The Pope’s Audience Hall building at the Vatican was designed to look exactly like a giant reptile inside and out. When the pope addresses an audience there the effect is that he is speaking from the mouth of a giant reptile. Why on earth would he want to do that?

Let me just start this by saying that, no, I am not signed off on just about any of the various reptilian incursion conspiracy theories floating around the Internet. Most of them are quite silly, though usually amusing. But if you want to talk Bible, where there is a real reptile that presents itself as a dragon with 7 heads and 10 horns, now I’m interested.

“So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” Revelation 17:3-5 (KJV)

And as fate would have it, that dragon, that ‘scarlet coloured beast’ of Bible prophecy is 100% connected with the Vatican, the pope and the Catholic Church. With that in mind, the fact that the Vatican created a building in the shape of a giant reptile and the pope gives speeches from the beast’s mouth is off-the-charts interesting.

Let’s start with the history and construction of the Papal Audience Hall

FROM ARCVISION PRIZE: Commissioned by Pope Paul VI in 1963, the Papal Audience Hall in Vatican City was inaugurated in 1971. Shortly thereafter, both the hall and the architect achieved such a worldwide fame that the auditorium came to be called familiarly Aula Nervi. It is one of the last great works of Pier Luigi Nervi, an engineer by training as well as a skilled entrepreneur and unsurpassed interpreter of cement as form and structure for architectural and infrastructural works, where it is impossible to distinguish the design project from structural computation.

The complex is located near St. Peter’s Basilica in an area between Italy and Vatican City. The large auditorium, which can accommodate up to twelve thousand people, is covered by a double curving parabolic vault that, thanks to its slender bearing structures, makes the big vault as suspended in air and powered by invisible anti-gravity forces.

In order to facilitate the view of the papal throne, even the floor has a double convex curvature. A refined and innovative system for air circulation was installed, consisting of nine channels and placed under the floor, to dissipate the intense heat output of the communication equipment like the lighting systems of TV cameras. The auditorium was built with extensive use of reinforced concrete and a special concrete mix with white marble dust and grit provided by Italcementi. It is characterised by special brightness, both for the ellipsoidal glass wall (built by John Hajnal) and for the vault consisting of variable-length corrugated structures and large openings creating an extraordinary luminescent plot. READ MORE

Now let’s look at how dark and sinister the whole thing is

Have a look at the image below and compare its shape to the image of a snake beside it. Note the overall shape — wide back, narrow, rounded front, eyes in the middle, nostril at the front, and curved top. So even from the outside and viewed from the sky, the entire building is a dead-ringer for a snake’s head.

When the building is viewed from the inside, the unmistakable resemblance to a reptile hits you like a ton of bricks. A ton of dark, evil and very sinister bricks.

Just when you thought it couldn’t possible get much worse, it does. Way worse. Right behind the pope’s throne, they installed a statue created by Pericle Fazzini in 1977 that purports to show Jesus Christ rising up from an ‘atomic apocalypse’, and looking for all the world like a scene from ‘Night Of The Living Dead’ zombie movie. And if you look closely at the top of the “Jesus” head, you will see something quite interesting indeed.

You will notice that the “head of Jesus” has his hair blowing in the breeze or some such thing, but if you look closer it is more than that. The head of Jesus is turning into…(anyone care to hazard a guess here?)…a reptile. What is the importance of that? Well, you read this verse and then you tell me what it means.

“And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” Genesis 3:14,15 (KJV)

In the Bible, Satan is pictured as a reptile who will have a coming war with King Jesus at the Battle of Armageddon at the Second Coming. Revelation shows us that the Genesis serpent had an ‘upgrade’ along the way and now is a giant, red-headed multi-headed dragon, though still a reptile.

The disgusting statue by Fazzini, mocking entitled ‘The Resurrection‘, actually shows Jesus Christ becoming a reptile, and thus re-writing the biblical prophecy made by God that Satan loses to Jesus at the Second Coming. And just to further drive the point home, the exact height of the abomination is exactly 66 feet.

This is where Satan’s seat is

Take a good look at this video and all these photos, and really meditate on what you are seeing. You are seeing a building called the Papal Audience Hall, in the undeniable shape of a serpent, from which the pope addresses his followers from a ‘throne’ place in front of a demonic image of Jesus turning into a reptile.

ADDED BONUS:

This is perhaps the best short video explaining the very intricate and ofttimes confusing hierarchy that is the Vatican. In it you will learn, among other things, that Vatican City is it’s own country over which the reigning pope is also the king. What is the Vatican? It’s a country, it’s a kingdom, it’s a corporation, and it’s anything but a church. Certainly not the actual Church that Jesus on the cross shed His own blood to create. Enjoy!

If you learn something from reading this article or if it assists your research even slightly, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to help us continue and expand our work.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Disney’s “Hocus Pocus 2” is a complete reversal of the original 1993 movie “Hocus Pocus”. In the original, the devil-worshipping, child-eating witches are the villains. In “Hocus Pocus 2”, they are celebrated as empowered women … even if they keep wanting to LURE AND EAT CHILDREN.

Once upon a time, on a brisk October evening, a family is looking for a movie to watch on Disney+. All of a sudden, Hocus Pocus 2 appears on the screen and fills everyone with joy! The children are intrigued by the colorful thumbnail image while the parents are nostalgic about the original Hocus Pocus.

So the family pops some corn, sits on the couch, and puts on this spooky (but children-friendly) movie – one that is sure to put everyone in the Halloween spirit.

Then, it happens: HARDCORE INDOCTRINATION.

Indeed, Hocus Pocus 2 was not made to simply entertain: It drills children on important social agendas. It mixes the concepts of feminism and sisterhood with satanism and witchcraft in an unholy stew that is served to unsuspecting children worldwide.

In many ways, Hocus Pocus 2 is the exact opposite of the original Hocus Pocus. In the 1993 movie, the witches are, without a doubt, the villains. Why? Because they worship the devil and eat children. That’s reason enough right? Then, they wreak havoc on modern-day Salem in their unique and silly way. While they’re entertaining, the witches still need to be banished forever because, like, they keep LURING AND EATING CHILDREN.

In Hocus Pocus 2, things are way more complicated. The witches still worship the devil and eat children … but they have valid reasons to do so. They’re not cursed, depraved hags anymore, they’re strong and empowered women who are misunderstood.

In short, Hocus Pocus 2 wants you to side with the witches. To do so, Hocus Pocus 2 starts with an origin story that makes the witches sympathetic to the viewers.

The Witches’ Origin Story

At the beginning of the original Hocus Pocus, the old, creepy witches kill a young girl by sucking away her life force. As the witches regain their youthful looks, they cackle away like harpies, clearly indicating to the viewers that these wretched characters are the villains.

In Hocus Pocus 2, it’s the complete opposite.

Hocus Pocus 2 begins in 1653 Salem with a young version of the Sanderson sisters.

At the beginning of Hocus Pocus 2, a young Winifred Sanderson celebrates her 16th birthday with her two sisters. However, the festivities are cut short when the reverend of the village knocks on their door and orders Winifred to marry some guy she doesn’t like.

When Winifred refuses, the reverend orders the sisters to be separated.

The reverend is depicted as an oppressive and ignorant figure. He represents Christianity to the viewers.

