibalistic ways are reframed as something fabulous and empowering. What a great way of normalizing the occult elite’s real-life obsession with consuming children to remain youthful (see adrenochrome).

Then, the sisters go back to the village and use the Devil’s spellbook to burn the reverend’s house.

Winifred watches in glee as the house burns down and the reverend yells about it being “ Satan’s work”.

To children whose entire lives are based on their parents not allowing them to do things, watching this scene is cathartic. Black magic gave these girls the power to get back at oppressive adults and the children watching this think that it’s cool.

The Heroes Are Also Witches

In the original Hocus Pocus, the hero is Max Dennison, a smart and courageous teenage boy who takes on the witches head-on.

The heroes of the original Hocus Pocus. Just regular kids who don’t want to be eaten.

In Hocus Pocus 2, things are VERY different.

The protagonists of Hocus Pocus 2 are Becca and Izzy, two teenage girls who are fascinated with witchcraft. The eyes on Izzy’s shirt (right) symbolically refer to the eye on the Mother Witch’s dress. They’re on her side.

In Hocus Pocus 2, the male protagonist is a bumbling fool named Mike. Not only is he depicted as a useless, cowardly idiot, but he also keeps offending Becca and Izzy.

Every time Mike says something, the camera immediately cuts to the girls rolling their eyes in disbelief at his idiocy. In 2022, male protagonists cannot be strong, heroic, or even smart. They must be jerks. Masculinity is bad. Witches are good.

Because Mike is a representative of toxic masculinity, Becca finds it OK to mess with him. So, during a class, she freaks him out by whispering a fake spell that ends with the word “seitan” … which sounds like “ Satan”.

Mike’s girlfriend tells Becca that her spell ended with a word that sounded like “ Satan”.

Throughout Hocus Pocus 2, we hear expressions such as “Holy Lucifer” and “By Lucifer’s hangnail”. The constant invocation of satanic entities in a children’s movie made by Disney is rather off-putting. However, it is completely in line with the elite’s agenda of normalizing everything satanic.

The same exact pattern was found in Chilling Adventures of Sabrina. In this Netflix series about a teenage witch, we keep hearing expressions such as “Holy Satan”. Also, witchcraft is portrayed as a potent tool of female empowerment while nearly all males in the series are jerks who need to be punished.

In Hocus Pocus 2, the wannabe witches inadvertently bring back the Sanderson sisters on Halloween night by doing a ritual. Contrary to their 1993 appearance, the witches are greeted in 2022 like superstars.

Superstar Witches

In the first Hocus Pocus, the witches are not welcomed in Salem. Because, for one, THEY LURE AND EAT CHILDREN. That’s a pretty good reason.

In Hocus Pocus 2, things are different.

As soon as they are summoned by the teenage girls, the witches put on an entertaining performance.

The lyrics of their introductory song are quite telling.

“We were running wild and so reviled
Raising Cain until we got exiled
But times are changing and now we’re on the attack
Yeah, the spell is gonna hit’cha,
Because the witches are back”

In Hocus Pocus 2, there’s a running theme of “times changing”. While, in the first Hocus Pocus, the witches were evil, the narrative in 2022 has changed. Today, witches are good and the movie constantly defends them.

For instance, at one point, a character says that the witches are evil because, like, THEY LURE AND EAT CHILDREN. So another character immediately defends them:

“Only because they had to be. You know, they were ahead of their time and they were misunderstood. Then, the whole world was against them. But now, look, everybody loves them”.

Yup, times have changed. When the Sanderson sisters visit 2022 Salem, they realize that the town idolizes them.

The witches meet teenagers who are dressed like them because they “worship” them. So, they take a selfie. Wow, these witches are so cool and relevant.

Later, the witches find themselves in Salem’s Halloween festival. They discover that there’s a contest for the best Sanderson sisters look-a-likes.

Of course, there had to be a team of drag queens. Disney has got to push that gender-blurring agenda to these children.

After the contest, the Sanderson sisters perform a song that bewitches the crowd.

This shot of young people being mind-controlled by the witches’ song is an apt representation of mass media brainwashing children with its satanic agenda.

The song contains these lines:

“One way or another
We’re going to snatch you”

The recurring theme of abducting children is upsetting in itself. But it gets worse when we realize that the witches are not actually portrayed as evil. Is it a coincidence that the logo of Hocus Pocus 2 contains a symbol used to identify pedophiles?

The spiral in Hocus Pocus 2 is quite similar to the spiral used to identify “Little Boy Lovers” in FBI files.

The Sanderson sisters then use the mind-controlled kids to seek out the mayor of Salem because they want to kill him. The reason: He’s a descendant of the reverend. However, the mayor is the father of Becca and Izzy’s friend, so they must stop the witches … by becoming witches.

The Heroes Become a Coven of Witches

In the original Hocus Pocus, the heroes gained possession of the Devil’s spellbook and were tempted to use it against the witches. However, Binx the cat stops them and angrily yells out:

“Nothing good can come out of that book! You got it?”

And that was the end of that. The book was evil so they didn’t use it. The protagonists ultimately banish the witches with good old-fashioned wit and courage.

In Hocus Pocus 2, it’s the exact opposite. The Devil’s spellbook actually saves the day.

At the end of the movie, Becca and her friends read from the book of spells to get rid of the Sanderson sisters. They’re now a coven.

The girl on the left is the daughter of the mayor who is a descendant of the reverend. Therefore, she broke her family’s Puritan lineage and converted to the witches’ side.

Considering the fact that the Sanderson sisters are sympathetic figures in Hocus Pocus 2, they are banished from Salem in a very “compassionate” way. Instead of burning them to ashes because, like, THEY LURE AND EAT CHILDREN, the ending is all about Winifred reuniting with her sisters in a dignified matter.

At the movie’s climactic end, Winifred gets an emotional sendoff as she disappears in a magical whirlwind while “whimsical music” plays in the background.

Even the book sheds a tear for Winifred. Poor Satanic book

In short, the witches were never really the “bad guys”. They were misunderstood women who valued the importance of sisterhood.

The movie ends with the three teenage girls walking side by side, exactly like the Sanderson sisters.

Moral of the story: Evil won.

In Conclusion

Comparing the original Hocus Pocus with Hocus Pocus 2 is a revealing exercise. It exposes the complete reversal of morals and values communicated to children by mass media in the 21st century. Despite the fact that the witches are obsessed with luring and eating children to remain youthful, the movie portrays them as sympathetic, empowered women. The fact that they sold their soul to the Devil for witch powers was a big deal in the first movie. In the second, it is not an issue. At all.

The rest of the movie is all about teenage girls discovering the powers of witchcraft and the joys of forming a coven of witches. Of course, this implies that they’ll eventually have to submit to Satan and eat children to stay alive. But, hey, it’s 2022. We’re cool with that now.

So, the family that simply wanted to watch a fun Halloween movie ended up being subjected to a session of indoctrination that culminated with three teenage girls converting to Satanism.

If you learn something from reading this article or if it assists your research even slightly, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to help us continue and expand our work.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

The following information was researched and compiled by Vigilant Citizen

Dawn begins by sharing her experiences in being raised by a homosexual father, where she was exposed to confusing, inappropriate and abusive sexual examples in the home from the time of infancy. She talks about some of the alarming evidence that shows how same sex parenting is detrimental to the health and wellbeing of the children involved in these relationships, which goes against the commonly accepted narrative from the Left that this is not the case. She also stresses that redefining marriage is just the beginning of a growing movement to normalize all forms of sexual practices. We look at how this forced acceptance of genderless relationships breaks apart the fundamental basis of procreation and parenting, and when children are involved, whether through natural conception or IVF technology, there is a painful loss of identity created by having one gender rejected.

Further, Dawn emphasizes what the LGBT movement has left out is what children really need and gain from growing up with a primordial family unit. Then, she describes the political climate of Canada, where publicly discussing issues related to same sex parenting or homosexuality can get one charged with a “hate crime.” In conclusion, we weigh up the ramifications of the state interfering with the moral values and education of our children and the rights of natural parents.

Transcribed Text

[Transcribed by Ken Adachi: Since this is a recorded interview, the English sentence construction isn’t as formal as it might be in a written exposition. However, the importance and value of the testimony compelled me to type out a transcription to allow wider distribution among English readers and permit electronic (and human translator) translations into other languages. To make the text easier to read and translate into other languages, I eliminated the false sentence starts and habitual pause interjections such as “uh” or “you know” while the speaker is trying to decide exactly what to say.]

[Transcribed by Ken Adachi: Since this is a recorded interview, the English sentence construction isn’t as formal as it might be in a written exposition. However, the importance and value of the testimony compelled me to type out a transcription to allow wider distribution among English readers and permit electronic (and human translator) translations into other languages. To make the text easier to read and translate into other languages, I eliminated the false sentence starts and habitual pause interjections such as “uh” or “you know” while the speaker is trying to decide exactly what to say.]

Lana (Red Ice radio host): Welcome new and regular listeners, this is Lana joining you for the next hour. I’m happy to have you. I’d like to talk about what we’re not allowed to talk about. These are the things we should be scrutinizing with a microscope. The things the establishment tells us not to question. We know what these topics are. One of those is the myth that children of homosexual parents are no different from other children and suffer no harm from being raised by homosexual parents. My guest today will discuss this myth and as you probably guessed, she’s quite controversial. Why? Because she wrote a book called Out From Under, the Impact of Homosexual Parenting. In fact, Dawn Stefanowicz could be charged for a hate crime in Canada for writing this book. So it was published in America which is still surprising. She’s even received death threats for this book. Dawn is a kind, intelligent woman and she doesn’t spew hatred of any kind.

And although she’s a Catholic, she’s isn’t preaching on whether gay is right or wrong. In the book, she shares her very personal story of being raised by a gay father, and how it impacted her life, family she was exposed to, different gay subcultures, explicit sexual practices and other behavior no child should be exposed to. And it affected her for many years. But as it turns out, this is a story shared by many other children who grew up with same-sex parents. You see, in the entire subject of gay parenting and surrogacy, nowhere are people asking about the rights of the children. Is it good for the children? How are children being impacted?

In fact, these days we’re told gay parents are actually better parents than a man and a woman. Somehow Nature didn’t get it right. The conversation that no one wants to objectively discuss is: what kind of family is best for the children? If you ask this question, you are a “bigot” and a “homophobe” and must be silenced and iced out of society. But this question must be dissected and studied from every angle scientifically. I don’t come from this from a religious perspective and people that listen to me know my stance on homosexuality. But I come from this from a nature-based biological perspective. Let’s talk about why children who grow up with same-sex parents have more anxiety, depression, suicide, are more likely to be abused or have been molested; more apt to engage in unhealthier habits such as sleeping around, drugs, smoking. They suffer from more unemployment, less education and need more public assistance

As possible future gay parents, it’s not a time to be selfish and think only of yourself. But to think of the child you are bringing into the planet via surrogacy. A child that will not know his or her true mother or father. This is cruelty because the harsh truth is: without science this would not be happening naturally. The biological truth is that gay sex is recreational, not procreational. But the fact is, the effects of being raised with two daddies or two mommies is a subject that also involves biology, psychology, social, emotional and legal ramifications. When will adults stop being selfish and ask what is best for the children?

We’ll discuss this and much more with Dawn,...coming up

Lana: Hi Dawn, welcome. Thanks for being here.

Dawn Stefanowicz: Thank you Lana, thankyou for inviting me.

Lana: Well, you’re a brave woman who I respect because taking this conversation public in our current political climate is not an easy task. But people need to realize you were the victim and yours is a story that is never heard. Is it?

Dawn Stefanowicz: It isn’t. You know for any child to go public it is extremely risky, personally and professionally. Uh, you know I’m a Canadian, but uh, you know there are risks for me because of our laws here. But I’m worried about the United States and other countries when they legalize same-sex marriage or genderless marriage, it eliminates and restricts a number of our freedoms.

Lana: That’s right and I’d remind people as we get going in this, that this topic, it’s bigger than people’s religious doctrines or views on homosexuality. It’s about what’s good for the children and how it affects them mentally, physically, spiritually. We know the negative impact of children who grow up without dads and also withour moms. But all of a sudden we forget that when it comes to homosexual parenting. Right?

Dawn Stefanowicz: It’s true because I mean, you know people try to diminish the fact that man-woman marriage is traditional. And when we look at the impact on children long-term, who’ve lived through cohabitation, divorce, single-parenting, step-parenting and especially after remarriage , foster care and adoption and even, children that have come through reproductive technologies and surrogancies. When you get to same-sex parenting, you know, definitely kids are going to struggle with a number of issues coming out of any area of brokenness, but especially when you’re denied the respect and the freedom to be able to share what you really, really feel inside.

Lana: That’s right. And today all you hear about is “human rights” but seldomly do we hear about children’s rights or what’s good for the children; not just what the selfish adults want. And we often hear that children grow up just as well-adjusted in homosexual homes, as in heterosexual home. So did your childhood experience in a homosexual home reflect that commonly accepted message?

Dawn: You know, I don’t follow the LGBT talking points and so I would say that the impact for children is quite negative overall. I’ve heard from well over 50 adult children that grew up in a same-sex parented household and they have experienced depression, all different types of stressors. About 30 percent of us self identify as second-generation, whether that’s homosexual, bisexual, or even transsexual, transgender. There’s a number of things we have to deal with long-term and you know it takes us until about our late twenties, early thirties before we can begin to understand how this has impacted us.

Lana: Now, what was it that caused you to wake up to this impact that you’ve endured?

Dawn: Part of it is, you know, I really didn’t have the maturity, as a child, to really comprehend what was going on. Why, from infancy, my father had different male partners that were in the home. And I also was taken into the developing GLBT subcultures in Toronto Canada. This would have been late sixties going into the early seventies, before there was that political correctness that you now see with the GLBT, LGBT movements. But you know, our brains as human beings don’t stop developing until we are in our mid-twenties and it’s by then, our frontal lobe of our brain can now actually judge what we feel about things; what we think about things and start reasoning and assessing where we’ve come from; where we’re at now, and where we’re going. And unfortunately, you know, by my late twenties when I was ready to begin to address my thoughts and my feelings around growing up in a homosexual household, I had already made a number of big decisions around relationships, my academic and career goals, and so forth.

Lana: Well, I think we should get into that and wanted to ask about your mother and father. So what was your relationship like with them for people who don’t know your story?

Dawn: Well, my parents married in 1960 and on the outside it looked like a traditional relationship. And my twin brother and I were about 10 months old when my father brought a male partner to live with us for about five, five-and-a-half years. And so, from that point on you know, my whole infancy, I don’t remember ever a time where my father didn’t have, at least one male partner in his life. And so people would have seen different males coming and going from the home. They also would have seen children which would have been my two brothers and myself. Now my younger brother was conceived, a few years after. And my twin brother and I, you know, came on the scene and at that point my parents stopped all sexual relations. And that meant that only homosexuals sex was going on in my home from the time I was about two and a half years of age.

Lana: So your mom still stuck with him even though he was, he came out as being gay?

Dawn: Yes, and what people don’t understand when you grow up in a homosexual household, we will have different types of family structures. And so we may not be represented in a census, if that is done, because they will usually ask you know, the husband and wife: or the adults in the home; and how many children; and some general questions. But they don’t necessarily go into “who are your sexual partners? Who are you currently having sex with?” You know, and “are these people living in your home?”

Lana: Yeah

Dawn: And that doesn’t get represented in a lot of the census taking, nor in the research.

Lana: Well, I know this is an intimate question, but what kind of sexual example where you exposed to in the home?

Dawn: I saw lots. There was nudity I did see some sodomy. I saw and heard a fair bit of things that would relate to sexuality. There was pornography. There was different types of inuendoes that were made of a sexual nature in that environment and when I also associated within the subcultures around my father and his partners, there was a fair bit of nudity there as well. There was also more than just hints of sado-masochism. There was also, what I would consider to be pedophilia in the sense that a number of the men around my father, including my father, were attracted to minors. You know men that were just coming into adolescence; young, basically boys, just hitting about the 12 - 13 year mark. And they seem to have a special fascination for teen boys.

Lana: Yeah, you know, this has been coming out more and more actually. There’s been some recent cases, but I was also reading on your side on how the public is unaware that there’s actually a growing movement within psychiatry to actually normalize all forms of sexual practice, including sex with children. Correct?

Dawn: Yes. You know if you look at it in certain countries. If you look at Germany as an example, they’re teaching that between zero and age four, children should be masturbated and learn about masturbation. And then from about age four onward, learn about sexuality and gender. And so there is a sexualization of children going on

And it’s being pushed into different countries, different parts of the world. And it’s not really about equality and love. It’s more about taking children hostage in a way where they’re emotionally and psychologically and mentally going to be obsessed. And you know, controlled by thoughts and feelings that they otherwise would not have experienced.

Lana: That’s right I know that in first grade now they’re even teaching some kids about you know graphic sexual positions, and gay sex and it’s like in FIRST grade. I mean who thinks about sex in first grade, you know?

Dawn: Well, this is it, you know. Now, the Left are not concerned about morality or ethics. And, you know, in the situation I grew up in, it was a boundlessness around sexuality and gender, gender identity. And that created a lot of confusion for me. I’m sure there was a lot of suffering and a lot of struggles that I had, that I would not have had in a different kind of environment,

Lana: Now, do you remember what you were feeling and what was going on in your head when you were seeing some of these things around you?

Dawn: Well, I was exposed to sexuality beginning in infancy. And so I was actually sexually abused beginning as an infant. And so was my twin brother. And so I had nightmares for about seven years. And I had a major speech impediment as well for about seven years, between the ages of three til almost ten. You can’t tell that now, but you know, after six years of speech therapy, plus an additional five and a half years, because of a family member with a level of deafness. You know, when you had close to a dozen years of speech therapy, you know, it’s very hard to now, uh, pick up some of the major struggles that I had as a young child growing up in this environment

Lana: Well, did your atmosphere confuse you sexually growing up because I know many gay parents actually encourage, they want their children to be gay and I had a friend who grew up with two moms and they were always encouraging him to be gay so eventually he got a boyfriend, But he told me that he didn’t even know if he really was gay. So did you ever come across any sort of confusion?

Dawn: Yes, definitely. I mean, I remember by the time I’m 8, 9 years of age, my father’s telling me that I can be whatever I want to be. And I can wear boys clothes, men’s clothes. My hair, you know, I can have it cut differently. He really was about exploring this idea of balanced gender. It wasn’t really something where, uh, “Dawn, you’re a girl. You’re going to grow up and be a woman.” You know, there was a lot of confusion around gender, around gender roles. In fact, I had thought that maybe it would have been better if I been born a boy than a girl because at least I wouldn’t have been feeling like a door mat and stepped on, and diminished See, I never felt that I was loved, valued or seen as important in my kind of environment, surrounded by gay men.

Lana: So did you try and seek out some kind of attention from men, almost looking for a father?

Dawn: Yes I did. I mean at age three, I am consciously turned away from my father looking for some level of replacement. There’s a real emptiness inside. You know, people can’t understand it. They think, you know “You had a gay father, so what are you worried about?” “What were you actually missing then?”

But his attentions were not on treating me like I was something special. He was totally caught up with the men in his life. And that’s where he spent his energies, and his time. And so I didn’t feel anywhere close to him in the sense of being loved and valued. I know he did love me, you know, deep down, but he didn’t have the ability to affirm me because I didn’t see him loving women.

Lana: Yeah,

Dawn: I didn’t see him loving my mother. And when we as children don’t see our parents being loved, and being loved by the opposite gender, that is extremely confusing for children because it makes us.,,we actually absorb that kind of negativity in that environment.

You know, being surrounded by just basically men; not normal heterosexual couples in my situation. It had a profound negative influence on my sense of sexuality and gender identity.

Lana: And sadly he passed away; correct? Your father?

Dawn: He did. In 1991, I was in my late twenties. And he passed away of AIDS. And, you know, we realized that, that was a very strong possibility. But about five years before he died, and we had confirmation that he died; that he had died of AIDS. And a number of his partners also died of AIDS. And a few of them are mentioned on the AIDS Memorial in Copley Square in the gay village in Toronto Canada.

Lana: Well, do you know other people who have lived with homosexual parents and how did their experiences differ from yours?

Dawn; You know, it’s interesting. The majority of us had a fair bit of instability in our family structure and in the adults that were coming and going from our home environment. I know two adult children that grew up in a situation where there was some level of stability in that their mother was in one relationship with another woman for quite a length of time, that those relationships existed. And so, outside of that, I have not seen that level of stability, and a lot of multiple partnering going on. And when they look at the research, they found that only 2 out of 15,000 adult children that have grown up with a parent that had had at least one same-sex relationship, only 2 out of 15,000 grew up from basically in the first 18 years of their lives, with their parent involved with one other same-sex partner. So the majority of us will have a fair bit of instability.

Lana: And it’s very difficult for little kids. I just think of when I was young, thinking of my parents breaking up or divorcing. That was really heavy for me to think of at that time. So children are really fragile.

Dawn: They are. You know, there’s this lie out there about children that we’re somehow very adaptable and strong. And that we can handle basically anything the world throws at us. And that isn’t true. We have to do our best at coping with what we’re living with. And then we have to assess it as we’re ready to and not everyone can. It can be too difficult for a lot of adults. And so that’s what you find. I mean the adult children that have contacted me often have difficulties with trust and intimacy in relationships. This is male and female. You know, girls who have grown up with gay fathers tend to have a great deal of difficulty in trusting men

I found with boys that have grown up with a gay father have often experienced molestation as children. Whether it was their father or one, or more, of his male partners. And they’ve also struggled with settling down with just one other person. And you know, you have to imagine what it’s like when you see your parent involved with different partners, even if they’re partnered for a time with one partner, it doesn’t mean it’s monogamous. There’s a fair bit of, like in my father’s situation, he shared... even though he was partnered, he and his partners shared certain relationships/ And they also went out and cruised individually by themselves.

Subscribe now

Lana: Yeah, not all of course, but generally the gay lifestyle; it is full of partying. There’s lots of drugs. There’s lots of sleeping around and other drama. But how do you respond to those who say: “Yeah, but yours is just one experience and there’s many monogamous gay couples.”

Dawn: I haven’t seen that level of monogamy that other, you know, people will put out there. Again, children when they grow up in this environment, they share. When they feel safe, they share the details of what it’s actually like. And it doesn’t seem to match the talking points that you’ll hear from the other side. You know, research bears it out. I mean they look at homosexual relationships. And they found that..,they couldn’t find any partnered men over a five-year period that were exclusively monogamous during that five-year period of time. And I was reading a recent New New York Times article and it was about men who legally got married to their same-sex partner and what they found is that in 50 percent of those relationships, these men opened up their relationships to other sexual partners within the first year

Lana: Yeah it’s funny to me how generally there’s been a lot of gays that looked down on and mocked marriage in traditional family unit. But then here they are trying to have that. And trying to copy that. It’s funny isn’t it?

Dawn: Yeah. In Canada, when we had same-sex marriage legalized - this was in July 2005. It was really interesting to us statistically, is that over 95 percent of those that could potentially have gotten married, only like under five percent actually tied the knot. And we actually had more licenses being given to international couples than Canadians. And so it was actually used, when it came into Canada and was legalized same-sex marriage, it was used by international couples to take it back to their own states and countries to, you know, create court challenges to see if they could have their relationship recognized in their own state, in their own country.

Lana: Yeah, I was wondering why is it so important for them to be
recognized, if marriage is ultimately about between two people? Why did they need the state involved so much? Have you thought about that?

Dawn: I have. No, I’ve testified in nine US states, in the Fifth Circuit, and at SCOTUS [Supreme Court of the United States]. As well in three areas in Canada and also internationally, in other countries, including Argentina and Australia and Paraguay. And what I found is that, there’s..., they will also bring up the argument about federal benefits, visitation rights when one partner is hospitalized or dying.

Lana: Uh, huh

Dawn: Also, inheritance rights. All of these things can be legally, uh, agreed to for whatever relationship someone has; so there are ways to go about that. I think it’s more about having forced acceptance of various types of relationships. The problem you have is in genderless relationships; that’s really what it is about. Creating a situation where the government, you know, the nation recognizes say, same-sex marriage, but it’s really genderless because it could be a transexual marrying. Whether it’s another transsexual or a transgendered person. It could be a situation where there are, you know, say a man with two women and they consider themselves bisexual and they could have the same kind of arranged marriage legally recognized by the government if they use the very same arguments of the LGBT movement.

Lana: Now, are you concerned with the legislative attempts to basically redefine marriage is an institution unrelated to children?

Dawn: Well, you know, I don’t believe you can separate marriage from procreation. Whether or not married couples, as husband and wife, can actually have children or not. Or do you have children or not. That isn’t the question. Fact is that when you have children, they are connected naturally, biologically to their father and to their mother. And you cannot create children in a petrie dish, and then say to them: “you don’t have a mother” or “you don’t have a father,” but you have this parent or these legal parents. A child knows, you know, deep down intuitively that they have a biological father and a biological mother and will often spend a good deal of their life looking for your own identity and their own security in their biology.

Lana: That’s right.

Dawn: With their parents

Lana: Yeah, and if we get real about this, without IVF [in vitro fertilization] and surrogates, this wouldn’t be happening naturally; which brings me to my next point. You, of course, knew your father and mother, but what about the kids who were born from an egg or sperm donor and who will never know who their true ancestors are. Have you heard from people who grow up this way?

Dawn: Yes I have. There’s Anonymous Us. There’s some other interesting blogs that are managed by children that have grown up never knowing either of their father or their mother. In most cases, it’s a sperm donor father. And they do really, really struggle with who they are and they feel like they’re missing half their identity. And that, they don’t like the idea that the adults in their life made a decision to permanently deprive them of at least one of their biological parents. And there’s a great deal of psychological and emotional struggling that goes on. And the other challenge that they have is they potentially could be attracted to a half sibling, you know, someone who was conceived artificially using the same sperm donor.

Lana: Uh, huh

Dawn: And in some cases they found, in certain communities where the sperm donor was used between 150 and 300 times.

Lana: Wow.

Dawn: So potentially, I mean, you do have communities of, as an example, of lesbian women who conceive children using the same sperm donor and the children actually play together as half-siblings

Lana: Wow. Well, what about, we’ve talked about two fathers, but what about the effects of growing up with two women?

Dawn: You know, you have to look at, first of all, the sex of the child, whether it’s a boy or a girl growing up with two women. And I don’t want to limit it to women because there is a greater chance that that relationship will end and there’ll be other relationships. Uh, for the daughters, I think she would, you know, from my discussions with adult children that have grown up with lesbian parents, the girls tend to grow up with this idea that they can do all things themselves and that they don’t need men. The reality is, when these adult children have grown up and married the opposite sex, they realize: “Oh my goodness. this is what I missed out on” And they, it’s like: “This is what a dad is supposed to do and be there for” And, uh, remember the testimony of Heather Barwick for the SCOTUS brief, and she realized what she was missing from watching her own husband. And how he was involved with her children. And just the raising of the children. Actually, “Oh my goodness, this is what I’m missing “

Lana: Yeah

Dawn: Uh, it’s very, very painful realization. And also the fact that you do come to the reality that as a girl growing up, uh, and you become a woman. That .., you know, society might be telling you and the lesbian community might be telling you: “you can do anything you want, be anything you want, do it all, and that you don’t need men.” But it’s a painful reality that you come to and you go...you know what? We’re not like men. We need men.

Lana: That’s right.

Dawn: And, uh, for boys that grow up, it can also be very confusing for them because they miss out on the role model. And what we have is: in our situation, when our parents are partnered with the same sex, the partner tend to take on pseudo gender roles

Lana: Yeah, they do.

Dawn: And so, we’ll be told: “okay, gender is not important. Gender roles are not important. You could be any sexuality you want; any sexual orientation you want; any gender you want. It’s boundless. “ At the same time, mimiced, right in front of me, is my father with a male partner and they all seem to have these traits: kind of more feminine traits, more submissive. And they tend to do cleaning and cookingm and certain things you’d expect of, you know, the mother in the home or the woman in the home

Lana: Yeah, it’s pretty funny

Dawn: And so, it’s a really weird thing when you start to see this pseudo gender substitution going on. And for a child growing up in this, you feel like: “Oh my goodness, like why on earth wouldn’t you just ask for the real thing?

Lana: (laughs)

Dawn: That’s the real thing. That’s what your parent’s same-sex partner is going to be doing Children see right through it. They see this idea of equality as it’s being really inequality because you don’t have equality between the genders. You don’t have male and female that are equal.

Lana: Yeah, yeah.

Dawn: You don’t see male and female being equally loved, equally valued, equally seen as important. And I apologize if I seem repetitive on this issue, but I’m restating it because it’s a very, very deep, uh, painful thing to have one gender rejected in your deepest relationships you could ever have, which should be both with your father and your mother. You should be able to see father and mother as husband and wife, father and mother. You should also be able to see interactions with your brothers and sisters, with your parents, both genders being represented there. You need to see all of that. Those family relationships are very vital to your understanding of who you are and how you connect within your own family. And creating these fake families, because they really are fake families, when you have, you know, a parent that is involved with different same-sex partners. Those are not your real parents. Even if you call that same-sex parenting

I could have an auntie or grandma come over and do pretty well the same things, except they’re not going to be having sex with my parent; hopefully not anyway, in the bedroom. You never know these days with what people are asking for recogntion of . But it’s just..., there’s something incestual in this for a child though, because you know, you grow up and you relate to that same-sex partner almost as if they’re an older sibling. And at the same time, what looks or feels like an adopted older sibling in your family, is actually having sex with your parent. It’s really an odd way of looking at it, but I never looked at any of my father’s partners as a parent. I looked at them, the only way I could really view them, was as an older sibling

Lana: Yeah, it’s interesting how the Left is just.., they’re just out to., they want to destroy the family unit. They have to destroy biological gender roles. They’re pushing, you know, shows like Modern Family, The New Normal. It’s just an all-out war on just the primordial family unit. Something we’ve had for thousands of years on this planet. So what do you think their real motive is behind that? Are they just out to destroy things? Or where is this coming from?

Dawn: I don’t think that the LGBT movement overall, the membership that belongs, actually know what’s going on. But I think there’s a fraction that use the LGBT movement, that are really about dismantling the family and bringing in state control. Because if you look at a number, what you have a number children that come out of this kind of brokeness. And when you grow up in a same-sex parented household, you truly start to lose your relations, or your connections to your relatives, and your ancestry within the first generation. You know, my children are growing up without ever knowing grandparents. They’re growing up without ever knowing what it’s like to have that extended family related to them. And a big part of that is because my father put so much of his energy and his time, his whole life, into his same-sex relationships. He really, really put my brothers and I at a much greater risk of losing that intergenerational support that we would have when we got married and have had our own kids. And so, it just takes one generation to separate us from our biology, from our ancestry, our roots

Lana: Yeah, not a good thing.

Dawn: We know what divorce does. We know it doesn’t work for kids. We understand that even when a stepparent comes into the home and is trying to do everything [that] he or she can in the family unit, that still is not the biological parent. And so we need to be truthful. We need to be honest about the relationships that our parents are involved with because that impacts us as children going forward. And you know, I believe that as much as possible, children need to be raised by their biological father and mother, who are married - as much as possible.

And I do know there are foster care situations and adoption situations, but even with children that come out of foster care and adoption, that they’re best to be raised by adoptive parents that are representative of married father and mother. I have looked at foster care and adoption and the risks for children is a much higher degree of there being psychological and emotional issues going forward. Even though they grow up, you try to place children in the safest, most secure home environment. These children are at much higher risk of a whole bunch of issues. Children that come out of reproductive technologies, surrogacy and so forth, [have a] much higher risk of psychological issues, risk of cancer, physical and mental disabilities. And the children are also [at] much higher risk when they grow up and want to have children to be infertile. So that, you know, we’re really playing with Nature and trying to be God in creating these artificial family structures and living arrangements that are not biologically tied together. And it’s sad. It’s very, very sad. And I know there’s always going to be exceptionalties. I understand that. But to be actually out there saying: all family structures are equal and will create good outcomes for children? No, that isn’t true.

Lana: Have you looked into the many studies on the importantance for children to have both their biological mother and father? Because I know there’s even crucial hormonal interactions from having both parents.

Dawn: There is. You know when I’ve looked into it...To be fair, when I did is....First of all, I looked at one man, one woman marriage. Then I looked at cohabitation of biological parents. So the biological parents have not tied the knot. They’re cohabiting. There’s a much higher risk of violence; like physical violence and emotional violence in the home. A much higher risk in a cohabiting, biological situation that the children will lose connection with at least one of their parents. And the children tend to have, you know, more sexual activity at earlier ages when their parents relationship.. you know, when these children do not grow up, are not born into and raised in a marriage, a married father-mother situation, just cohabiting, these kids don’t do as well. You look at children of divorce. You see that you know, I mean Judith...uh, I’m trying to remember her last name ... but this person Dr. Judith, she did research over 25 years. And what she found was , I think it was Wallerstein. She did research and she found these children are still dealing with the ramifications of divorce twenty-five years after their parents divorced.

Lana: Wow.

Dawn: You know, you look at fatherlessness, You look at..what, eighty-five percent of incarcerated men are fatherless. And we wonder why they got in trouble with the law and they dropped out of school. And they had issues with alcoholism and drug addiction and so forth. You know, we look at single parenting and even the best intentions of parents. And there are kids that somehow make it through and all of these areas of brokenness. We look at single parenting and we know these kids don’t fair as well, economically. We know that they are at much higher risk of early sexual activity and so forth. And so you move on and you move into remarriage and stepparenting, the children often struggle with the new parent that now is their stepparent. And it’s challenging when you bring two families, two broken families together under one roof. It isn’t exactly the Brady Bunch. But anyway, and then when you get to gay parenting and all the different ways that children, like myself. come into these situations, we are, I mean, obviously conceived heterosexually but we have compounding issues because our parent can have opposite sex sexual relationships and same-sex sexual relationships. And they can actually swing back and forth between heterosexual and homosexual relationships even throughout our childhood and into adulthood. Now, my father, remained in homosexual relationships throughout my early childhood, into my teens, into my twenties. And when, you know, before he died, I didn’t see him involved with other women. But my understanding is that for many of us we can have this, our parents, flipping back and forth. That there isn’t this stable sexual orientation that that the Left likes to present. You know, there’s like eight definitions for lesbianism and there’s only one definition for lesbianism that actually is exclusively lesbian. When Loman and other researchers began looking at human sexuality in the mid nineties, the research there showed that the majority of men who say they’re gay, have had and will have opposite sex sexual relationships. They found the same thing with women. The women said they were lesbian, have had, and will have, opposite sex sexual relationships.

Lana: Hmm

Dawn: So it’s really, really confusing for me growing up because I didn’t look at people under these titles of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transsexual, transgender. You know, questioning and so on. I didn’t look at people under those labels because I saw this whole experimentation going on where people were not necessarily labeling themselves. That is later. That came after there was this political/legal revolution to change family structures and to destabilize children from their biology. And that really has to do with selfish adult desires, not just sexual desires. But treating children like commodities, and removing them from their ancestry and their roots. And trading them back and forth based on the highest bidder and the most power that you have. You know, there’s a number of people that cannot have children naturally, but if they’re heterosexual, you know, it’s just you know that’s an issue for them. But anyone else, they’re going to be in for a trial (?) because biologically speaking, there’s no chance that they can ever conceive. Two women and two men can’t conceive naturally. And children, you know, we’re real human beings and we begin to recognize that the images that we were made into doesn’t reflect same-sex. It reflects male and female. That we need both for our own identity and for our own development. We need the complimentary genders interacting with each other in our growing-up years for us to truly, truly value who we are as human beings. And I think that’s what the LGBT movement has left out is what children really need. So they basically came out with the talking points and if you as adult child start speaking, as I have, about what it’s like to grow up in this, they often will threaten us.

Lana: Yeah, I bet you’ve been really attacked because this is like the ultimate taboo. You can’t talk about this at all. No one ever even questions. That’s out of the question to talk about it. So how have you been dealing with that?

Dawn: Well, you know, you get hate mail. You get verbal threats. And you get written threats. And in most cases, you know, if this was being done to, someone who was either gay or lesbian, they would have the person who’s making these threats and saying these vulgar things against you, they would have made sure those people were charged. But in my case, when I get all these email threats, bad emails and vulgar emails, I haven’t gone and asked for any one of these people to be charged or investigated.

Lana: Exactly. Yeah, well that’s just it. People keep saying”equality,” but now it’s they’re the protected group and people such as yourself have no protection legally? I mean, I’m hearing that
you know people keep saying “equality” but now discrimination against churches and pastors seems to be state sanctioned. So if you deny same-sex marriage in your church or you share your religious views on homosexuality, you can actually be charged with a hate crime.

Dawn: Yes.

Lana: I know Canada is pretty forward on that aren’t they?

Dawn: We are. In fact, I’ve had pastors confess to me that they have received, whether they’re phone calls or emails, basically saying that someone is sitting in their church..Usually they’re educated and they say they’re gay, And they say, you know, I really like being here, but if you say anything opposed to being gay or anything about the kinds of relationships I have, I just want you to know. I’m kind of putting you on notice.I’m going to be sitting in on the sermon and listening. And if you say anything I disagree with, I am going to make a complaint.

Lana: Wow

Dawn: And so pastors are being threatened and they are being silenced. And we have a fair bit of our denominations, and unfortunately. it doesn’t matter whether one is Catholic, Evangelical, or Protestant. A fair bit have become very politically incorrect. Politically, they’re very, very careful in what they’re saying. They’re trying not to say anything that would... a person who, say they’re a lesbian, would find offensive. And so, yes we do. We have human rights commissions. In British Columbia, we have a Human Rights Tribunal. So everyone of our territories and provinces are basically overseen by these human rights commissions. We have a federal Human Rights Commission that over three decades had a hundred percent conviction rate. And what you’ll find is, sexual orientation is a protected category. So if you are heterosexual, I just want you to know, that you are not under that sexual orientation protected category

Lana: Yeah, exactly

Dawn: So, you are “equally” protected in law. The Human Rights commissions are not run by real lawyers, judges and juries. They’re basically kangaroo courts. However, they have the power to, human rights commissions have the right..well, the power really, to enter your home, confiscate your laptop, computers, cell phones and files, looking for “hate crimes.” And even at our borders, where you have customs, there are materials that have been stopped at the border: books, DVD’s, and the like. I know there was a sodomy documentary put out by a Russian film company. And that was confiscated at the Canadian border being carried over by.., his name is Peter... he’s with Americans for Truth, and he was shocked that they confiscated the sodomy DVD when that is available and accessible on Youtube in Canada.

Lana: Yeah, they’re pretty full on up there right now, It’s pretty shocking. I Canada was just peaceful and calm, and respected everybody but it seems it’s just a one-way tolerance, huh?

Dawn: It is a one-way tolerance. And the only way to get around it really is to take a stand. And yes, there’s risks, but people understand.This is not about heating anyone. This is about freedom of speech. It’s something that in a true democracy everyone should have. And you know, I happen to have a Polish last name which means that in our family, going back, there was communism. And under state control, in communism, you have empty shelves. So you can’t easily access all the food you would need or you’d like to have. And when the food’s available, you stand in line - blocks and blocks at a time - and you wait until the bread, you can get your local bread or your meats, or whatever it is that has just came into the store. As well, in people under communism, you had to be very careful what they said about their political leaders. And they had to be careful they didn’t put down their government leaders, their political party that was in power. They had to be careful what they wrote. They had to be careful because they could be fined and they could be inprisoned and some were killed. And so, if you remember what it’s like to live under that kind of state control, that kind of regime, that takes away your freedom of speech and also restricts your religious freedom to the point that you can only go to the state-approved churches. You can’t go to the underground churches. You cannot freely worship and you cannot, you know, publicly express your faith, in your business or in any public places. So your worship, your religious freedom is restricted to a few hours on Sunday in a state-approved church. Well, coming out of that . Now when people come into Canada, they’re expecting that there will be more freedom here and they’re absolutely shocked that all this kind of language and discussion is banned in Canada publicly. Whereas, you know, if you go back to different parts of Europe, people are very aware of what it was like to live under a state regime and how restrictive speech was and religious freedom was restricted. And therefore they express all sorts of feelings and thoughts around political and religious topics. You know, and so they can’t imagine that any country, through human rights commissions and hate crime legislation would want to ban speech and protect certain categories of people under a special label. It just doesn’t make sense.

Lana: Yeah, I wonder if eventually, because they keep redefining everything, and the control, just more and more, against certain groups. Seem to might even redefine who a parent is or might even come and try and take your children away because you’re teaching them “hate”. Right?

Dawn: Well, this is it. In Canada, when same-sex marriage was legalized, the majority of Canadians did not have a clue that parenting was redefined immediately with same-sex marriage. And so, what happens when Canada’s gay marriage law bill C-38 was passed through and became legal, it included a provision to erase the term “natural parent” and replaced it across the board with gender-neutral “legal parent” in federal law. So now, all children only have “legal parents” as defined by the state. And by legally erasing biological parenthood, in this way, the state ignored and ignores the children’s formost right to know and be raised by their own biological parents.

Lana: Yeah, this is scary stuff. I always wondered too what the long-term effect would be, like let’s say, in the future if they went far enough and it’s like, utt, “the state raises your kids. There’s no such thing as a primordial family unit.” What kind of humans beings would we become?:

Dawn: Well, this is it. In Canada, as parents, you can expect state interference when it comes to moral values, parenting, and education. And it doesn’t just happen in school. We have some school policies in place that use a term called “school climate.” And what that means is that the child in school is bound by the regulations of the school board within that school and beyond. So wherever that child travels, as a student of the school, that child’s “school climate” around him is like a bubble and it walks with him; it goes with him. So he gets on the bus and he says something that the bus driver finds “hateful” or “hurtful” towards a particular group of people, that bus driver actually has to report, write that down, and report it to the
school principal within a day.

Lana: Wow

Dawn: That the school needs to be “aware.” So policing of speech by students, by the teachers, and the administration, and by the bus drivers, and the school counselors and social workers, and even the caretaker at the school. Well, that policing of speech continues on with the child when that child leaves the school and goes to the corner store, variety store, to pick up a snack or a pop. It also travels with the child on field trips. Also if that child meets with other students at the local mall or goes to a movie theater or a number of them or a few of them get together as friends after school, or at a child’s home, the “school climate” is traveling with that child throughout the child’s whole day;

Lana: Un huh

Dawn: not just at the physical location of where the school exists. And so.with that “school climate” it means when a child comes home and opens up his or her laptop or starts using their cell phone or starts communicating on a social network, that child’s speech and anything the child writes, anything the child posts, in photos or illustrations, all of that can be policed under the “school climate” which means even the parents can be investigated if somehow the school finds out, ...

Lana: Unbelievable.

Dawn: that the parents said something that’s in conflict with what the state is supporting.

Lana: Wow. This is like a dystopian sci-fi movie. So any tips for how to raise your kids in this kind of climate? Because I know we’ve got that and then we got the cultural Marxists on the other side. So how are you raising your children?

Dawn: I tell you what. I home schooled for a number of years. I’ve done all sorts of interesting things, but I home schooled. And one thing I would say to anyone who’s home schooling. They don’t have to be Christian, Catholic, religious at all. They could be Jewish or secular. It doesn’t matter. I would recommend anyone and everyone that’s home schooling to join Home Schooling Legal Defense Association. For that nominal fee to educate your child at home, that membership with HSLDA will offer you a level of protection like nothing else. They will defend you if you’re in a situation where the social worker or supervisor comes from the school or from the government to your door. They will actually give you legal advice on how you’re to handle that situation. And we do have.., we call them Family Services or Children’s Aid. We do have government employees that can potentially come to your door and investigate. They may be looking for “abuse” they say and I put that in quotes. And that “abuse” could be you teaching your child something very different, that they really disapprove of. And so it’s very, very important to have a community of people where you have connection and protection under HSLDA membership. The other thing that I would recommend too, is be very watchful and careful in who you are associating with. Be careful what you say publicly.

Lana: Yeah

Dawn: You have to you. You know, the other issue that we have is, because we are just “legal” parents now in Canada under same-sex marriage, and we have only been “legal” parents for the last ten years, the state does have the power to enter our homes if they feel there is a reason to do so. And we saw that happen with an Orthodox Jewish community, who actually, the majority of them left Canada because of state interference. Because they were not teaching curriculum to their students, to their children, that agreed with the state’s curriculum.

Lana: I thought that Jews were very protected in Canada

Dawn: Well, this is it. You know, they will go after the vulnerable small groups first. They will go after individuals and families and groups that may not be as protected as other groups. In the sense, they’re not as assimilated within the community and don’t have the network of support around them. This is the challenge, that if you see vulnerable groups having to leave the country, then you understand, as parents, how long will you have your freedom as a parent to be making the choices to teach your children certain values and beliefs, and your faith, in the privacy of your own home?

Lana: That’s right.

Dawn: How long will you have that freedom before someone knocks on your door. And if you’re a careful parent, you have to always be prepared for that in Canada under our hate crime legislation and under same-sex marriage; and with our Human Rights Commissions and Tribunal. We are at risk, we’re at a higher risk, and so we must be very careful before we open our front door.

Lana: And we have to remember that what kind of future are we creating for our children if we don’t fight this now? I mean, think of where your grandchildren could be living. I just had a couple of more questions for you. What would you say to other adults who have grown up like you? They’re learning to cope with their parent’s choices and they don’t know how to handle it?

Dawn: Well. I would say face the reality of it. It’s a lot harder to do than what I just said. It takes time. But if you truly want to be sane and a decent person in the sense of being able to cope with stress in day-to-day life, you have to deal with the past. You have to sift through it and love your parents. Appreciate them Value the different men and women that were in your life growing up, whether you agreed with them or not; whether you liked them or not. Really, just look at everyone as a valuable human being and love them. At the same time, recognize where there’s losses, those permanent losses and defficiencies and recognize that our whole identity is not just wrapped up in our sexuality and gender. That is very, very important to our identity, but it’s not all that we are. We’re much bigger than that. And that any inclinations that we have, that doesn’t have to become our identity. Also, forgive those people around you that have hurt you. It’s really important to practice forgiveness on a daily basis. I know that there are people that are Christians, Catholics, that believe in forgiveness. But I would say, whether you’re religious or not, forgive, Really, I mean so you don’t have to carry that bitterness around with you. And the third thing I would say in going forward is to make the best choices possible going forward. Life is not perfect. Life has its challenges, but you can live day to day and enjoy the beauty around you and appreciate the people in your life. You can love more deeply and more intimately, when you have faced the reality of the painful past when you’ve forgiven those that hurt you and when you move forward in making the best choices possible.

Lana: I’d encourage everyone to buy your book too and help support your work because you’re doing important work. But I wanted to ask you: Why is your message so critical now”

Dawn: Well,I’m this is not really about ego. I was compelled to write when I got home in 2004 after testifying before Canada’s senate of legal and constitutional affairs on the hate crime legislation. I was compelled to write my book because I felt like, “oh my goodness, they’re going to make it a hate crime that I came up and say something that hurts the feelings of certain men and women around me. Or, you know, men or women that are like my father who was involved with same-sex partners and so I thought I’ve got to write down my story. People have to understand what it’s like for a child to grow up in this. So I wrote Out From Under, The Impact of Homosexual Parenting and I publish it in the States because for a number of reasons. The major reason is I wasn’t sure if Canada would allow my book across the border. And we don’t have the distribution network that the United States has. And our postal system charges probably double to triple what you charge in the States. And so, I thought my book would be more accessible being published in America and I also felt that with my story out there, that more adult children would come forward to share their stories which is actually what’s happened. And that legislators would take a step back and really consider before they changed laws around marriage, [to] really consider the impact on children. So that was really the purpose of my book and I state that in my preface. My book can be read in just a matter of a few days, but I would recommend people take coffee breaks because there are difficult passages in the book. And especially if someone is an adult child that this could hit home in a number ways very personally. And I also recommend if people have issues, they’re still very stressed about it, if they have anxiety issues, or any other risk factors, that they seek counseling and get the kind of support that they need and that would respect their faith values and their beliefs around sexuality and gender, marriage and family.

Lana: Well Dawn, please share your website details and also let people know how they can get your book and any upcoming speaking engagements you might have

Dawn: Well, I have a website I’ve had since 2006 and it is filled with news articles and research. It’s a very simple website. It’s not flashy . It’s not one of those expensive web sites, so when you go there, it’s really triple W
my first name and my last name so it’s triple W dot Dawn, D-a-w-n and then my last name, which is S-t-e-f-a-n-o-w-i-c-z

And if you can’t remember my last name, just put in “Dawn” and then “out from under” and you’ll be able to find my website. I’ve done a number of articles. I have done different media interviews, but as for speaking engagements, because of the political and legal risks, with what I am doing publicly, I usually do not announce publicly where I’m next speaking

Lana: Yeah, it makes sense.

Dawn: But if you’re associated with an event that is hosting me, they will tell you about me. I don’t even send out emails to advise where I’m going next, what I’m doing. And the reason for that is because we have anti-spam legislation and I’m not spamming anyone, but I could imagine that there’d be some people that want to easily take me down with a five hundred thousand dollar fine if I sent out an email and someone said “You know, I really didn’t sign up for this. I don’t want this” And so, I cant afford it. I don’t even put it on Facebook or Twitter where I’m next speaking because it’s extremely dangerous. There are risks when you’re sharing publicly what I share publicly and I’m only really speaking up for the child, for the children and sying they need to be raised in the best environment possible and that is, you know, a married father-mother household and it doesn’t mean that every household out there is going to be perfect. You know every marriage has challenges, every family has challanges, but we need to give children the best start we can in life. And we need to be real and not create fabricated ideas and try to brainwash children and say that every family structure out there, no matter how broken, it’s going to be good for you. We have to be honest because children do soon realize what they’re missing and they don’t need to be permanently deprived of either a mother or a father who’s biologically related to them. Children really, really need that connection going forward; that history; that ancestry; that heritage. Not just biologically, but their heritage, their religious background; their ethnicity, and the differnet nationalities that are connected in their history. They need to know that. They need to know the culture they came from

Lana: Absolutely.

Dawn: It’s very important to our whole identity and of course on the biology side, there’s going to be mannerisms and certain physical features that we have. All of that is so important

Lana: Very good. Well, thank you Dawn. I know you’re busy so we appreciate your time

Dawn: Thank you Lana. Thank you so much for giving me this opportunity and all the best to you and thank you for your courage in addressing some of these very challenging topics today.

Lana: Well, it's no secret, Leftists are destroying personal freedom to choose how we raise our children, how we want to live our life, and who we want to associate with. What does the phony Right have left to conserve? It's all being taken away by force. and still, they worry about looking like fascists. Well, sadly these people won't make it to the next level of evolution. These are serious times, folks. It's dire straits. We need to start becoming self-sufficient, less dependent on the system. How can we reorganize our lives to become more self-sufficient because it's a matter of time before you can't get access to what you need, especially if you're cut off for a "hate crime." Who can you buy property with? What business can you start up? Where's our co-op? What food can you grow? Where's your brotherhood or your sisterhood you can call up when you need them? Where is our tribe? Its time to become tribal and think tribally in everything we do. Is it good for our people should be the question on our mind at all times. Is this ensuring the survival of our European children? The difference with Europeans is we think long-term. Can you see the long term of where this is going? What are you doing now to leave your legacy for your future children? Pull out of public school. Can't afford it? Well, damn it make some sacrifices: sell that second car or go out to eat less. Connect with the home school network. Make it happen. The children are our future. We must raise them right and armor them with truth. Nature is on our side and there's nothing more powerful than Nature.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

The divine proportion is the only mathematical ratio that the Universe needs to intelligently design all life. Phi, aka the Golden Ratio, is a truly divine number. It’s quite a phinomenon. Along with unity this number creates the perfect proportion. Let’s demystiphi some of the more esoteric geometric concepts attributed to this golden proportion.

Phi is found everywhere and yet nobody talks about it. It’s missing from the calculator. Its importance remains hidden even from the most hard-core math geeks. Most mathematicians have heard of it, but the mystery surrounding its existence is ineffable, and the complete understanding of it, perhaps insurmountable.

This ratio is also known as the divine cut, golden mean or golden section. Other names include Phi, extreme and mean ratio, medial section, divine proportion, divine section, golden proportion, golden cut, and golden number.

A straight line is said to have been cut in extreme and mean ratio when, as the whole line is to the greater segment, so is the greater to the lesser. -Euclid

With the golden ratio the whole line is to the large line; as the large line is to the small line.

“Like God, the Divine Proportion is always similar to itself.” –Fra Luca Pacioli

If we were to take a line and divide it, there is only one place where the two separate lines would be in golden proportion with each other. One side would be 1 and the other, 1.618. Or one side would be .618 (1/ø) and the other 1. This is the only ratio that works this way. It is the only ratio in geometric and mathematical progression. It’s perfect!

Phi (1.618..) and phee(.618..) are the numbers of fractal expansion and contraction. Like male and female, these two energies spiral around unity, creating life as we know it.

The powers of Phi work just like the Fibonacci sequence. 1 + Phi = Phi squared. Phi + Phi squared = Phi cubed, and so on. This is the only number that does this. Phi is the only number where its square is exactly 1 number larger. It’s also unique in that its reciprocal (1/Phi) is one less than Phi, which we’ll call phee (0.618..)

Jonathan Quinton made this video that beautifully displays the nature of the Golden Ratio.

Geometric Constructions of the Divine Proportion

Phi arises out of simple geometries. Take three lines of equal length and at their midpoints arrange them in this manner. Phi originates from the square root of five. (ø = (√5 +1/2). Being the number of life, Five is closely connected to Phi. Even here the midpoints are .5 their full length.

The square root of five is the cross section of the double square as seen above in blue. The square root of 4 (or 2) is the length of the double square. The square root of three comes from the vesica piscis. If the circle’s radius is one, the vertical length where they connect is the square root of three. Phi (seen in gold) arises from the relationship shown. The radius of the blue circle is the square root of five divided by two, or 1.180339… which is also Phi minus one half. The diameter of the blue circle is the square root of five.

This construction was developed by George Odom and published in American Mathematics Monthly in 1983. A circle with the simplest shape inside it reveals golden ratios, both in linear and curvilinear representations.

“Phiangle” further expanded upon by Michael S. Schneider

Starting with the circle on the right, divine proportions are derived in this way.

A very basic construction of Phi. The arc of the circle is needed to create it.

Phi constructed from three circles. John Michell gets credit for this one.

Phi springs to life from the geometry of five. Golden proportions are ubiquitous in the pentagons and pentagrams. It is this “phiveness” that brings Phi to life.

Robert Lawlor, in his book ‘Sacred Geometry’, shows Phi proportions with a circle split into 5×2 sections.

“ Where plants have five-fold patterns, a consideration of their souls is in place. For patterns of five appear in the regular solids, and so involve the ratio called the Golden Section, which results from a self-developing series that is an image of the faculty of propagation in plants. Thus the flower carries the authentic flag of this faculty, the pentagon.” – Johannes Kepler

In 2006 Bengt Erik Erlandsen showed that Phi can be represented simply in this way. Whenever you drive down the street you are subconsciously experiencing golden ratios. Again, with the appearance of five. This time the circles on the top and bottom are cut in half (or .5)

In 2002 Kurt Hofstetter published this construction in Forum Geometricorum. The vesica piscis (the two smaller circles) in combination with circles around the “bladder of the fish”, created phi proportions. He struck gold on this one.

Constructing the pentagram using circles and phi ratios: Starting with the green square, circles are extended out which define the points of the pentagram. The radius of the green circle is 1, the yellow 1.618.., and the magenta 1.23..

Vesica Phiscis, well not quite. The name may be a play on words, but the golden proportion inherent in this geometry is forever accurate. Phi seems to come up a lot analyzing circles. It may seem odd then that Phi is not encoded into the relationship of a circle’s circumference to its diameter, (π). Pi is well-known. It even has its own day.

Why then, is Phi not encoded into the ratio known as Pi? Well some mathematicians think it is. Australian mathemagician Jain108 has concluded that the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter IS linked to Phi. He goes on to show that π = 4/√ø. Four divided by the square root of Phi, which is a little over the accepted value today. (3.1446..) More on this in an upcoming article.

The green and red circles are in golden proportion with each other. The blue square and circle have the same perimeters. Thus Phi encodes the solution to “squaring the circle”.

Blue is to Red; as Magenta is to Green. Isn’t that phinomenal?!

The Pentagram and the many manifestations of Phi. One is always needed in between to transition from the higher powers of Phi into the lesser. These golden numbers Phi and phee, 1.618 and .618, are never without the presence of ONE.

My friend Rhuben Neal made this construction. If the diameter of the blue circle is 1, the diameter of the golden circle is Phi cubed.

Fibonacci Circles. Original construction by Sam Kutler.

Gary Meisner’s website GoldenNumber.net explores Phi in depth.

Phee Phi Pho Phum, I smell the blood of the Golden One.

“Neglect of mathematics work injury to all knowledge, since he who is ignorant of it cannot know the other sciences or things of this world. And what is worst, those who are thus ignorant are unable to perceive their own ignorance, and so do not seek a remedy.” ― Roger Bacon, Mathematics

This simple drawing reveals a lot, but like Hermes put it, The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding. Or in this case, eyes. The length of the square, in green, is one. The hypotenuse in magenta is √5 or 2.2360679.. The blue line is double the green. In red is ‘phee’ sometimes labeled lowercase phi. In Gold, Phi. The circle, as it seems in these drawings, is vital to the existence of this divine proportion.

The double square encodes Phi with the help of the circle. If the length of one square is one, the double-square’s perimeter is six, and the cross section(in magenta) is the square root of five. This relationship of 5 to 6 is encoded into the fabric of our reality. Five is the number of life, and Six the number of structure. These two archetypes combine to construct our numerical universe.

”He who joins the hexagram and pentagram has solved half of the sacred secret.” –Eliphas Levi (19th century magician)

Another phi construction ^ via George Leoniak

Elliot McGucken discovered a Phi relationship between the 3, 4 & 5 sided polygons^ https://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/Elliot2.shtml

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1798843/new-very-simple-golden-ratio-construction-incorporating-a-triangle-square-and

Here shows the edge relationships of regular polygons from a triangle to the hexagon inscribed in the same size 1 radius circle. [Credit to Hunter Hughes]

The following construction was made by George Leoniak

constructed by Hunter Hughes

Courtesy: JoeDubs

More articles on this topic are coming. I hope you’ll subscribe and stay tuned. And I’d really appreciate it if you considered becoming a paid subscriber to support my work.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

One of the most recognized families within the United States and globally, is that of the Rockefeller family. In 1870, the families patriarch John D. Rockefeller founded the Standard Oil company. Through the acquisition or annihilation of his competitors, John D. Rockefeller established a monopoly on the oil industry in the United States. By 1890, Standard Oil was conducting business on a global scale when it started shipping kerosene to China.

In 1909, the company was sued under Federal anti-trust Laws, the Sherman Antitrust Act. The company, by this time controlled ninety one percent of production and eighty five percent of kerosene sales in the United States. In 1911, Standard Oil was forced by the United States government to dismantle the company in to thirty four different companies. Of these companies, three of them have the right to still use the Standard name (Exxon-Mobil, Chevron Corporation, and BP).

John D. Rockefeller lived in retirement for the last four decades of his life, during this time he engaged in many philanthropic endeavors. He established many foundations that worked in the areas of medical, education, and scientific research.

A benevolent philanthropist? Not really!

David Rockefeller is known for the establishing the Chase Manhattan Bank in 1946. Since that time the Chase Manhattan bank has been renamed as the J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, this occurred in 1955.

David Rockefeller has been an insider to every White House administration since Eisenhower. Another achievement of David was his founding of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. He is also a participant at the Bilderberg Group meetings. Both of these entities operate like a shadow government, behind the scenes of the legitimate American government.

Rumors state that David Rockefeller has been associated to the Central Intelligence Agency for many years. David has had working relationships with a variety of high powered figures such as Fidel Castro, Nikita Khrushchev, Mikhail Gorbachev and Saddam Hussein.

Nelson Rockefeller served as Vice-President under Gerald Ford from 1974-1977. He was also Governor of New York from 1959 through 1973. He ran for President of the United States three times unsuccessfully, this was in the years, 1960, 1964, and 1968. He was also very influential in his support for the Museum of Modern Art.

Rockefellers and alternative energy sources.

John D. Rockefeller wealth was earned through the kerosene industry. At the time whale oil was the preferred fuel for use in lamps, etc... John D. saw the opportunity to replace this fuel with the new alternative energy source known as kerosene.

Neva Rockefeller Goodwin, one of the heiress of the Rockefeller fortune made a statement in 2008 that criticized Exxon-Mobil for not investing in today’s alternative energy sources. Her claim is that the Standard Oil company led the field of alternative energy in the past, and should be doing the same investing today.

She stated that her great grandfather John D. Rockefeller realized that the future depended on the transition to more affordable and cleaner burning energy sources.

Does the Rockefeller family actually care about greener energy sources?

Although it was suggested that the companies created from the break-up of the Standard Oil corporation should invest in cleaner energy. The family is much more concerned with the financial prosperity of the families “trust funds” than they are with the human population.

During a press conference, Peter O’Neill, a descendant of John D. Rockefeller stated:

“I have a world of respect for what the company has done well.”In fact, if the next 20 years of the energy business were just going to be about oil and gas, we probably would not be here today.”

This does not stop the elite controlled media from portraying the family as a group of benevolent environmentalists. In 2008, the New York Times ran a story with the headline:

“Can Rockefeller Heirs Turn Exxon Greener?”

The elite controlled media still portrays John D. Rockefeller as:

“one of the first major philanthropists in the U.S. and the World” and the purpose of the family’s Rockefeller Foundation’s as “promot[ing] the well-being of mankind throughout the world.”

The Rockefeller families own constructed mythology deserves that some light be shed on the truth! The Standard Oil company was the first oil monopoly the world was exposed too. The greed of the Rockefeller family was and is unquenchable.

The success of the Rockefeller family is deeply entrenched with the United States dependence on both oil and gas burning vehicles.

Concerning the Rockefeller families search for philanthropic projects is very suspect. For some odd reason the family seems infatuated with the concept of population control. The most ludicrous part of these eugenic beliefs is that it should be done to benefit mankind. Really?

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
Jacques Cousteau “

All of this truth could be revealed by the media, but being controlled by elite families such as the Rockefellers, they succumb easily to reporting nothing but the families own self-edited version of the families history.

In 1975, Congressman Larry P. McDonald stated:

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control….Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

Did John D. Rockefeller have a conscience?

The Rockefeller family has went to extreme measures to control the biography of John D. Rockefeller, they have managed to disguise the convicted robber-baron, and made him out to be a benevolent philanthropist.

John D. Rockefeller himself stated:

“God gave me my money, Having been endowed with the gift I possess, I believe it is my duty to make money and still more money and to use the money I make for the good of my fellow man according to the dictates of my conscience.”

Unfortunately John D.’s conscience did not stop him from hiring private armies to disrupt labor disputes. Nor did it compel him to pay his employees more than a pauper wages. His conscience did not stop him from entering in to illegal contracts for the purpose of annihilating any competitors.

“I would rather earn 1 percent off a hundred people’s efforts than 100 percent off my own efforts.”

It was beliefs such as this that caused John D. Rockefeller to become the richest man in the world!

Those that hold John D. Rockefeller in high regard will talk about how he lowered the price of gasoline so that every American could afford to drive an automobile. He successfully lowered the price of fuel from an average of sixty cents per gallon, down to an average or ten cents a gallon.

What is not often said of John D. is how he ferociously used his own private military forces against his workers, beating them in to submission, and killing some of them. His employees feared the repercussions of demanding better working conditions, less working hours in a day, or the dreaded pay raise. John D. Rockefeller had a conscience which led him to pursue profit over the benefit of humanity. A real benevolent philanthropist, yeah right!

What? How did John D. Rockefeller violate the Law to achieve his goals?

In 1914, the Colorado Fuel & Iron company, owned by the Rockefeller family, used a military force of around twelve hundred armed mercenaries to break up a strike by the companies employees. Before the assault was finished there was between nineteen to twenty five workers and their family members killed. One incident involved two woman and eleven children, these fatalities were due to asphyxiation, they all were burned to death in the same tent.

Rather than acting as honorable and trustworthy businessman, the Rockefellers behaved more like an organized crime syndicate. Creating his oil empire after the Civil War, John D. Rockefeller used bribes, blackmail and betrayal to achieve his goals.

Using these sinister tactics, John D. was able to destroy any competition to his empire. Added to these nefarious deeds, John D. also entered in to contracts with railroad moguls that were completely illegal in nature. He received discounts in the form of rebates that were received off the official business ledgers. These tactics aided him in the destruction of smaller competitors that were unable to receive the same deals for their shipping needs.

Standard Oil controlled at least ninety percent of the oil refining industry in the United States by 1879. It was not until 1911 that the Supreme Court required Standard Oil to disband itself as a monopoly trust. Unfortunately, by this time devastation had already been done!

The fact is that the break up of the Standard Oil monopoly increased the value of the companies stock by fifty percent. The companies that were created by this Supreme Court decision were Mobil, Arco, Amoco, Penzoil, Chevron, and Conoco. Mobil has since become Exxon-Mobil. Arco and Amoco is now known as BP. Penzoil has become Shell.

Shortly after this decision John D. Rockefeller retired from the business. His remaining time was spent on his so called philanthropic endeavors and playing the game of golf.

How has the next generations of the Rockefeller family behaved?

True to the family history the next generation of the Rockefeller family has been quite content with carrying on with the agenda of the family patriarch John D. Rockefeller. The family goes to great lengths to portray the family history in their own words. John D. Rockefeller and his family practically invented the Public relations industry.

Every member of the Rockefeller family receives a trust fund so that actual work is not a requirement to a Rockefeller. The trust fund is in the millions for each descendant of John D.. The family also donates an enormous amount of money to the most elite colleges in the world. This allows any member of the Rockefeller family immediate admittance to the University of their choice, regardless of actual grades.

The family proves that their charitable donations are used as a Public Relation exercise by assuring that the buildings they finance carry the Rockefeller name. One of the most well known of the buildings bearing the Rockefeller name is that of Rockefeller Center in New York city. The construction of this building began in 1930 with a starting budget of 250 million dollars, a mind blowing amount for the time! Rockefeller Center is made up of fourteen buildings in all.

Next to Rockefeller Center is Radio City Music hall, This building was part of Rockefeller Center. The main building is known as the GE building, this structure formally carried the name of the RCA building. Another very well known piece of Rockefeller Center is the Statue of Atlas that faces Fifth Avenue.

The Rockefeller family also donated eighteen acres to what would become the United Nations building. This project was authorized by John D. Rockefeller Jr., the building was completed in 1952. It was in the hopes of achieving a One World Government that was the inspiration for the creation of a United Nations. This occurred after the United States and the world failed to form a similar organization that would have been called the League of Nations.

Rockefellers NWO government

The Rockefeller family and the conspiracy to monopolize transportation within the United States!

There are many companies within the United States that is part of the automotive industry. One out of every six companies by 1960 was dependent on the motor vehicle industry. The more individuals that owned their own automobile, the more profit these companies could generate.

Before 1940, many large cities had the privilege of operating successful trolley systems for their inhabitants. The people using the trolley systems had no need to own their own vehicles. Cities such as New York, Detroit, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, among many others saw these trolley systems completely dismantled. Over one hundred trolley systems were decimated between the years 1936 through 1950. These trolley systems were purchased for the sole purpose of dismantling them. The purchasers had names like, Standard Oil of California, GM, Firestone, and Phillips Petroleum.

By eliminating the trolley systems they also annihilated the competition these public transportation systems presented to their business models. The inhabitants of the cities containing the trolleys had no choice but to acquire their own vehicles for transportation. If they did not buy their own vehicles, their other choice would be to use the new gas burning public transportation systems known as buses.

The companies involved in this conspiracy used a company called National City Lines as a front to purchase the trolley lines. Another company involved in the scandal was known as Pacific City Line. Both of these companies were brought up on charges of engaging in a conspiracy to control a significant amount of transportation companies, and attempting to create a monopoly on all transportation. In 1949, the companies were found guilty on the first charge but acquitted on the second.

The punishment was minuscule, the companies involved in the Great American Streetcar Scandal were ordered to pay a measly five thousand dollar fine. The directors of these companies had to hand over a whole one dollar! Not much of a punishment considering the profits taken in by these companies in the years to come! Of course the Rockefeller family was given no scrutiny over this scandal.

To add an insult to the injury, Congress agreed to spend the peoples wealth to build the massive highway systems nation wide. This expenditure resulted in the purchase of more private vehicles, all good news to the conspiratorial corporations. While increasing spending on highways, things like public transportation and train systems saw their government financing dwindle in comparison.

The Rockefeller family and the agenda of eliminating a large portion of the world’s population!

The Rockefeller name has become well known for a global movement that is pursued by many of the worlds elites. This program is one of population control. Gaining momentum throughout the twentieth century, the believers of population control seek to decrease the instances of human births.

Proving that these programs are designed to target humans not of the Caucasian race is revealed by the prevalence of these programs within third world nations and minority communities in the United States. There is also the fact that many of the people targeted for population reduction are extremely poor. So it can be stated that the agenda of population control systematically targets those areas of the world full of poor human beings.

By 1920, the Rockefeller Foundation invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in Germany for the purpose of studying eugenics.

Working in unity with the German chemical company I.G. Farben, Rockefeller owned Standard Oil of New Jersey, cooperated in a multitude of agreements. The Warburg family, which controlled the I. G. Farben corporation, was a financial partner with the Rockefeller family. These families cooperated in the establishment of the NazI Germany Eugenics movement. Even after Germany invaded the sovereign nation of Poland in 1939, the Standard Oil company stated that they would continue to cooperate with I.G, Farben company regardless of whether or not the United States was dragged in to the conflict.

This was revealed to the public in 1942, Senator Harry Truman led a Congressional Investigating Committee which exposed U.S. companies supporting the regime of Adolph Hitler. President Roosevelt had to take a plethora of legal maneuvers to force the Standard Oil/I.G. Farben cabal from providing assistance to the Nazi Germany war mechanisms.

During the years of 1940 and 1941, I.G. Farben constructed an enormous factory located in Aushwitz, Poland. This factory was built to use the patents obtained by the Standard Oil/I.G. Farben cabal, this endeavor would utilize slave labor for the purpose of creating gasoline from coal.

The Nazi SS, was assigned to provide security at the factory, these same soldiers made the decision to terminate any individuals deemed to be unable to work in the slave labor camps, set up by the Nazi regime. Once the war was concluded the president of German-Standard, Emil Helfferich, testified that there was money supplied by Standard-Oil to be used to pay the SS guards at the Auschwitz camp!

Daniel O’Brian, a European Rockefeller Foundation official stated in a letter to the Foundation’s top medical officer in 1940:

``it would be unfortunate if it was chosen to stop research which has no relation to war issues‘’

This was the motivation for the Rockefeller Foundation to maintain the financing of the Nazi research in psychiatric studies. This financing occurred while the nation of Germany was engaged in warlike hostilities.. How Patriotic!

Even though the Rockefeller family ended the financing of German research prior to the beginning of the Second World War. The damage had already been wrought.

To understand the Rockefeller family in modern times, it is necessary to know their history!

The sanctimonious attitude of the current generation of Rockefellers should be understood based on the smug attitude that the family has taken against humanity throughout their history.

In 1989, an oil tanker named the Exxon-Valdez struck Bligh reef in Prince William Sound along the coast of Alaska. The tanker leaked ten million gallons of oil in to the water. It was an environmental disaster.

Once the investigation concluded, the Court ordered the Rockefeller owned Exxon-Mobil corporation to compensate the thirty three thousand Alaskan residents effected by the disaster. This decision came in 1994, the Court issued the judgement based on the companies “reckless behavior”, concerning the incident.

Did the Rockefellers pay their victims?

No, they refused!

Were they jailed for contempt of a Court order?

NO!

Why not?

The Rockefeller family has remained silent concerning this matter! As is their Right, yet the people should require Justice through their Department of Justice. Shouldn’t they?

The Rockefeller family hold the Exxon-Mobil company in high esteem, as it is the most profitable corporation in the history of the United States. In 2007 alone the company earned over forty billion dollars in profit.

As the globe enters in to a recession never seen before in history, with people having to sacrifice purchasing nutritious food and living in adequate dwellings simply so they can afford to put fuel in their cars, the Rockefeller family remains silent! It has been reported that the Exxon company earns over $910.2 million in profit itself, DAILY!

With a record number of families needing the assistance of charitable food pantries just to feed their children, the Rockefeller family continues to accumulate enormous sums of wealth. The cost of fuel skyrocketing, food almost double what it was only a few years ago, yet the family of Rockefeller is not effected by this global catastrophe.

Why not?

Because the people’s wealth is being siphoned out of their paychecks and savings accounts, while the Rockefeller family and others like them are reaping in the profits of other’s misery!

How do these societies fall under the control of the Illuminati?

The Rockefeller family is associated with several secret societies, many of which were founded by the Rockefellers themselves.

The primary secret society that should be discussed is the Council on Foreign Relations. This council is rumored to be operating as the American section of the Illuminati. The Illuminati is the shadow group conspiring to gain control of the world. They are planning on achieving this goal by erecting a One World Government which would end all national sovereignty. Bringing every aspect of life under the control of a small number of global elitists.

You will learn more about Illuminati here:

Aaron Russo talks about the Rockefeller Conspiracy

JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies!

New World Order Plan to Kill 90% of the Worlds Population

David Rockefeller made the following statement in his book:

“ Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

In 1973, writing in the New York Times, David Rockefeller expressed the kind of society he would prefer prevailed over the world”

“One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony.... Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution it has obviously succeeded... in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive....The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose.... The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in history.”

If this does not open your eyes to the realization that there is a secret cabal conspiring to control the world, enslave the people, and decide who gets to live and who is designated for termination, nothing will.

David Rockefeller expressing his admiration for Chairman Mao? A maniacal tyrant responsible for the deaths of millions of his own people.

To think, if these Elitists have their way, no one is safe.

At anytime armed individuals could round up the dissenters and eliminate them. Your children could be sterilized against their will, if they are allowed to live. Does it have to get that far before the people realize that the conspiracy is real. This is not theory, based on their quotes, it is FAR TO REAL!!

Courtesy: Reality Bytes

Support RevealedEye

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Get 7 day free trial

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Do the Bilderberg members seek to form a One World Government? Are they engaged in nefarious activities? Who are the Bilderbergers and what do they do at their meetings? Does the Bilderberg Group actually exist or are they just a part of some conspiracy theory?

After researching the Bilderberg Group, it is a fact that they exist. They also seem to be very influential on business and financial endeavors. They also involve themselves in politics all over the globe, they make decisions as to whether a Nation is engaged in war or live in peace. The Bilderberg Group controls the majority of the globes resources, they also have control of most Nations currencies.

It was in 1954 that the Bilderberg Group, which includes some of the most powerful people in the world as members, met for their first meeting. The meeting took place in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, the subject of the meeting was a debate on the worlds future. At that time the members agreed to hold an annual meeting that was to be kept secret.

Who are the Bilderbergers?

The members of the first meeting decided to call themselves the Bilderberg Group, their members consisted of some of the most powerful people on the planet. The membership was comprised of members from Nations worldwide. There are members from The United States of America, Canada, and many Nations in Western Europe.

Many of the members are well known throughout the world. Names such as David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, the membership also includes many Leaders of Nations, prominent Senators, several Congressmen, and members of British Parliament.

Also included in the membership are Pentagon and NATO brass, royalty from European countries, and powerful media moguls. There are also individuals that attend the meetings by invitation. Some of these individuals that attend by invitation, attend very quietly, such as Barack Obama and many of his highest ranking administration officials.

Another list of Bilderberg Group meeting attendees include members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, members of the Trilateral Commission, the European Union, and some of the most prominent central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the European Central Banks Jean-Claude Trichet and Mervyn King of the Bank of England.

New World Order Bilderberg Group - Open Your Eyes and See The TRUTH

How was the Bilderberg group exposed?

For fifty years, not one note of the Bilderberg agenda or any of the topics that are discussed was made available to the public. The Bilderbergers do not allow any press to cover any aspect of their meetings. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule which has its origins at the Chatham House. (which is an independent policy institute that is based in London) This rule was implemented to keep all members anonymous and advocates openness and the ability to participate in sharing information.

People that attend these meetings by invitation are sworn to secrecy. Daniel Estulin has dedicated his lifes work to revealing the secrets of the Bilderberg Group as an investigative journey.

Estulin has said that, “Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I could not have done this without the help of “conscientious objectors” from inside, as well as outside, the Group’s membership.”

In return for their information, Daniel Estulin has agreed to keep all of the informants names confidential. Without certainty of the groups initial mission, the Bilderberg Group is currently a secretive and shadow world government. Whether or not the Bilderberg Group is associated with the Illuminati is a subject that is often discussed.

The fear of many people concerning the Bilderberg Group is that they are a threat to the removal of our Rights to control our own future. This would result in the creation of a very frightening reality which would have harmful effects on the welfare of the worlds' population.

Bilderberg Agenda!

The theory concerning the Bilderberg Agenda is that they would like to create a borderless world. This would mean eradicating the indivudual Nation States Sovereignty with a very powerful Central Global Government. This Central Global Government could also be called a New World Order!