Right from the opening scenes, the viewers are made to side with the witches against the reverend and the Church in general. Everything that follows continues on the same “left-handed path”.

When the three sisters flee to the woods, they hear the creepy song the witches sing to lure children:

“Come little children, I take thee away into a land of enchantment”.

That’s the theme song of the occult elite.

Then, the Mother Witch appears.

In the original Hocus Pocus, the witches are ugly and grotesque. In Hocus Pocus 2, the first witch we see is a glamorous, empowered woman. Also, she has an All-Seeing Eye on her dress, indicating her allegiance with the occult elite.

After attempting to poison and eat the sisters, the Mother Witch realizes that the girls are actually potential witches. So she gives Winifred a birthday gift.

A spellbook bound by human skin and handed down by the Devil himself. Of course, there’s a single eye on the book.

As the three sisters browse through the wide array of powerful spells contained in that book, they realize that they can now exact revenge on the village that banished them. This is when they realize that Satan is cool.

Then, the Mother Witch tells the sisters:

“One day, Salem will belong to us.”

Throughout the movie, there are mentions of the witches “taking back” Salem. That’s because, in real life, Salem was the site of the infamous witch trials.

The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts between February 1692 and May 1693. More than 200 people were accused. Thirty people were found guilty, 19 of whom were executed by hanging (14 women and five men).

As we’ll see, this movie is actually about witches retaking Salem. And doing great PR for them.

At one point, the Mother Witch wonders why the world is “not too fond of witches”. Young Mary answers:

“Perhaps because thou eateth the children?”

The Mother Witch promptly responds:

“How else does one stay young and ridiculously beautiful?”

With this answer, the Mother Witch’s cannibalistic ways are reframed as something fabulous and empowering. What a great way of normalizing the occult elite’s real-life obsession with consuming children to remain youthful (see adrenochrome).

Then, the sisters go back to the village and use the Devil’s spellbook to burn the reverend’s house.

Winifred watches in glee as the house burns down and the reverend yells about it being “ Satan’s work”.

To children whose entire lives are based on their parents not allowing them to do things, watching this scene is cathartic. Black magic gave these girls the power to get back at oppressive adults and the children watching this think that it’s cool.

The Heroes Are Also Witches

In the original Hocus Pocus, the hero is Max Dennison, a smart and courageous teenage boy who takes on the witches head-on.

The heroes of the original Hocus Pocus. Just regular kids who don’t want to be eaten.

In Hocus Pocus 2, things are VERY different.

The protagonists of Hocus Pocus 2 are Becca and Izzy, two teenage girls who are fascinated with witchcraft. The eyes on Izzy’s shirt (right) symbolically refer to the eye on the Mother Witch’s dress. They’re on her side.

In Hocus Pocus 2, the male protagonist is a bumbling fool named Mike. Not only is he depicted as a useless, cowardly idiot, but he also keeps offending Becca and Izzy.

Every time Mike says something, the camera immediately cuts to the girls rolling their eyes in disbelief at his idiocy. In 2022, male protagonists cannot be strong, heroic, or even smart. They must be jerks. Masculinity is bad. Witches are good.

Because Mike is a representative of toxic masculinity, Becca finds it OK to mess with him. So, during a class, she freaks him out by whispering a fake spell that ends with the word “seitan” … which sounds like “ Satan”.

Mike’s girlfriend tells Becca that her spell ended with a word that sounded like “ Satan”.

Throughout Hocus Pocus 2, we hear expressions such as “Holy Lucifer” and “By Lucifer’s hangnail”. The constant invocation of satanic entities in a children’s movie made by Disney is rather off-putting. However, it is completely in line with the elite’s agenda of normalizing everything satanic.

The same exact pattern was found in Chilling Adventures of Sabrina. In this Netflix series about a teenage witch, we keep hearing expressions such as “Holy Satan”. Also, witchcraft is portrayed as a potent tool of female empowerment while nearly all males in the series are jerks who need to be punished.

In Hocus Pocus 2, the wannabe witches inadvertently bring back the Sanderson sisters on Halloween night by doing a ritual. Contrary to their 1993 appearance, the witches are greeted in 2022 like superstars.

Superstar Witches

In the first Hocus Pocus, the witches are not welcomed in Salem. Because, for one, THEY LURE AND EAT CHILDREN. That’s a pretty good reason.

In Hocus Pocus 2, things are different.

As soon as they are summoned by the teenage girls, the witches put on an entertaining performance.

The lyrics of their introductory song are quite telling.

“We were running wild and so reviled
Raising Cain until we got exiled
But times are changing and now we’re on the attack
Yeah, the spell is gonna hit’cha,
Because the witches are back”

In Hocus Pocus 2, there’s a running theme of “times changing”. While, in the first Hocus Pocus, the witches were evil, the narrative in 2022 has changed. Today, witches are good and the movie constantly defends them.

For instance, at one point, a character says that the witches are evil because, like, THEY LURE AND EAT CHILDREN. So another character immediately defends them:

“Only because they had to be. You know, they were ahead of their time and they were misunderstood. Then, the whole world was against them. But now, look, everybody loves them”.

Yup, times have changed. When the Sanderson sisters visit 2022 Salem, they realize that the town idolizes them.

The witches meet teenagers who are dressed like them because they “worship” them. So, they take a selfie. Wow, these witches are so cool and relevant.

Later, the witches find themselves in Salem’s Halloween festival. They discover that there’s a contest for the best Sanderson sisters look-a-likes.

Of course, there had to be a team of drag queens. Disney has got to push that gender-blurring agenda to these children.

After the contest, the Sanderson sisters perform a song that bewitches the crowd.

This shot of young people being mind-controlled by the witches’ song is an apt representation of mass media brainwashing children with its satanic agenda.

The song contains these lines:

“One way or another
We’re going to snatch you”

The recurring theme of abducting children is upsetting in itself. But it gets worse when we realize that the witches are not actually portrayed as evil. Is it a coincidence that the logo of Hocus Pocus 2 contains a symbol used to identify pedophiles?

The spiral in Hocus Pocus 2 is quite similar to the spiral used to identify “Little Boy Lovers” in FBI files.

The Sanderson sisters then use the mind-controlled kids to seek out the mayor of Salem because they want to kill him. The reason: He’s a descendant of the reverend. However, the mayor is the father of Becca and Izzy’s friend, so they must stop the witches … by becoming witches.

The Heroes Become a Coven of Witches

In the original Hocus Pocus, the heroes gained possession of the Devil’s spellbook and were tempted to use it against the witches. However, Binx the cat stops them and angrily yells out:

“Nothing good can come out of that book! You got it?”

And that was the end of that. The book was evil so they didn’t use it. The protagonists ultimately banish the witches with good old-fashioned wit and courage.

In Hocus Pocus 2, it’s the exact opposite. The Devil’s spellbook actually saves the day.

At the end of the movie, Becca and her friends read from the book of spells to get rid of the Sanderson sisters. They’re now a coven.

The girl on the left is the daughter of the mayor who is a descendant of the reverend. Therefore, she broke her family’s Puritan lineage and converted to the witches’ side.

Considering the fact that the Sanderson sisters are sympathetic figures in Hocus Pocus 2, they are banished from Salem in a very “compassionate” way. Instead of burning them to ashes because, like, THEY LURE AND EAT CHILDREN, the ending is all about Winifred reuniting with her sisters in a dignified matter.