They would like to see this government controlled by corporations and protected by military police. This would be a private club for Presidents, Prime Ministers, International Bankers, and Military Leaders to congregate and network among themselves. They could be chaperoned by the new Royalty to ensure peace is upheld. The entities that are in control of the wars, the stock markets both in Europe and America would be able to speak things that they would never dare speak in a public arena.

When the Bilderberg Group was first formed, the group had already decided to create an “Aristocracy of Purpose” through Europe and America. This would be done for the purpose of achieving agreement on matters to rule the world using policy, economics, and strategic maneuvers.

Aristocracy of Purpose!

The global elitists have created an “Aristocracy of Purpose”. This purpose is to retain control over the currency and the resources of the entire planet. The Aristocrats that developed this “Aristocracy of Purpose“ have concentrated their energy, for the reason that without energy, currency quickly loses its value.

With petroleum becoming more and more valuable, the global elitists are frantically working to solidify control of this resource. They are striving to eradicate any National Sovereignty by creating a global governance which would leave all Nations incapable of being self-reliant and maintain the ability to survive on its own.

The Global Elitists also have the belief that the world is over-populated and the reduction of the worlds’ population is part of the Bilderberg Agenda. They would like to return the population back to the numbers that existed before the industrial revolution. One of the schemes that is discussed to reduce the population is by the destruction of the economies of the world.

Violations of the Logan Act!

The Logan Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 953 [1948]) is a Federal Statute making it a crime for any citizen to converse with foreign governments against the interests of the United States. Specifically, it prohibits citizens from negotiating with other nations on behalf of the United States without authorization from congress.

Does a citizen attending a Bilderberg group meeting without authorization from congress violate the Logan act?

Exact wording of the Logan Act!

Any citizen of the United States, it does not matter where he is or who he may be, who, without acquiring authority of the United States, whether directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or diplomatic relations with any foreign government or any officer or agent of a foreign government, with the intention to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.

How can the Bilderberg Group control the world?

The creation of NATO was a central part of the Bilderberg plans. Using a never-ending state of war combined with the ability to blackmail Nations combined with the threat of nuclear weapons. The next part of their agenda would be to acquire everything of value from the globe to attain enormous wealth and power. They also maintain the ability to destroy any challenges to their control mechanisms.

Not only is military dominance part of the plan but the true ability to control the world comes from the power to control the worlds’ currency. Having control of a Nations money supply guarantees that the Nation remains subservient to the controlling elite. This is something that the Rothschild family discovered early in the Nineteenth century.

Amschel Rothschild the patriarch of the Rothschild Empire was once reported as saying:

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”

More information about the Rothschild family 👇🏻

The Bilderberg Group is the most exclusive club on the planet. An individual cannot even buy their way in to the group. The Bilderberg Groups Steering Committee makes all decisions as to who to invite to the meetings. In every case anyone admitted in to the meetings are willing to succumb to a One World Government, that is to be controlled by the worlds most powerful elite.

Who attends Bilderberg meetings?

The Bilderberg Groups Steering Committee has very strict rules for invited guests. They must attend the meeting alone, they are not even allowed to bring their wives, girlfriends, husbands, even their bodyguards are not allowed in the meetings.

Any personal assistants, bodyguards, whether CIA or even Secret Service staff are refused the ability to enter the meeting. They cannot attend the conference and must even dine in a separate room from the meetings attendees.

Another rule applicable to Bilderberg guests is that they are forbidden from granting any interviews to journalists. Nor can they ever make public the activities or discussions of the meetings.

Whatever Nation that hosts the meeting is responsible for all security and to keep away any potential intruders. At least one third of those that attend the meetings are political figures.

The rest of the attendees come from industry, finance, academia, labor and communications. The procedures of the meetings are issued through the Chatham House Rules. These rules allow those in attendance to have freedom to express their opinions within an ambiance of relaxation in the knowledge that anything said in the meeting will never be quoted or divulged to the public.

Subscribe now

What is the benefit in being associated with the Bilderberg Group?

Discussion in the meetings are uninhibited, this does not mean that every discussion ends in unanimous decisions. The Groups membership is comprised of around eighty of the most prominent figures in the world, they regularly attend these meetings annually.

There are many others that attend the meetings by invitation due to their knowledge of, or involvement in, topics that are relevant to discussions which are part of the meetings’ agenda. Some of the invited guests receive invitations to attend future meetings, other attendees that are present at their first Bilderberger Group meeting are selected for the possibility that they may prove useful in the future.

One example of a first time attendee that has been invited to other meetings is Bill Clinton. He attended his first meeting in 1991 as Governor of Arkansas. It was at this first meeting in 1991 that David Rockefeller explained to Bill Clinton that the “North American Free Trade Agreement” was a major priority to the Bilderberg Group. Bill Clinton was told that the Bilderbergers would require that he would support the Treaty!

It was the very next year that Bill Clinton achieved the role of President of the United States, it was on January first 1994 that the “North American Free Trade Agreement” was put in place. There are many other examples which hold a resemblance to this occurrence. Many of the attendees of the Groups meetings are chosen to be placed in powerful positions, within politics, military and other prominent positions.

What are the goals of the Bilderberg Group?

One of the main pursuits of the Bildergerger Groups agenda is the creation of a One World Government that would be controlled by a global conglomerate of corporations. This One World Government would consist of one unified global market which would have the One World Governments military to provide policing for the globe. This would put the entire globe under control of this New World Order which would be financially regulated by a One World Central Bank that would use a new unified global currency.

The Bilderberg Groups agenda has a list of goals in which they are attempting to achieve. The list begins with a goal that is the creation of one International identity that would recognize a single set of universal values. They would also like to bring in central control of the population of the globe through mind control techniques. Meaning that they are seeking forms of control that would create and influence public opinion.

What are some of the plans of the Bilderberg Group?

There is also the plans of a New World Order that would contain no middle class in the population. There would be only two classes of people, those that are rulers and those that are servants. This New World Order would eliminate any forms of Democracy. This would create a zero growth society with the removal of any individual prosperity or the ability for the individual to progress. There would only be an accumulation of greater wealth and power for those in the ruling class.

All this can be accomplished by fabricating crisis and infinite wars. The Group also holds ambitions to have complete control of all forms of education. By controlling the mind of the public it would be easy to train their servants to perform assorted functions.

They would also like to have a centralized control of all policies, both foreign and domestic, a global unification. The United Nations would be for all practical purposes a world government with the ability to collect a United Nations global tax on what would become the worlds’ citizens.

Also on the list would be the expansion of both the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) would become the Global Military. There would also be the establishment of a universal legal system.

The creation of a global welfare state would also be part of the agenda. Under this Welfare State the submissive servants (slaves) would receive rewards while those that refuse to comply with the New World Order would be marked for termination!

What does the Council On Foreign Relations have to do with the Bilderberg Group?

When it comes to partners of the Bilderberg Group, many of the members identities are secret. In the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is a preeminent partner to the Group.

One of the main figures which created the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 was Edward Mandell House. Mr. House was a preeminent adviser to President Woodrow Wilson. Rumors exist which state that Edward Mandell House held the actual power in the nation from 1913 through 1921.

It was during the Edward Mandell House reigns of power that the Federal Reserve Act was passed and signed in to Law in the year 1913. This Act gave the power to print money to international bankers. The Sixteenth Amendment was sanctioned in February which was the basis for the creation of the Federal Income Tax. This Amendment was enacted to provide a revenue source for the Government for the reason to repay the service on the debt of the Country.

From the time of its inception, the Council on Foreign Relations’ main goal was to usher in a One world Government, which would have as its basis a Centralized global system of financing. In the modern world the Council on Foreign Relations has a membership in the thousands, with many of its members being some of the most important and influential people In the United States.

Many of the members of the Council on Foreign Relations also belong to the corporate media, as well as many other powerful positions within the political and private sector. The Council on Foreign Relations remains discrete, and extremely secretive concerning its actual agenda.

There are people that consider the Council on Foreign Relations to be a “front organization for the heart of the American Establishment”. The Council meets in private and only reveals to the public the knowledge that it desires for the population to be aware of existing.

What does the Trilateral Commission have to do with the Bilderberg Group?

The Trilateral Commission, a group similar to the Council on Foreign Relations also holds secretive meetings concerning the combination of the worlds elite in to one body, controlling the globe.

The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller, who is also a member of the Bilderberg Group, as well as the Council on Foreign Relations. He still holds an emeritus position on all three boards as well as continuing to give financial support.

Based on past and present members of the Group, it is easy to see the power behind the “think tanks“. Members of these secretive groups amass great power. This list would include almost every single Presidential candidate, regardless of party affiliation. It would also include some of the most powerful Senators and Congressmen. Many of the most powerful figures in the media, as well as the most prominent figures that belong to the FBI, CIA, NSA, as well as the rest of the defense establishment.

Even leading Government agencies are infiltrated. This would include employees of the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, even the Judiciary, and Department of Treasury. Leading figures in these departments have all been members of these Secretive Societies.

It is as though the entire Nation of the United States has been penetrated by Secret Society members, whose allegiance is unknown. Are they sworn to allegiance to their secret group? Does their Oath of Office have any merit in their life?

What are some of the things that the Council on Foreign Relations involved in?

Since its inception, the Council on Foreign Relations has served as an employment agency for the Federal Government of the United States. It does not matter what party the individual belongs to, many CFR members are offered high ranking positions within all aspects of Government, media, and control of major corporations.

It makes no difference which political party resides within the White House, the Council on Foreign Relations has not lost any power or altered their agenda since it was founded in 1921.

The Council supports the Global unification of a superstate, one in which the United States of America and all other Nations of the world would be required to surrender their Nations Sovereignty to a unified and centralized power.

The founder of the Council on Foreign Relations, Paul Warburg was previously a member of Franklin Roosevelt’s “brain trust“. This “brain trust“ was a group of advisers to FDR during his first Presidential campaign. In 1950, Paul Warburgs son John said to the Senate Foreign Relations’ Committee;

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it - by conquest or consent.”

Later, during a 1992 Bilderberg meeting, Henry Kissinger told the members of the meeting that;

“Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful.”

This statement would be true if Americans believed there was a threat from enemies. Whether the threat was real or fabricated was irrelevant, as long as the American people held the belief that there was a threat to their existence.

United Nations | When did the plans for a One World Government begin?

Through threats to our safety whether real or simply fiction, both would end in the same result. Once a threat is perceived the population of the world will beg for the leaders of the world to save them from this perceived evil.

To guarantee safety many individuals would happily give up their Rights for the feeling of security. The population would eagerly consent to a One World Government if they felt that such a Government would keep them and their families safe.

It was the Council on Foreign Relations that started the planning for a New World Order before 1942. The United Nations inception began with a cartel of CFR members which was called at the time the “Informal Agenda Group.”

It was this group that created the framework for the original United Nations proposal. The group presented the proposition to Franklin Roosevelt. The President made the announcement of the United Nations the following day.

When it was founded in 1945, the Council on Foreign Relations was composed of over forty United States delegates. The Council on Foreign Relations performs its agenda in small groups containing around twenty-five people. These groups concentrate on leaders from six different conspiratorial categories, these categories are industrialists, financiers, ideologues, military, professional, specialists.

There were lawyers, medical doctors and members of organized labor which were brought together for the reason of engaging in detailed discussions on a wide variety of topics concerning Foreign Affairs.

The Council on Foreign Relations, although not financed by Government, works so intimately with the Government it is extremely difficult to differentiate between actions performed by the Council from Government actions done through Sovereign decisions.

During the 1930s through the 1940s, the United States of America was the most self sustaining country on the planet. It was during the great depression that this fact was recognized.

In 1937 an author named Eugene Staley that made statements concerning raw resources:

“United States is more nearly capable than any other great power (besides the Soviet Union) of meeting its normal demands from resources within its boundaries.”

Those in power used the Council on Foreign Relations to fortuitously pursue a distinct consideration concerning the interests of the United States of America.

This attitude did not have any basis in reality concerning the overall concerns of the citizens of the United States. Instead it was more meaningful to the capitalist economic system which was under their control and gave advantage to those who wielded the most power in the nation.

The theory behind the actions of the Council on Foreign Relations is that the United States of America would require more space to place inhabitants. This acquisition would need to be accomplished while perpetuating the prevailing system. Without the need of altering the foundations of the Nation into a Socialistic Society.

One of the Planning Council members, Mr. Henry R. Luce said quite candidly in an interview with Life magazine in 1941 that:

“Tyrannies may require a large amount of living space. But Freedom requires and will require far greater living space than Tyranny.”

How is the Bilderberg Group financed?

The most significant form of revenue comes from major corporations and key foundations. To name just three of the foundations are the Rockefeller, the Carnegie, and the Ford Foundations all of which are administered by essential corporate officers.

A major executive at CBS news gave an explanation as to what the medias role is in the New World Order would be, he stated:

“Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.”

CBS among many other giant media conglomerates have control over everything that we see, everything we hear, and everything we read. They use tools such as television broadcasts, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, films, and a large part of the Internet to maintain this control.

Many top executives and journalists are regular attendees at Bilderberg Group meetings. Their agreement with the Bilderberg Group is that nothing that takes place within the meetings are ever reported through any media sources.

The Rockefeller family still holds a tremendous amount of power. In fact the families’ patriarch David Rockefeller is in his mid 90’s and nearly at the end of his worldly dominance. This does not change the fact that the Rockefeller family, led by David holds major control over the media in general.

With this power the Rockefeller family accumulated a huge supremacy over the opinions of the public. With this control over public opinion it gave the family the opportunity to accumulate a huge influence in the field of politics.

How does the Bilderberg Group and Council of Foreign Relations control the world?

Once the control of American politics was complete, these groups are seizing dominion over the Nation itself. Once that goal is achieved control of the world will be the next step on the agenda.

The Bilderberger-Rockefeller tactics is to assure that their beliefs become so tempting by disguising them, that they will eventually become public policy. They can then use their dominance to compel the leaders of the world to succumb to the wants and needs of the ‘Masters of the Universe.’

The free world press is their mechanism to publicize their “agreed-upon propaganda.” The Council of Foreign Relations control of the Presidents cabinet aided in the passage of “The National Security Act of 1947.” This act created the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Since its inception, fourteen Department of Defense Secretaries have been members of the Council of Foreign Relations. From 1940 to the present only one Secretary of State (James Byrnes) has not had a membership either in the Council of Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission.

Programming the Public Mind!

The sociologist Hadley Cantril stated in 1967 in his book titled, “ The Human Dimension - Experiences in Policy Research”, that governments

“Psycho-political operations are propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the Council of Foreign Relations seeks to achieve in the world.”

Read more

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is smack dab in the middle of it all. Indeed, through its annual Davos meetings, the WEF attempts to legitimize and normalize its influence on the world’s democratic nations by having a panel of world leaders attending and speaking at the event.

A simple look at the list of attendees at these meetings reveals the organization’s incredible reach and influence. The biggest names in media, politics, business, science, technology, and finance are represented at the WEF.

According to mass media, the Davos meetings gather people to discuss issues such as “inequality, climate change, and international cooperation”. This simplistic description appears to be custom-made to cause the average citizen to yawn in boredom. But topics at the WEF go much further than “inequality”.

Throughout the years, people at the WEF have said some highly disturbing things, none of which garnered proper media attention. In fact, when one pieces together the topics championed by the WEF, an overarching theme emerges: The total control of humanity using media, science, and technology while reshaping democracies to form a global government.

If this sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory, keep reading. Here are the 10 most dystopian things that are being pushed by the WEF right now. This list sorted is in no particular order. Because they’re all equally crazy.

1. Penetrating Governments

The least one can say is that Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, is not a fan of democracy. In fact, he perceives it as an obstacle to a fully globalized world.

In the 2010 WEF report titled “Global Redesign”, Schwab postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a

“self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system), and select civil society organizations (CSOs)”.

This is the exact opposite of a democracy.

He argued that governments are no longer “the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage” and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance”. For this reason, the Transnational Institute (TNI) described the WEF as “a silent global coup d’état” to capture governance.

In 2017, at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, Schwab blatantly admitted what is continually dismissed as a “conspiracy theory” by mass media: The WEF is “penetrating” governments around the world.

Klaus Schwab in 2017 at Harvard: "What we are very proud of, is that we penetrate the global cabinets of countries with our WEF Young Global Leaders."

In this outstanding talk, Schwab blatantly stated that Angela Merkel of Germany, Vladimir Putin of Russia, Justin Trudeau of Canada, and Emmanuel Macron of France were “groomed” by the WEF. He even adds that at least half of Canada’s cabinet consists of representatives sold to the WEF’s agenda. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the absolute truth, confirmed by the head of the WEF himself.

2. Controlling Minds Using Sound Waves

In 2018, one of the topics of discussion at the WEF was “Mind Control Using Sound Waves” I did not alter this title for sensationalism, those are exactly the words used by the WEF.

The WEF’s Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils took place on November 11-12 in the United Arab Emirates. One of the topics discussed was “mind control using sound waves”. University of Oxford Professor Antoine Jérusalem describes the technology and the issues related to it:

Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?

Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.

If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves carefully.

In other words, there’s a difference between ultrasound stimulation used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the tissue.

Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but that we still don’t understand.

What social good can come of it?

The current buzzwords are Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, as well as traumatic brain injuries. But scientists are also looking at the spinal cord and peripheral nervous systems. As far as I am concerned, since the brain is the de facto centre of decision for so many processes, any of them could be targeted.

Is it safe?

When attempting to ‘control’ neuronal activity by providing minute mechanical vibrations to a region of the brain, it’s important that the focus of the ultrasound, frequency and amplitude are properly tuned, or the brain can potentially be damaged. The point is that we still don’t know how to tune all of this; and if I were to exaggerate a bit, I could say that our current approach is not that far off from fiddling around with the settings on a radio until we hear the right station.

One of the many difficulties is to know for sure that we are indeed controllingneurons with these sound waves, as opposed to damaging them. The truth is that we still don’t know how the process works. And if you don’t know how it works, you don’t know how much is “too much”.

What are the biggest ethical challenges?

The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.

From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.

I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.

How dystopian could it get?

I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.

What can we do to safeguard its potential?

I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s human nature, and not unique to scientists.

Either way, our job is to find something that is beneficial to humanity. And if you find a way to make somebody better, then you most likely also know how to do the contrary. The goal is to make sure that regulation prevents the latter, without impeding the former. I believe that this is the role of regulators. And I think that the European Union, where I work, is quite good at this.

Another role of politicians should be to provide a communication platform to explain the long vision of any given area of research. And it can be too early, or not a good idea, and the final decision might very well be to stop it. But in the long term, the public should have the potential benefits of a new technology explained to them in plain words, which is something that scientists are not necessarily good at.

Politicians should remember that if we don’t do it, then somebody somewhere will do it anyway…potentially unregulated.

In short, Antoine Jérusalem says that remote mind control is an incredibly powerful technology that has the power to possibly cure illnesses. However, in the wrong hands, the technology can completely take control of one’s brain. In his words, it can be the “perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak”.

Despite the technology’s admitted dystopian potential, Antoine Jérusalem believes that humanity cannot avoid developing it. He probably says that because a company developing this technology is part of the WEF. His solution to make sure that the technology is not used to turn humans into mind control slaves? Government regulation.

In short, the WEF states that this technology should be under the control of the global elite. Does that comfort you?

3. Pills That Contain Microchips

Once again, this title sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory cleverly worded for sensationalism. It is not. Here’s a video from the WEF’s 2018 meeting where Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, talks about pills that contain microchips.

Bourla says:

“FDA approved the first ‘electronic pill’, if I can call it like that. It is basically a biological chip that is in the tablet and, once you take the tablet, and it disolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that, the compliance. The insurance companies would know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.”

Is this field truly fascinating? Or utterly dystopian? As Bourla himself said: Imagine the compliance. This kind of technology could easily open the door to all kinds of nefarious applications. Since then, COVID put Pfizer in a position of power never seen before for a pharmaceutical company.

4. Praising Massive Lockdowns

In 2020 and 2021, cities around the world were subjected to massive and drastic lockdowns, causing job losses, suicides, drug overdoses, isolation, mental health issues, domestic abuse, bankruptcies, and homelessness. During this horrific period, children could not attend school for months and were essentially barred from interacting with other children. A slew of small and medium businesses was destroyed while large corporations strived.

Despite all of this, the WEF could not hide its love of drastic, life-destroying lockdowns. In fact, it released a video surrealistically called “Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world”. Here’s this piece of complete insanity.

The video states “Lockdowns significantly reduced human activity … leading to Earth’s quietest period in decades,” while showing dystopian images of empty cities and planes stuck on the ground.

Completely ignoring the immense human suffering caused by these lockdowns, the WEF considered it was all worth it because “carbon emissions were down 7% in 2020”.

When this thing was first posted, it garnered intense backlash. So the WEF deleted the video above and posted this tweet

As you can see, despite deleting the video, the WEF kept praising lockdowns. That’s because the WEF would love to see “covidian” life become permanent.

5. “Take a Peek at the Future”

Judging by comments on YouTube and social media, people absolutely hate videos created by the WEF. But they keep coming. Because they don’t care what you think. They just want to plant their seed of insanity into your mind. In a video titled “How our lives could soon look”, the WEF invites viewers to “take a peek at the future”. And it is BLEAK. It is all about making COVID life permanent. World Economic Forum on Twitter: "This is how our lives could soon look."

The video is filled with masked people, purell dispensers, and QR codes. This is the future they want. Then, there’s this nugget of insanity.

No. Go away.

The video proudly says:

“NASA has invented a system that can ID you from your heartbeat using a laser.”

As if that wasn’t enough, the video shows children stuck at home and being schooled through screens. The video ends by showing people wearing masks outside, like crazy people

6. Pushing For a Great Reset

As stated above, the WEF perceives the pandemic as an “opportunity”. It is not only an opportunity to reshape our personal existence but to restructure the entire world structure according to its principles. The WEF calls it “the Great Reset”. To promote this Reset (that absolutely nobody wants) the WEF released a propaganda video (it really fits the definition of “propaganda”). Here it is in all of its insanity.

This short video manages to contain an incredible amount of subversive messages. It even ridiculizes “conspiracy theories” while, astoundingly, confirming these theories.

A screenshot from the video. Are you serious?

The video also announced the “death of capitalism”.

Another surreal screenshot from the video.

While capitalism is based on a self-regulating system of offer and demand, the Great Reset looks to redefine the way businesses are evaluated through new parameters. The main one: Compliance with the elite’s social and political agendas.

Towards the end, the narrator utters this enigmatic sentence:

“And that’s all about getting the right people in the right place at the right time”.

While the video doesn’t quite explain what this sentence actually means in real-life situations, its implications are rather chilling. Instead of allowing successful individuals and businesses to grow organically, the elite’s system would interfere to “get the right people at the right place at the right time”, in accordance with its agenda. In other words, the system would be rigged and compliance with a wider agenda would be mandatory in a new economy.

The video ends with a call to viewers to get involved. However, of course, you’re not actually invited to the WEF. In fact, they’re actually looking to “recalibrate” your freedom of speech.

7. “Recalibrating” freedom of speech

An easy way to identify world leaders who are groomed by the WEF is through their incessant railing against free speech. They absolutely hate it and they’re constantly calling for the internet to be censored and highly regulated. At the 2022 Davos meeting, Australian “eSafety commissioner” Julie Inman Grant stated that we need a “recalibration of free speech”.

Grant said:

“We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.”

Here, Grant essentially calls for censorship. She even believes that freedom of speech as a human right should be “recalibrated” using “online violence” as an excuse. There is no such thing as “online violence”. They love to equate speech with violence. It is an extremely manipulative way of justifying China-style censorship.

Free speech is, in fact, binary. Either it exists or it doesn’t. And they clearly don’t want it to exist.

8. Tracking Your Clothes

The WEF wants to control your clothes. And they’ve made a video about it. Did I mention that people absolutely hate WEF videos? Here’s another one that got people’s blood boiling.

Using the environment as an excuse (as usual), the WEF announced the coming of clothing laced with “digital passports” that can be traced at all times. Backed by Microsoft (of course).

They really want RFID chips and QR codes everywhere.

According to the WEF, these chips will allow fashion brands to resell their clothes. I have no idea how that would work. The video makes sure NOT to mention that this technology would be a great way of tracking those who ditched their smartphones.

But ditching your smartphone might become … impossible.

9. “Smartphones will be in your body by 2030”

At the 2022 Davos meeting, Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark claimed that, by 2030, “smartphones will be implanted directly into the body.” This would coincide with the coming of 6G technology, which is expected to be launched by the end of the decade.

For years, this site has been documenting the elite’s incessant push for transhumanism, which is the merging of humans with machines. They’re looking to accelerate this transition by making things people cannot live without (such as smartphones) available in transhumanist form.

Are you noticing their creepy eagerness to insert things inside our bodies?

Subscribe now

10. “You’ll Own Nothing. And You’ll Be Happy.”

This is probably the most dystopian moment in WEF history. In 2016, Ida Auken, a Member of Parliament in Denmark said:

“Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better”.

The WEF loved that quote so much that it tweeted about it.

The WEF also created a video (that everybody absolutely hated) titled “8 Predictions for the World in 2030”.

The WEF loves to phrase its “predictions” in a non-conditional form, as if they’re an inevitability. But look at this smiling guy. He’s clearly happy. Thank you WEF!

An article on the WEF’s website explains:

“I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes,” writes Danish MP Ida Auken. Shopping is a distant memory in the city of 2030, whose inhabitants have cracked clean energy and borrow what they need on demand. It sounds utopian, until she mentions that her every move is tracked and outside the city live swathes of discontents, the ultimate vision of a society split in two.

In this dystopian future, there are no products you can own. Only “services” that are rented and delivered using drones. This system would make all humans completely dependent on WEF-controlled corporations for every single basic need. There would be absolutely no autonomy, no freedom, and no privacy. And you’ll be happy.

Honorable Mention: Individual carbon footprint tracker

At the 2022 Davos meeting, Alibaba Group president J. Michael Evans announced the development of an “individual carbon tracker”.

Once again, the WEF uses the environment to promote the micro-management of human behavior. Evans says that the tracker can monitor “where they’re traveling, how they’re traveling, what are they’re eating and what are they consuming on the platform”.

Notice that he used the pronoun “they” and not “we” because there is no way in hell he’s going to use that thing. Me neither.

In Conclusion

Upon reviewing this list, two common themes become obvious. The first theme is “penetration”. The WEF wants to penetrate governments using “Global Leaders” (aka Manchurian candidates). It also wants to penetrate our bodies through pills, microchips, and vaccines. It also wants to penetrate our minds using soundwaves, censorship, and propaganda.

The other theme is “control”. They want to control what we think, where we go, what we say, what we eat, and what we wear.

Do you know who agrees with the WEF? China. Censorship is widespread, a social credit system controls people’s behaviors and COVID is still used as an excuse for massive lockdowns and total population control. Not to mention the literal concentration camps. Despite all of this, Chinese officials are constantly present at WEF meetings. Why? Because China is basically a laboratory for the WEF’s policies.

With all of that being said, how can we counteract the WEF’s insanity? How can we vote them out if they were never voted in? A first step would be to elect – at all levels of government – representatives that want nothing to do with the WEF. If our elected officials treated the WEF as the rogue, illegitimate organization that it is, its influence would be greatly reduced.

Second, we can boycott every company that is part of the WEF. I realize this is easier said than done because many of these companies are virtual monopolies. However, if we stop giving them our money, they’ll stop using our money to poison our lives.

Then, they’ll own nothing. And we’ll all be happy.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

To help speed up your orientation and understanding of what’s explained in the paper, I’ll give the reader a brief overview of how the system works first and will later add a parts list, telling you where you can obtain the needed parts. I realize that it’s easy for those with a background in electronics to build the controller circuit, but not so easy for non techies. With that in mind, I’ll probably assemble a ready made kit which will include the controller circuit, and perhaps the reaction chamber, the dash gauges, etc. to simplify running around on your part. If you have the ability and time though, the necessary info is included in this paper to assemble everything yourself.

Introduction & Overview

This WaterFuel system is adapted to an ordinary internal combustion engine found in most cars. Rather than use vaporized gasoline as the fuel, this system uses a hydrogen/oxygen gas mixture (along with some water vapor) which is ignited in the engine’s combustion chamber in the same way that gasoline vapor is ignited. According to this paper, water stores more latent energy than gasoline, so you can get expect better performance, better mileage, and zero pollution using water as a fuel. It is not necessary to dismantle your car’s existing gasoline fuel system. You can leave everything in place and use your gasoline when and if you find it necessary. The parts required to build this WaterFuel system are not very expensive and can be readily obtained from off the shelf suppliers.

Overview

Since you are now using water as a fuel, you need a Water Tank to hold it and enough tubing to deliver it to the Reaction Chamber located under the hood (bonnet for Aussie, UK readers). The Reaction Chamber contains two stainless steel cylinders, one nested inside the other. The gap between these two cylinders must be between 1-5 mm, with a 1 mm gap producing the best results. These two cylinders are functioning as two electrodes which “vibrate” under the influence of the electronic pulse signal coming from the Controller. The particular frequency and special shape of this electronic pulse will break the water down into hydrogen and oxygen gases. The gas mixture is then delivered to the carburetor where it enters the combustion chamber within the cylinder and explodes just like gasoline.

You need a few Monitoring Gauges mounted to the dashboard area of your car to tell you

1. the level of water in the Water Tank and

2. the level of water in your Reaction Chamber. You need another gauge to tell you

3. the temperature of the cylinder heads and you should have a dash gauge to tell you

4. the pressure inside the Reaction Chamber.

You’ll need to install a variable control device (10 k ohm potentiometer) to the existing accelerator pedal or install a second accelerator pedal for this control mechanism. This accelerator control is connected to the Controller box and allows you to vary the width of the pulse going to the stainless steel electrodes inside the Reaction Chamber. By ‘widening’ the width of the electronic pulse, the electrodes can produce more hydrogen/oxygen gas which in turn will allow the car to go faster when the accelerator pedal is pushed down. To start the process, you need an on/off switch mounted on the dash to send battery power to the Controller to start the Reaction Chamber producing the hydrogen/oxygen gas mixture. Once the gas pressure inside the Reaction Chamber gets up to 30 pounds per square inch, you can turn on the ignition key and crank the engine to start it.

For safety, you need to install a safety relief valve in the Reaction Chamber in case the pressure within the chamber exceeds the upper specified limit of 75 pounds per square inch (psi.). To prevent rusting, the cylinders, the piston heads, the exhaust system piping, and the valves need to made rust proof. You replace the existing valves and the existing exhaust system with stainless steel and coat the inside of the cylinders and the piston heads with ceramic to prevent the water vapor from rusting the iron. To prevent a flashback explosion in the Reaction Chamber from the carb/intake manifold/cylinder combustion area, you need a Flashback Arrestor made of copper mesh connected to the flexible stainless steel tubing going from the Reaction Chamber into the carburetor .

If your engine develops knock, you can install an optional donut shaped stainless steel coil around the electrode cylinders inside the Reaction Chamber along with an extra controller circuit called a Prahydogen Enhancement

That’s about it in a nut shell.

After you read through the paper a couple of times, you’ll see how the system goes together and understand the process with greater clarity. This is a rather easy project to construct, so don’t sit on your hands. You can do it. After building this system for your car, you can also consider other uses for your hydrogen/oxygen gas mixture which you can now produce in unlimited quantities. How about using it for heating water? Or your house? Or run an electric generator? Or your boat’s outboard motor? Get the idea?

The Freedom Reclamation Project

CONVERT YOUR ENGINE TO BURN HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN

VAPOR FROM WATER ON DEMAND + POLLUTION-FREE

ZPV: ZERO POLLUTON VEHICLE

VIRTUALLY FREE ENERGY

FREEDOM FROM GA$OLINE

SIMPLE AND INEXPENSIVE CONVERSION

ON DEMAND’ VAPOR RATE (i.e. THROTTLE )

EAST TO FOLLOW DO-IT-YOURSELF PLANS

HELP CLEAN THE AIR WHILE YOU SAVE MONEY

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

RUN YOUR CAR / TRUCK / RV / MOTORCYCLE / AIRPLANE (ETC) ON TAP WATER!

Introduction

Are you fed up with ga$oline price$ and THE POLLUTION?

Would you like to do something about it besides complain and wait?

Are you still CHOKING on the whole idea of fossil fuel CON$UMPTION? WHY?

Wouldn’t you like to free yourself from centrally-controlled or imported fuel?

Do you have a 2nd vehicle you don’t use every day?

Now there is something we can actually do about it, as individuals willing to help clean the environment, and travel at lower cost to both you and your environment. Do-it-yourself plans allow the individual (that’s you and me, folks) to make a difference.

This is the easiest and lowest cost way to convert your car to run on (relatively) free energy. Now with existing technology, anyone can stand up and make a difference by reducing the local automotive pollution, eliminate ga$oline expen$e$, help restore our atmosphere, and breathe a little easier. You will be making use of your entire existing system, except the fuel tank and catalytic converter.

The Plan:

Know the Truth and set yourself FREE. Set a good example for the World you choose to create. Exercise your own Free Will. Live cleaner and healthier.

Build and install a low-cost alternative method for running your vehicle (internal combustion) engine on TAP WATER, using off-the-shelf components. This is simply an efficient way to convert ordinary tap water into gaseous Hydrogen and Oxygen, and then burn these vapours in the engine, instead of that $melly, $tinky, expen$ive ‘other $tuff.

This ‘minisystem’ runs easily from your existing battery and electrical system, and it plugs into your carburetor with simple off-the-shelf fittings. You will be installing a plastic water tank, a control circuit, a reaction chamber, a hi-pressure carb/FI fitting, and 3 gauges (see Figure 1), and then hooking into your existing carb/FI.

The SIMPLICITY comes from being an ‘on-demand’ system requiring no fancy storage, or plumbing. You crank the gas pedal or throttle and you electrically create more vapour for immediate consumption, on demand; Lo - Hi Flow Rate as needed from idle - max power. The only real change is that you are using tap water as fuel, instead of the traditional petroleum-based fuel. Given, a choice, which way would you choose?

FAQs

Q: Does it really work?

A: Yes; this is well-established technology dating back to stainless steel. But be sure to follow these instructions using the proper mechanical and electrical assembly techniques, as it incorporates the best qualities of several techniques.

Q: How does it qualify as ‘free energy’?

A: If you’re paying someone for the water you use, then it is not strictly ‘free’. But, the alternative is to keep buying into the expen$ive ga$oline and re$ultant hydrocarbon pollution.

Q: ls it Safe?

A: Technically, it is safer than running on fossil fuel, because you are no longer choking on your own emissions (health-wise), but in general it is practically as safe as your current gasoline arrangement. You will be installing a few simple safety devices, using current automotive standards.

Q: What kind of performance can I expect?

A: Properly adjusted, your modified vapour-only fuel system will run cooler, and at a modestly higher power level. The mileage performance expected from this design ranges from 50-300 mpg, depending on your adjusting skills.

Q: Can I do the modification myself?

A: Why not? If you know someone with basic mechanical and/or electrical skills, you can even delegate some of the construction. If you are using a fuel-injected engine, you may have to get a mechanic’s opinion.

0: What is the environmental impact that my vehicle will have?

A: It will be producing H20 steam and unburnt 02, hence it will be cleaning the environment, rather than dumping nauseous toxins into it. Plus you will be helping to save our dwindling supply of atmospheric oxygen. Any excess vapour in the reaction becomes either steam or oxygen. You can also expect to be receiving more than casual interest from those around you.

Q: Is this really a steam engine?

A: No; really. Exceedingly hi temp & pressure are not used. This is strictly an internal combustion engine (burning orthohydrogen) with residual steam in the exhaust as a by product.

0. Gasoline as a fuel is NOT NECESSARY; it is optional.

1. ORIGIN - In the 19th century, the gasoline portion of the refining process, was first considered to be a ‘waste’ product of extracting the purified crude oil. Later on, it was discovered that it could be $old as fuel, instead of just dumping it back in the hole as had been the tradition.

2. CONSUMPTION RATE - The gasoline consumption rate for every mass-produced car has been carefully ‘designed in’ as a market asset. As an indication, simply observe how quickly and closely ALL the local different gas stations adjust their prices. Even the hybrid cars which use electric motors still consume a designed amount of gasoline, and their price tags are prohibitively high.

3. EFFICIENCY - There is a lot of thermochemical energy in gasoline, but there is even more energy in water. The DOE has quoted about 40%, 50 it is probably much more than that. Most people are unaware that ‘internal combustion’ is DEFINED as: a thermo-vapour process; as in ‘no liquid in the reaction’; AND most of the gasoline in a standard internal combustion engine, is ACTUALLY CONSUMED cooked and finally broken down) IN THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER, which happens AFTER the fuel has been not-so-burnt in the engine. Sadly, this means that most of the fuel we use in this way, is used only to cool down the combustion process, rather than using a cleaner and more efficient means to do so.

4. ADDITIVES - Also sadly, we are told by ‘authorities’ that some of the many gasoline additives are in the mix to increase performance; but because of its current overly-complex molecular structure, the real built-in function of the gasoline formula is to slow down the combustion so that only so much is actually consumed in the cylinder, and the liquid balance goes to the catalytic converter. As a further insult, the additives are also there to clog and prevent the use of the Pogue-style carburetors, designed to get 200-300 mpg.

5. PROFIT- Of course the oil companies are making a huge profit. It is by design. What do you suppose the Gulf War was about? Just look at where the crude oil comes from and where the money is flowing. Rest assured that the oil companies do NOT want you to know how to make use of this water-fuel technology. They have been making money on our ignorance, dis-empowerment, and willingness to follow along in a mindless ‘comfort-zone’ of toxic waste, suppression, resentment, and apathy: WHO NEEDS IT?

Let us proceed to set a good example and do it right, do it clean.

Exceedingly simple. Water is pumped as needed to replenish and maintain the liquid level in the chamber. The electrodes are vibrated with a 0.5-SA electrical pulse which breaks 2(H20) ---> 2H2 + 02. When the pressure reaches say 30-60 psi, you turn the key and go. You step on the pedal, you send more energy to the electrodes, and thus more vapour to the cylinders; i.e. fuel vapour on demand. You set the idle -max flow rate to get the most efficient use of power, and you’re off to the races.

In the BIG picture, your Free Energy is coming from the tap water, in an open system, as the latent energy in the water is enough to power the engine, and hence drive the alternator and whatever belt-driven accessories; AND the alternator is efficient enough to run the various electrical loads (10-20 amps), including the additional low current to run this vapour reaction. No extra batteries are required.

Step-by-Step Construction

Overview- Here is the suggested sequence of steps:

0. Install the CHT (or EGT) gauge and measure your current operating temp range (gasoline), for comparison.

1. Build & test the controller to verify the correct pulse output.

2. Build the reaction chamber & test it w. the controller (i.e pressure out).

3. Install the tank, controller, chamber, and pressure fittings.

4. Run engine & Adjust the control circuit as necessary for best performance.

5. Install the stainless steel valves and get the pistons/cylinders coated with ceramic.

6. Coat the exhaust system with ceramic without the catalytic converter OR let it rust out and replace the whole dang thang with stainless steel pipe sections.

You Will Need

- plastic water tank with pump and level sensor.

- control circuit, wiring, connectors, and epoxy.

- reaction chamber with electrodes and fittings.

- 3/8” stainless steel flex-tubing, fittings and clamps.

- carb/FI vapor-pressure fitting kit. - pressure, CHT (or EGT), & level gauges.

- stainless steel valves.

- copper mesh junction.

- ceramic surface treatment for cylinders & pistons.

- stainless steel or ceramic treated exhaust assembly.

Basics tools

- drill, screwdriver and pliers

- hole cutter

- wire-wrap, solder-iron and clippers

- DVM and oscilloscope.

Reaction Chamber

Construct as shown in Figure 2. Use a section of 4” PVC waste pipe with a threaded screw-cap fitting on one end and a standard end-cap at the other.

Make sure to drill-and-epoxy or tap threads through the PVC components for all fittings. Set and control the water level in the chamber so that it well submerses the pipe electrodes; yet leave some headroom to build up the hydrogen/oxygen vapour pressure. Use stainless steel wires inside the chamber or otherwise use a protective coating; use insulated wires outside. Ensure that the epoxy perfects the seal, or otherwise lay down a bead of water-proof silicone that can hold pressure.

The screw fitting may require soft silicone sealant, or a gasket; its purpose is to hold pressure and allow periodic inspection of the electrodes. No leaks, no problems. Make sure you get a symmetric 1-5mm gap between the 2 stainless steel pipes. The referenced literature suggests that the closer to 1mm you get, the better. You WILL want to get your chamber level sensor verified BEFORE you epoxy the cap on.

Make your solder connections at the wire/electrode junctions nice, smooth, and solid; then apply a water-proof coating, e.g. the epoxy you use for joining the pipes to the screw cap.

This epoxy must be water-proof and be capable of holding metal to plastic under pressure.

You WILL want to get your chamber level sensor verified BEFORE you epoxy the cap on.

Control Circuit

Figures 3 & 4 show a simple circuit to control and drive this mini-system. You are going to make a ‘square-pulse’ signal that ‘plays’ the electrodes like a tuning fork; which you can watch on an oscilloscope. The premise given by the literature is:

The faster you want do go down the road, the ‘fatter’ you make the pulses going into the reaction chamber. Duty cycle will vary with the throttle in the vicinity of

90% MARK 10% SPACE (OFF/ON).

There is nothing sacred about how the pulse waveform is generated; there are many ways to generate pulses, and the attached diagrams show a few. Figure 4 gives the NE555-circuit approach from the referenced patent. The output switching transistor must be rated for

1-5 amps @ I2VDC(in saturation).

Go with a plan that works for you or your friendly neighborhood technoid or mechanic, and go get all the circuit elements from your local electronics store, such as Radio-Shack or Circuits-R-Us, including the circuit board, IC sockets, and enclosure/box.

DigiKey has better selection, service, and knowledge; plus they have no minimum order crap. Be sure to use a circuit board with a built-in ground plane, and to accommodate room for mounting 2 or 3 of the gauges. Mounting the reaction chamber in the engine compartment will require running a stub to your pressure gauge where you can watch it.

You can easily make 30-gauge wire-wrap connections between the socket pins and through-hole discrete components having wire leads. Also make sure to get spec sheets on any IC you use. More details of the best circuits to use will be announced pending prototype testing. You WILL want to get your chamber level sensor verified BEFORE you epoxy the cap on.

Subscribe now

Throttle Control.

If you have a throttle position sensor, you should be able to access the signal from the sensor itself OR from the computer connector. This signal is input to the circuit as the primary control (i.e. throttle level pulse width = vapour rate).

If you don’t have such a signal available, you will have to rig a rotary POT (variable resistor) to the gas linkage (i.e. coupled to something at the gas pedal or throttle cable running to the carb or Fl. If you make the attachment at the cart/Fl, be sure to use a POT that can handle the engine temp cycles. Don’t use a cheezy-cheapy POT; get one rated for long life and mechanical wear; mount it securely to something sturdy and stationary that will not fall apart when you step on the gas.

Control Range.

The full throttle RANGE (idle-max) MUST control the vapour rate, i.e. pulse-width (duty). The resistor values at the throttle signal must allow the throttle signal voltage, say 1-4 Volt swing, to drive the VAPOR RATE. You will be using this voltage swing to generate a 10% ON ‘square’ pulse.

The patent implies using a ‘resonant’ pulse in the 10-250 KHz frequency range; but it is not explicitly stated so. In this circuit, you will simply tune to whatever frequency makes the most efficient vapour conversion. You will have to get into the specs for each IC you use, to insure you connect the right pins to the right wires, to control the frequency and pulse width.

You can use spare sockets to try out different discrete component values. Just keep the ones that are spec-compatible in the circuit, and get the job done.

You crank up the throttle signal and put more electrical energy (fatter pulses) into the electrodes; verify you can get 10% duty on the scope (2 - 100 usec on the horizontal time-base). Your averaging DVM will display the 90%-I 0% DC voltage across the output transistor (Vce or Vds or Output to Ground). Set and connect DVM in the supply current and measure .5 - 5 amps, without blowing the DVM fuse. Now verify that you got everything you wanted.

Verify your wiring connections using your DVM as a continuity detector. Check your wiring 1 at a time and yellow line your final schematic as you go. You can best use board-mount miniature POTs for anything you want to set-and-forget. The LEDs are there to give you a quick visual check of normal vs abnormal operation of your new creation. You WILL want to get your chamber level sensor verified BEFORE you epoxy the cap on (see Figures 2 & 4).

CARB/FI CONNECTION –

Figure 2 also shows that fittings are required to the carb/FI I. There are ready-made kits (such as by Impco) available for making your pressure fittings to the carburetor or fuel-injector as the case may be. You will necessarily be sealing the built in vents and making a 1-way air-intake.

The copper mesh comprises the inadvertent backfire’ protection for the reaction chamber. Make sure that all vapor/duct junctions are air-tight and holding full pressure without leakage. Your new ‘system’ is considered successful and properly adjusted when you get the full power range at lower temp and minimum vapor flow without blowing the pressure safety valve.

CHT (or EGT)- Monitor your engine temp with the CHT (cylinder head temp) or EGT (exhaust gas temp) instead of your original engine temp indicator (if any). Your existing gauge is TOO SLOW for this application and will not warn you against overheating until after you have burnt something.

Make sure that your engine RUNS NO HOTTER than in the gasoline arrangement. VDO makes a CHT gauge with a platinum sensor that fits under your spark plug against the cylinder head (make sure it is REAL CLEAN before you reinstall your spark plug (as this is also an electrical ground).

ENGINE/EXHAUST TREATMENT –

Get the valves replaced with stainless steel ones AND get the pistons/cylinders ceramic-treated ASAP when you have successfully converted and run your new creation. Do not delay as these items WILL RUST, either by sheer use or by neglect (i.e. letting it sit). You could make max use of your current exhaust system by using it with your new deal until it rusts through, then have your mechanic or welder friend to fit a stainless steel exhaust pipe (no catalytic converter is required). But it could be ea$ier to send your existing exhaust system out for the ceramic treatment, and then simply re-attach it to the exhaust ports.

GENERAL

1. Do not discard or remove any of the old gasoline set up components, e.g. tank, carb/FI, catalytic converter, unless necessary. Better to always leave an easy way to revert back to something that at least runs, just in case. Some people are leaving their gasoline set up completely intact, and switching back and forth at will, just to have a backup plan.

2. Set your throttle circuit so that you get minimum vapour flow at IDLE, and maximum vapour flow at FULL POWER without blowing the pressure relief valve. In this way, you control how ‘lean’ your mixture is by the strength of the pulse (i.e. ‘fatness’ at the optimum pulse frequency).

3. If you just don’t get enough power (at any throttle setting), it means that you need to (1) change the pulse frequency, (2) change the gap between the electrodes, (3) change the size (bigger) electrodes, OR (4) make a higher output pulse voltage (last resort). Always use an output transistor, such as a MOSFET, that is rated for the voltage and current you need to get the job done. OK so you might have to play around with it some. Isn’t that where all the Fun is anyhow?

4. If you get ANY engine knock our loud combustions (not compensated by adjusting the timing), it means that you need to install an additional coil in the chamber, and drive the coil with an additional pulse signal (about 19 Hz on the .lsec time base) (see Figure 5).

Here,you will be slowing down the burn rate just enough so that the vapours burn throughout the power stroke of the piston. Be sure to include a board-mount POT to set the correct strength of this 2nd pulse signal into the coil. This is a stainless steel coil of about 1500 turns (thin wire) that you can arrange like a donut around the center pipe (but NOT touching either electrode), directly over the circular 1-5mm gap. You want NO KNOCKING at any power/throttle setting; smooth power only, but also no excess hydrogen leftover from the combustion.

5. Build the canister(s) as tall as you can without compromising your ability to mount them conveniently near the dash panel, or in the engine compartment, as the case may be. This way, you can always make the electrodes bigger, if necessary without undue hardship. Remember that anything in the engine compartment should be mounted in a bullet-proof, vibration and temperature tolerant fashion.

6. If you have to drill a through-hole for wiring or plumbing through metal, make sure to also install a grommet for protection against chafing. Always watch your chamber pressure range from

IDLE (15-25 psi) - FULL POWER (30-60 psi). Set your safety-pressure relief-valve to 75 psi and make sure it’s rated for much higher.

7. Shut OFF the power switch and pull over if there is any MALFUNCTION of the system. Your engine will last longest when it still develops FULL POWER+ at some minimum temperature that we are sure you can find, by leaning back the Royal Vapour Flow and/or by making use of the water-vapour cooling technique (see Figure 7). Keep good mpg performance records, and periodic maintenance/inspection. Keep it clean; save some money; clean the air; heal the planet; happy motoring; tell a friend; enjoy your freedom and self-empowerment; haul ass.

8. There lacks documented material for perfecting this vapour system through a fuel injector; there may be some details you will discover on your own as working prototypes progress. For example, you may be restricted to inject the hydrogen/oxygen vapour WITHOUT ANY water vapour, as it may rust the injectors. If engine temp and CHT is a problem, then you will want to re-think your plan, e.g. ceramic-coating the injectors. There is always ‘replacing the Fl system with a Carb’.

9. If you install the water-vapour system (for lower operating temp/stress), you will want to lean the mixture (vapour/air) for minimum vapour flow rate to achieve any given throttle position (idle - max). Make sure that you get a minimum flow for IDLE an a modestly sufficient flow for MAX, that does the cooling job without killing the combustion.

10. If you cannot find stainless steel pipe combinations that yield the 1-5mm gap, you can always regress back to alternating plates of +/- electrodes.

11. If you are concerned about the water freezing in your system, you can (a) add some 98% isopropyl alcohol and re-adjust the pulse frequency accordingly; or (b) install some electric heating coils.

12. Do not let ANYONE ever compromise your dream, your freedom, your independence, your truth.

References

1. Stephen Chambers ‘Apparatus for Producing Orthohydrogen and/or Parahydrogen’ US Patent 6126794, uspto.gov

2. Stanley Meyer ‘Method for the Production of a Fuel Gas’ US Patent 4936961, uspto. gov

3. Creative Science & Research, ‘Fuel From Water’, fuelless.com

4. Carl Celia ‘A Water-Fuelled Car’ Nexus Magazine Oct-Nov 1996

5. Peter Lindemann ‘Where in the World is All the Free Energy’, free-energy.cc

6. George Wiseman ‘The Gas-Saver and HyCO Series’ eagle-research.com

7. C. Michael Holler ‘The Dromedary Newsletter’ and ‘SuperCarb Techniques’

8. Stephen Chambers ‘Prototype Vapor Fuel System’, xogen.com

Disclaimer: The author of this document assumes no liability for the use or misuse if this information, which is made available as public-domain information, for the purposes of education, ecology, health, well-being, freedom, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

Often, the criticism of vintage ads focuses on their inherent sexism, racism, or other displays of social prejudices, which we find laughable today, despite their continued presence. But what about ads that steered consumers into dangerous territory, espousing outmoded scientific evidence or misleading half-truths to convince people that appallingly toxic products, or even deadly ones, were actually good for them?

While some faulty campaigns were merely the victims of evolving scientific knowledge, many blatantly ignored facts in their race for the dollar, using so-called experts to promote products terrible for public health, like cigarettes. Revered professionals like doctors and scientists routinely told us precisely the wrong things to do, as they are likely still doing today.

We may take comfort in feeling we’re far beyond the bad old days of deceptive advertising, but our current obesity epidemic suggests exactly the opposite: We’ve simply traded effects like lung cancer and emphysema for diabetes and heart disease.

So here’s a look back at 10 colossally painful advertisements, which make you wonder: What modern “health” products – vitamin water, granola bars, acai berry supplements – might look a little more evil in the future?

1. Junk Food, Now Fortified with Vitamins and Minerals

Disguising empty calories with healthful nutritional values has been a trope of the processed food world ever since vitamins were first discovered in the 1910s. This 1942 poster for “Vitamin Donuts” may be a little hard to swallow today, but Ovaltine’s reputation as a health drink is still being disputed, a powerful testament to simple brand positioning. But let’s be real, we’re talking about powdered chocolate milk made by Nestlé, the company who brought us such healthy foods as Butterfinger candy bars and Häagen-Dazs ice cream.

The Ovaltine ad from 1947 still boggles the mind with its display of so many nutritional perks packed into two glasses of powdered milk, and seems eerily similar to the many supposed benefits contained in drinks like Vitamin Water or Gatorade. In reality, even the benefits of ordinary vitamin supplements are now being questioned, despite the fact that around half of American adults take them regularly.

2. Let Them Eat Lead

The most heartbreaking part of this 1923 brochure is its emphasis on kids having fun with the whole “Lead Family” of products, whose presence in everything from their nursery walls to their windup toys made young children particularly susceptible to its dangers. Combined with lead paint’s seductively sweet flavor, putting kids in environments literally covered with the stuff was a recipe for disaster.

In fact, the effects of lead poisoning (brain damage, seizures, hypertension, etc.) were known long before the Consumer Product Safety Commission finally banned them in 1977; the industry had simply refused to acknowledge them. An article by Jack Lewis published in the EPA Journal in 1985 covers lead’s history as an additive and poison, and how we’ve consistently downplayed its adverse effects. Lewis writes:

“The Romans were aware that lead could cause serious health problems, even madness and death. However, they were so fond of its diverse uses that they minimized the hazards it posed. Romans of yesteryear, like Americans of today, equated limited exposure to lead with limited risk.”

3. 7-Up is for Babies

Not only were sugary soft-drinks great for adults, but sodas like 7-Up used to help babies grow up strong and fit, or so these ads from 1955 and 1953 would have you believe. That’s pretty disturbing, considering that childhood obesity, linked arm-in-arm with massive soda intake, is shortening our youngest generation’s lifespan. The high amount of refined sugar in soda has also been shown to be particularly harmful for children.

Today it seems crazy to show a baby drinking a soda, as the tide finally turns against the sugary drinks: School districts across the nation have removed soda machines from their schools and New York City’s Board of Health has proposed a ban on over-sized sodas. However, many adults today opt to serve kids “healthy” fruit juice, which may be just as bad, despite its deceptive nutritional marketing.

4. Cigarettes: Just What the Doctor Ordered

Camel’s campaign featuring doctor endorsements is probably the most familiar instance of false advertising, seen here in an ad from 1948. Yet almost every cigarette company twisted science to support its products, including Chesterfield’s 1953 ads, which rephrased expert findings to show that smoking had “no adverse effect.” Long after 1950, when Morton Levin published his definitive study linking smoking to lung cancer, experts continued to imply that there were other factors causing cancer and lung disease.

Though the industry has been seriously weakened over the past 20 years, primarily by government regulation, Big Tobacco is still issuing misleading health information in an attempt to reap a profit.

5. Feminine Hygiene: The Original Home Wrecker

Long before Lysol was reinvented as the caustic household cleaner we know today, the same substance was basically promoted for use as a feminine hygiene product. These Lysol ads from 1948 tout the internal use of poisonous Lysol as a marriage saver. To sum up the message: if you weren’t so dirty down there, he would love you more.

In a time when speaking about sex was even more frowned upon than today, a whole spectrum of sexual products, including vibrators and contraceptives, was marketed with campaigns focusing on their dubious health benefits for women.

6. Plastics, Plastics, Everywhere

Suffocating babies in Cellophane! A bunch of infants tied up in clear cellophane packaging is pretty frightening to modern viewers, but at the time, these ads were just plain cute. When these Du Pont Cellophane ads came out in 1954, things like plastic grocery bags weren’t a ubiquitous part of American culture. Only after plastic bags became widespread during the 1970s did their strangulating qualities become frighteningly clear.

7. Dieting? Try Sugar

In a time before the current widespread obesity epidemic, sugar companies wanted shoppers to believe that a sweet treat would somehow inspire you to eat less. These ads from 1969 coach readers to “have a soft drink before your main meal” or “snack on some candy an hour before lunch.” Their strange logic isn’t even backed by a company name, though the campaign does include a helpful mailing address for “Sugar Information.” Talk about creepy.

Now refined sugar is presented as the dieter’s enemy, and is thought to make you want to eat more rather than less.

8. Shock Your Way to Physical Perfection

In 1922, “Violet Rays” were said to cure pretty much anything that ailed you. This Vi-Rex device plugged into a light socket so users could give themselves home shock-treatments, which would supposedly make you “vital, compelling, and magnetic.” Various recalls and lawsuits erupted throughout the U.S., forcing the FDA to finally prohibit their manufacture. The last batch of Violet Ray products was seized in 1951.

Just Google “light therapy” to find a range of new infrared devices whose claims to prevent everything from aging to anxiety sound pretty darn familiar.

9. DDT For You and Me

This ad for “Penn Salt Chemicals” from 1947 shows a range of dangerous applications for now-illegal DDT, from agricultural sprays to household pesticides. Particularly disturbing is the image of a mother and infant, above the caption stating that DDT “helps make healthier, more comfortable homes.” Not quite.

While effective in eliminating dangerous mosquitoes that carry malaria, DDT also has a variety of hazardous effects: Especially among young children, the chemical has been shown to damage the nervous, immune, endocrine, and neurological systems, not to mention its devastating influence on the natural environment. The spread of DDT across mid-century America is mirrored today by the success of Monsanto (one of the companies that originally manufactured DDT) in placing its genetically modified products on store shelves before researchers have a full understanding of their larger ecological impacts.

The Solution: Developing a Modern Bullshit Detector

If history tells us anything, it’s that we cannot wait for a “Banned” stamp to tell us what’s killing us. By the time the 7-Up babies of the 1950s grew up, the damage was already done. The solution isn’t more regulation—which is often just a game of catch-up played by bureaucrats and lobbyists—it’s a fundamental shift in how we consume “truth.”

Stop Trusting the “Expert” Shield

We have to stop falling for the white lab coat. In 1948, it was a doctor recommending Camels; today, it’s a “wellness influencer” or a paid researcher touting a proprietary “superfood” study funded by the very company selling the supplement. Rule one: Follow the money. If a health claim feels too miraculous to be true, look at who paid for the clinical trial. Real science rarely comes with a sleek marketing department and a pre-order link.

The “Grandmother” Litmus Test

Marketing thrives on complexity. They use terms like “bio-available,” “electrolyte-infused,” and “antioxidant-rich” to distract us from the fact that we’re often just buying flavored sugar water or processed sludge. A simple way to cut through the noise? If the ingredient list looks like a chemistry final and the product didn’t exist 100 years ago, treat it with the same suspicion you’d reserve for a 1920s radioactive “vitality” tonic.

Demand Transparency, Not Just Labels

We need to move beyond reading the front of the box. The “Front-of-Package” (FOP) labeling system is currently a battleground where companies fight to hide high sugar content behind “natural” descriptors.

• Support Radical Disclosure: Align with movements that demand clear, “Traffic Light” labeling (Red, Yellow, Green) for fats and sugars, which has already seen success in countries like Chile and the UK, reducing sugary drink consumption by upwards of 25% in some regions.

• Boycott the Obfuscators: If a company spends millions lobbying against GMO labeling or sugar taxes, they are telling you exactly how much they value your health.

Reclaiming the “Lived Experience”

Ultimately, we have to stop outsourcing our common sense to the advertising industry. We’ve been conditioned to think we need a product to fix a problem that the industry created in the first place. Before you buy the next “miracle” infrared wand or the “vitamin-fortified” snack bar, ask yourself: Is this actually making me healthier, or am I just the latest target in a century-old race for the dollar?

The “Lead Family” isn’t gone; they’ve just rebranded. The only way to stay safe is to stop buying the pitch.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Courtesy: collectorsweekly.com

Oil. From farm to pharmaceutical, diesel truck to dinner plate, pipeline to plastic product, it is impossible to think of an area of our modern-day lives that is not affected by the petrochemical industry. The story of oil is the story of the modern world.

Parts of that story are well-known: Rockefeller and Standard Oil; the internal combustion engine and the transformation of global transport; the House of Saud and the oil wars in the Middle East. Other parts are more obscure: the quest for oil and the outbreak of World War I; the petrochemical interests behind modern medicine; the Big Oil money behind the “Green Revolution” and the “Gene Revolution.”

But that story, properly told, begins somewhere unexpected. Not in Pennsylvania with the first commercial drilling operation and the first oil boom, but in the rural backwoods of early 19th century New York state. And it doesn’t start with crude oil or its derivatives, but a different product altogether: snake oil.

“Dr. Bill Livingston, Celebrated Cancer Specialist” was the very image of the traveling snake oil salesman. He was neither a doctor, nor a cancer specialist; his real name was not even Livingston. More to the point, the “Rock Oil” tonic he pawned was a useless mixture of laxative and petroleum and had no effect whatsoever on the cancer of the poor townsfolk he conned into buying it.

He lived the life of a vagabond, always on the run from the last group of people he had fooled, engaged in ever more outrageous deceptions to make sure that the past wouldn’t catch up with him. He abandoned his first wife and their six children to start a bigamous marriage in Canada at the same time as he fathered two more children by a third woman. He adopted the name “Livingston” after he was indicted for raping a girl in Cayuga in 1849.

When he wasn’t running away from them or disappearing for years at a time, he would teach his children the tricks of his treacherous trade. He once bragged of his parenting technique: “I cheat my boys every chance I get. I want to make ’em sharp.”

A towering man of over six feet and with natural good looks that he used to his advantage, he went by “Big Bill.” Others, less generously, called him “Devil Bill.” But his real name was William Avery Rockefeller, and it was his son, John D. Rockefeller, who would go on to found the Standard Oil monopoly and become the world’s first billionaire.

The world we live in today is the world created in “Devil” Bill’s image. It’s a world founded on treachery, deceit, and the naivety of a public that has never wised up to the parlor tricks that the Rockefellers and their ilk have been using to shape the world for the past century and a half.

This is the story of the oil-igarchy.

(This article is a transcript from the documentary, How Big Oil Conquered The World.)

Part One: Birth of the Oil-igarchy

Titusville, 1857. A most unlikely man alights from a railway car into the midst of this sleepy Western Pennsylvania town on the shores of Oil Creek: “Colonel” Edwin Drake. He’s from the Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company, and he’s here on a mission: to collect oil.

Like “Dr.” Bill, Drake isn’t really a Colonel. The title is bestowed on him by George Bissell and James Townsend, a lawyer and a banker who started the Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company after they discovered they could distill the region’s naturally occurring Seneca oil into lamp oil, or kerosene. Drake is actually an unemployed railroad conductor who talked himself into a job after staying at the same hotel as Bissel the year before. Calling him a Colonel, it is hoped, will help win the respect of the locals.

The locals think he’s crazy anyway. Seneca oil is indeed plentiful, bubbling out of seeps and collecting in the creek, but other than as a cure-all medicine or grease for the local sawmill’s machinery, it’s hardly seen as something valuable. In fact, it can be a downright nuisance, contaminating brine wells that supply Pittsburgh’s booming salt industry.

Still, Drake has a task to complete: finding a way to collect enough oil to make the distillation of Seneca oil into lamp oil profitable. He tries everything he can think of. The Native Americans had historically collected the oil by damming the creek near a seep and skimming the oil off the top. But Drake can only collect six to ten gallons of oil a day this way, even when he opens up extra seeps. He tries digging a shaft, but the groundwater floods in too quickly.

By the summer of 1859 he’s desperate. Drake’s running out of ideas, Bissell and Townsend are running out of patience and, most importantly, the company is running out of funds. He turns to “Uncle” Billy Smith, a Pittsburgh blacksmith who had experience drilling brine wells with steam-powered equipment. They get to work drilling down through the shale bedrock to reach the oil. It’s maddeningly slow work, with the crude equipment struggling to get through three feet of bedrock a day. By August 27th they’ve drilled down 69 and a half feet, Drake has used the last of his funds, and Bissell and his partners have decided to close up the operation.

Then on Sunday, August 28th, 1859, oil bubbled up the drive pipe. Uncle Billy and his son Sam bailed out several buckets of oil. On Monday, the very day that Colonel Drake received his final payment and an order to close down the operation, they hitched the walking beam to a water pump and the oil began to flow. The first oil was to sell for $40 a barrel. Years later a local newspaper interviewed Uncle Billy about the day they struck oil:

“I commenced drilling and at 4:00 I struck the oil. I says to Mr. Drake, ‘Look there! What do you think of this?’ He looked down the pipe and said, ‘What’s that?’ And I said, ‘That is your fortune!’”

Drake’s well proved that by drilling for it, oil could be found in abundance and produced cheaply. Overnight a whole new industry was born. Before long in millions of homes, farms and factories around the world, lamps would be lit with kerosene refined from West Pennsylvania crude.

“When the word came out that Drake had struck oil, the cry went up throughout the narrow valleys of Western Pennsylvania: ‘The crazy Yankee has struck oil! The crazy Yankee has struck oil!’ And it was the first great boom. It was like a gold rush.” ~ Daniel Yergin

Overnight the quiet farming backwoods of rural Pennsylvania was transformed into a bustling oil region, with prospectors leasing up flats, towns springing up from nowhere, and a forest of percussion rigs covering the land. The first oil boom had arrived.

Already poised to make the most of this boom was a young up-and-coming bookkeeper in Cleveland with a head for numbers: John Davison Rockefeller. He had two ambitions in life: to make $100,000 and to live to 100 years old. John D. set off to make his fortune in the late 1850s, armed with a $1000 loan from his father, “Devil” Bill.

Grandfather never finished high school and went to Cleveland having borrowed $1000 from his father to start a business — paid 9% interest on it incidentally. And he read about the oil business just beginning and got interested, and came to realize it was a very volatile business at the time.” ~ David Rockefeller

In 1863, seeing the oil boom and sensing the profits to be made in the fledgling business, Rockefeller formed a partnership with fellow businessman Maurice B. Clark and Samuel Andrews, a chemist who had built an oil refinery but knew little about the business of getting his product to market. In 1865 the shrewd John D. bought out his partners for $72,500 and, with Andrews as partner, launched Rockefeller & Andrews. By 1870, after five years of strategic partnerships and mergers, Rockefeller had incorporated Standard Oil.

The story of the rise of Standard Oil is an oft-told one.

In a move that would transform the American economy, Rockefeller set out to replace a world of independent oilmen with a giant company controlled by him. In 1870, begging bankers for more loans, he formed Standard Oil of Ohio. The next year, he quietly put what he called “our plan” — his campaign to dominate the volatile oil industry — into devastating effect. Rockefeller knew that the refiner with the lowest transportation cost could bring rivals to their knees. He entered into a secret alliance with the railroads called the South Improvement Company. In exchange for large, regular shipments, Rockefeller and his allies secured transport rates far lower than those of their bewildered competitors.

Ida Tarbell, the daughter of an oil man, later remembered how men like her father struggled to make sense of events: “An uneasy rumor began running up and down the Oil Regions,” she wrote. “Freight rates were going up. … Moreover … all members of the South Improvement Company — a company unheard of until now — were exempt. … Nobody waited to find out his neighbor’s opinion. On every lip there was but one word and that was ‘conspiracy.’”

“By 1879, when Rockefeller is 40, he controls 90 percent of the oil refining in the world. Within a few years, he will control 90 percent of the marketing of oil and a third of all of the oil wells. So this very young man controls what is not only a national but an international monopoly in a commodity that is about to become the most important strategic commodity in the world economy.” ~ Ron Chernow, Biographer [Source: The Rockefellers]

By the 1880s, the American oil industry was the Standard Oil Company. And Standard Oil was John D. Rockefeller. But it wasn’t long until a handful of similarly ambitious (and well-connected) families began to emulate the Standard Oil success story in other parts of the globe.

One such competitor emerged from the Caucasus in the 1870s, where Imperial Russia had opened up the vast Caspian Sea oil deposits to private development. Two families quickly combined forces to take advantage of the opportunity: the Nobels, led by Ludwig Nobel and including his dynamite-inventing prize-creating brother Alfred, and the French branch of the infamous Rothschild banking dynasty, led by Alphonse Rothschild.

In 1891, the Rothschilds contracted with M. Samuel & Co., a Far East shipping company headquartered in London and run by Marcus Samuel, to do what had never been done before: ship their Nobel-supplied Caspian oil through the Suez Canal to East Asian markets. The project was immense; it involved not only sophisticated engineering to construct the first oil tankers to be approved by the Suez Canal Company, but the strictest secrecy. If word of the endeavour was to get back to Rockefeller through his international intelligence network it would risk bringing the wrath of Standard Oil, which could afford to cut rates and squeeze them out of the market. In the end they succeeded, and the first bulk tanker, the Murex, sailed through the Suez Canal in 1892 en route to Thailand.

In 1897 “M. Samuel & Co.” became The Shell Transport and Trading Company. Realizing that reliance on the Rothschild/Nobel Caspian oil left the company vulnerable to supply shocks, Shell began to look to the Far East for other sources of oil. In Borneo they ran up against Royal Dutch Petroleum, established in The Hague in 1890 with the support of King William III of the Netherlands to develop oil deposits in the Dutch East Indies. The two companies, fearing competition from Standard Oil, merged in 1903 into the Asiatic Petroleum Company, jointly owned with the French Rothschilds, and in 1907 become Royal Dutch Shell.

Another global competitor to the Standard Oil throne emerged in Iran at the turn of the 20th century. In 1901 millionaire socialite William Knox D’arcy negotiated an incredible concession with the king of Persia: exclusive rights to prospect for oil throughout most of the country for 60 years. After 7 years of fruitless search, D’Arcy and his Glasgow based partner, Burmah Oil, were ready to abandon the country altogether. In early May of 1908 they sent a telegram to their geologist telling him to dismiss his staff, dismantle his equipment and come back home. He defied the order and weeks later struck oil.

Burmah Oil promptly spun off the Anglo-Persian Oil Company to oversee production of Persian oil. The British government took 51% majority control of the company’s shares in 1914 at the behest of Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, and survives today as BP.

The Rothschilds and Nobels. The Dutch royal family. The Rockefellers. These early titans of the oil industry and their corporate shells pioneered a new model for amassing and expanding fortunes hitherto unheard of. They were the scions of a new oligarchy, one built around oil and its control, from wellhead to pump.

But it was not just about money. The monopolization of this, the key energy resource of the 20th century, helped secure the oiligarchs not just wealth but power over the lives of billions. Billions who came to depend on black gold for the provision of just about every aspect of their daily lives.

In the late 19th century, however, it was by no means certain that oil would become the key resource of the 20th century. As cheap illumination from the newly-commercialized light bulb began to destroy the market for lamp oil, the oiligarchs were on the verge of losing the value from their monopoly. But a series of “lucky strikes” was about to catapult their fortunes even further.

The very next year after the commercial introduction of the light bulb, another invention came along to save the oil industry: German engineer Karl Benz patented a reliable, two-stroke internal combustion engine. The engine ran on gasoline, another petroleum byproduct, and became the basis for the Benz Motorwagen that, in 1888, became the first commercially available automobile in history. And with that stroke of luck, the business that Rockefeller and the other oiligarchs had spent decades consolidating was saved.

But more luck was needed to ensure the market for this new engine. In the early days of the automobile era it was by no means certain that gas-powered cars would come to dominate the market. Working models of electric vehicles had been around since the 1830s, and the first electric car was built in 1884. By 1897 there was a fleet of all-electric taxis shuttling passengers around London. The world land speed record was set by an electric car in 1898. By the dawn of the 20th century electric cars accounted for 28% of the automobiles in the United States. The electrics had advantages over the internal combustion engine: they required no gear shifting or hand cranking, and had none of the vibration, smell, or noise associated with gasoline-powered cars.

Perhaps John D.’s greatest stroke of luck, however, was not supposed to be luck at all. Rockefeller had come under increasing scrutiny by a public outraged by the unprecedented wealth he had amassed through Standard Oil. Muckraking reporters like Ida Tarbell began digging up the dirt on his rise to power through railroad conspiracies, secret deals with competitors and other shady practices. The press pictured him as a colossus with bribed politicians literally in the palm of his hand; Standard Oil was a menacing octopus with its tentacles strangling the lifeblood of the nation. Hearings began, investigations were launched, lawsuits were brought against him. And then, finally, in 1911 the Supreme Court made a monumental decision.

On May 15th, 1911, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that Standard Oil was a monopoly in restraint of trade and should be dissolved. Rockefeller heard of the decision while golfing at Kykuit with a priest from the local Catholic church, Father J.P. Lennon.

And Rockefeller reacted with amazing aplomb. He turned to the Catholic priest and said, “Father Lennon, have you some money?” And the priest was very startled by the question and said, “No.” And then he said, “Why?” And Rockefeller replied, “Buy Standard Oil.” ~ Ron Chernow, Biographer

As Rockefeller foresaw, the individual Standard Oil companies were worth more than the single corporation. In the next few years, their shares doubled and tripled in value. By the time the rain of cash was over, Rockefeller had the greatest personal fortune in history — nearly two percent of the American economy.

“And it was really losing the antitrust case that converted John D. Rockefeller into history’s first billionaire. So that Standard Oil was punished in the federal antitrust case, but John D. Rockefeller, Sr. most assuredly was not.” ~ Ron Chernow, Biographer [Source: The Rockefellers]

To the amazement of the world, Rockefeller’s punishment had in fact been his reward. Rather than being taken down a peg, the splitting up of the Standard Oil monopoly had launched him as the world’s only acknowledged billionaire at a time when the average annual income in America was $520.

Rockefeller’s story was perfectly mirrored by the story of Colonel Edwin Drake. Having struck oil in Titusville and given rise to a billion dollar global industry, Drake had not had the foresight to patent his drilling technique or even to buy up the land around his own well. He ended up in poverty, relying on an annuity from the state of Pennsylvania to scrape together a living and dying in 1880.

For the oiligarchy, the lesson of the rise and rise of Rockefeller was obvious: the more ruthlessly that monopoly was pursued, the tighter that control was grasped, the greater the lust for power and money, the greater the reward would be in the end.

From now on, no invention would derail the oil majors from their quest for total control. No competition would be tolerated. No threat to the oiligarchs would be allowed to rise.

Part Two: Competition is a Sin

When asked how he could justify the treachery and deceit with which he pursued the creation of the Standard Oil monopoly, John D. Rockefeller is reputed to have said: “Competition is a sin.” This is the mentality of the monopolist, and it is this justification, framed as religious conviction, that drove the oiligarchs to so ruthlessly eliminate anyone who would dare rise up as a pretender to their throne.

Ironically, it was the competition between the oiligarchs in the early 20th century that helped give rise to an early external threat to their empire: alcohol fuel.

As historian Lyle Cummins has noted of the period:

“The oil trust battles between Rockefeller, the Rothschilds, the Nobels and Marcus Samuel’s Shell kept prices in a state of flux, and engines often had to be adaptable to the fuel that was available.”

In many areas where oil wasn’t available, the alternative was alcohol. Ethyl alcohol had been used as a fuel for lamps and engines since the early 19th century. Although it was generally more expensive, alcohol fuel offered a stability of supply that was alluring, especially in areas like London or Paris that did not have predictable access to oil supplies.

Alcohol has a lower heat value, or BTU, than gasoline, but a series of tests by the US Geological Survey and the US Navy in 1907 and 1908 proved that the higher compression ratio of alcohol engines could perfectly offset the lower heat value, thus making alcohol and gasoline engines fuel economy equivalent.

One early supporter of alcohol fuel was Henry Ford, who designed his Model T to run on either alcohol or gasoline. Sensing an opportunity for new markets to boost the independent American farms that he felt were vital to the nation, Henry Ford told the New York Times:

“The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that sumach out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust – almost anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can be fermented.”

Farmers, looking to capitalize on this, lobbied for the repeal of a $2.08 per gallon alcohol tax that had been imposed to help pay for the Civil War. They were aided by those who saw fuel alcohol as a way to break the oiligarchs’ monopoly. In support of a bill to repeal the alcohol tax, President Teddy Roosevelt told the US Congress in 1906:

“The Standard Oil Company has, largely by unfair or unlawful methods, crushed out home competition. It is highly desirable that an element of competition should be introduced by the passage of some such law as that which has already passed the House, putting alcohol used in the arts and manufactures upon the free list.”

The alcohol tax was repealed in 1906 and for a time corn ethanol at 14 cents a gallon was cheaper than gasoline at 22 cents a gallon. The promise of cheap, unpatentable, unmonopolizable fuel production, production open to anyone with raw vegetable matter and a still, swept the nation.

But cheap, plentiful fuel that can be grown and produced locally and independently is not what the oiligarchs had in mind.

A 1909 USGS report comparing gas and alcohol engines had noted that a significant point in alcohol fuel’s favour was that there were fewer restrictions on alcohol engines. For the oiligarchs, the answer was simple: find a way to place greater restrictions on alcohol engines. Thankfully for them, the answer to their problem was already gaining popular support.

In the 19th century, America had a drinking problem. By 1830, the average American over 15 years old drank seven gallons of pure alcohol per year, three times higher than today’s average. This led to the first anti-alcohol movements in the 1830s and 1840s, and the formation of the Prohibition Party in 1869 and the Women’s Christian Temperance Union in the 1870s. The movement enjoyed widespread and growing support but had few political successes; Maine flirted with prohibition by outlawing the sale and manufacture of liquor in 1851, but the ban only lasted five years.

This changed with the formation of the Anti-Saloon League in Standard Oil’s birth state of Ohio in 1893. The ASL was started by John D. Rockefeller’s long-time personal friend Howard Hyde Russell and was bankrolled in part by generous annual donations from Rockefeller himself. The ASL, with Rockefeller’s backing, quickly became the driving force behind a national movement to outlaw the production and sale of alcohol.