At the movie’s climactic end, Winifred gets an emotional sendoff as she disappears in a magical whirlwind while “whimsical music” plays in the background.

Even the book sheds a tear for Winifred. Poor Satanic book

In short, the witches were never really the “bad guys”. They were misunderstood women who valued the importance of sisterhood.

The movie ends with the three teenage girls walking side by side, exactly like the Sanderson sisters.

Moral of the story: Evil won.

In Conclusion

Comparing the original Hocus Pocus with Hocus Pocus 2 is a revealing exercise. It exposes the complete reversal of morals and values communicated to children by mass media in the 21st century. Despite the fact that the witches are obsessed with luring and eating children to remain youthful, the movie portrays them as sympathetic, empowered women. The fact that they sold their soul to the Devil for witch powers was a big deal in the first movie. In the second, it is not an issue. At all.

The rest of the movie is all about teenage girls discovering the powers of witchcraft and the joys of forming a coven of witches. Of course, this implies that they’ll eventually have to submit to Satan and eat children to stay alive. But, hey, it’s 2022. We’re cool with that now.

So, the family that simply wanted to watch a fun Halloween movie ended up being subjected to a session of indoctrination that culminated with three teenage girls converting to Satanism.

If you learn something from reading this article or if it assists your research even slightly, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to help us continue and expand our work.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

The following information was researched and compiled by Vigilant Citizen

Dawn begins by sharing her experiences in being raised by a homosexual father, where she was exposed to confusing, inappropriate and abusive sexual examples in the home from the time of infancy. She talks about some of the alarming evidence that shows how same sex parenting is detrimental to the health and wellbeing of the children involved in these relationships, which goes against the commonly accepted narrative from the Left that this is not the case. She also stresses that redefining marriage is just the beginning of a growing movement to normalize all forms of sexual practices. We look at how this forced acceptance of genderless relationships breaks apart the fundamental basis of procreation and parenting, and when children are involved, whether through natural conception or IVF technology, there is a painful loss of identity created by having one gender rejected.

Further, Dawn emphasizes what the LGBT movement has left out is what children really need and gain from growing up with a primordial family unit. Then, she describes the political climate of Canada, where publicly discussing issues related to same sex parenting or homosexuality can get one charged with a “hate crime.” In conclusion, we weigh up the ramifications of the state interfering with the moral values and education of our children and the rights of natural parents.

Transcribed Text

[Transcribed by Ken Adachi: Since this is a recorded interview, the English sentence construction isn’t as formal as it might be in a written exposition. However, the importance and value of the testimony compelled me to type out a transcription to allow wider distribution among English readers and permit electronic (and human translator) translations into other languages. To make the text easier to read and translate into other languages, I eliminated the false sentence starts and habitual pause interjections such as “uh” or “you know” while the speaker is trying to decide exactly what to say.]

[Transcribed by Ken Adachi: Since this is a recorded interview, the English sentence construction isn’t as formal as it might be in a written exposition. However, the importance and value of the testimony compelled me to type out a transcription to allow wider distribution among English readers and permit electronic (and human translator) translations into other languages. To make the text easier to read and translate into other languages, I eliminated the false sentence starts and habitual pause interjections such as “uh” or “you know” while the speaker is trying to decide exactly what to say.]

Lana (Red Ice radio host): Welcome new and regular listeners, this is Lana joining you for the next hour. I’m happy to have you. I’d like to talk about what we’re not allowed to talk about. These are the things we should be scrutinizing with a microscope. The things the establishment tells us not to question. We know what these topics are. One of those is the myth that children of homosexual parents are no different from other children and suffer no harm from being raised by homosexual parents. My guest today will discuss this myth and as you probably guessed, she’s quite controversial. Why? Because she wrote a book called Out From Under, the Impact of Homosexual Parenting. In fact, Dawn Stefanowicz could be charged for a hate crime in Canada for writing this book. So it was published in America which is still surprising. She’s even received death threats for this book. Dawn is a kind, intelligent woman and she doesn’t spew hatred of any kind.

And although she’s a Catholic, she’s isn’t preaching on whether gay is right or wrong. In the book, she shares her very personal story of being raised by a gay father, and how it impacted her life, family she was exposed to, different gay subcultures, explicit sexual practices and other behavior no child should be exposed to. And it affected her for many years. But as it turns out, this is a story shared by many other children who grew up with same-sex parents. You see, in the entire subject of gay parenting and surrogacy, nowhere are people asking about the rights of the children. Is it good for the children? How are children being impacted?

In fact, these days we’re told gay parents are actually better parents than a man and a woman. Somehow Nature didn’t get it right. The conversation that no one wants to objectively discuss is: what kind of family is best for the children? If you ask this question, you are a “bigot” and a “homophobe” and must be silenced and iced out of society. But this question must be dissected and studied from every angle scientifically. I don’t come from this from a religious perspective and people that listen to me know my stance on homosexuality. But I come from this from a nature-based biological perspective. Let’s talk about why children who grow up with same-sex parents have more anxiety, depression, suicide, are more likely to be abused or have been molested; more apt to engage in unhealthier habits such as sleeping around, drugs, smoking. They suffer from more unemployment, less education and need more public assistance

As possible future gay parents, it’s not a time to be selfish and think only of yourself. But to think of the child you are bringing into the planet via surrogacy. A child that will not know his or her true mother or father. This is cruelty because the harsh truth is: without science this would not be happening naturally. The biological truth is that gay sex is recreational, not procreational. But the fact is, the effects of being raised with two daddies or two mommies is a subject that also involves biology, psychology, social, emotional and legal ramifications. When will adults stop being selfish and ask what is best for the children?

We’ll discuss this and much more with Dawn,...coming up

Lana: Hi Dawn, welcome. Thanks for being here.

Dawn Stefanowicz: Thank you Lana, thankyou for inviting me.

Lana: Well, you’re a brave woman who I respect because taking this conversation public in our current political climate is not an easy task. But people need to realize you were the victim and yours is a story that is never heard. Is it?

Dawn Stefanowicz: It isn’t. You know for any child to go public it is extremely risky, personally and professionally. Uh, you know I’m a Canadian, but uh, you know there are risks for me because of our laws here. But I’m worried about the United States and other countries when they legalize same-sex marriage or genderless marriage, it eliminates and restricts a number of our freedoms.

Lana: That’s right and I’d remind people as we get going in this, that this topic, it’s bigger than people’s religious doctrines or views on homosexuality. It’s about what’s good for the children and how it affects them mentally, physically, spiritually. We know the negative impact of children who grow up without dads and also withour moms. But all of a sudden we forget that when it comes to homosexual parenting. Right?

Dawn Stefanowicz: It’s true because I mean, you know people try to diminish the fact that man-woman marriage is traditional. And when we look at the impact on children long-term, who’ve lived through cohabitation, divorce, single-parenting, step-parenting and especially after remarriage , foster care and adoption and even, children that have come through reproductive technologies and surrogancies. When you get to same-sex parenting, you know, definitely kids are going to struggle with a number of issues coming out of any area of brokenness, but especially when you’re denied the respect and the freedom to be able to share what you really, really feel inside.