Rockefeller was a teetotaler himself, not from moral concern but because he was afraid that “good cheer among friends” would lead to his downfall in business. Stephen Harkness, one of the silent partner investors in Standard Oil and a director in the company until his death, had caught Rockefeller’s eye when he made a fortune buying up whiskey in advance of a new excise tax that he had been tipped about and selling it at a huge profit after the tax kicked in.

No, Rockefeller and Standard Oil were not concerned about the moral state of the nation…except as far as it impacted their bottom line. But when prohibition did come in 1920, it had an interesting side effect: although it didn’t ban the use of ethanol as a fuel directly, it did lead to increasingly burdensome restrictions requiring producers to add petroleum products to their ethanol to make it poisonous before it could be sold. Alcohol fuel, now completely unable to compete with gasoline, was abandoned altogether by the automobile industry.

Another existential threat to the vast fortunes of the early oiligarchs was to require an even greater effort at social engineering: public transportation.

By the end of World War I, private car ownership was still a relative rarity; only one in 10 Americans owned a car. Rail was still the transportation of choice for the vast majority of the public, and city-dwellers in most major cities relied on electric trolley networks to transport them around town. In 1936, General Motors formed a front company, “National City Lines,” along with Firestone Tire and Standard Oil of California, to implement a process of “bustitution”: scrapping streetcars and tearing up railways to replace them with GM’s own buses running on Standard Oil supplied diesel. The plan was remarkably successful.

As historian and researcher F. William Engdahl notes in “Myths, Lies and Oil Wars”:

“By the end of the 1940s, GM had bought and scrapped over one hundred municipal electric transit systems in 45 cities and put gas-burning GM buses on the streets in their place. By 1955 almost 90% of the electric streetcar lines in the United States had been ripped out or otherwise eliminated.”

The cartel had been careful to hide their involvement in National City Lines, but it was revealed to the public in 1946 by an enterprising retired naval lieutenant commander, Edwin J. Quinby. He wrote a manifesto exposing what he called “a careful, deliberately planned campaign to swindle you out of your most important and valuable public utilities – your Electric Railway System.” He uncovered the oiligarchs’ stock ownership of National City Lines and its subsidiaries and detailed how they had step by step bought up and destroyed the public transportation lines in Baltimore, Los Angeles, St. Louis and other major urban centres.

Subscribe now

Quinby’s warning caught the attention of federal prosecutors and in 1947 National City Lines was indicted for conspiring to form a transportation monopoly and conspiring to monopolize sales of buses and supplies. In 1949, GM, Firestone, Standard Oil of California and their officers and corporate associates were convicted on the second count of conspiracy. The punishment for buying up and dismantling America’s public transportation infrastructure? A $5,000 fine. H. C. Grossman, who had been the director of Pacific City Lines when it oversaw the scrapping of LA’s $100 million Pacific Electric system, was fined exactly $1.

Unsurprisingly, GM and its associates did not remain in the doghouse for long. In 1953 President Eisenhower appointed Charles Wilson, then the President of General Motors, as Secretary of Defense. Wilson, with Francis DuPont of the Rockefeller-connected DuPont family as Chief Administrator of Federal Highways, oversaw one of the largest public works projects in American history: the creation of the interstate highway system. With a war-era excise tax on train tickets still in place and federally funded highways and airports providing cheaper alternatives, rail travel declined a startling 84% between 1945 and 1964.

This social engineering paid off well for Standard Oil and its growing list of petrochemical associates. In the two and a half decades after the outbreak of World War II, vehicle production in Detroit almost tripled, from 4.5 million cars a year in 1940 to over 11 million in 1965. As a result, sales of refined gasoline over the same period rose 300%.

But Rockefeller was not the only oiligarch working to crush all opposition to his monopoly. Across the pond, the European oiligarchs were working to protect their own oil investments from upstart competitors.

In 1889, a consortium of German investors led by Siemens’ Deutsche Bank obtained a concession from the Turkish government for extension of a railway line connecting Berlin to Basra on the Persian Gulf via Baghdad in what was then part of the Ottoman Empire. The Berlin-Baghdad Railway concession was for ninety-nine years and came with mineral rights for twenty kilometers on either side of the line…an especially lucrative deal since the rail cut right through the heart of the still untapped Mesopotamian oil regions south of Mosul along the Tigris River.

For the powers behind the British empire, concerned with the military rise of Germany, this deal was unacceptable. Explains historian and journalist William Engdahl:

Read more

But the first things to get past are your own doubts and fears. It can be hard to step out of the box of orthodox, conventional, mainstream, allopathic Western Medicine, especially when faced with a serious illness like cancer. However, the prospect of facing surgery, radiation or chemo is no more difficult or appealing, as each comes with its own set of toxic and even lethal side effects (and extremely low survival rates.)

Below is a summary of a variety of natural cancer cures. Many are proven with a solid record of efficacy, while others are remedies which are promising enough to consider.

Numerous Natural Cancer Cures with Solid Evidence of Efficacy

Humanity has a very good idea of how to handle cancer for a long time – it’s just the top natural cancer cures have been suppressed because there was no money in them; they couldn’t be patented by Big Pharma, and they threatened the Big Pharma monopoly, which is carefully guarded by the likes of the CDC and FDA — and is worth $245 - $250 billion a year.

#1: Frequency Machines

The brilliant discoveries of Royal Raymond Rife were suppressed by the FDA and AMA, but luckily Rife Frequency Therapy has survived. It uses radio frequencies to kill germs. There is always a frequency at which a germ will vibrate until its structure is destroyed, just as the opera singer can shatter a wine glass with her voice. Most bacteria, viruses and other pathogens have very weak outer cell walls; when the right frequency is aimed at them, they dissolve. There are also a range of zappers, blood purifiers and devices based on this principle, either made by or named after Bob Beck and Hulda Clark.

#2: Laetrile / Amygdalin / Vitamin B17

Natural Cancer Cure Laetrile (Amygdalin, Vitamin B17) Works Better than Chemotherapy, laetrile has the prized ability to target cancerous cells while leaving healthy ones intact. In this way, it is far superior to chemotherapy which is an indiscriminate killer. I am still amazed by the fact that the solutions to cancer are to be found in Nature right in front of our noses, if we just care to broaden our perspective. Here’s exactly how laetrile works:

“Laetrile is made of 4 parts, two of which are glucose, the third of which is benzaldehyde and the fourth of which is cyanide. The mere mention of the word “cyanide” tends to send people into mild shock since it is a well know poison. However, the cyanide and benzaldehyde in laetrile are not free molecules, and come naturally bound within other molecular formations. In fact there are many foods including vitamin B12 that contain cyanide, but they are safe since the cyanide remains locked up as part of another molecule.

Now here’s the brilliant part: cancer cells contain an enzyme that healthy cells do not, beta-glucosidase, called the “unlocking enzyme”. This enzyme causes the release of both the benzaldehyde and the cyanide, thus destroying the cancer cell, but cannot occur in a healthy cell, since it doesn’t contain this unlocking enzyme. Additionally, there is an enzyme in healthy cells, rhodanese, which catches free cyanide molecules and renders them harmless by combining them with sulfur. By binding the cyanide to sulfuric rhodanese, it is converted to a cyanate, which is a neutral substance. Cancer cells don’t contain enough sulfur to do this!”

Another important aspect to laetrile are the 2 glucose parts. Recall that cancer cells do not gain energy aerobically (through oxygen) but rather anaerobically (by fermenting sugar); in fact, cancer cells consume around 15 times more sugar than normal healthy cells. This means they steal the energy from the food you eat, but you can use this fact against them. Cancer cells are way more attracted to sugar molecules, so when you pair a cancer-killing molecule with the sugar molecule, the cancer cell will consume both and end up dying. It’s a kind of Trojan Horse killing method and is the exact same principle by which the other natural cancer cures work, such as ones with baking soda.

#3: DCA

DCA (short for Sodium Dichloroacetate) became widely known after cardiologist Dr. Evangelos D. Michelakis, working at the Department of Medicine at the University of Alberta, Canada, found in 2007 that it led to regression in lung, breast, and brain cancers – sometimes causing the tumor mass to shrink by 70% in just 3 weeks! One of the hallmarks of cancer is that the cancer cells have overridden the command to commit suicide (apoptosis). DCA corrects this by turning on the mitochondria of cancerous cells, which directs them to commit apoptosis.

DCA is an ordinary molecule with extraordinary abilities. It is non-toxic, odorless and colorless. DCA is a small, simple compound that cannot be patented – and so, since it is not a drug and does not require a prescription, it threatens the profits of Big Pharma, who don’t want you to know about it. It only affects cancerous cells and leaves healthy cells intact.

#4: Baking Soda

Baking soda (sodium bicarbonate or NaHCO3) has been used in a variety of ways to heal cancer. The Italian medic Dr. Tullio Simoncini believes cancer is a fungus and has had great success in treating patients with IV (intravenous) baking soda. Others have paired baking soda with a sweetener such as maple syrup, in a Trojan horse like way. Since cancer cells consume 15 times more sugar than normal cells, they are attracted to and gobble up the maple syrup, which is bound to the baking soda. Then the baking soda (a very alkaline substance) forces a rapid shift in the pH of the cancer cells, killing them. The cancer cells can’t withstand such alkalinity.

Subscribe now

#5: The Gerson Therapy

Dr. Max Gerson was a brilliant German doctor who took in weak cancer patients after Western Medicine was done with them and said “You’ve tried all our treatments. There’s nothing more we can do for you.” Gerson then managed to heal an amazing percentage of them. In his day, skin TB was the scariest thing, not cancer. Gerson cured 446 out of 450 skin TB patients, which is a greater-than-99% cure rate!

The Gerson Therapy is predicated on the fact that the 2 main causes of cancer are deficiency and toxicity. The Gerson Therapy is basically 3 things:

1. Salt and Water Management (restrict sodium, increase potassium)

2. Toxin Removal (performs coffee enemas, restrict animal protein)

3. Energy (ATP) Production (add iodine, perform hyperalimentation [best nutrition in largest possible quantity])

The Gerson cancer protocol basically consists of 13 vegetable juices (8 oz each) per day, 1 vegetable soup, herbal teas and coffee enemas. There are no animal products, no alcohol, no caffeine, no salt, no white sugar (a little honey is OK), no grains (except a little rye), no legumes, no berries, no pineapple and no mushrooms allowed. The tumors do not grow on the sugar in the vegetable juice, because the enzymes keep them in check.

Gerson’s work has continued on under the watchful eye of his daughter Charlotte, who has fine-tuned the protocol. They discovered that cancer tumors grow on sodium, animal protein and fat (the one exception is flax oil which is the only oil that does not grow tumors but helps supply patients with essential fatty acids). Charlotte claims that salt/sodium is a type of poison (since it’s an enzyme inhibitor), and unnecessary for human nutrition needs, and therefore not part of the Gerson cancer protocol. In 1957 Danish scientist Professor Jens Christian Skou of Aarhus University discovered there is a sodium-potassium pump in the cell (for which he later received the Nobel Prize in 1997). Sodium resides outside of the cell (saltwater), whereas potassium is inside of cell (freshwater). Cancer patients need to eat lots of foods with high potassium/sodium ratios (e.g. banana, guava, fig, nectarine, peach) to rebalance the sodium overload. Just as there is a big lack of potassium and overuse of sodium in modern diets, there is likewise a lack of magnesium and overuse of calcium. The Gerson approach is very scientific in deliberately increasing the potassium and magnesium levels of its patients to starve the cancer of fuel. The results have been very impressive.

#6: The Budwig Diet

Another German doctor (Dr. Johanna Budwig) came up with a clever cancer cure based on combining 2 relatively common foods. In 1951, she found that the blood of seriously ill cancer patients was deficient in some essential substances (e.g. phosphatides and lipoproteins) which a healthy person’s blood always contained. She discovered a way to easily replace these substances using just 2 common foods, flax oil and cottage cheese. When mixed together, amazing results can be achieved, such as the disappearance of anemia and weakness, and the healing of diabetes and cancer.

The Budwig Diet works because it recognizes that the human body is electric, and that we acquire cancer when we let our inner voltage get too low:

“In Germany in 1952, [Dr. Budwig] was the [German] central government’s senior expert for fats and pharmaceutical drugs … considered one of the world’s leading authorities on fats and oils. Her research has shown the tremendous effects that commercially processed fats and oils have in destroying cell membranes and lowering the voltage in the cells of our bodies, which then result in chronic and terminal disease … The cells of our body fire electrically. They have a nucleus in the center of the cell which is positively charged, and the cell membrane, which is the outer lining of the cell, is negatively charged … when unsaturated fats have been chemically treated, their unsaturated qualities are destroyed and the field of electrons removed. This commercial processing of fats destroys the field of electrons that the cell membranes (60-75 trillion cells) in our bodies must have to fire properly (i.e. function properly). The fats’ ability to associate with protein and thereby to achieve water solubility in the fluids of the living body—all this is destroyed.”

It’s all about polarity. When the polarity is missing (due to the lack of electron-rich highly unsaturated fat), your body can’t make new cells properly. This can be reversed by providing flax oil and cottage cheese which together revive the stagnated growth process. This naturally causes any tumors present to dissolve.

#7: The Hoxsey Cure

Harry Hoxsey reportedly had a flamboyant personality, and he was certainly not the first (nor the last) natural cancer healer to go up against the Big Pharma-Western Medicine establishment, including the AMA and its guard-dog the FDA. After the AMA/FDA forced him out the US, he set up a clinic in Tijuana, Mexico. Hoxsey cured many people of cancer with a concotion based on roots and bark that had worked for his family (of veteranians) to cure their horses of cancer. Ty Bollinger writes that the Hoxsey formula contained:

“A solution of cascara (Rhamnus purshiana) and potassium iodide served as a base for the following herbs, added according to individual cancer cases:

• Burdock root (Arctium lappa)

• Barberry or berberis root (Berberis vulgaris)

• Buckthorn bark (Rhamnus frangula)

• Stillingia root (Stillingia sylvatica)

• Prickly ash bark (Zanthoxylum americanum)

• Poke root (Phytolacca americana)

Hoxsey’s understanding of cancer was that it is a systemic disease created from metabolic imbalances that needed to be restored. His tonics were meant to help create homeostasis (internal stability), kill cancer cells, and remove the toxins created from killing cancer cells. This perspective is in line with almost all natural cancer treatments and practitioners.”

Interestingly, both Hoxsey and Dr. Gerson emphasized the importance of iodine in their natural cancer protocols.

#8: Graviola (Soursop) and Paw Paw

There are also certain fruits which have been known to kill cancer, including graviola (also known as soursop) and paw paw:

We [the ICRF] recommend graviola on the basis of several scientific articles, several testimonials, and several comments by practitioners (mostly from Brazil), however, Paw Paw is actually stronger than graviola at treating cancer. Paw Paw is the more potent of the two because of its more sophisticated and larger molecular structures. Graviola is sometimes called “Brazilian Paw Paw,” which can cause some confusion … Graviola only has single ring compounds, while the Paw Paw’s acetogenins have several double ring compounds (e.g. bullatacin) which makes Paw Paw much more powerful.”

These fruits work by decreasing or eliminating the production of ATP (the main energy fuel of a cell). This in turn lowers the voltage of the cell. For normal cells, there is plenty of ATP, thus lowering the level of ATP has no real effect. However, with cancer cells, due to the fact they create energy by fermentation, ATP is far more critical. When the ATP level of the cancer cell falls to a critical level, the cell falls apart.

These Central and South American fruits kill cancer in a different way to other protocols, and thus should never be combined with them.

Just as with the Essiac Tea treatment above, the ICRF rates the graviola/paw paw treatment as only being effective on newly diagnosed cancer patients who do not have fast-growing cancer.

#9: Essiac Tea

Former Canadian cancer nurse Rene Caisse successfully treated the terminally ill for over 50 years with her remarkable plant-based formula. It removes toxic accumulation in the lymphs, bone marrow, bladder and alimentary canal, clears the respiratory channel, purifies the blood, protects the body against radiation, relieves pain, increases appetite and boosts energy levels – as well as curing cancer. Her formula came to be known as “Essiac” tea (which is her last name Caisse spelt backwards). The basic components of Essiac are sheep sorrel and burdock root which are known to kill cancer cells.

Essiac Tea is a long-proven method of curing cancer. It dates back to the 1920s and earlier. There are several brands on the market, however what is most important are the quality and freshness of the herbs (and how well they are processed so as to keep their nutrients intact), not the exact secret recipe or secret formula with certain proportions.

The ICRF rates the Essiac Tea treatment as only being effective on newly diagnosed cancer patients who do not have fast-growing cancer.

#10: IP6

IP6 is short for inositol hexaphosphate. It’s a natural carbohydrate molecule present in most plant and animal cells. Your body makes IP6 from inositol, and you can also intake it from grains, legumes and meat. It regulates numerous intracellular functions, such as signal transduction, cell growth and differentiation, platelet function and cholesterol metabolism. Its anticarcinogenic properties are based on its ability to stimulate the immune system, act as a powerful antioxidant and its capacity to stop angiogenesis (one of the 6 hallmarks of cancer)

#11: Cannabis

One of the most controversial natural cancer treatments to spring to public consciousness has been the cannabis plant. It has gone from being shunned to embraced in many US states due to its potent medical properties. Cannabis has been shown to help with a variety of ailments including cancer. There are many medical studies now proving the cancer-fighting ability of THC. For one example out of many, look at the 2010 Spanish study which found that THC reduced “tumor growth, tumor number, and the amount/severity of lung metastases” in mice. Rick Simpson (Run From the Cure) famously made cannabis oil with THC, however the non-THC varieties which are high in CBD also have anti-cancer properties.

Cannabinoids (the phytochemicals or plant chemicals found in the cannabis plant) can cross the blood-brain barrier, and therefore show great promise as a brain cancer cure. Cannabis arrests the growth of cancer in these 4 key ways (all of which directly combat the hallmarks of cancer):

• antiproliferative (prevents cancer cells from reproducing)

• apoptotic (induces cancer cells to self-destruct)

• antiangiogenic (prevents formation of new blood vessels needed by tumor to grow)

• antimetastatic (prevents cancer from spreading to other organs)

#12: Cesium Chloride

Cesium chloride is another natural cancer treatment which is both simple and astounding. To understand how it works, you need to remember that cancer cell function in a very different way to healthy cells. Healthy cells use oxygen to burn glucose (oxidation), whereas cancer cells use fermentation to burn the glucose. Dr. Otto Warburg won the 1931 Nobel Prize for discovering that cancer is anaerobic, not aerobic. Oxygen (O2), and ozone for that matter (O3), are the archenemies of cancer. It can’t stand them. So, as the cancer cells ferment the glucose, they produce the byproduct lactic acid, which begins to flood the surrounding cells. This naturally lowers the pH of the cells, taking them from a healthy alkaline state (around 7.3) to an acidic state (around 5.7). The newly created acidity also destroys the ability of DNA and RNA to control cell division, so the cancerous cells begin to multiply without limit.

A vicious cycle of cachexia can begin in some cancer patients. The body sends the excess lactic acid is sent to the liver to detoxify it; the liver converts the lactic acid into glucose then sends it back into the rest of the body; and the cancerous cells are likely to pick it up again since they consume 15 more times glucose than normal cells.

Cesium chloride works by smashing this entire situation and cycle. Specifically, it works in 4 key ways:

1. Cesium is a very alkaline substance, so it dramatically increases the alkalinity of the body, boosting the pH back above 7 into an alkaline state where cancerous are less likely to thrive;

2. Cesium starves the cancer cells by limiting the body’s uptake of glucose. They end up starving to death;

3. Cesium halts the process of fermentation, the means by which cancer cells metabolize glucose;

4. Cesium neutralizes the lactic acid, thus breaking the cachexic cycle and preventing the liver form inadvertently feeding the cancer with more glucose.

#13: DMSO and MSM

DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide) and MSM (methylsulfonylmethane, or just “organic sulfur”) are 2 different but related natural sulfur substances. In the interests of brevity, I have grouped them together here. DMSO, a non-toxic natural byproduct of the wood industry, has an amazing affinity to target cancer cells. It has been combined successfully with MSM, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and cesium chloride. MSM is an sulfur compound which occurs naturally in food. It offers an amazing range of benefits, such relieving pain, reducing inflammation, and supporting healthy muscles, tendons, ligaments, hair, skin and nails. MSM improves your body’s ability to make its own antioxidants, especially the master antioxidant glutathione. It is impossible to overdose on either DMSO or MSM since the body automatically flushes out excess after 12 hours.

MSM tackles cancer in the following 3 ways:

1. It transports oxygen deep into the cells (remember, oxygen is to cancer like garlic to a vampire);

2. It kills microbes in the bloodstream;

3. It helps get rid of lactic acid from the bloodstream to prevent cachexia (as discussed above with the natural cancer treatment cesium chloride).

CancerTutor.com notes:

“DMSO and MSM, when used together, have been shown to cause cancer cells in vitro to revert back to being normal cells. The only way this can happen is if they kill the microbe(s) inside of the cancer cell and/or completely reverse the anaerobic metabolism.

However, the only treatment designed to take advantage of this discovery is still an experimental treatment. It is not experimental due to toxicity, it is perfectly safe to use, it is only experimental in the sense that no one knows yet how to convert what was discovered in the lab into an actual cancer treatment.

It is also not known whether MSM actually helps the DMSO revert cancer cells into normal cells. DMSO, by itself, has been shown to revert many types of cancer cells into normal cells.”

#14: Modified Citrus Pectin

You may associate pectin with apples and as the binding agent within jams. It turns out that pectin is also found within citrus fruit such as oranges, lemons and limes. Modified citrus pectin refers to the pectin (a type of fiber) taken from citrus and made more digestible (by changing its temperature and pH, and shortening its soluble fibers). It becomes one of the simpler natural cancer treatments by virtue of the way it can stick to a certain kind of protein (galectin-3) which is associated with cancer growth. The website TheTruthAboutCancer.com explains:

“Researchers have long known that galectins, and in particular galectin-3, cause cells to clump together because of their sticky consistency. Over the last decade, however, studies have shown that these proteins, found especially in epithelial and immune cells, are also associated with cancer growth and metastasis.

A study conducted at the Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University in Detroit suggested that the presence of galectin-3 contributed to “cancer aggressiveness, metastasis, cell growth, adhesion, differentiation, angiogenesis, apoptosis, invasion, cell-matrix interaction, and dissemination of cancer cells through blood flow and extravasation [i.e. the beginning stages of cancer tumor spread].” Their findings also suggested that galectin-3 plays a role in cancer cell longevity.”

In addition:

“A previous study at the University of Alberta in Canada found that higher levels of galectins in the bloodstream equated with more frequent rates of cancer cell proliferation for breast and prostate cancer cells as well as for melanoma.”

The modified citrus pectin sticks to the cancer cell’s galectin-3, thus preventing angiogenesis (the cancer cells forming new blood vessels to grow more or larger tumors). Modified citrus pectin is also an excellent chelator, meaning it can binding with toxic metals in the body (such as lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium etc.) and safely remove them without affecting the levels of essential metals in the body such as iron and zinc. Heavy metals (mercury, lead, etc.) are immunosuppressants and can lead to genetic mutations and cancer. Chelation itself via the substance EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) has been used as a successful complimentary or adjunctive natural cancer treatment. EDTA safely removes heavy metals from the body, just like modified citrus pectin, zeolite and certain kinds of clay.

#15: UV Light Protocol

The very simple and cheap UV light protocol works in a similar way to the radio frequency/zapping protocols of Royal Rife, Bob Beck, Hulda Clark and others listed in part 2. The UV light kills microbes using ultraviolet light (instead of a frequency or electrical current). According to the ICRF, you can use the UV light protocol for a variety of different ailments and conditions, including serious ones such as influenza, viral pneumonia, staph infections and ebola. Once the light strikes the cancerous cells, it begins to cause a die-off. Many of the dead cancer cells end up in the bloodstream, and may lead to an intense healing reaction. The ICRF lists 8 warnings to heed when using this treatment.

#16: Antineoplastons (Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski)

The story of medical doctor and PhD biochemist, Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, is incredible. He discovered the genetic mechanism that can cure most human cancers: antineoplastons. Burzynski set up a clinic in Houston, Texas, where he has been harassed by the FDA and AMA ever since its inception. He defined antineoplastons as naturally occurring peptides and amino acid derivatives that inhibit the growth of malignant cells while leaving normal cells unaffected, which is a trait of all effective natural cancer cures. The antineoplastons correct the cancer cells by reprogramming them.

In the movie made about his cancer remedy (The Burzynski Movie), we learn about Burzynski’s medical records of various cancer survivors who chose his treatment instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation – and were completely cured. Even though the FDA’s own clinical trials show this treatment, with no side-effects, outperformed conventional cancer treatments on all counts, the FDA still strongly opposed it.

#17: Salvestrols

Salvestrols are the wonder nutrients found in fruit and vegetables that hold potential as yet another effective natural cancer cure. They are only found in organic plants since other plants sprayed with pesticides don’t produce them. Salvestrols belong to a subcategory called phytoalexins, substances produced by plants to protect themselves against bacteria, viruses, fungi, insects and ultraviolet light. Salvestrols interact with CYP1B1 (the gene and protein enzyme which becomes over-expressed in cancer cells) to become cancer-killing agents. Like many other proven natural cancer cures above, especially laetrile or B17, salvestrols are a targeted and selective cancer killer.

Natural Cancer Treatments: Great Alternative Doctors and Cancer Healers

There are many healers and doctors, alive and dead, who have successfully healed many people of cancer using natural cancer treatments. Some of these doctors have their own protocols, whereas some use a combination of the natural cures listed here. There are too many to mention here, but here are 4 such people. Dr. Francisco Contreras heals thousands of cancer patients in his hospital Oasis of Hope in Mexico, and after battling the AMA and FDA he was able to open his current branch in Irvine, California. The late Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez offered nutritional protocols for patients with cancer and other degenerative diseases through his Foundation, which still promotes his work today. Gonzalez studied the cancer treatment of the late Dr. William Kelley, who treated pancreatic cancer with enzymes with an amazingly high cure rate. The late Bill Henderson developed his own cancer cure which built on the Budwig diet, and specified the cancer patient follow a very strict diet which would lead to maximum alkalinity within the cells. He outlined the protocol in his book Cancer-Free.

Natural Cancer Treatments: Other Honorable Mentions

There are way too many natural cancer treatments to explain in detail, so we will finish up by highlighting a few. Walter Wainright has researched how fermented soy (e.g. tempeh, natto, miso) can reverse carcinogenic cells to normal cells. Soy contains phytoestrogens which can prevent breast, ovarian and prostate cancers; soy proteins mimic the powerful antioxidant enzyme SOD (Super Oxide Dismutase), the body’s first line of defense against cancer-inducing free radicals. Recently it was found that prostate cancer could be prevented by combining ursolic acid (a waxy natural chemical found in apple peelings and rosemary), curcumin (turmeric) and resveratrol (the longevity molecule found in peanuts, pistachios, grapes, berries, cinnamon and cacao). These 3 ingredients work together to block the cancer cells accessing glutamine, which cancer cells need to break down nutrients and get energy. Vitamin D is another very important nutrient which is often overlooked but which some studies have revealed can slash your cancer risk by 77%. It’s important not to get too much sun, but just as important not to get too little and become scared of the sun either.

Cancer cures are more flashy and attention-grabbing than the simple things you can do every day to protect yourself against cancer, such as avoiding carcinogens like fluoride, mercury, aluminum, tobacco and glyphosate. Eating an organic, whole-foods based diet is obviously very important, however we can single out some foods above the others for their outstanding cancer-killing properties. Turmeric is at the top of this list. Other foods and herbs such as ashwagandha, aloe vera, carrot, wormwood and sheep sorrel are also noteworthy.

List of natural cancer treatments

• For colorectal cancers, it’s legumes and leafy vegetables. Beans, chickpeas, lentils, and split peas are brimming with anti-cancer compounds called phytates.

• Spices are also attributed with anti-cancer properties. Turmeric, for example, is an important ingredient in Indian curries and Okinawan tea.

• If you’re a pre-menopausal woman who’s worried about breast cancer, a daily serving of beans or lentils can cut the risk by two-thirds. Adding legumes or wholegrains like bulgur wheat and brown rice to your meals will raise your protection to more than 90 percent.

• Mushrooms are rich in amino acids that supercharge the immune system. According to Australian researchers, they can protect against viral infections and breast cancer in women.

• Citrus fruits have a phytonutrient called hesperidin. In addition to healing and shielding your DNA against carcinogens, citrus zest also lower the risk of skin and breast cancers.

• The entire allium family share anti-cancer properties. Like turmeric, red onion has quercetin, a phytonutrient that reduces the growth of bower cancer polyps. Garlic exhibits similar suppressive properties.

• Cruciferous vegetables can minimize the risk of colon cancer for weeks after consumption. Brussels sprouts, especially, is an anti-cancer superweapon. Broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, and kale are almost as good.

• Soya bean and flaxseed have phytoestrogens. Different from oestrogens, phytoestrogens do the work of two by reducing the risk of breast tumors and menopausal hot-flush.

• Then there is the ever-popular antioxidant-rich apple. Eating one a day (peel and pulp and all) actually keeps various cancers away by reactivating an anti-tumor gene called maspin.”

Natural Cancer Treatments: Final Thoughts

In conclusion, cancer is something you need not fear any longer. Yes, it’s a serious disease, but it doesn’t have to be a life sentence. There are so many natural and effective options you can explore if you or your loved ones get cancer. Like it or not, cancer has or will become a major reality in the lives of close to two-fifths of Americans. Education is essential. Remember, cancer can be beaten – and it can be done without subjecting yourself to AMA “cures” which are just as deadly as the disease itself.

Thank you very much for reading this far. Revealed Eye is a completely independent publication. I rely entirely on the support of monthly and yearly subscribers to keep this research going. If you find value in my work, please consider becoming a paid member. Your support allows me to dedicate the time necessary to dive deep into these topics while providing for my family, and it truly helps me move this mission forward.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

I guess we just tilt our nose up in the air, and mutter under our breath with our teeth shifted forward “Parasites are only a problem in third-world countries.”

You sure about that Doc? How would you know? In the US of A, parasitology -according to a 2001 study I found on PubMed- is not a required course in OVER HALF of the 41 US medical schools they looked at. On top of that over a third of these schools don’t even offer the class. And that’s the thing, it’s just a class, usually about 12 hours, compared to all the fields that germs, bacteria, and viruses encompass. Below is a hierarchy, only the green words deal with parasitology at all. All the remaining are inextricably intertwined with viruses germs and bacteria.

Interestingly, if we refer to the Merck Manual, a very well known medical reference book, it says repeatedly that “viruses are the of smallest parasites”. Watch this video real quick.

“Parasitology disappeared from the Vanderbilt catalogue course listings… Our class took the next to last course in parasitology offered at the school. In a few years parasitology would cease to be a course in most medical schools in the United States. It would no longer be necessary. Parasitic diseases—now very rare in the United States—were still present, though in diminishing numbers, in the 1950s, especially in the rural South. The disappearance of parasitic diseases is a story of the extraordinary power of the scientific method in action, coupled with the extreme power of public education. Above all, it is a story of prevention over cure.” source: PMC

Here’s a paragraph from ChatGPT explaining how parasitology slowly faded away, while virology, bacteriology, and similar fields filled the void. It’s equivalent to using baking soda instead of baking powder to bake a cake; maybe it was just a big mistake, or perhaps the government steered us in the wrong direction on purpose, who knows.

But the US Government incentives both the medical schools and pharmaceutical companies with grants, subsidies, and tax breaks to study what they want them to study. If somebody up top says it’s viruses and not parasites, if you want to keep your career you’re not going to disagree.

Another thing to consider is patents, because patents give the pharmaceutical companies the ability to research, develop and market their drugs at a much higher cost. Did you know dtca (direct to consumer advertising) is only legal in the United States and New Zealand? There are no drug commercials anywhere everywhere else, must be nice. Did you know that virtually everybody in Europe deworms themselves at least a few times a year?

Now here is the big secret, which is more obvious for some than others, these pharmaceutical companies are for-profit companies, they are not nonprofit organizations, they are interested in making money. It’s very difficult for them to make money if everyone is healthy.

As it turns out, there are many parasitic drugs, of which their patent has expired, in some cases decades ago. These drugs are in a class of their own, often very simple molecules that only specifically target parasites, and do very little harm to your body. In fact, these drugs are somewhat anomalous, can you think of any drug out there that, when you take it, not only is it incredibly effective, but nearly all of the side effects are positive?? (Think about this for while)

Okay are you back from thinking? What positive side effects? I’m talking about my neck not hurting anymore after years of pain, cleared up pimples on my forehead, better sleep, improved mood, weight loss, and I’m sure other things, but these are the positive side effects that I am experiencing after taking fenbendazole, which is the veterinary version of mebendazole, an FDA approved drug that is designed to do one thing, kill parasites in your body.

These drugs don’t really stay in your system long, they are designed to get stuff out of your system, and they do. You should see some of the videos out there of 18 inch tapeworms being pulled out of someone’s butt.

Would you like to be less horny in our world of seduction, not have your mind think about sex every seven point three seconds? Have no cravings for sugar? No hankering for alcohol either? It’s almost like the government doesn’t want have access to these salubrious methods of existing.

You know, when I was like 15 they put me on Accutane for acne which was pretty crazy because not only did it not work, it dried me up like a son-ofa-bitch. They call this dry skin ‘xerosis’ and everyone got it. It caused birth defects, it made children KILL THEMSELVES, there were lawsuits, and it was finally banned in 2009, only later to be brought back under different names. You can’t make this shit up. I had to look it up, I couldn’t believe they still have it on the market. They know the side effects are so bad they mandate this for anyone taking it. It’s insane.

The drug (really just a molecule) that I’m taking cured decades of acne in 9 days. Do you know how this makes me feel?

The system is completely broken. They have drugs out there that have warnings, literally “may cause suicidal thoughts, seizures, blood clots, bleeding”, and people take them daily.

Anyway… I’ve only had three epiphanies in my life, and this is one of them, and somehow it came last, probably one of the most important things to understand is how to remain healthy.

Parasites are the cause of nearly all disease from Asthma to Allergies, to Lupus, MS, Alzheimer’s, Cardiovascular Heart Disease and Cancer. I could keep going. Dementia, Lou Gehrig’s disease… on and on you name it.

This is why after your start deworming yourself, there are so many positive side effects, because the helminths and protozoa that are using your body as a host are physically draining you and causing you to be sick, they are what keep you up at night, and they are the mechanism behind nearly all disease, they’re that nasty cold sore that appears the night before your cousin’s wedding.

So how do I know that parasites cause disease not the germs or viruses? Because that’s what all of the evidence suggests. There are thousands of case studies out there of people that have cure themselves of different ailments, you will even find people in total remission of stage four pancreatic cancer. On top of that, all one has to do is scroll through the national library of medicine and they will find a plethora of studies that suggest these anti-parasitic drugs cause programmed cell death and block the energy pathways of these nasty microscopic critters.

Fenbendazole Albendazole and Mebendazole Ivermectin

Case studies and testimonies

Drugs are not the only effective remedy. There are powerful herbs like wormwood, black walnut, clove and others that are anti-parasitic. The way I understand it is the wormwood kills the mother worms, the black walnut kills the developmental stages in the larvae, and the cloves help kill and clean up the eggs.

Drug Prices:

I used ChatGPT to gather some info about parasite drug prices. I wondered if drugs in other just as expensive, and as it turns out….. not really, not even close.

These next images show the price per single pill, I tried to be as fair as possible, listing different common conditions, to get a rough estimate on how much more expensive certain classes of drugs are.

On this next graph, I included conditions that are not really comparable to something as common as worms, we are talking about multiple melanoma, hepatitis C, leukemia… I wouldn’t compare worms to conditions like this, but I did to gain a better per perspective on the prices. The parasite pill is still among the most expensive.

So what can you conclude if you take a pill to make your butthole stop itching, but in the process you find that the pill has elevated your mood, you’re getting much better sleep, you feel less depressed, your acne is gone and it doesn’t seem to come back, your neck pain has lessened????

It means it’s parasites that are causing all these problems in the first place. All the pill does is kill the parasites. It’s all very simple.

Do your own research. Use Yandex.com instead of Google. It works a lot better. You’ll come to the same conclusion I have, because that’s where all the evidence points and it all makes perfect sense.

This is the document that woke me up to this topic.

Parasite Pill 1.0 (Share this with normies)

Parasite Pill 2.0 (sometimes crude but good info)

Here’s all my research on Parasites at Librarium Esotericum.

If the fenben helped you in anyway, then you know for sure your problems are related to parasites, and then you can go from there. The point is; you are your own doctor. Stop trusting these expert in white coats that look down their nose at you. Find out how you can improve your health with a protocol like this, then you don’t have to believe or think what is causing your ill-health, you will know, and you will know how to stay healthy thenceforth!

Dr. William Makis Treating Cancer & Other Diseases Successfully Using Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Etc
https://www.bitchute.com/video/uQzx1wechJX0

Dr Thomas Lodi about how to effectively kill your parasites
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zJBKIVYB7l08

Fenbendazole Cancer Success Stories: 226 Case Reports Compilation (September 2025 Edition)
https://www.onedaymd.com/2024/02/fenbendazole-cancer-success-stories.html

Dr. William Makis’s Exciting Cancer Treatment Testimonials https://therealtruthnetworkcom.wordpress.com/2025/01/15/dr-makis-cancer/

Fenbendazole and Ivermectin for Cancer Case Series: Over 160 Case Reports (2025)
https://cancer.aestheticsadvisor.com/2025/04/fenbendazole-and-ivermectin-for-cancer.html

There are thousands of success stories online | This one below comes from Dr Makis’s patient

I have counted about a half million people on Facebook groups alone, discussing these anti-parasitic drugs for cancer and other things.

The FB group called “Ivermectin and Fenbendazole Protocols Global Group” has 222,000 members. This isn’t going away. With social media these days people talk too much. Secrets cannot be hidden forever.

Add the fact that way less people trust their government these days after what happened with Covid. We’re just not taking it any more. We want the truth.

The truth is most health problems are caused by two things

Parasites and Heavy Metals

There are safe ways to remove these heavy metals as well, which is absolutely key.

The heavy metals are a bed, a breeding ground for these parasites who just love them so much.

Then of course you need to think about binders. A binder is something like human grade carbon charcoal, or zeolites, which bind to the dead parasites and heavy metals, and allow your body to safely discard them through your stool.

This stuff takes and deserves careful attention. You must unlearn what you have learned and view the whole thing through this lens to gain a better perspective with reality. Ask if you are being honest with yourself.

Author’s note: If you find value in what I write - if it supports your research, challenges your assumptions, or helps you see things most people never question - I want you to know that it truly matters to me.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

1. Divide and Conquer: The power source might deliberately exploit existing divisions within society, such as cultural, ethnic, or ideological differences. By amplifying these divisions, they could weaken unity and collective action against their influence.

2. Disinformation Campaigns: Creating and spreading false information or narratives to confuse and manipulate public perception. This can undermine trust in institutions and make it difficult for people to discern accurate information.

3. Economic Manipulation: Control over economic resources can be used to exert influence. The power source could manipulate markets, control essential goods, and create economic dependencies to keep populations compliant.

4. Propaganda and Psychological Warfare: Deploying psychological tactics to influence public opinion and behavior. This might involve exploiting emotional triggers, using fear-based messaging, and crafting narratives that align with the power source’s agenda.

5. Surveillance and Monitoring: Employing extensive surveillance to monitor dissent and identify potential threats. This can lead to a climate of self-censorship and discourage individuals from expressing dissenting views.

6. Censorship and Media Control: Exerting control over media outlets and information distribution to shape public perception. This could involve suppressing critical voices and promoting narratives that align with the power source’s interests.

7. Co-opting Leadership: Identifying and co-opting influential leaders or organizations to gain legitimacy and control over opposition movements.

8. Manipulating Legal Systems: Using legal frameworks to target and silence dissent. This might involve enacting vague or overly broad laws that allow for the prosecution of individuals who challenge the power source’s authority.

9. Cyberattacks and Disruption: Utilizing cyber capabilities to disrupt communication, infrastructure, and critical services, causing chaos and fostering dependency on the power source for stability.

10. Selective Rewards and Punishments: Rewarding compliance and punishing dissent. The power source might offer privileges or benefits to those who support its agenda while marginalizing or penalizing those who resist.

11. Social Engineering: Manipulating social norms, values, and perceptions to shape behavior. This could involve promoting narratives that glorify compliance with the power source’s agenda while stigmatizing dissent.

12. Selective Information Release: Controlling the information that is released to the public. The power source might strategically leak information to achieve specific objectives, such as discrediting opponents or diverting attention from unfavorable events.

13. False Flag Operations: Staging events that appear to be carried out by opposition groups or foreign entities, with the goal of discrediting and justifying crackdowns on dissent.

14. Surrogate Networks: Establishing and supporting proxy groups that appear independent but ultimately serve the power source’s interests. These groups can amplify certain narratives and actions.

15. Polarization and Echo Chambers: Encouraging extreme polarization and creating echo chambers where individuals are exposed only to information that aligns with the power source’s agenda. This can lead to a lack of critical thinking and a distorted view of reality.

16. Economic Coercion: Exerting economic pressure on individuals or groups to compel compliance. This might involve offering financial incentives to those who align with the power source’s goals or imposing economic sanctions on dissenters.

17. Scapegoating: Blaming societal issues on specific groups or individuals to divert attention from the power source’s actions. This can foster hostility and distract from underlying problems.

18. Isolation and Alienation: Creating an environment where dissenters feel isolated and powerless. This can involve discrediting opposing voices and ensuring that they face social ostracism.

19. Psychological Manipulation: Employing psychological techniques to induce learned helplessness or dependency on the power source. This can make individuals more susceptible to accepting the power source’s influence.

20. Surrounding Nations: Extending influence beyond national borders by fostering alliances or dependencies with neighboring countries. This can help isolate dissent and weaken potential opposition.

21. Manufacturing Consent: Utilizing media, propaganda, and psychological tactics to create a perception of public support for the power source’s agenda. This can give the illusion of widespread approval and minimize opposition.

22. Undermining Education: Manipulating education systems to control the narrative and shape young minds. This can involve revising curricula to align with the power source’s ideology and suppress critical thinking.

23. Societal Fragmentation: Exploiting generational, cultural, or demographic divides to weaken social cohesion. This can lead to a fractured society that is less likely to unite against the power source’s actions.

24. Cultural Appropriation: Appropriating symbols, traditions, or narratives from marginalized groups to undermine their identities and manipulate their perspectives. This can sow confusion and division within these groups.

25. Selective Enforcement of Laws: Applying laws selectively to target dissenters or opposition while turning a blind eye to violations committed by supporters of the
    power source.

26. Proxy Conflicts: Instigating conflicts or supporting proxy groups in other regions to distract from domestic issues and rally support for the power source’s actions.

27. Use of Fear Tactics: Creating a constant state of fear among the population to justify increased surveillance, control, and erosion of civil liberties.

28. Silencing Independent Media: Suppressing independent media outlets and journalists who challenge the power source’s narratives. This can reduce access to alternative viewpoints.

29. Psychological Manipulation of Leaders: Exploiting psychological vulnerabilities of leaders or influencers to gain their support or manipulate their actions.

30. Exploiting Technological Dependence: Leveraging society’s dependence on technology for communication, information, and services to control access to information and monitor behavior.

31. Cultural Suppression: Discouraging or suppressing cultural practices, languages, or traditions that foster unity and resistance among a population. This can weaken a sense of identity and solidarity.

32. Selective Information Filtering: Manipulating algorithms and information distribution to control what individuals are exposed to online, reinforcing echo chambers and limiting access to diverse perspectives.

33. Controlled Opposition: Creating and controlling opposition groups or leaders to give the appearance of dissent while ensuring they don’t pose a real threat to the power source.

34. Economic Dependency: Establishing economic systems that make individuals and communities dependent on the power source’s resources or support. This can create compliance out of necessity.

35. Gaslighting: Manipulating information and events to make individuals doubt their own perceptions and question reality. This can create confusion and diminish trust in critical sources of information.

36. Selective Aid Distribution: Providing aid, resources, or benefits selectively to individuals or groups that align with the power source’s agenda, while excluding those who oppose it.

37. Surveillance Capitalism: Exploiting personal data and surveillance technologies to predict and influence individual behaviors, opinions, and preferences.

38. Social Credit Systems: Implementing systems that assign “social scores” to individuals based on their behavior, affiliations, or actions, with consequences for
    those with low scores.

39. Covert Operations: Undertaking covert operations to destabilize opposition, disrupt communication, or create chaos, attributing the outcomes to other entities.

40. Erosion of Rule of Law: Gradually undermining legal institutions and due process to create an environment where the power source’s actions are unchecked.

41. Strategic Litigation: Filing lawsuits against opponents to drain their resources, distract them from their goals, and force them to allocate time and money to legal defense.

42. Forum Shopping: Choosing legal venues or jurisdictions that are favorable to the power source’s objectives, even if they are not directly related to the conflict.

43. Abuse of Legal Processes: Manipulating legal procedures to delay proceedings, file frivolous claims, or engage in other actions that tie up opponents in litigation.

44. Intimidation Through Legal Threats: Sending cease and desist letters or legal threats to opponents in order to silence criticism or prevent the publication of unfavorable information.

45. Public Relations through Legal Channels: Leveraging legal proceedings to gain media attention and shape public perception in favor of the power source.

46. Strategic Settlements: Settling lawsuits on terms that favor the power source’s interests, even if they involve concessions, to create a narrative of success and compromise.

47. Law Enforcement Instrumentalization: Influencing law enforcement agencies to target opponents with investigations or legal action, using the legal system as a tool of intimidation.

48. Harassment Through Lawsuits: Filing a series of lawsuits, often on similar grounds, against opponents to create a pattern of legal harassment.

49. Counterclaims and Counter-narratives: Responding to legal actions with counterclaims that distract from the original issues and create a competing narrative.

50. Strategic Regulatory Challenges: Using regulatory bodies and legal processes to hinder opponents* operations or projects through compliance issues or investigations.

    This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

51. Targeting Financial Resources: Initiating legal actions that freeze or seize opponents assets, hindering their ability to fund their operations or legal defense.

52. Influence Over Legal Reforms: Lobbying for changes in laws and regulations that benefit the power source’s interests, potentially disadvantaging opponents.

53. Selective Prosecution: Using the legal system to target specific individuals or groups aligned with opposition movements while overlooking similar behavior from allies.

54. Legal Disinformation: Disseminating false legal interpretations, arguments, or information to mislead opponents and the public about the legal situation.

55. Use of International Legal Forums: Engaging international legal bodies or treaties to advance the power source’s objectives on a global scale.

56. Harassment of Legal Counsel: Targeting lawyers, judges, or legal advisors who support opponents with harassment, threats, or intimidation.

57. Strategic Discovery: Requesting extensive amounts of documents, records, or information through legal discovery processes to overwhelm opponents with the sheer volume of information.

58. Legal Blocking Maneuvers: Filing preemptive legal actions to block opponents from pursuing their own legal actions or to gain leverage in negotiations.

59. Misuse of Injunctions: Seeking court orders that restrict opponents’ actions, communication, or movement, thereby limiting their ability to operate effectively.

60. Legal Pressure on Supporters: Targeting individuals or organizations that support opponents with legal actions, causing them to reconsider their affiliations.

61. Legal Sabotage: Initiating legal actions that disrupt opponents’ operations, projects, or activities, causing delays or financial strain.

62. Strategic Test Cases: Selectively choosing legal cases that have broader implications for the power source’s objectives, shaping legal precedent.

63. Fictitious Litigation: Creating false legal personas or cases to deceive opponents into expending resources on fictitious legal battles.

64. Public Legal Threats: Announcing potential legal actions or lawsuits publicly to create uncertainty, fear, and a sense of vulnerability among opponents.

65. Legal Infiltration: Placing operatives within legal organizations, activist groups, or opponents’ legal teams to gain insights and influence outcomes.

66. Exploitation of Legal Loopholes: Identifying and exploiting gaps in legal systems or ambiguities in regulations to achieve objectives.

67. Strategic Timing: Initiating legal actions at critical moments, such as during key events or prior to important decisions, to disrupt opponents’ plans.

68. Public Disclosures: Filing legal documents or evidence publicly to embarrass, shame, or damage the reputation of opponents.

69. Targeting Advocacy: Pursuing legal actions against individuals or organizations engaged in advocacy efforts that challenge the power source’s agenda.

70. Manipulation of Appeals: Using the appeals process to prolong legal battles, thereby creating financial strain and draining opponents’ resources.

71. Strategic Funding of Legal Cases: Providing financial support to legal cases that align with the power source’s interests, thereby indirectly influencing outcomes.

72. Legal Threats on Behalf of Third Parties: Sending legal threats or notices on behalf of fictitious individuals or organizations to confuse opponents.

73. Judicial Intimidation: Attempting to intimidate judges or legal officials involved in cases through threats or manipulation.

74. Selective Leverage: Holding back certain legal actions or evidence as leverage to be used strategically during negotiations.

75. Legal Disqualification Attempts: Seeking to disqualify opponents’ legal representation or witnesses through technicalities or conflicts of interest.

76. Legal Blacklisting: Attempting to blacklist individuals, organizations, or companies that support opponents from participating in certain activities or industries.

77. False Whistleblower Claims: Filing false whistleblower claims or reports to trigger investigations against opponents, diverting attention from the main issues.

78. Legal Manipulation of Media: Engaging in legal actions against media outlets that report unfavorably on the power source, thereby influencing media coverage.

79. Strategic Mediation: Using mediation or alternative dispute resolution processes to gain concessions from opponents while maintaining an appearance of compromise.

80. International Human Rights Complaints: Filing human rights complaints against opponents at international forums to tarnish their reputation on a global scale.

81. Selective Legal Aid: Providing legal aid or resources to individuals or groups that align with the power source’s objectives, while withholding support from opponents.

82. Economic Sanctions Through Legal Channels: Initiating legal proceedings to justify economic sanctions or trade restrictions against opponents.

83. Strategic Public Relations Suits: Filing defamation or libel lawsuits against opponents to create negative publicity and hinder their ability to counter narratives.

84. Extradition Requests: Requesting the extradition of opponents from other countries based on politically motivated charges.

85. Intellectual Property Claims: Filing intellectual property claims against opponents as a means of stifling innovation or competitive activities.

86. Legal Coercion Through Family: Threatening legal action or consequences against family members or associates of opponents to pressure them indirectly.

87. Use of Emergency Legal Measures: Urgently seeking legal measures or restraining orders during times of crisis to limit opponents’ actions.

88. Legal Manipulation of Regulatory Agencies: Influencing regulatory agencies to target opponents with investigations or punitive actions.

89. Strategic Withdrawal of Lawsuits: Withdrawing lawsuits at strategic times to create uncertainty or to lure opponents into dropping their guard.

90. Legal Framing: Framing opponents’ actions or statements in a way that makes them legally actionable, even if their original intent was different.

91. Cherry-Picking Evidence: Selectively presenting evidence that supports the prosecutor’s case while omitting information that could be favorable to the defense.

92. Strategic Charging Decisions: Choosing charges that are likely to result in convictions or plea bargains, even if the original incident could have multiple interpretations.

93. Offering Leniency: Using plea deals to offer reduced sentences in exchange for cooperation, encouraging individuals to testify against others.

94. Pressure for Guilty Pleas: Applying pressure on defendants to accept guilty pleas by threatening more severe charges or longer sentences if they choose to go to
    trial.

95. Witness Intimidation: Using legal procedures to expose or exploit witnesses” vulnerabilities, thereby making them more amenable to the prosecution’s narrative.

96. Presenting Complex Legal Arguments: Utilizing legal jargon and complex arguments to confuse the defense or the jury and create an advantage.

97. Emotional Appeals: Making emotionally charged arguments to appeal to the jury’s emotions and biases, potentially influencing their perceptions.

98. Seeking Pretrial Detention: Requesting pretrial detention to keep defendants incarcerated before trial, making it harder for them to prepare a defense.

99. Limiting Discovery: Restricting the sharing of evidence with the defense, potentially depriving them of crucial information.

100. Strategic Use of Expert Witnesses: Presenting expert witnesses who support the prosecution’s theories and challenge the credibility of defense witnesses.

101. Discrediting Defense Witnesses: Cross-examining defense witnesses aggressively to create doubt about their credibility or the veracity of their testimony.

102. Character Assassination: Attempting to portray defendants in an unfavorable light by presenting evidence of past behavior or unrelated incidents.

103. Framing the Narrative: Framing the case in a way that highlights the prosecution’s version of events while downplaying alternative explanations.

104. Using Law Enforcement Support: Leveraging the cooperation of law enforcement agencies to strengthen the prosecution’s case and bolster credibility.

105. Obstruction Allegations: Alleging that defendants attempted to obstruct justice by interfering with investigations or tampering with evidence.

106. Hypothetical Scenarios: Presenting hypothetical scenarios to the jury that align with the prosecution’s narrative, even if they haven’t been proven.

107. Using Co-Defendant Statements: Presenting statements made by co-defendants that implicate the defendant, even if they may not be admissible as evidence against the defendant.

108. Playing on Sympathy: Presenting victims emotional testimony to invoke sympathy from the jury and potentially sway their decision.

109. Utilizing Aggressive Cross-Examination: Cross-examining defense witnesses aggressively to challenge their credibility or to elicit inconsistencies.

110. Presenting Circumstantial Evidence: Using indirect or circumstantial evidence to build a case when direct evidence might be lacking.

111. Portraying Inconsistencies: Pointing out inconsistencies or changes in the defendant’s statements to create doubt about their truthfulness.

112. Using Criminal Record: Introducing the defendant’s prior criminal record to suggest a pattern of behavior consistent with the current charges.

113. Rapid Fire Questioning: Asking rapid-fire questions during cross-examination to disorient and potentially provoke emotional responses from witnesses.

114. Emphasizing Expert Credentials: Highlighting the credentials and expertise of expert witnesses to give their testimony greater weight.

115. Appealing to Community Standards: Framing the case in a way that aligns with community values and expectations to win the jury’s approval.

116. Voluminous Documentation: Presenting large amounts of documentary evidence to overwhelm the defense and jurors with the sheer volume of information.

117. Using Demonstrative Evidence: Utilizing visual aids, diagrams, and simulations to help jurors visualize and understand complex or technical aspects of the case.

118. Utilizing Witness Testimony: Presenting witnesses who can speak to the defendant’s character, behavior, or interactions that support the prosecution’s narrative.

119. Discrediting Defense Strategy: Anticipating the defense’s strategy and undermining it through pre-emptive arguments or evidence.

120. Focusing on the Intent: Emphasizing the defendant’s alleged intent or state of mind to demonstrate culpability for the charges.

121. Invoking Legal Precedents: Citing legal precedents to support the prosecution’s interpretation of laws or regulations.

122. Appealing to Fear of the Unknown: Suggesting that acquitting the defendant could lead to negative consequences, even if they are speculative.

123. Portraying Complex Concepts: Simplifying complex legal or technical concepts to make them more accessible and relatable to the jury.

124. Using Emotional Closures: Building the prosecution’s narrative towards an emotionally charged conclusion to leave a lasting impact on jurors.

125. Maximizing Use of Testimony: Ensuring that each piece of testimony or evidence presented supports the prosecution’s theory and narrative.

126. Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false or misleading information through social media, websites, or traditional media to shape public perception and manipulate opinions.

127. Astroturfing: Creating fake grassroots movements or organizations to give the appearance of widespread public support for a certain cause or viewpoint.

128. Polarization Promotion: Amplifying divisive issues or exploiting existing divisions to create hostility and conflict among different groups in society.

129. Smear Campaigns: Launching coordinated efforts to tarnish the reputation of opponents through personal attacks, character assassination, or spreading damaging rumors.

130. Political Manipulation of Media: Exerting influence over media outlets to ensure favorable coverage or suppress critical reporting.

131. Strategic Leaks: Releasing sensitive or confidential information to damage the credibility of opponents or divert attention from other issues.

132. Infiltration of Opposition Groups: Planting operatives within opposition movements to gather intelligence, sow discord, or influence decision-making.

133. Vote Suppression: Implementing tactics such as restrictive voter ID laws, gerrymandering, or disinformation to discourage or prevent certain groups from voting.

134. Promotion of Populist Movements: Supporting populist leaders or movements that align with the power source’s interests to gain influence and control.

135. Diversionary Tactics: Creating distractions or crises to shift public attention away from unfavorable issues or to create a sense of urgency.

136. Co-opting Political Parties: Influencing or manipulating political parties from within to advance the power source’s agenda.

137. Promotion of Radicalization: Amplifying extreme ideologies to create social unrest and chaos, which can undermine stability and opposition movements.

138. Selective Enforcement of Laws: Using legal mechanisms to target political opponents while turning a blind eye to allies who engage in similar behavior.

139. Economic Manipulation: Leveraging economic power to create dependency among certain groups or countries, enabling political leverage.

140. Foreign Interference: Exploiting geopolitical dynamics to promote or destabilize governments, aligning with the power source’s interests.

141. Strategic Alliances: Forming alliances with countries, organizations, or groups that support the power source’s objectives, bolstering its influence on the global stage.

142. Promotion of Propaganda: Using state-controlled media or external outlets to disseminate narratives that favor the power source’s agenda.

143. Fear-Mongering: Utilizing fear-based messaging to create a sense of insecurity and rally public support for certain policies or actions.

144. Selective Transparency: Presenting a facade of transparency by releasing some information while keeping critical details hidden.

145. Election Interference: Manipulating election processes through cyberattacks, disinformation, or funding to influence outcomes.

146. Proxy Conflicts: Instigating or supporting conflicts in other regions to divert attention from domestic issues or to advance geopolitical interests.

147. Censorship and Suppression: Restricting freedom of speech, press, or online expression to control the flow of information and prevent opposition voices from gaining traction.

148. Surveillance State: Establishing extensive surveillance systems to monitor citizens’ activities, communication, and behavior, thereby stifling dissent.

149. Promotion of Conspiracy Theories: Amplifying and promoting conspiracy theories to create confusion, distrust in institutions, and undermine public discourse.

150. Selective Humanitarian Interventions: Advocating for or against interventions in other countries based on political interests rather than genuine concern for human rights.

151. Strategic Foreign Aid: Providing financial or humanitarian aid to countries or groups that align with the power source’s objectives, thereby gaining influence.

152. Culture and Identity Manipulation: Exploiting cultural or identity issues to create division and distract from critical political matters.

153. Control of Key Resources: Securing control over vital resources, such as energy, water, or food, to exert political leverage over other nations.

154. Selective Diplomacy: Engaging in diplomatic negotiations or agreements that favor the power source’s objectives while disregarding broader global interests.

155. Public Relations Stunts: Orchestrating events, gestures, or symbolic actions for media coverage to project an image of goodwill or responsiveness.

156. Social Engineering: Manipulating societal norms, values, and narratives to shape public opinion and maintain control over political discourse.

157. Undermining International Agreements: Disregarding or withdrawing from international agreements, treaties, or organizations that don’t align with the power source’s agenda.

158. Cyber Espionage: Using cyber operations to gather intelligence on political opponents, foreign governments, or influential individuals.

159. Public Opinion Manipulation: Commissioning or supporting opinion polls, surveys, or studies that yield results favorable to the power source’s narrative.

160. Promotion of Scapegoats: Blaming certain groups, individuals, or external entities for societal issues or failures to divert responsibility.

161. Legal Maneuvering: Exploiting legal processes, loopholes, or ambiguities to advance political objectives, often at the expense of democratic principles.

162. Strategic Economic Partnerships: Forging economic partnerships or trade agreements to strengthen political ties and exert influence over partner countries.

163. Selective Immigration Policies: Using immigration policies to control demographic shifts, exploit labor, or influence the composition of certain regions.

164. Promotion of Nationalism: Utilizing nationalist rhetoric and symbols to foster loyalty, distract from internal issues, and rally support for the power source.

165. Politicizing Bureaucracy: Appointing individuals loyal to the power source to key positions within agencies to ensure alignment with the agenda.

166. Selective Enforcement: Directing agencies to selectively enforce regulations, laws, or policies to benefit the power source’s objectives or allies.

167. Budget Manipulation: Allocating or redirecting funds to projects or initiatives that align with the power source’s interests, potentially at the expense of critical
     programs.

168. Obstruction of Transparency: Limiting access to information, data, or reports that could be unfavorable to the power source or its agenda.

169. Personnel Purges: Removing or reassigning agency personnel who are perceived as not aligned with the power source’s goals.

170. Influence Over Rulemaking: Shaping the regulatory rulemaking process to favor industries or interests aligned with the power source.

171. Promotion of Partisan Narratives: Releasing official statements, reports, or statements that promote partisan narratives or misinformation.

172. Selective Data Release: Releasing data or information in a way that supports the power source’s narrative, while withholding data that might counter it.

173. Surveillance and Intimidation: Using agency resources to monitor and intimidate individuals or organizations critical of the power source’s agenda.

174. Erosion of Civil Liberties: Proposing or implementing policies that infringe on civil liberties under the guise of security or safety.

175. Targeting Dissenting Voices: Labeling dissenting voices as security threats or subversive elements, potentially leading to investigations or surveillance.

176. Influence Over Inspections: Directing inspections, audits, or investigations to focus on certain targets that align with the power source’s interests.

177. Strategic Staffing Changes: Appointing individuals loyal to the power source in mid-level positions to ensure alignment with the agenda.

178. Suppressing Whistleblowers: Intimidating or retaliating against employees who expose wrongdoing or provide information contrary to the power source’s narrative.

179. Influence Over International Agreements: Using agency involvement to shape or undermine international agreements, treaties, or cooperation efforts.

180. Promotion of Propaganda: Collaborating with agencies to produce propaganda or misleading information that supports the power source’s narrative.

181. Undermining Science and Research: Discrediting or sidelining scientific research that contradicts the power source’s agenda.

182. Influence Over Advisory Panels: Shaping the composition and conclusions of advisory panels to align with the power source’s objectives.

183. Selective Funding Allocation: Allocating government funding or grants to projects or research that promote the power source’s goals.

184. Influence Over Regulation Repeals: Directing agencies to roll back regulations that hinder the power source’s interests or allies.

185. Strategic International Aid: Providing foreign aid to countries or groups that support the power source’s geopolitical objectives.

186. Economic Warfare: Using agency actions to apply economic pressure on other countries, entities, or industries to achieve political goals.

187. Influence Over Public Education: Shaping curriculum, textbooks, or educational materials to promote narratives aligned with the power source.

188. Censorship of Scientific Findings: Suppressing or altering scientific findings that conflict with the power source’s ideology or agenda.

189. Influence Over Disaster Response: Directing disaster response efforts to prioritize certain areas or communities based on political considerations.

190. Targeted Investigations: Initiating investigations or audits against political opponents or entities that challenge the power source’s agenda.

191. Influence Over Intellectual Property Protection: Tailoring intellectual property policies to benefit industries or entities that support the power source.

192. Promotion of Regulatory Capture: Allowing industries to heavily influence regulatory decision-making to align with their interests.

193. Influence Over Government Contracts: Steering government contracts or contracts for public projects toward entities aligned with the power source.

194. Strategic Use of International Trade: Utilizing trade policies and negotiations to exert pressure on other countries or achieve geopolitical objectives.

195. Influence Over International Organizations: Shaping the direction and decisions of international organizations to align with the power source’s goals.

196. Selective FOlA Requests: Using Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests strategically to access information that supports the power source’s narrative while limiting access to potentially damaging information.

197. Influence Over Emergency Declarations: Leveraging emergency declarations to centralize power and bypass checks and balances in the name of crisis response.

198. Strategic Funding Reductions: Cutting or reallocating funding for agencies, programs, or initiatives that don’t align with the power source’s agenda.

199. Influence Over Regulatory Exemptions: Granting exemptions or waivers from regulations to favored entities, industries, or allies.

200. Promotion of Partisan Appointments: Appointing individuals to advisory boards, commissions, or panels based on political loyalty rather than expertise.

201. Influence Over Legislative Agenda: Working closely with legislative bodies to push for bills or legislation that advance the power source’s objectives.

202. Strategic Lobbying: Utilizing agency resources and connections to lobby lawmakers and influence policy decisions.

203. Influence Over international Development: Shaping international development programs to further geopolitical interests or promote specific ideologies.

204. Influence Over State and Local Government Relations: Coordinating with state and local governments to align policies and regulations with the federal power source’s goals.

205. Surveillance of Political Opponents: Monitoring, collecting data on, or surveilling individuals or groups critical of the power source’s agenda.

206. Influence Over Research Funding: Directing research funding to projects or studies that align with the power source’s narrative or objectives.

207. Promotion of Ideological Purity: Implementing ideological tests or loyalty oaths for employees within agencies to ensure alignment.

208. Influence Over Humanitarian Aid: Controlling the distribution of humanitarian aid or disaster relief to support geopolitical or strategic objectives.

209. Strategic International Sanctions: Applying international sanctions selectively to exert pressure on specific countries, individuals, or entities.

210. Influence Over Census and Demographics: Shaping the way population data is collected, reported, or analyzed to serve the power source’s goals.

211. Promotion of Surveillance Programs: Expanding surveillance programs under the pretext of national security, even if they infringe on civil liberties.

212. Influence Over International Trade Agreements: Leveraging trade negotiations to gain advantages for domestic industries or to further geopolitical objectives.

213. Undermining Independent Agencies: Undermining or weakening the influence of independent agencies that are not directly under the control of the power source.

214. Strategic Diplomatic Efforts: Using diplomatic channels and negotiations to advance political objectives, even if they are unrelated to traditional diplomacy.

215. Strategic Deployment: Shifting military forces to strategic locations to exert pressure or deter actions by other countries or entities.

216. Disinformation Warfare: Spreading false or misleading information through cyber operations, media manipulation, or other means to confuse and disrupt
     adversaries.

217. Asymmetric Warfare: Utilizing unconventional tactics, such as guerrilla warfare or cyberattacks, to exploit weaknesses in opponents* defenses.

218. Influence Over Military Leadership: Appointing loyal commanders and officers to key positions to ensure alignment with the power source’s agenda.

219. Psychological Operations (PSYOPS): Using propaganda, social media manipulation, and other tactics to influence the perceptions and behavior of target populations.

220. Covert Operations: Conducting secret missions, espionage, or sabotage to achieve military or political objectives without overtly exposing the power source’s involvement.

221. Strategic Weapon Development: Prioritizing the development and deployment of specific weapons systems to enhance military capabilities.

222. Proxy Warfare: Supporting or using proxy forces, militias, or rebel groups to achieve military or geopolitical goals without direct involvement.

223. Strategic Alliances: Forming military alliances or partnerships to bolster defense capabilities and exert influence on regional or global affairs.

224. Information Suppression: Suppressing or controlling the release of sensitive military information to maintain a strategic advantage.

225. Strategic Withdrawal or Retreat: Temporarily withdrawing forces from a conflict zone to regroup, reorganize, or negotiate from a position of strength.

226. Blockades and Embargoes: Imposing naval blockades or trade embargoes to exert economic pressure on adversaries or target states.

227. Strategic Use of Military Exercises: Conducting military exercises near disputed territories or sensitive regions to signal strength or test opponents’ reactions.

228. Denial of Territory or Resources: Preventing adversaries from accessing specific territories, resources, or infrastructure through military actions.

229. Space and Cyber Operations: Leveraging capabilities in space and cyberspace to disrupt adversaries’ communication, surveillance, or critical infrastructure.

230. Rapid Deployment Forces: Establishing highly mobile forces capable of rapid response to emerging threats or opportunities.

231. Economic Warfare: Using military actions to support economic objectives, such as securing access to resources or protecting trade routes.

232. Strategic Use of Drones: Deploying unmanned aerial vehicles for reconnaissance, surveillance, and targeted strikes.

233. Counterinsurgency Strategies: Employing tactics to combat insurgency and win over local populations through development projects and humanitarian aid.

234. Strategic Naval Presence: Maintaining a strong naval presence in key maritime regions to protect shipping lanes and assert influence.

235. Information Warfare: Launching cyberattacks to disrupt adversaries” communication networks, critical infrastructure, or military systems.

236. Decapitation Strikes: Targeting key leadership figures or command centers of adversaries to disrupt their decision-making processes.

237. Use of Non-Lethal Weapons: Deploying non-lethal weapons or technologies to incapacitate or deter opponents without causing significant harm.

238. Strategic Maneuvering: Employing rapid and unexpected military movements to outflank, encircle, or surprise opponents.

239. Escalation Control: Employing measured force to signal resolve without triggering a larger conflict or military escalation.

240. Strategic Bombardment: Conducting precision airstrikes against military installations, infrastructure, or economic targets to weaken adversaries.

241. Psychological Warfare on Civilians: Employing psychological tactics to induce fear, panic, or demoralization among civilian populations.

242. Targeting Communication Networks: Disrupting opponents’ communication and information systems to hinder their ability to coordinate.

243. Strategic Deception: Using misinformation, decoys, and false signals to mislead opponents about intentions and military movements.

244. Electronic Warfare: Jamming, disrupting, or intercepting opponents’ electronic communication and sensor systems.

245. Scorched Earth Tactics: Destroying infrastructure, resources, or assets to deny them to adversaries and impede their advancement.

246. Combined Arms Operations: Employing a mix of ground, air, and naval forces to exploit opponents’ weaknesses across different domains.

247. Defensive Fortifications: Constructing defensive structures, such as bunkers or fortifications, to protect critical positions or infrastructure.

248. Infiltration and Sabotage: Sending special forces or covert operatives to infiltrate and sabotage opponents’ facilities or operations.

249. Strategic Siege: Surrounding and isolating opponents to cut off their supply lines
     and force surrender or negotiation.

250. Interdiction of Supply Routes: Disrupting or cutting off opponents’ supply routes
     to weaken their logistical capabilities.

251. Air Superiority Operations: Establishing control of airspace to deny opponents
     the ability to launch airstrikes or reconnaissance.

252. Naval Blockade: Imposing a naval blockade to restrict the movement of ships and cargo in and out of a region.

253. Precision Targeting: Using advanced targeting technologies to minimize collateral damage and civilian casualties.

254. Unconventional Warfare: Employing unconventional tactics, such as guerrilla warfare or insurgency, to weaken adversaries from within.

255. Financial Sanctions: Imposing targeted financial sanctions on countries, individuals, or entities that oppose the power source’s agenda.

256. Currency Manipulation: Manipulating currency exchange rates to benefit the power source’s economy or to undermine opponents’ economies.

257. Strategic Investment: Directing investments toward projects or industries that align with the power source’s interests.

258. Covert Financial Support: Providing covert financial support to groups or organizations that further the power source’s objectives.

259. Financial Blacklisting: Blacklisting individuals, companies, or countries from accessing international financial systems, thereby restricting their economic activities.

260. Economic Blockades: Leveraging control over international banks to freeze assets
     or block transactions of target countries or entities.

261. Information Warfare on Markets: Spreading false information or rumors to manipulate financial markets and achieve desired economic outcomes.

262. Debt Diplomacy: Extending loans or financial assistance to other countries in exchange for political concessions or alignment with the power source’s interests.

263. Influence Over Credit Ratings: Using influence to manipulate credit rating agencies’ assessments of countries, affecting their borrowing costs.

264. Strategic International Aid: Leveraging control over international financial institutions to provide aid to countries or groups aligned with the power source.

265. Market Manipulation: Manipulating stock markets, commodities markets, or currency markets to create economic instability in target countries.

266. Control Over Investment Flows: Directing international investment flows to benefit certain industries or sectors that align with the power source’s agenda.

267. Financial Support for Media: Providing financial support to media outlets that promote narratives favorable to the power source.

268. Control Over Trade Finance: Exerting control over trade finance mechanisms to influence trade patterns and the flow of goods.

269. Strategic Divestment: Using control over financial institutions to divest from sectors or companies that oppose the power source’s agenda.

270. Influence Over Multilateral Agreements: Shaping the terms and conditions of international economic agreements to align with the power source’s objectives.

271. Control Over SWIFT System: Leveraging control over the Society for Worldwide

272. Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT system to disrupt financial
     transactions of adversaries.

273. Economic Warfare: Deploying financial tactics to weaken opponents’ economies
     and undermine their geopolitical influence.

274. Financial Espionage: Gathering intelligence on opponents economic activities, financial vulnerabilities, and strategies.

275. Manipulation of International Debt: Using control over international financial
     institutions to manipulate the terms of debt agreements with target countries.

276. Control Over Remittances: Exerting control over the flow of remittances to influence economic conditions or political developments in certain regions.

277. Strategic Development Loans: Providing loans for development projects that align with the power source’s interests, fostering dependency and influence.

278. Influence Over Central Banks: Exerting influence over the policies and decisions of central banks in target countries to align with the power source’s agenda.

279. Financial Support for Proxies: Providing financial resources to proxy groups or entities to advance the power source’s geopolitical goals.

280. Strategic Reserve Management: Manipulating the management of international currency reserves to influence exchange rates and economic conditions.

281. Influence Over Sovereign Wealth Funds: Exerting influence over sovereign wealth funds of other countries to direct investments and support specific industries or projects.

282. Promotion of Financial Regulations: Shaping international financial regulations and standards to benefit industries or entities aligned with the power source.

283. Economic Leverage in Negotiations: Using economic threats or promises to gain concessions in diplomatic negotiations or international agreements.

284. Financial Incentives for Alignment: Offering financial incentives or rewards to countries or entities that align with the power source’s objectives.

285. Control Over International Lending: Exerting control over international lending institutions to condition loans on policy changes or alignment with the power
     source’s interests.

286. Strategic Use of Trade Tariffs: Imposing trade tariffs or restrictions on specific goods to influence the economic behavior of target countries.

287. Financial Coercion: Using economic pressures to force target countries to comply with the power source’s demands or policies.

288. Control Over Critical Commodities: Exerting control over the supply and pricing of critical commodities to influence global markets and geopolitical dynamics.

289. Strategic Diversion of Capital: Diverting capital flows away from target countries to weaken their economies and influence their policies.

290. Financial Support for Regime Change: Providing financial support to opposition groups or individuals to facilitate regime change in target countries.

291. Influence Over Investment Banking: Directing investment banking activities to support projects and ventures that align with the power source’s objectives.

292. Promotion of Economic Dependence: Creating economic dependencies in target countries through financial assistance, loans, or investments.

293. Control Over International Debt Negotiations: Using influence to shape the terms of international debt negotiations to the advantage of the power source.

294. Financial Support for Cultural Exchange: Providing financial support for cultural and educational programs that promote narratives favorable to the power source.

295. Strategic Financial Espionage: Gathering intelligence on financial transactions, economic strategies, and vulnerabilities of adversaries.

296. Selective Funding: Directing financial support only to charities that align with the power source’s agenda or withholding funding from those that oppose it.

297. Promotion of Narratives: Encouraging charities to promote narratives or causes that support the power source’s objectives.

298. Diversion of Funds: Diverting charitable donations to projects or initiatives that benefit the power source’s interests.

299. Control Over Aid Distribution: Exerting control over the distribution of humanitarian aid to strategically influence regions or populations.

300. Propaganda Through Charity: Using charitable efforts as a front to spread propaganda or misinformation that aligns with the power source’s agenda.

301. Influence Over Humanitarian Missions: Shaping the focus and objectives of humanitarian missions to support the power source’s geopolitical goals.

302. Charitable Interventions: Using charities to intervene in conflicts or crises to further the power source’s interests.

303. Targeted Support: Providing financial or logistical support to specific groups, communities, or regions to align with the power source’s objectives.

304. Promotion of Dependency: Creating dependency among communities or regions through charitable assistance to ensure long-term influence.

305. Control Over Medical Aid: Directing medical aid efforts to focus on certain health issues or regions that align with the power source’s agenda.

306. Selective Medical Support: Providing medical resources or expertise only to areas or populations that support the power source’s objectives.

307. Suppression of Medical Information: Withholding or manipulating medical information or research findings that conflict with the power source’s narrative.

308. Control Over Medical Personnel: Appointing medical personnel or administrators who are aligned with the power source’s interests.

309. Promotion of Ideological Medical Practices: Encouraging medical providers to promote certain medical practices or treatments that align with the power source’s ideology.

310. Diversion of Medical Supplies: Diverting medical supplies or equipment to certain regions or groups that support the power source’s goals.

311. Manipulation of Medical Research: Shaping medical research efforts to support the power source’s agenda or interests.

312. Control Over Medical Outreach: Exerting control over medical outreach efforts, such as vaccination campaigns, to further the power source’s objectives.

313. Influence Over Medical NGOs: Exerting influence over medical non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to align with the power source’s goals.

314. Promotion of Medical Diplomacy: Using medical aid and expertise as a tool for diplomatic influence and to advance geopolitical interests.

315. Targeted Health Interventions: Providing specific health interventions or treatments to certain groups or populations to gain their support.

316. Funding for Proxies: Providing financial support to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or charities that indirectly advance the power source’s interests.

317. Influence Over Education: Shaping educational programs and materials supported by charities to align with the power source’s narrative.

318. Charitable Diplomacy: Leveraging charitable efforts to build relationships and alliances with other countries or entities.