Lana: That’s right. And today all you hear about is “human rights” but seldomly do we hear about children’s rights or what’s good for the children; not just what the selfish adults want. And we often hear that children grow up just as well-adjusted in homosexual homes, as in heterosexual home. So did your childhood experience in a homosexual home reflect that commonly accepted message?

Dawn: You know, I don’t follow the LGBT talking points and so I would say that the impact for children is quite negative overall. I’ve heard from well over 50 adult children that grew up in a same-sex parented household and they have experienced depression, all different types of stressors. About 30 percent of us self identify as second-generation, whether that’s homosexual, bisexual, or even transsexual, transgender. There’s a number of things we have to deal with long-term and you know it takes us until about our late twenties, early thirties before we can begin to understand how this has impacted us.

Lana: Now, what was it that caused you to wake up to this impact that you’ve endured?

Dawn: Part of it is, you know, I really didn’t have the maturity, as a child, to really comprehend what was going on. Why, from infancy, my father had different male partners that were in the home. And I also was taken into the developing GLBT subcultures in Toronto Canada. This would have been late sixties going into the early seventies, before there was that political correctness that you now see with the GLBT, LGBT movements. But you know, our brains as human beings don’t stop developing until we are in our mid-twenties and it’s by then, our frontal lobe of our brain can now actually judge what we feel about things; what we think about things and start reasoning and assessing where we’ve come from; where we’re at now, and where we’re going. And unfortunately, you know, by my late twenties when I was ready to begin to address my thoughts and my feelings around growing up in a homosexual household, I had already made a number of big decisions around relationships, my academic and career goals, and so forth.

Lana: Well, I think we should get into that and wanted to ask about your mother and father. So what was your relationship like with them for people who don’t know your story?

Dawn: Well, my parents married in 1960 and on the outside it looked like a traditional relationship. And my twin brother and I were about 10 months old when my father brought a male partner to live with us for about five, five-and-a-half years. And so, from that point on you know, my whole infancy, I don’t remember ever a time where my father didn’t have, at least one male partner in his life. And so people would have seen different males coming and going from the home. They also would have seen children which would have been my two brothers and myself. Now my younger brother was conceived, a few years after. And my twin brother and I, you know, came on the scene and at that point my parents stopped all sexual relations. And that meant that only homosexuals sex was going on in my home from the time I was about two and a half years of age.

Lana: So your mom still stuck with him even though he was, he came out as being gay?

Dawn: Yes, and what people don’t understand when you grow up in a homosexual household, we will have different types of family structures. And so we may not be represented in a census, if that is done, because they will usually ask you know, the husband and wife: or the adults in the home; and how many children; and some general questions. But they don’t necessarily go into “who are your sexual partners? Who are you currently having sex with?” You know, and “are these people living in your home?”

Lana: Yeah

Dawn: And that doesn’t get represented in a lot of the census taking, nor in the research.

Lana: Well, I know this is an intimate question, but what kind of sexual example where you exposed to in the home?

Dawn: I saw lots. There was nudity I did see some sodomy. I saw and heard a fair bit of things that would relate to sexuality. There was pornography. There was different types of inuendoes that were made of a sexual nature in that environment and when I also associated within the subcultures around my father and his partners, there was a fair bit of nudity there as well. There was also more than just hints of sado-masochism. There was also, what I would consider to be pedophilia in the sense that a number of the men around my father, including my father, were attracted to minors. You know men that were just coming into adolescence; young, basically boys, just hitting about the 12 - 13 year mark. And they seem to have a special fascination for teen boys.

Lana: Yeah, you know, this has been coming out more and more actually. There’s been some recent cases, but I was also reading on your side on how the public is unaware that there’s actually a growing movement within psychiatry to actually normalize all forms of sexual practice, including sex with children. Correct?

Dawn: Yes. You know if you look at it in certain countries. If you look at Germany as an example, they’re teaching that between zero and age four, children should be masturbated and learn about masturbation. And then from about age four onward, learn about sexuality and gender. And so there is a sexualization of children going on

And it’s being pushed into different countries, different parts of the world. And it’s not really about equality and love. It’s more about taking children hostage in a way where they’re emotionally and psychologically and mentally going to be obsessed. And you know, controlled by thoughts and feelings that they otherwise would not have experienced.

Lana: That’s right I know that in first grade now they’re even teaching some kids about you know graphic sexual positions, and gay sex and it’s like in FIRST grade. I mean who thinks about sex in first grade, you know?

Dawn: Well, this is it, you know. Now, the Left are not concerned about morality or ethics. And, you know, in the situation I grew up in, it was a boundlessness around sexuality and gender, gender identity. And that created a lot of confusion for me. I’m sure there was a lot of suffering and a lot of struggles that I had, that I would not have had in a different kind of environment,

Lana: Now, do you remember what you were feeling and what was going on in your head when you were seeing some of these things around you?

Dawn: Well, I was exposed to sexuality beginning in infancy. And so I was actually sexually abused beginning as an infant. And so was my twin brother. And so I had nightmares for about seven years. And I had a major speech impediment as well for about seven years, between the ages of three til almost ten. You can’t tell that now, but you know, after six years of speech therapy, plus an additional five and a half years, because of a family member with a level of deafness. You know, when you had close to a dozen years of speech therapy, you know, it’s very hard to now, uh, pick up some of the major struggles that I had as a young child growing up in this environment

Lana: Well, did your atmosphere confuse you sexually growing up because I know many gay parents actually encourage, they want their children to be gay and I had a friend who grew up with two moms and they were always encouraging him to be gay so eventually he got a boyfriend, But he told me that he didn’t even know if he really was gay. So did you ever come across any sort of confusion?

Dawn: Yes, definitely. I mean, I remember by the time I’m 8, 9 years of age, my father’s telling me that I can be whatever I want to be. And I can wear boys clothes, men’s clothes. My hair, you know, I can have it cut differently. He really was about exploring this idea of balanced gender. It wasn’t really something where, uh, “Dawn, you’re a girl. You’re going to grow up and be a woman.” You know, there was a lot of confusion around gender, around gender roles. In fact, I had thought that maybe it would have been better if I been born a boy than a girl because at least I wouldn’t have been feeling like a door mat and stepped on, and diminished See, I never felt that I was loved, valued or seen as important in my kind of environment, surrounded by gay men.

Lana: So did you try and seek out some kind of attention from men, almost looking for a father?

Dawn: Yes I did. I mean at age three, I am consciously turned away from my father looking for some level of replacement. There’s a real emptiness inside. You know, people can’t understand it. They think, you know “You had a gay father, so what are you worried about?” “What were you actually missing then?”

But his attentions were not on treating me like I was something special. He was totally caught up with the men in his life. And that’s where he spent his energies, and his time. And so I didn’t feel anywhere close to him in the sense of being loved and valued. I know he did love me, you know, deep down, but he didn’t have the ability to affirm me because I didn’t see him loving women.

Lana: Yeah,

Dawn: I didn’t see him loving my mother. And when we as children don’t see our parents being loved, and being loved by the opposite gender, that is extremely confusing for children because it makes us.,,we actually absorb that kind of negativity in that environment.

You know, being surrounded by just basically men; not normal heterosexual couples in my situation. It had a profound negative influence on my sense of sexuality and gender identity.

Lana: And sadly he passed away; correct? Your father?