319. Control Over Disaster Relief: Exerting control over the allocation of disaster relief funds and resources to strategically influence affected regions.

320. Promotion of Cultural Influence: Using charities to promote cultural activities or events that align with the power source’s objectives.

321. Creation of Medical Dependency: Providing medical resources or assistance in a way that creates long-term dependence on the power source.

322. Selective Medical Research Funding: Directing funding only to medical research projects that align with the power source’s interests.

323. Medical Espionage: Gathering medical intelligence on adversaries’ health capabilities, vulnerabilities, or strategies.

324. Influence Over Medical Licensing: Exerting control over the licensing and accreditation of medical professionals to ensure alignment with the power source’s agenda.

325. Medical Humanitarian Missions: Deploying medical teams on humanitarian missions to support regions or communities that align with the power source’s goals.

326. Control Over Medical Supply Chains: Exerting control over the production and distribution of medical supplies to influence availability and accessibility.

327. Promotion of Biomedical Ethics: Shaping discussions and policies related to biomedical ethics to align with the power source’s ideological positions.

328. Targeted Health Awareness Campaigns: Launching health awareness campaigns that promote specific health issues or practices aligned with the power source’s agenda.

329. Control Over Medical Training: Directing medical training programs and curriculum to prioritize certain medical practices or ideologies.

330. Medical Intelligence Gathering: Collecting medical data and information that could be used strategically for political or geopolitical purposes.

331. Censorship of Charitable Activities: Suppressing or limiting charitable activities that contradict the power source’s narrative or interests.

332. Promotion of Cultural Hegemony: Using charitable initiatives to promote the power source’s culture, values, or ideology in target regions.

333. Selective Disaster Response: Providing aid and support only to regions or communities that align with the power source’s objectives.

334. Influence Over Philanthropic Initiatives: Shaping philanthropic initiatives to prioritize projects or causes that support the power source’s goals.

335. Charitable Espionage: Gathering intelligence on vulnerable populations, social dynamics, or economic conditions through charitable activities.

336. Influence Over Clinical Trials: Directing the design and implementation of clinical trials to align with the power source’s medical or pharmaceutical interests.

337. Control Over Medical Ethics Boards: Exerting influence over medical ethics boards or review committees to shape decisions that align with the power source’s goals.

338. Medical Coercion: Using medical resources or assistance as leverage to pressure target individuals, communities, or organizations to align with the power source’s interests.

339. Promotion of Medical Narratives: Encouraging medical professionals to endorse or promote narratives that support the power source’s agenda.

340. Strategic Use of Medical Aid: Deploying medical aid or assistance to strategically influence regions or populations that align with the power source’s goals.

341. Control Over Medical Technology Sharing: Exerting control over the sharing and dissemination of medical technology and innovations to serve the power source’s interests.

342. Influence Over Medical Research Funding Allocation: Shaping the allocation of research funding to prioritize areas of medical research that align with the power source’s agenda.

343. Control Over Medical Conferences: Exerting control over medical conferences and events to ensure that discussions align with the power source’s narrative.

344. Promotion of Alternative Medicine Narratives: Encouraging medical providers to promote alternative medical practices that align with the power source’s ideology.

345. Data Collection and Surveillance: Encouraging tech companies to collect and share user data that aligns with the power source’s objectives, potentially infringing on user privacy.

346. Algorithm Manipulation: Influencing algorithms and search rankings to promote content that supports the power source’s narrative and suppresses opposing viewpoints.

347. Content Moderation Bias: Pressuring tech companies to moderate content selectively, allowing certain narratives while suppressing others that contradict the power source’s agenda

348. Censorship and Deplatforming: Encouraging the removal or suspension of users, accounts, or platforms that oppose the power source’s interests.

349. Promotion of Propaganda: Collaborating with tech companies to disseminate propaganda or misleading information that supports the power source’s goals.

350. Influence Over Al Development: Shaping the development of artificial intelligence technologies to prioritize applications that align with the power source’s objectives.

351. Tech Export Restrictions: Using influence to restrict the export of certain technologies to target countries or entities that oppose the power source’s agenda.

352. Backdoor Access: Coercing tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communication platforms for surveillance purposes.

353. Control Over Tech Standards: Exerting influence over the establishment of tech standards to favor technologies or practices that support the power source’s goals.

354. Tech Investment Direction: Directing tech investments toward projects or startups that align with the power source’s interests.

355. Influence Over Social Media Platforms: Shaping the policies, features, and user experiences of social media platforms to align with the power source’s narrative.

356. Influence Over Tech Lobbying: Coordinating with tech companies to lobby for policies or regulations that support the power source’s objectives.

357. Tech Supply Chain Manipulation: Using influence to manipulate the global tech supply chain to benefit industries or entities aligned with the power source.

358. Influence Over Tech Innovation: Shaping tech research and innovation priorities to favor technologies that advance the power source’s geopolitical interests.

359. Promotion of Digital Nationalism: Encouraging tech companies to promote digital nationalism or patriotism in line with the power source’s agenda.

360. Influence Over Tech Education: Shaping tech education programs and curriculum
     to align with the power source’s ideological positions.

361. Tech Espionage: Gathering intelligence on tech developments, vulnerabilities, and strategies through covert means.

362. Control Over Tech Patents: Exerting control over the granting of tech patents to favor innovations that align with the power source’s goals.

363. Promotion of Tech Diplomacy: Using tech initiatives and collaborations as a means of diplomatic outreach to promote international relationships.

364. Influence Over Tech Trade Agreements: Shaping tech-related clauses in trade agreements to benefit industries or entities that support the power source.

365. Coercion and Threats: Using threats of harm, intimidation, or blackmail to compel witnesses or informants to provide testimony or information that supports the power source’s narrative.

366. Bribery: Offering financial incentives, favors, or rewards in exchange for favorable testimony or information.

367. Selective Disclosure: Sharing sensitive or damaging information about witnesses or informants to exert control or manipulation.

368. Promotion of Personal Interests: Exploiting the personal interests, desires, or vulnerabilities of witnesses or informants to gain their cooperation.

369. Manipulation of Legal Proceedings: Influencing legal proceedings to protect witnesses or informants aligned with the power source’s agenda.

370. Falsified Evidence: Planting or manufacturing evidence to support the claims made by witnesses or informants.

371. Influence Over Legal Representation: Directing legal representation for witnesses or informants to ensure their cooperation.

372. Isolation and Separation: Isolating witnesses or informants from external influences to control their access to information and perspectives.

373. False Narratives: Coercing witnesses or informants to provide false narratives that support the power source’s objectives.

374. Influence Over Media Coverage: Using influence to shape media coverage of witness testimonies or informant revelations.

375. Protection and Security: Offering witness protection or security in exchange for their cooperation, while controlling their actions and communications.

376. Exploitation of Loyalties: Leveraging personal loyalties or relationships to manipulate witnesses or informants into cooperation.

377. Emotional Manipulation: Appealing to witnesses’ emotions or personal connections to garner their support.

378. Intimidation Campaigns: Launching intimidation campaigns against witnesses or informants who resist the power source’s influence.

379. Control Over Communication: Monitoring and controlling witnesses’ or informants’ communication channels to ensure compliance.

380. Influence Over Legal Decisions: Exerting influence over legal decisions or verdicts to favor witnesses or informants who align with the power source’s agenda.

381. Framing Dissenters: Framing dissenting witnesses or informants with false accusations to discredit their testimonies.

382. Influence Over Protection Programs: Shaping witness protection programs to ensure that protected individuals align with the power source’s goals.

383. Manufacturing Testimonies: Crafting testimonies through scripting or rehearsing to ensure they align with the power source’s narrative.

384. Influence Over Law Enforcement: Exerting influence over law enforcement agencies to prioritize cases involving witnesses or informants who support the power source’s interests.

385. Control Over Manufacturing: Exerting control over the production and distribution of specific birth control methods that align with the power source’s
     objectives.

386. Supply Chain Manipulation: Manipulating the global supply chain for birth control products to favor certain suppliers or manufacturers.

387. Selective Export Restrictions: Imposing export restrictions on birth control products to limit their availability in regions that oppose the power source’s interests.

388. Strategic Funding: Providing funding or incentives to companies that produce birth control methods that align with the power source’s goals.

389. Promotion of Cultural Norms: Using birth control supply to promote cultural norms or practices that support the power source’s demographic objectives.

390. Influence Over Research and Development: Shaping research and development efforts in the field of birth control to focus on methods that align with the power
     source’s agenda.

391. Control Over Marketing: Exerting influence over the marketing and promotion of specific birth control methods that support the power source’s objectives.

392. Influence Over Regulatory Approval: Shaping the regulatory approval process for new birth control methods to expedite methods aligned with the power source’s interests.

393. Promotion of Reproductive Technologies: Advocating for the adoption of reproductive technologies that align with the power source’s demographic goals.

394. Selective Resource Allocation: Directing resources toward the production and distribution of birth control methods that are in line with the power source’s agenda.

Influence Over Consumer Demand:

1. Creation of Trends: Shaping consumer trends and preferences to align with products or services that support the power source’s interests.

2. Selective Marketing: Directing marketing efforts towards products or industries that are aligned with the power source’s objectives.

3. Influence Over Popular Culture: Shaping popular culture, entertainment, and media content to promote products or ideologies that support the power source’s agenda.

4. Cultural Narratives: Leveraging cultural narratives to drive consumer demand for specific products or commodities that align with the power source’s goals.

5. Influence Over Social Media Influencers: Coordinating with social media influencers to promote products or services that support the power source’s narrative.

6. Selective Endorsements: Securing endorsements from celebrities or influencers for products or services that align with the power source’s agenda.

7. Promotion of Lifestyle Ideals: Encouraging consumer lifestyles that prioritize products or experiences in line with the power source’s goals.

8. Influence Over Product Placements: Shaping product placements in movies, TV shows, and other media to support the power source’s objectives.

9. Creation of Artificial Scarcity: Manipulating supply and demand dynamics to create artificial scarcity and increase consumer desire for specific commodities.

10. Promotion of Brand Identity: Shaping brand identities and values to align with the power source’s narrative and attract consumers who share similar values.

Influence Over Advertising:

1. Narrative Shaping: Shaping advertising narratives to promote products or services that support the power source’s objectives.

2. Control Over Media Channels: Exerting influence over media channels to ensure that advertising content is consistent with the power source’s agenda.

3. Discrediting Competing Narratives: Launching advertising campaigns that discredit or undermine products or services that oppose the power source’s interests.

4. Selective Ad Placement: Directing advertising resources towards platforms or outlets that align with the power source’s goals.

5. Promotion of Cultural Hegemony: Using advertising to promote cultural values, symbols, and ideals that align with the power source’s narrative.

6. Influence Over Influencer Marketing: Coordinating with influencers to deliver advertising content that supports the power source’s agenda.

7. Control Over Product Endorsements: Exerting control over product endorsements and testimonials to ensure alignment with the power source’s narrative.

8. Emotional Manipulation: Using emotional appeals in advertising to elicit specific consumer behaviors that support the power source’s objectives.

9. Influence Over Sponsorships: Shaping sponsorship agreements to align with products or events that support the power source’s agenda.

10. Promotion of Socially Responsible Brands: Encouraging the adoption of brands that align with the power source’s social or environmental goals.

Influence Over Commodities:

1. Supply Chain Manipulation: Manipulating global supply chains to favor commodities that support the power source’s interests.

2. Selective Export Control: Imposing export controls on specific commodities to
   limit their availability in regions that oppose the power source’s agenda.

3. Strategic Stockpiling: Stockpiling or controlling the distribution of certain commodities to influence their availability and prices.

4. Control Over Distribution Networks: Exerting control over distribution networks to prioritize commodities that align with the power source’s objectives.

5. Promotion of Sustainable Commodities: Encouraging the adoption of commodities that align with the power source’s environmental or sustainability goals.

6. Influence Over Commodity Pricing: Shaping commodity pricing through market manipulation or supply chain control to favor products aligned with the power source’s agenda.

7. Promotion of Ethical Sourcing: Advocating for the use of commodities sourced ethically and in line with the power source’s values.

8. Control Over Resource Extraction: Exerting control over the extraction and production of specific commodities to benefit industries aligned with the power source’s goals.

9. Promotion of Local Economies: Encouraging the consumption of commodities produced locally to support local economies aligned with the power source’s agenda.

10. Influence Over Trade Agreements: Shaping trade agreements or policies related to commodities to benefit industries or entities aligned with the power source.

Influence Over Food Production:

1. Selective Crop Subsidies: Directing agricultural subsidies towards crops that align with the power source’s interests or objectives.

2. Control Over Seed Distribution: Exerting control over the distribution of seeds for specific crops that support the power source’s goals.

3. Genetic Modification: Influencing the genetic modification of crops to produce traits that align with the power source’s agenda.

4. Influence Over Farming Practices: Shaping farming practices to prioritize methods that support the power source’s environmental or economic goals.

5. Promotion of Sustainable Agriculture: Encouraging the adoption of sustainable agriculture practices that align with the power source’s environmental objectives.

6. Control Over Food Production Facilities: Exerting control over food production facilities to prioritize products that support the power source’s agenda.

7. Selective Regulation: Shaping food safety and quality regulations to favor products or practices that align with the power source’s goals.

8. Influence Over Agrochemical Use: Shaping the use of agrochemicals, such as pesticides and fertilizers, to align with the power source’s objectives.

9. Promotion of Ethical Farming: Advocating for ethical farming practices and animal welfare standards that align with the power source’s values.

Influence Over Food Supply:

1. Supply Chain Manipulation: Manipulating the global food supply chain to favor products that support the power source’s interests.

2. Selective Export Restrictions: Imposing export restrictions on certain food products to limit their availability in regions that oppose the power source’s agenda.

3. Strategic Stockpiling: Controlling the stockpiling and distribution of certain food products to influence their availability and prices.

4. Control Over Distribution Networks: Exerting control over distribution networks to prioritize the availability of food products aligned with the power source’s goals.

5. Promotion of Health-Conscious Foods: Encouraging the consumption of foods that align with the power source’s health or wellness objectives.

6. Influence Over Food Packaging: Shaping food packaging and labeling to promote products that support the power source’s agenda.

7. Control Over Dietary Guidelines: Exerting influence over dietary guidelines and recommendations to align with the power source’s objectives.

8. Promotion of Local Food Systems: Encouraging the consumption of locally produced foods to support local economies aligned with the power source’s agenda.

9. Influence Over Food Imports: Shaping import policies and regulations related to food products to benefit industries or entities aligned with the power source.

Influence Over Consumer Behavior:

1. Promotion of Food Narratives: Shaping narratives around certain foods to
   promote their consumption based on alignment with the power source’s goals.

2. Influence Over Nutrition Information: Exerting control over nutritional information and education materials to favor foods that support the power source’s objectives.

3. Selective Advertisement: Directing advertising efforts towards food products that align with the power source’s narrative.

4. Promotion of Cultural Eating Habits: Encouraging the adoption of cultural eating habits that align with the power source’s cultural or ideological objectives.

5. Influence Over Dietary Trends: Shaping dietary trends and fads to prioritize foods that support the power source’s agenda.

6. Control Over Restaurant Menus: Exerting control over restaurant menus to promote dishes that align with the power source’s goals.

7. Promotion of Ethical Consumption: Advocating for ethical and sustainable food consumption practices that align with the power source’s values.

8. Influence Over Nutritional Education: Shaping nutritional education programs and materials to support foods that align with the power source’s interests.

9. Control Over Food Industry Lobbying: Exerting influence over food industry lobbying efforts to prioritize policies or regulations that support the power source’s agenda.

10. Promotion of Food Alliances: Encouraging collaborations and alliances among food producers and companies that align with the power source’s goals.

Influence Over Curriculum and Content:

1. Narrative Shaping: Shaping educational content and curriculum to promote narratives that align with the power source’s ideology or objectives.

2. Control Over Textbooks: Exerting control over textbook content to ensure alignment with the power source’s agenda.

3. Selective Historical Interpretation: Influencing the way history is taught to emphasize certain events or perspectives that support the power source’s goals.

4. Influence Over Standardized Testing: Shaping the content and focus of standardized tests to reflect the power source’s educational priorities.

5. Promotion of Cultural Values: Incorporating cultural values and ideals into educational content that align with the power source’s narrative.

6. Control Over Teacher Training: Exerting influence over teacher training programs to ensure educators align with the power source’s educational objectives.

7. Selective Inclusion of Topics: Shaping the inclusion or exclusion of certain topics in the curriculum to align with the power source’s interests.

8. Promotion of Scientific Narratives: Encouraging the teaching of scientific theories or concepts that support the power source’s ideological viewpoints.

9. Influence Over Civic Education: Shaping civic education programs to promote specific political values or ideologies aligned with the power source’s agenda.

Influence Over Educational Institutions:

1. Control Over Funding: Exerting control over funding allocation to educational institutions that align with the power source’s goals.

2. Influence Over Leadership Appointments: Shaping leadership appointments in educational institutions to ensure alignment with the power source’s narrative.

3. Promotion of Research Areas: Encouraging research areas and studies that align with the power source’s priorities and interests.

4. Control Over Grants and Scholarships: Exerting control over the distribution of grants and scholarships to support students and researchers aligned with the power source’s agenda.

5. Selective Collaboration: Facilitating collaborations between educational institutions and entities that support the power source’s objectives.

6. Promotion of Educational Diplomacy: Using educational initiatives and partnerships for diplomatic outreach to promote international relationships.

7. Influence Over Alumni Networks: Shaping alumni networks to support causes or initiatives that align with the power source’s goals.

8. Control Over Student Organizations: Exerting control over student organizations and activities to ensure they reflect the power source’s values.

Influence Over Educational Messaging:

1. Promotion of Propaganda: Using educational platforms to disseminate propaganda or narratives that support the power source’s agenda.

2. Influence Over Media Literacy Education: Shaping media literacy education to promote certain media sources or viewpoints aligned with the power source’s narrative.

3. Control Over Online Learning Platforms: Exerting control over online learning platforms to ensure content aligns with the power source’s goals.

4. Promotion of Technology in Education: Encouraging the integration of technology in education to promote certain tools or platforms that support the power source’s objectives.

5. Influence Over Education Policy: Shaping education policies and regulations to reflect the power source’s educational priorities.

6. Control Over Educational Research Journals: Exerting influence over educational research journals to promote studies that support the power source’s agenda.

7. Promotion of Digital Literacy: Encouraging digital literacy programs that align with the power source’s technological and digital objectives.

8. Influence Over Education Advocacy Groups: Shaping the activities and advocacy efforts of education-related organizations to support the power source’s goals.

Influence Over Spiritual Practices:

1. Narrative Shaping: Shaping spiritual teachings and practices to promote narratives that align with the power source’s ideology or objectives.

2. Control Over Spiritual Texts: Exerting control over spiritual texts and teachings to ensure alignment with the power source’s agenda.

3. Selective Interpretation: Influencing the interpretation of spiritual teachings to emphasize certain beliefs or perspectives that support the power source’s goals.

4. Influence Over Rituals: Shaping rituals and ceremonies to promote specific spiritual experiences or values aligned with the power source’s narrative.

5. Promotion of Ethical Values: Encouraging the incorporation of ethical values and principles into spiritual teachings that align with the power source’s agenda.

6. Control Over Spiritual Leaders: Exerting influence over spiritual leaders and influencers to ensure their alignment with the power source’s spiritual objectives.

7. Promotion of Meditation and Mindfulness: Encouraging the adoption of meditation and mindfulness practices that support the power source’s wellness goals.

8. Influence Over Spiritual Retreats: Shaping the content and focus of spiritual
   retreats to reflect the power source’s spiritual priorities.

9. Promotion of Compassion and Empathy: Advocating for the emphasis of compassion and empathy in spiritual teachings that align with the power source’s values.

Influence Over Spiritual Communities:

1. Control Over Spiritual Organizations: Exerting control over spiritual organizations and communities to ensure they reflect the power source’s narrative.

2. Influence Over Religious Events: Shaping religious events and gatherings to promote themes or messages that support the power source’s objectives.

3. Promotion of Interfaith Dialogue: Encouraging interfaith dialogue and cooperation that align with the power source’s goals.

4. Selective Sponsorship: Providing financial support or resources to spiritual communities that promote values aligned with the power source’s agenda.

5. Influence Over Pilgrimages: Shaping the organization and focus of pilgrimages or spiritual journeys to support the power source’s objectives.

6. Promotion of Spiritual Diplomacy: Using spiritual initiatives and collaborations as a means of diplomatic outreach to promote international relationships.

7. Influence Over Spiritual Education: Shaping spiritual education programs and materials to reflect values and narratives aligned with the power source’s agenda.

8. Promotion of Environmental Stewardship: Encouraging spiritual communities to emphasize environmental stewardship and sustainability in line with the power source’s values.

Author’s note: If you find value in what I write - if it supports your research, challenges your assumptions, or helps you see things most people never question - I want you to know that it truly matters to me.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Get 7 day free trial

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

What if the sinking of the Titanic in 1912 was yet another event in our history books – alongside virtually every event other of major significance – that was not an accident but was instead intentionally created and orchestrated by the elite? We know that the Rothschilds and other elite New Word Order families had their hand in funding, organizing and carrying out the American, French and Russian Revolutions; the political assassinations (attempted and real) of Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, MLK and JFK; and the false flag events of the sinking of the Lusitania in 1916, Pearl Harbor, and the fake Gulf of Tonkin Incident, all of which embroiled the US in wars the public would not otherwise have allowed. Was the sinking of the Titanic another Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan conspiracy? What follows below is a hypothesis or educated guess about what might have transpired. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

The Background to the sinking of the Titanic

Before we begin to describe how it happened, you need to know the background to the sinking of the Titanic. In those days of the early 20th century, many passengers on ocean liners were poor immigrants. The ships were frequently overloaded, and there were many overinsured ships, as insurance scams were common.

Wealthy banker and industrialist JP Morgan was in charge of White Star Line, the company that built ocean liner ships such as the RMS Titanic and the RMS Olympic. Those familiar with conspiracy history may be aware of Morgan’s role in the life of Nikola Tesla, and how he bankrolled Tesla to develop new forms of energy, but pulled the funding after he discovered that Tesla was thinking about providing free energy to the whole world – unmetered.

The Titanic and the Olympic was sister ships, almost identical in design. The Olympic was the first to set sail of the two, but right from the start was beset with problems. On her maiden voyage, she had a collision in the September of 1911, followed by another accident. She was repaired for 4 days in Belfast for a propeller that could have taken only hours to repair. The repairs involved taking a propeller from the Titanic for the Olympic. This fact is suspicious as you will later see.

JP Morgan had a big problem. The Olympic was quite probably uninsurable, at least for the amount of money he wanted.

Anyone Who Was Anyone Was On the Titanic …

The newspapers of the day – owned by Morgan and other rich financiers – talked up the Titanic and heaped praise upon her, saying she was of “unrivalled extent and magnificence.” They managed to attract the top movers and shakers of society, and entice them to take the trans-atlantic journey. Among the passengers were 3 very wealthy and influential men at the time: Benjamin Guggenheim, John Jacob Astor and Isador Strauss. All were millionaires and all were opposed to the plan to create a private central bank in the USA, because it would negatively affect their personal fortunes. This of course was a big problem for the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan cartel. The Rothschilds has risen to power and wealth, and had become the masters of Europe, by introducing private, central, government-sanctioned banks in England, France, Germany, Italy and Austria, and they weren’t about to let anybody stand in their way of capturing the grand prize and doing the same in America.

The Switching of the Olympic and Titanic

It is quite likely at this point that JP Morgan hatched a wicked scheme that would kill 2 birds with 1 stone. He needed to get the Olympic insured and preferably off his hands to receive the insurance payout. He also needed to eliminate Guggenheim, Astor and Strauss so that there would be no opposition to his plan to be part of a new central bank in America. So what did he do? He switched the Olympic and Titanic ships!

In the video below, John Hamer presents impressive photographic evidence of the switch, including a picture of the “Titanic” sailing off on its “maiden voyage” with 16 portholes (the Olympic had 16 portholes and the Titanic 14 portholes). Hamer also presents other evidence such as from the 1986 Titanic wreckage discovery by Robert Ballard, who found a grey underboard (originally the Olympic’s was grey and the Titanic’s was black). He also found a propeller with the number “401” (originally from the real Titanic, but switched and given to the Olympic during the Belfast repairs).

Just Before Departure of the Olympic Titanic

The Olympic’s maiden voyage was full, yet the Titanic’s was half full. Around 50 first class passengers cancelled their reservations on the Titanic at the last moment, all of whom were friends or colleagues of JP Morgan. He himself was due to ride but did not show up, claiming he was ill, yet was seen 2 days later at a French Resort in good health with his mistress. The chief officer in command (second only to the captain), a man by the name of Henry Wilde, wrote a letter to his sister in which he stated: “I still don’t like this ship.” Why still?

Captain Smith was chosen to pilot the vessel, despite his atrocious track record of safety with previous ships he had commandeered.

The SS Californian

There was another massive ship patrolling the Atlantic when the Titanic was setting off. It was called the Californian, and its captain was a man named Ward. He appears to have been in on the conspiracy. Strangely (or not), the night before the Titanic hit the iceberg, Captain Ward slept fully clothed all night on the sofa, kept the ship’s boilers going (using precious fuel; standard practice was to turn them off at night), kept the crew on standby all night, and ordered his ship be dead stopped in the middle of the night, in a sea of ice.

The Fateful Iceberg

The Titanic received 6 messages on the night of April 14, 1912. Of these, 3 were warnings of icebergs, and 3 were from Captain Ward to Captain Smith. It was recorded that the Titanic’s stopping distance from full speed was 850 yards (around 1/2 mile), and we know from the testimony of the 2nd officer Charles Lightoller that the iceberg was visible from 2 miles. Therefore, it should have been relatively easy to avoid. Yet, incredibly, once the iceberg was sighted and the order was given to port around it, the engines of the Titanic were inexplicably reversed, so a collision could not be avoided. Were the engines tampered with in Belfast before departure?

It is also strange to consider what happened with the distress signals. The Californian was only 19 miles away from the Titanic when it hit the iceberg, yet due to the curvature of the Earth in that part of the Atlantic, the ships couldn’t see each other. The Titanic sent out distress signal rockets, in red, blue and white, yet the Californian only saw white rocket signals, which it chose to ignore. At the exact same time of the sinking of the Titanic, there was illegal seal-fishing boat called Samson in the vicinity, which was sending up white rocket signals, thus confusing the matter. The Samson was directly in between the Californian and Titanic. What are the chances that another boat would be in that exact part of the ocean at that time sending off different-clored rocket signals?

As with many other conspiracies, key witnesses seem to have magically disappeared. We are told that the 1st officer William Murdoch committed suicide, and that the 6th officer James Paul Moody drowned.

Whitewash: The American and British Inquiries

The 2nd officer Lightoller was the highest in command to survive, yet at both the American and British inquiries after the event, he was very evasive. He was repeatedly caught lying; for instance, he said he was in the water at the time of the collision for an hour, yet life expectancy at that temperature (28 to 30°F or -2 to -1°C) is only 4 minutes! Lightoller actually wrote: “it was very necessary to keep one’s hand on the whitewash brush”, referring to the inquiries.

At these inquiries, experienced sea captains said that icebergs of the size that collided with Titanic can be seen 3.5 miles away on a moonless night. It was normal procedure to maintain full speed during an iceberg sighting, so why did the Titanic stop?

After the survivors made it back to land at Plymouth, the crew was immediately detained and held against their will overnight with no access to Union representatives. They were coerced or bribed to sign a document called the “Official Secret Act”.

John Hamer concludes his above presentation by saying that the coverup could not have happened without collusion of the Government.

More Than 100 Years Later, We’re Still Suffering from the Fallout of the Sinking of the Titanic

It is now 2026, and we are more than 100 years past that fateful date of the sinking of the Titanic in 1912. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed without opposition, the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan cartel has cemented their own personal central bank in the “Land of the Free”, and US debt now surpasses $38 trillion. We are, unfortunately, still some distance away from reaching a critical mass of people who understand how the current banking system enslaves us, and who have enough knowledge, desire and power to change this system.

I hope that the truth around the sinking of the Titanic becomes widely known, and serves as a wake up call to those who value freedom.

Thanks to John Hamer for doing the research on this important historical event, and uncovering some of the deeper truth behind the sinking of the Titanic.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

However, before you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they claim to be.

Definition of Zionism:

An organization of Jews whose goal is to create a nation for Jews.

Definition of Judaism:

Jews collectively who practice a religion based on the Torah and the Talmud.

The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people.

You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. These people knowingly lie to the world with their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.

So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Therefore when all these Prime Ministers have curried favor with the West for their re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.

The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family. As you will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position through lies, manipulation and murder.

Their bloodline also extends into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names: Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn.

However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about. You are probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country, which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere. There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that deceptive tradition.

Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly that they can put into positions of power when required. This started with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret sixth son. Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish.

Please, therefore, do not automatically assume someone you see with the name Rothschild or any of the names listed above are part of the Rothschild criminal network. Furthermore and most importantly, the majority of Ashkenazi Jews are innocent and not part of this network.

Check the facts out for yourself first, this article is designed to inform people who the enemy is, not single out people of a particular race or people with a particular surname, who may have nothing to do with this Rothschild criminal network.

1743: Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house.
Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house.

This sign is a red hexagram (which geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666) which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later.

1753: Gutle Schnaper, an Ashkenazi Jew (future wife of Mayer Amschel Bauer), born to respected merchant, Wolf Salomon Schnaper.

1760: During this decade Mayer Amschel Bauer works for a bank owned by the Oppenheimers’ in Hanover, Germany. He is highly successful and becomes a junior partner. Whilst working at the bank he becomes acquainted with General von Estorff.

Following his father’s death, Bauer returns to Frankfurt to take over his father’s business. Bauer recognises the significance of the red hexagram and changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door (“Rot,” is German for, “Red,” “Schild,” is German for, “Sign”).

Now Mayer Amschel Rothschild, he discovers that General von Estorff is now attached to the court of Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, one of the richest royal houses in Europe, which gained its’ wealth by the hiring out of Hessian soldiers to foreign countries for vast profits (a practice that continues today in the form of exporting, “peacekeeping,” troops throughout the world).

He therefore makes the General’s re-acquaintance on the pretext of selling him valuable coins and trinkets at discounted prices. As he plans, Rothschild is subsequently introduced to Prince William himself who is more than pleased with discounted prices he charges for his rare coins and trinkets, and Rothschild offers him a bonus for any other business the Prince can direct his way.

Rothschild subsequently becomes close associates with Prince William, and ends up doing business with him and members of the court. He soon discovers that loaning money to governments and royalty is more profitable than loaning to individuals, as the loans are bigger and are secured by the nation’s taxes.

1769: Mayer Amschel Rothschild is given permission by Prince William to hang a sign on the front of his business premises declaring that he is, “M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his serene highness, Prince William of Hanau.”

1770: Mayer Amschel Rothschild draws up plans for the creation of the Illuminati and entrusts Ashkenazi Jew, Adam Weishaupt, a Crypto-Jew who was outwardly Roman Catholic, with its organization and development.

The Illuminati is to be based upon the teachings of the Talmud, which is in turn, the teachings of Rabbinical Jews. It was to be called the Illuminati as this is a Luciferian term which means, keepers of the light.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild marries Gutle Schnaper.

1773: Amschel Mayer Rothschild born, the first of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons. He like all his brothers who follow him, will enter the family business at the age of 12.

1774: Salomon Mayer Rothschild born.

1776: Adam Weishaupt officially completes his organization of the Illuminati on May 1 of this year. The purpose of the Illuminati is to divide the goyim (all non-Jews) through political, economic, social, and religious means. The opposing sides were to be armed and incidents were to be provided in order for them to: fight amongst themselves; destroy national governments; destroy religious institutions; and eventually destroy each other.

Weishaupt soon infiltrates the Continental Order of Freemasons with this Illuminati doctrine and establishes lodges of the Grand Orient to be their secret headquarters. This was all under the orders and finance of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the concept has spread and is followed within Masonic Lodges worldwide to the present day.

Weishaupt also recruits 2,000 paid followers including the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science, finance,and industry. They were instructed to follow the following methods in order to control people.

1) Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control of men already in high places, in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavour. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.

2) The faculties of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability belonging to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in internationalism, or rather the notion that only a one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships to those selected by the Illuminati.

3) All influential people trapped into coming under the control of the Illuminati, plus the students who had been specially educated and trained, were to be used as agents and placed behind the scenes of all governments as experts and specialists. This was so they would advise the top executives to adopt policies which would in the long-run serve the secret plans of the Illuminati one-world conspiracy and bring about the destruction of the governments and religions they were elected or appointed to serve.

4) To obtain absolute-control of the press, at that time the only mass-communications media which distributed information to the public, so that all news and information could be slanted in order to make the masses believe that a one-world government is the only solution to our many and varied problems.

1777: Nathan Mayer Rothschild born.

1784: Adam Weishaupt issues his order for the French Revolution to be started by by Maximilien Robespierre in book form. This book was written by one of Weishaupt’s associates, Xavier Zwack, and sent by courier from Frankfurt to Paris. However en route there, the courier is struck by lightning, the book detailing this plan discovered by the police, and handed over to the Bavarian authorities.

As a consequence, the Bavarian government orders the police to raid Weishaupt’s masonic lodges of the Grand Orient, and the homes of his most influential associates. Clearly, the Bavarian authorities were convinced that the book that was discovered was a very real threat by a private group of influential people, to use wars and revolutions to achieve their political ends.

1785: The Bavarian government outlaw the Illuminati and close all the Bavarian lodges of the Grand Orient.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild moves his family home to a five storey house in Frankfurt which he shares with the Schiff family.

1786: The Bavarian government publish the details of the Illuminati plot in a document entitled, “The Original Writings of The Order and Sect of The Illuminati.” They then send this document to all the heads of church and state throughout Europe, but sadly their warning is ignored.

1788: Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild Born.

1789: Due to the European ignorance of the Bavarian government’s warning, the Illuminati’s plan for a French Revolution succeeded from this year to 1793. This revolution was a bankers’ dream, it established a new constitution and passed laws that forbade the Roman Church from levying tithes (taxes) and also removed its exemption from taxation.

1790: Mayer Amschel Rothschild states,

“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”

1791: The Rothschilds get, “control of a nation’s money,” through Alexander Hamilton (their agent in George Washington’s cabinet) when they set up a central bank in the USA called the First Bank of the United States. This is established with a 20 year charter.

1792: Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild born.

1796: Amschel Mayer Rothschild marries Eva Hanau.

1798: John Robison publishes a book entitled, “Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies.” In this book, Professor Robison of the University of Edinburgh, one of the leading intellects of his time, who in 1783 was elected general secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, gave details of the whole Rothschild Illuminati plot.

He advised how he had been a high degree mason in the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and had been invited by Adam Weishaupt to Europe, where he had been given a revised copy of Weishaupt’s conspiracy. However, although he pretended to go along with it, Professor Robison did not agree with it and therefore published his aforementioned book. The book included details of the Bavarian government’s investigation into the Illuminati and the French Revolution.

That same year on July 19th, David Pappen, President of Harvard University, lectured the graduating class on the influence illuminism was having on American politics and religion.

At the age of 21, Nathan Mayer Rothschild leaves Frankfurt for England, where with a large sum of money given to him by his father, he sets up a banking house in London.

1800: Salomon Mayer Rothschild marries Caroline Stern.

1806: Napolean states that it is his,

“Object to remove the house of Hess-Cassel from ruler-ship and to strike it out of the list of powers.”

On hearing this, Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, flees Germany, goes to Denmark and entrusts his fortune valued at $3,000,000 at that time to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild marries Hannah Barent Cohen the daughter of a wealthy London merchant.

1808: Nathan Mayer Rothschild has his first son born Lionel Nathan de Rothschild.

1810: Sir Francis Baring and Abraham Goldsmid die. This leaves Nathan Mayer Rothschild as the remaining major banker in England.

Salomon Mayer Rothschild goes to Vienna, Austria and sets up the bank, M. von Rothschild und Söhne.

1811: The charter for the Rothschilds Bank of the United States runs out and Congress votes against its renewal. Nathan Mayer Rothschild is not amused and he states,

“Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.”

However the United States stands firm and the Charter is not renewed, which causes Nathan Mayer Rothschild to issue another threat,

“Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status.”

1812: Backed by Rothschild money, and Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s orders, the British declare war on the United States. The Rothschilds plan was to cause the United States to build up such a debt in fighting this war that they would have to surrender to the Rothschilds and allow the charter for the Rothschild owned First Bank of the United States to be renewed.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild dies. In his will he lays out specific laws that the House of Rothschild were to follow: all key positions in the family business were only to be held by family members; only male members of the family were allowed to participate in the family business, this included a reported sixth secret bastard son (It is important to note that Mayer Amschel Rothschild also has five daughters, so today the spread of the Rothschild Zionist dynasty without the Rothschild name is far and wide, and Jews believe the mixed offspring of a Jewish mother is solely Jewish);

The family was to intermarry with it’s first and second cousins to preserve the family fortune (of the 18 marriages by Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s grandchildren, 16 were between first cousins – a practice known today as inbreeding);

No public inventory of his estate was to be published; no legal action was to be taken with regard to the value of the inheritance; the eldest son of the eldest son was to become the head of the family (this condition could only be overturned when the majority of the family agreed otherwise).

This was straightaway the case and Nathan Mayer Rothschild was elected head of the family following his father, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s death.

Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild goes to Paris, France to set up the bank, de Rothschild Frères.

Nathaniel de Rothschild, the son in law of Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild, born.

1814: With regard to the $3,000,000 Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau had entrusted to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping, for an account of what happened next we turn to the Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1905 edition, Volume 10, page 494, which states,

“According to legend this money was hidden away in wine casks, and, escaping the search of Napoleon’s soldiers when they entered Frankfurt, was restored intact in the same casks in 1814, when the elector (Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau) returned to the electorate (Germany). The facts are somewhat less romantic, and more businesslike.”

This last line indicates the money was never returned by Rothschild to Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau. The encyclopaedia goes on to state,

“Nathan Mayer Rothschild invested this $3,000,000 in, gold from the East India Company knowing that it would be needed for Wellington’s peninsula campaign.”

On the stolen money Nathan made,

“no less than four profits:

i) On the sale of Wellington’s paper which he bought at 50 cents on the dollar and collected at par;
ii) on the sale of gold to Wellington;
iii) on its repurchase; and
iv) on forwarding it to Portugal.”

1815: The five Rothschild brothers work to supply gold to both Wellington’s army (through Nathan in England) and Napoleon’s army (through Jacob in France), and begin their policy of funding both sides in wars. The Rothschilds love wars because they are massive generators of risk free debt.
This is because they are guaranteed by the government of a country, and therefore the efforts of the population of that country, and it doesn’t matter if that country loses the war because the loans are given on the guarantee that the victor will honor the debts of the vanquished.