Dawn: He did. In 1991, I was in my late twenties. And he passed away of AIDS. And, you know, we realized that, that was a very strong possibility. But about five years before he died, and we had confirmation that he died; that he had died of AIDS. And a number of his partners also died of AIDS. And a few of them are mentioned on the AIDS Memorial in Copley Square in the gay village in Toronto Canada.

Lana: Well, do you know other people who have lived with homosexual parents and how did their experiences differ from yours?

Dawn; You know, it’s interesting. The majority of us had a fair bit of instability in our family structure and in the adults that were coming and going from our home environment. I know two adult children that grew up in a situation where there was some level of stability in that their mother was in one relationship with another woman for quite a length of time, that those relationships existed. And so, outside of that, I have not seen that level of stability, and a lot of multiple partnering going on. And when they look at the research, they found that only 2 out of 15,000 adult children that have grown up with a parent that had had at least one same-sex relationship, only 2 out of 15,000 grew up from basically in the first 18 years of their lives, with their parent involved with one other same-sex partner. So the majority of us will have a fair bit of instability.

Lana: And it’s very difficult for little kids. I just think of when I was young, thinking of my parents breaking up or divorcing. That was really heavy for me to think of at that time. So children are really fragile.

Dawn: They are. You know, there’s this lie out there about children that we’re somehow very adaptable and strong. And that we can handle basically anything the world throws at us. And that isn’t true. We have to do our best at coping with what we’re living with. And then we have to assess it as we’re ready to and not everyone can. It can be too difficult for a lot of adults. And so that’s what you find. I mean the adult children that have contacted me often have difficulties with trust and intimacy in relationships. This is male and female. You know, girls who have grown up with gay fathers tend to have a great deal of difficulty in trusting men

I found with boys that have grown up with a gay father have often experienced molestation as children. Whether it was their father or one, or more, of his male partners. And they’ve also struggled with settling down with just one other person. And you know, you have to imagine what it’s like when you see your parent involved with different partners, even if they’re partnered for a time with one partner, it doesn’t mean it’s monogamous. There’s a fair bit of, like in my father’s situation, he shared... even though he was partnered, he and his partners shared certain relationships/ And they also went out and cruised individually by themselves.

Subscribe now

Lana: Yeah, not all of course, but generally the gay lifestyle; it is full of partying. There’s lots of drugs. There’s lots of sleeping around and other drama. But how do you respond to those who say: “Yeah, but yours is just one experience and there’s many monogamous gay couples.”

Dawn: I haven’t seen that level of monogamy that other, you know, people will put out there. Again, children when they grow up in this environment, they share. When they feel safe, they share the details of what it’s actually like. And it doesn’t seem to match the talking points that you’ll hear from the other side. You know, research bears it out. I mean they look at homosexual relationships. And they found that..,they couldn’t find any partnered men over a five-year period that were exclusively monogamous during that five-year period of time. And I was reading a recent New New York Times article and it was about men who legally got married to their same-sex partner and what they found is that in 50 percent of those relationships, these men opened up their relationships to other sexual partners within the first year

Lana: Yeah it’s funny to me how generally there’s been a lot of gays that looked down on and mocked marriage in traditional family unit. But then here they are trying to have that. And trying to copy that. It’s funny isn’t it?

Dawn: Yeah. In Canada, when we had same-sex marriage legalized - this was in July 2005. It was really interesting to us statistically, is that over 95 percent of those that could potentially have gotten married, only like under five percent actually tied the knot. And we actually had more licenses being given to international couples than Canadians. And so it was actually used, when it came into Canada and was legalized same-sex marriage, it was used by international couples to take it back to their own states and countries to, you know, create court challenges to see if they could have their relationship recognized in their own state, in their own country.

Lana: Yeah, I was wondering why is it so important for them to be
recognized, if marriage is ultimately about between two people? Why did they need the state involved so much? Have you thought about that?

Dawn: I have. No, I’ve testified in nine US states, in the Fifth Circuit, and at SCOTUS [Supreme Court of the United States]. As well in three areas in Canada and also internationally, in other countries, including Argentina and Australia and Paraguay. And what I found is that, there’s..., they will also bring up the argument about federal benefits, visitation rights when one partner is hospitalized or dying.

Lana: Uh, huh

Dawn: Also, inheritance rights. All of these things can be legally, uh, agreed to for whatever relationship someone has; so there are ways to go about that. I think it’s more about having forced acceptance of various types of relationships. The problem you have is in genderless relationships; that’s really what it is about. Creating a situation where the government, you know, the nation recognizes say, same-sex marriage, but it’s really genderless because it could be a transexual marrying. Whether it’s another transsexual or a transgendered person. It could be a situation where there are, you know, say a man with two women and they consider themselves bisexual and they could have the same kind of arranged marriage legally recognized by the government if they use the very same arguments of the LGBT movement.

Lana: Now, are you concerned with the legislative attempts to basically redefine marriage is an institution unrelated to children?

Dawn: Well, you know, I don’t believe you can separate marriage from procreation. Whether or not married couples, as husband and wife, can actually have children or not. Or do you have children or not. That isn’t the question. Fact is that when you have children, they are connected naturally, biologically to their father and to their mother. And you cannot create children in a petrie dish, and then say to them: “you don’t have a mother” or “you don’t have a father,” but you have this parent or these legal parents. A child knows, you know, deep down intuitively that they have a biological father and a biological mother and will often spend a good deal of their life looking for your own identity and their own security in their biology.

Lana: That’s right.

Dawn: With their parents

Lana: Yeah, and if we get real about this, without IVF [in vitro fertilization] and surrogates, this wouldn’t be happening naturally; which brings me to my next point. You, of course, knew your father and mother, but what about the kids who were born from an egg or sperm donor and who will never know who their true ancestors are. Have you heard from people who grow up this way?

Dawn: Yes I have. There’s Anonymous Us. There’s some other interesting blogs that are managed by children that have grown up never knowing either of their father or their mother. In most cases, it’s a sperm donor father. And they do really, really struggle with who they are and they feel like they’re missing half their identity. And that, they don’t like the idea that the adults in their life made a decision to permanently deprive them of at least one of their biological parents. And there’s a great deal of psychological and emotional struggling that goes on. And the other challenge that they have is they potentially could be attracted to a half sibling, you know, someone who was conceived artificially using the same sperm donor.

Lana: Uh, huh

Dawn: And in some cases they found, in certain communities where the sperm donor was used between 150 and 300 times.

Lana: Wow.

Dawn: So potentially, I mean, you do have communities of, as an example, of lesbian women who conceive children using the same sperm donor and the children actually play together as half-siblings

Lana: Wow. Well, what about, we’ve talked about two fathers, but what about the effects of growing up with two women?

Dawn: You know, you have to look at, first of all, the sex of the child, whether it’s a boy or a girl growing up with two women. And I don’t want to limit it to women because there is a greater chance that that relationship will end and there’ll be other relationships. Uh, for the daughters, I think she would, you know, from my discussions with adult children that have grown up with lesbian parents, the girls tend to grow up with this idea that they can do all things themselves and that they don’t need men. The reality is, when these adult children have grown up and married the opposite sex, they realize: “Oh my goodness. this is what I missed out on” And they, it’s like: “This is what a dad is supposed to do and be there for” And, uh, remember the testimony of Heather Barwick for the SCOTUS brief, and she realized what she was missing from watching her own husband. And how he was involved with her children. And just the raising of the children. Actually, “Oh my goodness, this is what I’m missing “

Lana: Yeah

Dawn: Uh, it’s very, very painful realization. And also the fact that you do come to the reality that as a girl growing up, uh, and you become a woman. That .., you know, society might be telling you and the lesbian community might be telling you: “you can do anything you want, be anything you want, do it all, and that you don’t need men.” But it’s a painful reality that you come to and you go...you know what? We’re not like men. We need men.

Lana: That’s right.

Dawn: And, uh, for boys that grow up, it can also be very confusing for them because they miss out on the role model. And what we have is: in our situation, when our parents are partnered with the same sex, the partner tend to take on pseudo gender roles

Lana: Yeah, they do.

Dawn: And so, we’ll be told: “okay, gender is not important. Gender roles are not important. You could be any sexuality you want; any sexual orientation you want; any gender you want. It’s boundless. “ At the same time, mimiced, right in front of me, is my father with a male partner and they all seem to have these traits: kind of more feminine traits, more submissive. And they tend to do cleaning and cookingm and certain things you’d expect of, you know, the mother in the home or the woman in the home

Lana: Yeah, it’s pretty funny

Dawn: And so, it’s a really weird thing when you start to see this pseudo gender substitution going on. And for a child growing up in this, you feel like: “Oh my goodness, like why on earth wouldn’t you just ask for the real thing?

Lana: (laughs)

Dawn: That’s the real thing. That’s what your parent’s same-sex partner is going to be doing Children see right through it. They see this idea of equality as it’s being really inequality because you don’t have equality between the genders. You don’t have male and female that are equal.

Lana: Yeah, yeah.

Dawn: You don’t see male and female being equally loved, equally valued, equally seen as important. And I apologize if I seem repetitive on this issue, but I’m restating it because it’s a very, very deep, uh, painful thing to have one gender rejected in your deepest relationships you could ever have, which should be both with your father and your mother. You should be able to see father and mother as husband and wife, father and mother. You should also be able to see interactions with your brothers and sisters, with your parents, both genders being represented there. You need to see all of that. Those family relationships are very vital to your understanding of who you are and how you connect within your own family. And creating these fake families, because they really are fake families, when you have, you know, a parent that is involved with different same-sex partners. Those are not your real parents. Even if you call that same-sex parenting

I could have an auntie or grandma come over and do pretty well the same things, except they’re not going to be having sex with my parent; hopefully not anyway, in the bedroom. You never know these days with what people are asking for recogntion of . But it’s just..., there’s something incestual in this for a child though, because you know, you grow up and you relate to that same-sex partner almost as if they’re an older sibling. And at the same time, what looks or feels like an adopted older sibling in your family, is actually having sex with your parent. It’s really an odd way of looking at it, but I never looked at any of my father’s partners as a parent. I looked at them, the only way I could really view them, was as an older sibling

Lana: Yeah, it’s interesting how the Left is just.., they’re just out to., they want to destroy the family unit. They have to destroy biological gender roles. They’re pushing, you know, shows like Modern Family, The New Normal. It’s just an all-out war on just the primordial family unit. Something we’ve had for thousands of years on this planet. So what do you think their real motive is behind that? Are they just out to destroy things? Or where is this coming from?

Dawn: I don’t think that the LGBT movement overall, the membership that belongs, actually know what’s going on. But I think there’s a fraction that use the LGBT movement, that are really about dismantling the family and bringing in state control. Because if you look at a number, what you have a number children that come out of this kind of brokeness. And when you grow up in a same-sex parented household, you truly start to lose your relations, or your connections to your relatives, and your ancestry within the first generation. You know, my children are growing up without ever knowing grandparents. They’re growing up without ever knowing what it’s like to have that extended family related to them. And a big part of that is because my father put so much of his energy and his time, his whole life, into his same-sex relationships. He really, really put my brothers and I at a much greater risk of losing that intergenerational support that we would have when we got married and have had our own kids. And so, it just takes one generation to separate us from our biology, from our ancestry, our roots

Lana: Yeah, not a good thing.

Dawn: We know what divorce does. We know it doesn’t work for kids. We understand that even when a stepparent comes into the home and is trying to do everything [that] he or she can in the family unit, that still is not the biological parent. And so we need to be truthful. We need to be honest about the relationships that our parents are involved with because that impacts us as children going forward. And you know, I believe that as much as possible, children need to be raised by their biological father and mother, who are married - as much as possible.

And I do know there are foster care situations and adoption situations, but even with children that come out of foster care and adoption, that they’re best to be raised by adoptive parents that are representative of married father and mother. I have looked at foster care and adoption and the risks for children is a much higher degree of there being psychological and emotional issues going forward. Even though they grow up, you try to place children in the safest, most secure home environment. These children are at much higher risk of a whole bunch of issues. Children that come out of reproductive technologies, surrogacy and so forth, [have a] much higher risk of psychological issues, risk of cancer, physical and mental disabilities. And the children are also [at] much higher risk when they grow up and want to have children to be infertile. So that, you know, we’re really playing with Nature and trying to be God in creating these artificial family structures and living arrangements that are not biologically tied together. And it’s sad. It’s very, very sad. And I know there’s always going to be exceptionalties. I understand that. But to be actually out there saying: all family structures are equal and will create good outcomes for children? No, that isn’t true.

Lana: Have you looked into the many studies on the importantance for children to have both their biological mother and father? Because I know there’s even crucial hormonal interactions from having both parents.

Dawn: There is. You know when I’ve looked into it...To be fair, when I did is....First of all, I looked at one man, one woman marriage. Then I looked at cohabitation of biological parents. So the biological parents have not tied the knot. They’re cohabiting. There’s a much higher risk of violence; like physical violence and emotional violence in the home. A much higher risk in a cohabiting, biological situation that the children will lose connection with at least one of their parents. And the children tend to have, you know, more sexual activity at earlier ages when their parents relationship.. you know, when these children do not grow up, are not born into and raised in a marriage, a married father-mother situation, just cohabiting, these kids don’t do as well. You look at children of divorce. You see that you know, I mean Judith...uh, I’m trying to remember her last name ... but this person Dr. Judith, she did research over 25 years. And what she found was , I think it was Wallerstein. She did research and she found these children are still dealing with the ramifications of divorce twenty-five years after their parents divorced.

Lana: Wow.

Dawn: You know, you look at fatherlessness, You look at..what, eighty-five percent of incarcerated men are fatherless. And we wonder why they got in trouble with the law and they dropped out of school. And they had issues with alcoholism and drug addiction and so forth. You know, we look at single parenting and even the best intentions of parents. And there are kids that somehow make it through and all of these areas of brokenness. We look at single parenting and we know these kids don’t fair as well, economically. We know that they are at much higher risk of early sexual activity and so forth. And so you move on and you move into remarriage and stepparenting, the children often struggle with the new parent that now is their stepparent. And it’s challenging when you bring two families, two broken families together under one roof. It isn’t exactly the Brady Bunch. But anyway, and then when you get to gay parenting and all the different ways that children, like myself. come into these situations, we are, I mean, obviously conceived heterosexually but we have compounding issues because our parent can have opposite sex sexual relationships and same-sex sexual relationships. And they can actually swing back and forth between heterosexual and homosexual relationships even throughout our childhood and into adulthood. Now, my father, remained in homosexual relationships throughout my early childhood, into my teens, into my twenties. And when, you know, before he died, I didn’t see him involved with other women. But my understanding is that for many of us we can have this, our parents, flipping back and forth. That there isn’t this stable sexual orientation that that the Left likes to present. You know, there’s like eight definitions for lesbianism and there’s only one definition for lesbianism that actually is exclusively lesbian. When Loman and other researchers began looking at human sexuality in the mid nineties, the research there showed that the majority of men who say they’re gay, have had and will have opposite sex sexual relationships. They found the same thing with women. The women said they were lesbian, have had, and will have, opposite sex sexual relationships.