Whilst the Rothschilds are funding both sides in this war, they use the banks they have spread out across Europe to give them the opportunity to set up an unrivaled postal service network of secret routes and fast couriers. The post these couriers carried was to be opened up by these couriers and their details given to the Rothschilds so they always were one step ahead of current events.

Furthermore, these Rothschild couriers were the only merchants allowed to pass through the English and French blockades. It was these couriers who also kept Nathan Mayer Rothschild up to date with how the war was going so he could use that intelligence to buy and sell from his position on the stock exchange in accordance with that intelligence.

One of Rothschild’s couriers was a man named Rothworth. When the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo was won by the British, Rothworth took off for the Channel and was able to deliver this news to Nathan Mayer Rothschild, a full 24 hours before Wellington’s own courier.

At that time British bonds were called consuls and they were traded on the floor of the stock exchange. Nathan Mayer Rothschild instructed all his workers on the floor to start selling consuls. The made all the other traders believe that the British had lost the war so they started selling frantically.

Therefore the consuls plummeted in value which was when Nathan Mayer Rothschild discreetly instructed his workers to purchase all the consuls they could lay their hands on.

When news came through that the British had actually won the war, the consuls went up to a level even higher than before the war ended leaving Nathan Mayer Rothschild with a return of approximately 20 to 1 on his investment.

This gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy, now the financial center of the world following Napolean’s defeat, and forced England to set up a new Bank of England, which Nathan Mayer Rothschild controlled.

Interestingly 100 years later the New York Times would run a story stating that Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s grandson had attempted to secure a court order to suppress publication of a book which had this insider trading story in it. The Rothschild family claimed the story was untrue and libellous, but the court denied the Rothschilds request and ordered the family to pay all court costs.

Back to 1815, this is the year Nathan Mayer Rothschild makes his famous statement,

“I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”

He would go onto brag that in the 17 years he had been in England he had increased the £20,000 stake given to him by his father, 2500 times to £50 million.
The Rothschilds also use their control of the Bank of England to replace the method of shipping gold from country to country and instead used their five banks spread across Europe to set up a system of paper debits and credits, the banking system of today.
By the end of this century, a period of time that was known as the, “Age of the Rothschilds,” it is estimated that the Rothschild family controlled half the wealth of the world.

However something that did not go well for the Rothschilds this year was the Congress of Vienna, which started in September, 1814 and concluded in June of this year. The reason for this Congress of Vienna, was for the Rothschilds to create a form of world government, to give them complete political control over much of the civilized world.

Many of the European governments were in debt to the Rothschilds, so they figured they could use that as a bargaining tool. However the Tsar Alexander I of Russia, who had not succumbed to a Rothschild central bank, would not go along with the plan, so the Rothschild world government plan failed.

Enraged by this, Nathan Mayer Rothschild swore that some day he or his descendants would destroy the Tsar Alexander I’s entire family and descendants. Unfortunately he was true to his word and 102 years later Rothschild funded Bolsheviks would act upon that promise.

Interestingly, world government fanatic and Ashkenazi Jew, Henry Kissinger, did his doctoral dissertation on the Congress of Vienna.

1816: The American Congress passes a bill permitting yet another Rothschild dominated central bank, which gives the Rothschilds control of the American money supply again. This is called the Second Bank of the United States and is given a twenty year charter. The British war against the America therefore ends with the deaths of thousands of British and American soldiers, but the Rothschilds get their bank.

1818: Following the French securing massive loans in 1817 in order to help rebuild after their disastrous defeat at Waterloo, Rothschild agents bought vast amounts of French government bonds causing their value to increase.

On November 5th they dumped the lot on the open market causing their value to plummet and France to go into a financial panic. The Rothschilds then stepped in to take control of the French money supply. This was the same year the Rothschilds were able to loan £5,000,000 to the Prussian government.

1821: Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild was sent to Naples, Italy. He would end up doing a lot of business with the Vatican and Pope Gregory XVI subsequently conferred upon him the Order of St. George.

Also, whenever the Pope received Kalmann, he would give him his hand rather than the customary toe to kiss, which showed the extent of Kalmann’s power over the Vatican.

1822: The emperor of Austria made the five Rothschild brothers Barons. Nathan Mayer Rothschild chose not to take up the title.

1823: The Rothschilds take over the financial operations of the Catholic Church, worldwide.

1827: Sir Walter Scott publishes his nine volume set, The life of Napolean and in volume two he states that the French Revolution was planned by the Illuminati (Adam Weishaupt) and was financed by the money changers of Europe (The Rothschilds).

1832: President Andrew Jackson (the 7th President of the United States from 1829 to 1837), runs the campaign for his second term in office under the slogan, “Jackson And No Bank!” This is in reference to his plan to take the control of the American money system to benefit the American people, not for the profiteering of the Rothschilds.

1833: President Andrew Jackson starts removing the government’s deposits from the Rothschild controlled, Second Bank of the United States and instead deposits them into banks directed by democratic bankers.

This causes the Rothschilds to panic and so they do what they do best, contract the money supply causing a depression. President Jackson knows what they are up to and later states,

“You are a den of thieves vipers, and I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out.”

1834: The Italian revolutionary leader, Guiseppe Mazzini, is selected by the Illuminati to direct their revolutionary program throughout the world and would serve in that capacity until he died in 1872.

1835: On January 30, an assassin tries to shoot President Jackson, but miraculously both of the assassin’s pistols misfired. President Jackson would later claim that he knew the Rothschilds were responsible for that attempted assassination. He is not the only one, the assassin, Richard Lawrence, who was found not guilty by reason of insanity, later bragged that powerful people in Europe had hired him and promised to protect him if he were caught.

The Rothschilds acquire the rights in the Almadén quicksilver mines in Spain. This was at the time the biggest concession in the world and as quicksilver was a vital component in the refining of gold or silver this gave the Rothschilds a virtual world monopoly.

1836: Following his years of fighting against the Rothschilds and their central bank in America, President Andrew Jackson finally succeeds in throwing the Rothschilds central bank out of America, when the bank’s charter is not renewed. It would not be until 1913 that the Rothschilds would be able to set up their third central bank in America, the Federal Reserve, and to ensure no mistakes are made, this time they will put one of their own bloodline, Jacob Schiff, in charge of the project.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild dies and the control of his bank, N. M. Rothschild & Sons is passed on to his younger brother, James Mayer Rothschild.

1837: The Rothschilds send one of their own, August Belmont, an Ashkenazi Jew, to America to salvage their banking interests defeated by President Andrew Jackson.

1840: The Rothschilds become the Bank of England’s bullion brokers. They set up agencies in California and Australia.

1841: President John Tyler (the 10th President of the United States From 1841 to 1845) vetoed the act to renew the charter for the Bank of the United States. He goes on to receive hundreds of letters threatening him with assassination.

1844: Salomon Mayer Rothschild purchases the United Coal Mines of Vítkovice and Austro-Hungarian Blast Furnace Company that would go on to be one of the top ten global industrial concerns.

Benjamin Disraeli, an Ashkenazi Jew (who would go on to become British Prime Minister twice – the only admitted Ashkenazi Jew to do so) publishes Coningsby, in which he characterises Nathan Mayer Rothschild as,

“the Lord and Master of the money markets of the world, and of course virtually Lord and Master of everything else. He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and Monarchs and Ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions.”

1845: The Great American Patriot, Andrew Jackson (7th President of the United States) dies.Before his death he is asked what he regarded his as greatest achievement. He replies without hesitation,

“I Killed The Bank,”

This is in reference to the fact he banished the Rothschilds Second Bank of the United States in 1836.
Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild (who by now had married his niece, Betty, Salomon Mayer Rothschild’s daughter), now known as Baron James de Rothschild, wins the contract to build the first major railway line across the country.

This was called the Chemin De Fer Du Nord and ran initially from Paris to Valenciennes and then joined with the Austrian rail network built by his brother (and wife’s father – all sounds a bit sordid doesn’t it) Salomon Mayer Rothschild.

1847: Lionel De Rothschild now married to the daughter of his uncle, Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild, is elected to the parliamentary seat for the City of London.
A requirement for entering parliament was to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian. Lionel De Rothschild refused to do this as he was Jewish and his seat in parliament remained empty for 11 years until new oaths were allowed.

He must have been an invaluable representative for his constituency, bearing in mind he could never vote on any bill as he never entered parliament! I wonder how he managed to keep his parliamentary seat for 11 years?

1848: Karl Marx, an Ashkenazi Jew, publishes, “The Communist Manifesto.” Interestingly at the same time as he is working on this, Karl Ritter of Frankfurt University was writing the antithesis which would form the basis for Freidrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s, “Nietzscheanism.” This Nietzecheanism was later developed into Fascism and then into Nazism and was used to forment the first and second world wars.

Marx, Ritter, and Nietzsche were all funded and under the instruction of the Rothschilds. The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies to enable them to divide larger and larger factions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other, and particularly, to destroy all political and religious institutions. The same plan put forward by Weishaupt in 1776.
Eva Hanau, Amschel Mayer Rothschild’s wife dies.

1849: Gutle Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife dies. Before her death she would nonchalantly state,

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.”

1850: Construction begins this decade on the manor houses of Mentmore in England and Ferrières in France, more Rothschilds Manors will follow throughout the world, all of them filled with works of art.
Jacob (James) Rothschild in France is said to be worth 600 million francs, which at the time was 150 million francs more than all the other bankers in France put together.

1852: N.M. Rothschild & Sons begins refining gold and silver for the Royal Mint and the Bank of England and other international customers.

1853: Nathaniel de Rothschild, the son in law of Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild, purchases Château Brane Mouton, the Bordeaux vineyard of Mouton, and renames it Château Mouton Rothschild.

1854: Caroline Stern, Salomon Mayer Rothschild’s wife, dies.

1855: Amschel Mayer Rothschild dies.

Salomon Mayer Rothschild dies.

Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild dies.

1858: Lionel De Rothschild finally takes his seat in parliament when the requirement to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian is broadened to include other oaths. He becomes the first Jewish member of the British parliament.

1861: President Abraham Lincoln (16th President of the United States from 1860 till his assassination in 1865) approaches the big banks in New York to try to obtain loans to support the ongoing American civil war. As these large banks were heavily under the influence of the Rothschilds, they offer him a deal they know he cannot accept, 24% to 36% interest on all monies loaned.

Lincoln is very angry about this high level of interest and so he prints his own debt free money and informs the public that this is now legal tender for both public and private debts.

1862: By April $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money has been printed and distributed. He states of this,

“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”

That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement,

“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.

It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

1863: President Abraham Lincoln discovers the Tsar of Russia, Alexander II (1855 – 1881), was having problems with the Rothschilds as well as he was refusing their continual attempts to set up a central bank in Russia. The Tsar then gives President Lincoln some unexpected help.
The Tsar issued orders that if either England or France actively intervened in the American Civil War, and help the South, Russia would consider such action a declaration of war, and take the side of President Lincoln. To show that he wasn’t messing about, he sent part of his Pacific Fleet to port in San Francisco and another part to New York.

The Rothschild banking house in Naples, Italy, C. M. de Rothschild e figli, closes following the unification of Italy. The Rothschilds use one of their own in America, John D. Rockefeller, to form an oil business called Standard Oil which eventually takes over all of its competition.

1864: Rothschild, August Belmont, who by now is the Democratic Party’s National Chairman, supports General George McClellan as the Democratic nominee to run against President Abraham Lincoln in this year’s election. Much to the anger of Belmont, President Lincoln wins the election.

1865: In a statement to Congress, President Abraham Lincoln states,

“I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe.”

Later that year, on April 14, President Lincoln is assassinated, less than two months before the end of the American Civil War.
Following a brief training period in the Rothschilds London Bank, Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, born in their house in Frankfurt, arrives in America at the age of 18, with instructions and the finance necessary to buy into a banking house there. The purpose of this was to carry out the following tasks.

1. Gain control of America’s money system through the establishment of a central bank.
2. Find desirable men, who for a price, would be willing to serve as stooges for the Illuminati and promote them into high places in the federal government, the Congress, Supreme Court, and all the federal agencies.
3. Create minority group strife throughout the nations, particularly targeting the whites and blacks.
4. Create a movement to destroy religion in the United States, with Christianity as the main target.

Nathaniel de Rothschild becomes Member of Parliament for Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire.

1868: Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild dies, shortly after purchasing Château Lafite, one of the four great premier grand cru estates of France. He is the last of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons to die.

1870: Nathaniel de Rothschild dies.

1871: An American General named, Albert Pike, who had been enticed into the Illuminati by Guissepe Mazzini, completes his military blueprint for three world wars and various revolutions throughout the world, culminating into moving this great conspiracy into its final stage.

Read more

At the 2:50 mark, Hunter S. Thompson addresses George Bush on Late Night with David Letterman on NBC in 1988: “George Bush is the guiltiest man in politics.”

Go to the 6:55 mark, Hunter says “You want to talk about guilt? You want to talk about religion? I went to Hillbilly. I don’t know too much about (unintelligible) but we share one thing in common, which is a sense of justice.”

Hillbilly was the name of the Bush camp at Bohemian Grove, which included such luminaries as Walter Cronkite, William F. Buckley, Donald Rumsfeld, and the commander of Apollo 8, the first U.S. human space mission that went to the moon but did not land in 1968.

Some of these men have dark, disturbing ties to secret societies and lies that were told to the people over the decades.

“Meet the Press” host Tim Russert asked George W. Bush and John Kerry about their membership in Skull and Bones, the secret society at Yale University, and both men avoid the question.

Russert even mentions “322,” the secret number in Skull and Bones that stands for the year 322 B.C. when Greek populist Demosthenes died and with it Greek democracy, ushering in the rise of a class of unelected plutocrats who rule the commoners.

Tim Russert suffered a surprise heart attack at age 58 in the NBC Washington Bureau and died on June 13, 2008.

At the Skull and Bones initiation ceremony, captured briefly on video, participants chant "The devil equals death. Death equals death."

Skull and Bones steals the skulls of various American populists through history. George H.W. Bush’s father Prescott Bush was part of the Skull and Bones crew that stole American Indian warrior Geronimo’s skull.

The History Channel finally ran a segment about it

In 1999, after many years, victim Paul Bonacci won $1 million in federal civil court against”Franklin Cover-Up” pedo pimp Lawrence King, who was operating out of Omaha, Nebraska in the ‘80s.

Bonacci claimed that George H.W. Bush was a participant at child rape parties in Washington, D.C. and that a man named Hunter Thompson directed a child snuff film at Bohemian Grove.

Here is Paul Bonacci’s 30+ minute testimony:

“Homosexual prostitution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush: ‘Call boys’ took midnight tour of White House” blared the headline of The Washington Times on June 29, 1989.

The scandal involved the Franklin Child Sex Slave Ring, operating out of Omaha, which Paul Bonacci proved in court that he was a victim of. Paul Bonacci accused George H.W. Bush of being involved in child rape parties in Washington, D.C.

A foster child named Eulice “Lisa” Washington came forward to Nebraska social worker Julie Walters and also the FBI. Lisa explained that she saw George H.W. Bush at a gay sex party in D.C. and another in Chicago where he left with a 19-year old black male named Brent.

This is documented in the book “The Franklin Cover-Up” by journalist John DeCamp

Paul Bonacci (who accused George H.W. Bush of being involved with the Franklin Pedo Ring) said that he helped kidnap 12-year old paperboy Johnny Gosch in Iowa in 1982. Gosch was the original "Boy on the Milk Carton." His mother Noureen always believed it.

A man named Jeff Gannon went viral on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart in 2005 when he asked George W. Bush a softball question for an outlet called Talon News. Gannon turned out to be a fake name used by male escort James Guckert of http://HotMilitaryStud.com. Gannon appeared on Bo Dietl’s show on MSNBC in one of the weirdest segments in TV history to claim that he is not Johnny Gosch, the kidnapped boy from the milk carton, despite allegations on the Internet

Johnny Gosch's mother Noureen Gosch said that she was visited by two men, including an adult Johnny and an apparent handler, years later and she kept the meeting secret out of fear that Johnny's abductors would hurt him. Noureen went to the FBI but the case remains unsolved. True Crime Recaps covered the story:

The Bushes have long been accused of occult practices.

After Barbara Bush had a miscarriage, she showed George “the fetus in the jar”

George H.W. Bush presented the “New World Order” on September 11, 1990 and brought it back in his 1991 State of the Union to push diverse globalism.

But the New World Order began long before George...

Gary Caradori, an investigator who interviewed George H.W. Bush pedophilia accuser Paul Bonacci and other victims, was about to break big news in the Nebraska Legislature.

In 1990, a self-piloted plane he was flying with his son from Nebraska to Chicago crashed and he died.

Lobbyist and ex-ABC News reporter Craig Spence, who was part of the D.C. pedo ring that allegedly involved George H.W. Bush, mysteriously died at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Boston in 1989.

The Bush Secret Service and other intel agencies discouraged reporters in D.C. from pursuing the story of the pedo ring tied to George H.W. Bush, according to an archived 1989 Washington Post article trying to downplay the scandal

In August 1989, shortly before he died, pedo-ring member Craig Spence consented to an interview with the Washington Times in which he fingered George H.W. Bush adviser Donald Gregg (longtime CIA spook) as the facilitator of the call-boy tours of the White House

In August 1989, amid the Bush pedo scandal, news broke that Rep. Barney Frank had a gay prostitution ring in his brownstone home in D.C.

This scandal became known as “Project Brownstone” due to allegations of CIA “brownstoning” blackmail ops

Subscribe now

“The Finders” kidnapping cult got busted in 1987 with children in Florida. The group was based out of a duplex in northwest D.C. But the case got squashed.

In 1993, after Bush left the White House, DOJ opened a probe based on info that the Finders were a CIA front. According to US News and World Report, the CIA admitted “A firm that provided computer training to CIA officers also employed several members of the Finders.”

At least eight women accused George H.W. Bush of groping them, including one when she was 16 years old. Bush reportedly called himself “David Cop-a-feel” when he did it.

Powerful men are protected in politics. So where does the Bush clan’s power and privilege really come from?

Samuel Prescott Bush (grandfather of George H.W.) got hired by John Rockefeller's brother Frank in 1901 to run Buckeye Steel Castings Company, which built railroad parts to help the Rockefellers move their oil. Bush took over the company from Frank in 1908

George H.W. Bush's father Prescott Bush (seen here with Hitler) was a director of the Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that held Nazi financier Fritz Thyssen's assets, which led to Bush's bank getting its assets seized in 1942 for violating the Trading with the Enemy Act.

In August 2004, more than 3 years into his presidency, neocon president George W. Bush asked his father what “neocon” means.

Elder neocon George Bush described it thusly: “Israel.”

According to Andrew Cockburn’s book on Donald Rumsfeld:

The Rockefeller Foundation funded Nazi eugenics research in a bid to push mass sterilization. Josef Mengele even worked at a lab funded by the Rockefellers.

Standard Oil had a patent-sharing deal with Germany’s top chemical company, even after the U.S. got into the war.

The Bush family was a very early supporter of Zionism. George Bush, an NYU Hebrew Lit professor, wrote the 1844 book "The Valley of Vision; or, The Dry Bones of Israel Revived," which advocated for a Jewish nation in Palestine to give Jews "honorable repute among the nations"

In 1953, George H.W. Bush used his dad's money to start the oil company Zapata Petroleum with his partner/handler Thomas Devine, a CIA staff officer who served as a "commercial asset" for the CIA for many years, according to internal CIA memos

A J. Edgar Hoover memo from 1963 identified George H.W. Bush as CIA and said the FBI briefed Bush after the JFK assassination.

Bush, who used his “oil business as a cover,” spread his reach to the Caribbean (around Cuba) and the Middle East.

Little more than an hour after JFK was shot, George Bush called the FBI to register a tip that he heard "James Parrot," a possible college student, was plotting to kill JFK, according to a stunning FBI memo made public in the 1980's. Bush then flew to Dallas.

James Parrot, the man George Bush tried to make a patsy for JFK’s killing, was a conservative activist with the John Birch Society. He had an alibi and FBI cleared him.

Bush had won the chairmanship of the Harris County GOP months earlier specifically to stop the Birchers

In 1971, George Bush became Nixon's UN ambassador and spearheaded the Zionist cause of letting Soviet Jews emigrate. He cancelled a Dick Cavett appearance at the behest of "Jewish leaders" and had a 1973 NYC dinner thrown in his honor by the "Let My People Go" movement. Later, as president, he got rid of the UN resolution that Zionism is racism.

Nixon appointed George Bush RNC chairman in 1973. Bush made Nixon think he was on his side, then Bush flipped and called for Nixon to resign 2 days before it happened. Bush went on to become ambassador to Mao, working with Zionist Kissinger to help make China a superpower

In 1971, George Bush joined the globalist Council on Foreign Relations and later served on its board of directors. He was an early member of David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission, formed in 1973. In 1976, he became Gerald Ford's CIA director, where his power skyrocketed

As CIA director, George Bush oversaw "Operation Condor," in which CIA-friendly Latin American dictators killed their opponents. When Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet ordered a deadly car-bombing in Washington, D.C., Bush leaked Fake News to dupe the FBI and cover for Pinochet

Subscribe now

Share

In October 1976, the month after the car bombing in D.C., George Bush told then-congressman Ed Koch that Operation Condor put out a contract on Koch's life for trying to cut funding to Uruguay. Bush's CIA knew about the assassination plot months earlier but did not tell Koch.

In 1976, George Bush first met Manuel Noriega, a longtime CIA asset. Bush was photographed with Noriega in 1983, the same year Noriega was installed as dictator of Panama. Together, Bush and Noriega oversaw a drug-trafficking empire that ended when Noriega defied CIA policy and backed the Sandinistas, leading Bush to invade Panama in 1989 in one of the numerous controlled wars that Bush helped engineer.

In 1980, George Bush lost a bitter primary to Ronald Reagan. On the trail, Reagan called the Trilateral Commission “a group of multilateral corporations and international bankers...not directed towards the general problems of the people of this country.”

Even Reagan had no clue what Bush had in store for him next...

George Bush squeezed himself onto Reagan’s ticket as running mate in 1980 despite their mutual hatred. The people around Bush were determined to keep Reagan in line and suppress the conservative movement.

Reagan soon found out the lengths they were willing to go...

George Bush's distant cousin John Hinckley Jr. shot Reagan in 1981. Hinckley's father was a Texas oilman, Bush donor, and frequent Bush dinner companion. Dubya's brother Neil was set to have dinner with Hinckley Jr.'s brother the next day.

George Bush oversaw Saddam Hussein. Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam in 1983 to work together against Iran, and returned to Iraq the next year to assure the Iraqis not to worry about their chemical weapons use.

When Saddam defied handlers’ orders, he got the Noriega treatment

Post-White House, George Bush spent a decade working for the Carlyle Group, a private equity fund that received millions in investments from the bin Laden family.

On 9/11, as Howard Lutnick was late to work, George Bush was watching the attack on TV with Osama bin Laden’s half-brother Shafiq.

Though he is cringe, Michael Moore had a good bit on this in “Fahrenheit 9/11”

Subscribe now

Hunter S. Thompson was among the first to publicly question the official story of 9/11. In a 2002 Australian radio interview he said “The public version of the news or whatever event is never really what happened.” He also predicted an invasion of Iraq in his ESPN column one week after the attack.

Hunter died of a “suicide” in 2005.

The night before he died, Hunter S. Thompson (who claimed that he attended George Bush's "Hillbilly" camp at Bohemian Grove) called journalist Paul William Roberts to tell him that he had proof 9/11 was a controlled explosion. Hunter said, "They're gonna make it look like suicide. I know how these bastards think."

College dropout Jeffrey Epstein started teaching at the elite Dalton School immediately after the 1974 departure of headmaster Donald Barr, father of William Barr and author of “Space Relations,” a 1973 sci-fi novel about sex slavery.

William Barr worked for George Bush at the CIA and as attorney general, helping to cover up Iran-Contra.

In the 1980’s, Jeffrey Epstein worked with British arms dealer Douglas Leese to funnel Chinese weapons to Iran, according to @_whitneywebb‘s book “One Nation Under Blackmail.” This operation ran parallel to George Bush’s Iran-Contra scheme...

Jeffrey Epstein worked for arms dealer and Iran-Contra “middleman” Adnan Khashoggi and was partners and roommates with J. Stanley Pottinger, who helped ship weapons to Iran prior to Iran-Contra.

Israeli intelligence was heavily involved in Iran-Contra

The CIA's infamous "Air America" airline used to carry out the Iran-Contra scheme was purchased by Les Wexner and converted into a private airline by none other than Jeffrey Epstein, who claimed to be a CIA asset during Reagan-Bush according to Epstein crony Steven Hoffenberg

Jeffrey Epstein reportedly had dinner in New York City with President George W. Bush two months before 9/11.

When Jeffrey Epstein got arrested for pedophilia the first time he visited Israel and then got a sweetheart plea deal from the Bush administration's Alex Acosta, who was told Epstein "belonged to intelligence" according to Vicky Ward.

Here is George Bush at the Satanic Bohemian Grove with TV icon Art Linkletter in 1993. His son Dubya reportedly went to the Grove around the year 1995. Bush's "Hill Billies" camp at the Grove included Walter Cronkite, William F. Buckley, and Donald Rumsfeld

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

• The problem: Are you dreaming?

• Waking dreams

• The Gates of Awakening

• Humanity’s enemy: Television & the mainstream media

• Mainstream media ownership/control infographs

• Examples of media manipulation across mass consciousness:

• The solution

• The hidden truth: Learning about the real situation on Earth

• Important documentaries

• Important books

• How You Can Help: Help to Awaken Others

There is far more to this world than taught in our schools, shown in the media, or proclaimed by the church and state. Most of mankind lives in a hypnotic trance, taking to be reality what is instead a twisted simulacrum of reality, a collective dream in which values are inverted, lies are taken as truth, and tyranny is accepted as security. They enjoy their ignorance and cling tightly to the misery that gives them identity. Fortunately, some are born with spiritual immune systems that sooner or later give rejection to the illusory worldview grafted upon them from birth through social conditioning. They begin sensing that something is amiss and start looking for answers. Inner knowledge and anomalous outer experiences show them a side of reality others are oblivious to, and so begins their journey of awakening. Each step of the journey is made by following the heart instead of following the crowd and by choosing knowledge over ignorance.

Knowledge is the key to unlocking our potential. It gives us the self-​determination, responsibility, and power necessary to cast off the chains of covert oppression. Knowledge is therefore the greatest protector, for it also gives us foresight to impeccably handle the challenges of life and, most importantly, to sidestep the traps on the path to awakening. The more you know of higher truths and apply what you know, the more you begin operating under higher laws that transcend the limitations of the lower.

The problem: Are you dreaming?

Are you asleep or awake? What about people you interact with daily? Most will answer that they are awake, and that those around them are awake as well. It’s a simple question with an easily determined answer, or so it seems.

Not all is as it seems. Rather than two states of being, there are at least four. The mind and body can be asleep or awake independently of each other.

With mind and body awake, one is truly awake. With mind and body asleep, one is dreaming. With mind awake and body asleep, one is lucid-dreaming. With mind asleep and body awake, one is sleepwalking. Gradations exist between these four states, ranging from hypnotism and trance to daydreaming and dim consciousness.

The common understanding of what it means to be “awake” disguises the truth. In truth, most who call themselves awake are actually not awake at all. They are either hypnotized, dimly conscious, sleepwalking, daydreaming, or in a state of trance. What all these states have in common is that the conscious core of the individual is absent or passive, blowing like a leaf in the winds of environmental stimuli.

Waking dreams

We dream while physically asleep. But for many, dreams do not end in the morning. Getting up, showering, eating, working, watching TV—all those are continuations of a dream state that remains essentially uninterrupted, 24 hours a day.

You may realize how in dreams our sense of reality is disabled and we submit our attention to the most ridiculous dramas and scenarios. In dreams, we make the strangest “logical” associations that amount to no logic at all, have little say in what happens to us, do things impulsively, and never question our reality or observe ourselves.

Because people tend to be mentally asleep while going about their daily business, they carry out exactly the same behavior. All that limits them is the stability of their physical environment. Nevertheless, they are just as easily suggestible, capable of false logic, and in passive submission to the environment as during their nightly dreams.

Observe what people do and say, the anecdotes and gossip they speak, how they may communicate via recitations of lines from movies or TV shows, speak in trite memetic phrases without conscious thought or originality, engage in ludicrous programmed behavior, engross themselves in petty dramas, and switch to goofy or borrowed personalities that you never question—as long as you are asleep.

The world and society is an insane asylum, but everyone is too asleep to notice the insanity. Just as you may not question insane dreams while having them, so do most people not question their insane lives. But, if you observe yourself, return your focus of attention to your present location and moment in time, then observe those around you with this perspective, you will see that they are virtually sleepwalking. Ever wish you could observe another person’s dreams? Well, your wish is granted – just observe others and you will see them behaving exactly as they would in dreams, were their dream environments as stable as this physical one.

The moment you forget yourself and become fully absorbed in what you perceive, you are no longer awake. You have forgotten about your own consciousness and are in a hypnotic trance focused entirely upon the object of your thoughts or perceptions. At that point, your freewill is surrendered and you become a machine, input and output determined by what enthralls you.

The implications of mass somnambulism is obvious. With billions of people asleep, those in power who are awake have the advantage. Sleeping people are easily controlled. Their conscious core exists within a mental prison, harnessed for time, labor, and energy. They possess little or no freewill because they have abandoned the awareness necessary to utilize it.

The Gates of Awakening

ENGAGEMENT

• Attachment

• Left Brain

• Study

UNVEILING

• Disassociation

• Left Brain

• Perception

EXPANSION

• Awareness

• Right Brain

• Realization

INTEGRATION

• Transcendence

• Psychic

• Power

1. Engagement

– On-going, life-long self-education.

– Personal, self-motivated, disciplined and enthusiastic study of subjects that matter:

Philosophy, psychology, history, mythology, geopolitics, physics, mysticism, art, occultism, ethnobotany, spiritual disciplines, astronomy, linguistics, iconography, etymology, epistemology, astrology, palaeontology, archaeology, chemistry, anthropology.

2a. Dark unveilings

– Secret Societies & Illuminist Groups. Characterized by the extreme stratification of knowledge and technology through hierarchical forms of distribution. A synthesis of solar symbolism, ancient mystery cults and numerology.

– Masons, Rosicrucians, OTO, Order of the Garter, Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Jesuits.

– Globalist Groups – Bilderbergers, Council On Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Tavistock Institute. Many of which stem from the ancient mystery cults.

– Conspiracies, PSYOPS, propaganda, disinformation, illegal wars, assassinations, media manipulation.

2b. Light unveilings

– The universe is magickal and mysterious.

– The consensus 3D world is only one representation of reality, nested in numerous enfolded realms.

– Actual human history is radically different and far more dynamic than we were led to believe.

– Consciousness creates reality. It is the primary shaping force of the quantum field (the ultra soup).

– There is no separation between any energetic entities.

3. Expansion

– Work on yourself: clean and re-wire the inner system.

– Meditation, connecting with nature, entheogenic work.

– Learning to perceive subtle messages from the universe.

– Linear left-brain thinking quietened.

– Softening of the boundaries of self.

– Knowing begins to replace the predominance of thinking.

4. Integration

– Walking the path, every day.

– Acknowledging source and experiencing its unfoldment.

– Harmoniously balancing selfhood and individuality with a fluid connection to the universal field.

– Attunement with one’s own highest frequency of consciousness.

Humanity’s enemy: Television & the mainstream media

The corporate media and network news is controlled and works against us

Let me begin by stating that all in the world is not as you have been told. The old saying that “truth is stranger than fiction” couldn’t be more accurate, for we have been deceived on such a grand scale that most would have a difficult time in comprehending the full extent.

The behind the scenes machinations of big money and politics are so well hidden from most of the population that if people actually knew how things were really run, we would quite literally have a second revolution overnight. Henry Ford knew this well when he said,

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

Most people who read this might have a hard time fathoming how an entire nation could be so well deceived, but it’s really not that hard when you understand the inner workings and hierarchy of an overly revered media in which we place our blind trust.

The truth is not as you know it. Our faith in the media myth has been our Achilles heel.

Many have realized long ago that our politicians will lie to us at the drop of a hat, but most have no clue that our news media lies and deceives us just as much, if not more so.

We have been deceived by our media to such an extent, mostly because people are too trusting of our news system. They very naively believe that broadcasters and journalists would never lie to us. This trust has worked against us with devastating consequences which are unknown to most.

To understand how badly you have been misled, you first need to learn about how our news organizations have been infiltrated. Once you learn this undeniable historical fact, it is far easier to understand that life is not as you know it.

If you’ve never seen the 1976 movie “Network” you’ve missed one of the best Oscar nominated films on the power of the media over people. The media is supposed to be the watchdog over the American republic and our democracy, but few know or realize that it was usurped nearly 100 years ago and has been completely stolen from us in the last thirty years since the advent of Reagan deregulation.

Don’t believe it? Put down the TV remote and do some research on your own for once, instead of being spoon-fed your news, or disinformation, as it truly is.

Mainstream media ownership/control infographs

The following infographs were created over many years ago and since that time some mergers have occurred, otherwise this information is correct. Please remember, when 3-6 individuals own every aspect of the media it is very easy to control what information is distributed (or withheld) to millions/billions of people.

Examples of media manipulation across mass consciousness:

What you should know about:

• Why bats are dying by the millions

• Why bees are dying by the billions

• Why birds populations are plunging

• Ocean acidification

• The melting ice caps

• Deforestation

• Dangers of natural gas fracking

• Tar sands pollution and its dangers

• Mountaintop removal

• GMOs, Monsanto, and the problems caused by toxic farming practices

• Potential food shortages because of drought, soil depletion, and the plunge in wildlife populations

• Polluted and depleted aquifers

• How to grow food

• Hazards of industrial pollution

• Lies your government is feeding you

• Lies the financial system is spewing

• Lies about the tax system

• How your rights are being violated

• Damaged, clunky, aging nuclear power plants and their dangers

• The realities of war

• Depleted uranium bomb residue from the ongoing wars and how it is spreading via weather patterns

• Growth of the prison industry

• Lies about the War of Drugs

• How to disconnect from fossil fuels

• Permaculture and sustainable living

• Importance of organic foods

What the news tells you about:

• Who got murdered

• Lyndsay Lohan

• Who said what that doesn’t matter

• Kanye West and Kim Kardashian

• Car chases

• Justin Beiber

• Who is getting divorced

• The First Lady’s workout routine

• Sex scandals

• The stock report

• Who is gay

• How many cars are selling

• Who got arrested

• Drama in D.С.

• The housing market

• Sports drama

• Misinformation about history

• Who got an award

• Courtroom scandals

• Gas prices

• “Reality” show drama

• What’s being built

• Whatever subtly perpetuates fear

• Travel and leisure stuff

• Who bought something expensive

• What haircut to get

• A little about racism and sexism

• Corporate products to buy

• Who had a baby

• Where to eat

• What color to wear

• Whatever will keep you tuned in

The solution

Forget the mainstream media, you are being lied to. Refocus your energies towards learning the real truth of our world by shifting towards alternative and independent sources of news and information critical to our very survival on planet earth. The alternative media includes a diverse range of radio stations, video broadcasts, news and information websites, lecturers and podcasts.

The truth that a complete media blackout is in effect over the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster (the worst nuclear disaster in the history of planet earth); this fact alone should be all you really need to take your head out of the sand and see the mainstream media for what it is, a controlled disinformation industry in place to keep you distracted and uninformed.

This is exactly why I created RevealedEye. RevealedEye is an independent publication. It is not funded by corporations. It is not sponsored by advertisers. It is supported entirely by readers - by people like you.

Right now, there are 107 paid subscribers and over 21,000 free subscribers who are part of this growing community. A community of people who want to question, learn, and think more deeply about the world around them. I work hard to research, to go deeper, and to present information in a way that challenges the surface-level story. My goal has always been simple: to make important research and articles accessible to everyone - without locking truth behind a permanent paywall.

But to make that possible, I need support. If more readers choose to become paid subscribers, it will allow me to keep producing work and eventually make more of it freely available for everyone. Your support doesn’t just help me - it helps keep independent journalism alive and accessible.

If you believe in independent voices…
If you value research over repetition…
If you want a space where questioning is allowed…

Then I ask you to consider supporting RevealedEye and becoming a paid subscriber.

Subscribe now

Let’s continue….

The hidden truth: Learning about the real situation on Earth

Wrestler Rowdy Roddy Piper, the star of the cult film They Live (1988), said on his Twitter account that They Live actually wasn’t a work of fiction, but a documentary.

Allegorical films you really must watch & analyze

The following films depict the awakening process of the protagonist and subsequent journey once awakened:

• They Live(1988)

• The Matrix(1999)

Important documentaries

Please, invest the time to watch each of the following documentaries. These films cover a variety of areas which threaten the human race and are critical for not only the individual, but society in general. Becoming aware of the problems, then acting to counter them is the only way in which we can save our planet. Making the choice to remain ignore-ant of these issues will only lead to eventual personal and greater collective suffering across the planet.

The Zeitgeist Film Series is about examining the world we share, the values we hold, the problems we face, along with what we can do to make it better. As the word “Zeitgeist” implies, we are dealing with the “intellectual, spiritual, cultural awareness of the time” and the goal of this project is to explore what makes us who we are, how we relate, what we are doing and what we should be doing if we wish to live in a peaceful, humane, sustainable and healthy global society.

Official Website | IMDB | Watch

The decision was made to make a follow up in 2008 entitled “Zeitgeist: Addendum“. Originally this was going to conclude the Series, introducing ideas of resolve for some of our ongoing social problems. In 2011, the third of the series, “Zeitgeist: Moving Forward“, was released independently in over 60 countries and in over 30 languages. This more traditional, interview based documentary focuses on the very fabric of the social order: Monetary-Market Economics. While the majority of the world today have slowly come to see some basic flaws in the economic system we share, as large scale debt defaults, inflation, industrial pollution, resource depletion, rising cancer rates and other signposts emerge to bring the concern into the realm of “public health” overall, very few however consider the economic paradigm as a whole as the source. The tendency is to demand reform in one area or another, avoiding the possibility that perhaps the entire system is intrinsically flawed at the foundational level. ZMF presents the case that it is, indeed, the very foundational mechanics of this system that generates the patterns of behavior and unsustainable methods of conduct that are leading to the vast spectrum of detrimental consequences both personal, social, and environmental and the longer they go on, the worse things will become.

Thrive (2011)

Official Website | IMDB

THRIVE is an unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what’s REALLY going on in our world by following the money upstream — uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.

What in the world are they spraying (2010)