Lana: Hmm

Dawn: So it’s really, really confusing for me growing up because I didn’t look at people under these titles of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transsexual, transgender. You know, questioning and so on. I didn’t look at people under those labels because I saw this whole experimentation going on where people were not necessarily labeling themselves. That is later. That came after there was this political/legal revolution to change family structures and to destabilize children from their biology. And that really has to do with selfish adult desires, not just sexual desires. But treating children like commodities, and removing them from their ancestry and their roots. And trading them back and forth based on the highest bidder and the most power that you have. You know, there’s a number of people that cannot have children naturally, but if they’re heterosexual, you know, it’s just you know that’s an issue for them. But anyone else, they’re going to be in for a trial (?) because biologically speaking, there’s no chance that they can ever conceive. Two women and two men can’t conceive naturally. And children, you know, we’re real human beings and we begin to recognize that the images that we were made into doesn’t reflect same-sex. It reflects male and female. That we need both for our own identity and for our own development. We need the complimentary genders interacting with each other in our growing-up years for us to truly, truly value who we are as human beings. And I think that’s what the LGBT movement has left out is what children really need. So they basically came out with the talking points and if you as adult child start speaking, as I have, about what it’s like to grow up in this, they often will threaten us.

Lana: Yeah, I bet you’ve been really attacked because this is like the ultimate taboo. You can’t talk about this at all. No one ever even questions. That’s out of the question to talk about it. So how have you been dealing with that?

Dawn: Well, you know, you get hate mail. You get verbal threats. And you get written threats. And in most cases, you know, if this was being done to, someone who was either gay or lesbian, they would have the person who’s making these threats and saying these vulgar things against you, they would have made sure those people were charged. But in my case, when I get all these email threats, bad emails and vulgar emails, I haven’t gone and asked for any one of these people to be charged or investigated.

Lana: Exactly. Yeah, well that’s just it. People keep saying”equality,” but now it’s they’re the protected group and people such as yourself have no protection legally? I mean, I’m hearing that
you know people keep saying “equality” but now discrimination against churches and pastors seems to be state sanctioned. So if you deny same-sex marriage in your church or you share your religious views on homosexuality, you can actually be charged with a hate crime.

Dawn: Yes.

Lana: I know Canada is pretty forward on that aren’t they?

Dawn: We are. In fact, I’ve had pastors confess to me that they have received, whether they’re phone calls or emails, basically saying that someone is sitting in their church..Usually they’re educated and they say they’re gay, And they say, you know, I really like being here, but if you say anything opposed to being gay or anything about the kinds of relationships I have, I just want you to know. I’m kind of putting you on notice.I’m going to be sitting in on the sermon and listening. And if you say anything I disagree with, I am going to make a complaint.

Lana: Wow

Dawn: And so pastors are being threatened and they are being silenced. And we have a fair bit of our denominations, and unfortunately. it doesn’t matter whether one is Catholic, Evangelical, or Protestant. A fair bit have become very politically incorrect. Politically, they’re very, very careful in what they’re saying. They’re trying not to say anything that would... a person who, say they’re a lesbian, would find offensive. And so, yes we do. We have human rights commissions. In British Columbia, we have a Human Rights Tribunal. So everyone of our territories and provinces are basically overseen by these human rights commissions. We have a federal Human Rights Commission that over three decades had a hundred percent conviction rate. And what you’ll find is, sexual orientation is a protected category. So if you are heterosexual, I just want you to know, that you are not under that sexual orientation protected category

Lana: Yeah, exactly

Dawn: So, you are “equally” protected in law. The Human Rights commissions are not run by real lawyers, judges and juries. They’re basically kangaroo courts. However, they have the power to, human rights commissions have the right..well, the power really, to enter your home, confiscate your laptop, computers, cell phones and files, looking for “hate crimes.” And even at our borders, where you have customs, there are materials that have been stopped at the border: books, DVD’s, and the like. I know there was a sodomy documentary put out by a Russian film company. And that was confiscated at the Canadian border being carried over by.., his name is Peter... he’s with Americans for Truth, and he was shocked that they confiscated the sodomy DVD when that is available and accessible on Youtube in Canada.

Lana: Yeah, they’re pretty full on up there right now, It’s pretty shocking. I Canada was just peaceful and calm, and respected everybody but it seems it’s just a one-way tolerance, huh?

Dawn: It is a one-way tolerance. And the only way to get around it really is to take a stand. And yes, there’s risks, but people understand.This is not about heating anyone. This is about freedom of speech. It’s something that in a true democracy everyone should have. And you know, I happen to have a Polish last name which means that in our family, going back, there was communism. And under state control, in communism, you have empty shelves. So you can’t easily access all the food you would need or you’d like to have. And when the food’s available, you stand in line - blocks and blocks at a time - and you wait until the bread, you can get your local bread or your meats, or whatever it is that has just came into the store. As well, in people under communism, you had to be very careful what they said about their political leaders. And they had to be careful they didn’t put down their government leaders, their political party that was in power. They had to be careful what they wrote. They had to be careful because they could be fined and they could be inprisoned and some were killed. And so, if you remember what it’s like to live under that kind of state control, that kind of regime, that takes away your freedom of speech and also restricts your religious freedom to the point that you can only go to the state-approved churches. You can’t go to the underground churches. You cannot freely worship and you cannot, you know, publicly express your faith, in your business or in any public places. So your worship, your religious freedom is restricted to a few hours on Sunday in a state-approved church. Well, coming out of that . Now when people come into Canada, they’re expecting that there will be more freedom here and they’re absolutely shocked that all this kind of language and discussion is banned in Canada publicly. Whereas, you know, if you go back to different parts of Europe, people are very aware of what it was like to live under a state regime and how restrictive speech was and religious freedom was restricted. And therefore they express all sorts of feelings and thoughts around political and religious topics. You know, and so they can’t imagine that any country, through human rights commissions and hate crime legislation would want to ban speech and protect certain categories of people under a special label. It just doesn’t make sense.

Lana: Yeah, I wonder if eventually, because they keep redefining everything, and the control, just more and more, against certain groups. Seem to might even redefine who a parent is or might even come and try and take your children away because you’re teaching them “hate”. Right?

Dawn: Well, this is it. In Canada, when same-sex marriage was legalized, the majority of Canadians did not have a clue that parenting was redefined immediately with same-sex marriage. And so, what happens when Canada’s gay marriage law bill C-38 was passed through and became legal, it included a provision to erase the term “natural parent” and replaced it across the board with gender-neutral “legal parent” in federal law. So now, all children only have “legal parents” as defined by the state. And by legally erasing biological parenthood, in this way, the state ignored and ignores the children’s formost right to know and be raised by their own biological parents.

Lana: Yeah, this is scary stuff. I always wondered too what the long-term effect would be, like let’s say, in the future if they went far enough and it’s like, utt, “the state raises your kids. There’s no such thing as a primordial family unit.” What kind of humans beings would we become?:

Dawn: Well, this is it. In Canada, as parents, you can expect state interference when it comes to moral values, parenting, and education. And it doesn’t just happen in school. We have some school policies in place that use a term called “school climate.” And what that means is that the child in school is bound by the regulations of the school board within that school and beyond. So wherever that child travels, as a student of the school, that child’s “school climate” around him is like a bubble and it walks with him; it goes with him. So he gets on the bus and he says something that the bus driver finds “hateful” or “hurtful” towards a particular group of people, that bus driver actually has to report, write that down, and report it to the
school principal within a day.

Lana: Wow

Dawn: That the school needs to be “aware.” So policing of speech by students, by the teachers, and the administration, and by the bus drivers, and the school counselors and social workers, and even the caretaker at the school. Well, that policing of speech continues on with the child when that child leaves the school and goes to the corner store, variety store, to pick up a snack or a pop. It also travels with the child on field trips. Also if that child meets with other students at the local mall or goes to a movie theater or a number of them or a few of them get together as friends after school, or at a child’s home, the “school climate” is traveling with that child throughout the child’s whole day;

Lana: Un huh

Dawn: not just at the physical location of where the school exists. And so.with that “school climate” it means when a child comes home and opens up his or her laptop or starts using their cell phone or starts communicating on a social network, that child’s speech and anything the child writes, anything the child posts, in photos or illustrations, all of that can be policed under the “school climate” which means even the parents can be investigated if somehow the school finds out, ...

Lana: Unbelievable.

Dawn: that the parents said something that’s in conflict with what the state is supporting.

Lana: Wow. This is like a dystopian sci-fi movie. So any tips for how to raise your kids in this kind of climate? Because I know we’ve got that and then we got the cultural Marxists on the other side. So how are you raising your children?

Dawn: I tell you what. I home schooled for a number of years. I’ve done all sorts of interesting things, but I home schooled. And one thing I would say to anyone who’s home schooling. They don’t have to be Christian, Catholic, religious at all. They could be Jewish or secular. It doesn’t matter. I would recommend anyone and everyone that’s home schooling to join Home Schooling Legal Defense Association. For that nominal fee to educate your child at home, that membership with HSLDA will offer you a level of protection like nothing else. They will defend you if you’re in a situation where the social worker or supervisor comes from the school or from the government to your door. They will actually give you legal advice on how you’re to handle that situation. And we do have.., we call them Family Services or Children’s Aid. We do have government employees that can potentially come to your door and investigate. They may be looking for “abuse” they say and I put that in quotes. And that “abuse” could be you teaching your child something very different, that they really disapprove of. And so it’s very, very important to have a community of people where you have connection and protection under HSLDA membership. The other thing that I would recommend too, is be very watchful and careful in who you are associating with. Be careful what you say publicly.

Lana: Yeah

Dawn: You have to you. You know, the other issue that we have is, because we are just “legal” parents now in Canada under same-sex marriage, and we have only been “legal” parents for the last ten years, the state does have the power to enter our homes if they feel there is a reason to do so. And we saw that happen with an Orthodox Jewish community, who actually, the majority of them left Canada because of state interference. Because they were not teaching curriculum to their students, to their children, that agreed with the state’s curriculum.

Lana: I thought that Jews were very protected in Canada

Dawn: Well, this is it. You know, they will go after the vulnerable small groups first. They will go after individuals and families and groups that may not be as protected as other groups. In the sense, they’re not as assimilated within the community and don’t have the network of support around them. This is the challenge, that if you see vulnerable groups having to leave the country, then you understand, as parents, how long will you have your freedom as a parent to be making the choices to teach your children certain values and beliefs, and your faith, in the privacy of your own home?

Lana: That’s right.

Dawn: How long will you have that freedom before someone knocks on your door. And if you’re a careful parent, you have to always be prepared for that in Canada under our hate crime legislation and under same-sex marriage; and with our Human Rights Commissions and Tribunal. We are at risk, we’re at a higher risk, and so we must be very careful before we open our front door.

Lana: And we have to remember that what kind of future are we creating for our children if we don’t fight this now? I mean, think of where your grandchildren could be living. I just had a couple of more questions for you. What would you say to other adults who have grown up like you? They’re learning to cope with their parent’s choices and they don’t know how to handle it?

Dawn: Well. I would say face the reality of it. It’s a lot harder to do than what I just said. It takes time. But if you truly want to be sane and a decent person in the sense of being able to cope with stress in day-to-day life, you have to deal with the past. You have to sift through it and love your parents. Appreciate them Value the different men and women that were in your life growing up, whether you agreed with them or not; whether you liked them or not. Really, just look at everyone as a valuable human being and love them. At the same time, recognize where there’s losses, those permanent losses and defficiencies and recognize that our whole identity is not just wrapped up in our sexuality and gender. That is very, very important to our identity, but it’s not all that we are. We’re much bigger than that. And that any inclinations that we have, that doesn’t have to become our identity. Also, forgive those people around you that have hurt you. It’s really important to practice forgiveness on a daily basis. I know that there are people that are Christians, Catholics, that believe in forgiveness. But I would say, whether you’re religious or not, forgive, Really, I mean so you don’t have to carry that bitterness around with you. And the third thing I would say in going forward is to make the best choices possible going forward. Life is not perfect. Life has its challenges, but you can live day to day and enjoy the beauty around you and appreciate the people in your life. You can love more deeply and more intimately, when you have faced the reality of the painful past when you’ve forgiven those that hurt you and when you move forward in making the best choices possible.

Lana: I’d encourage everyone to buy your book too and help support your work because you’re doing important work. But I wanted to ask you: Why is your message so critical now”

Dawn: Well,I’m this is not really about ego. I was compelled to write when I got home in 2004 after testifying before Canada’s senate of legal and constitutional affairs on the hate crime legislation. I was compelled to write my book because I felt like, “oh my goodness, they’re going to make it a hate crime that I came up and say something that hurts the feelings of certain men and women around me. Or, you know, men or women that are like my father who was involved with same-sex partners and so I thought I’ve got to write down my story. People have to understand what it’s like for a child to grow up in this. So I wrote Out From Under, The Impact of Homosexual Parenting and I publish it in the States because for a number of reasons. The major reason is I wasn’t sure if Canada would allow my book across the border. And we don’t have the distribution network that the United States has. And our postal system charges probably double to triple what you charge in the States. And so, I thought my book would be more accessible being published in America and I also felt that with my story out there, that more adult children would come forward to share their stories which is actually what’s happened. And that legislators would take a step back and really consider before they changed laws around marriage, [to] really consider the impact on children. So that was really the purpose of my book and I state that in my preface. My book can be read in just a matter of a few days, but I would recommend people take coffee breaks because there are difficult passages in the book. And especially if someone is an adult child that this could hit home in a number ways very personally. And I also recommend if people have issues, they’re still very stressed about it, if they have anxiety issues, or any other risk factors, that they seek counseling and get the kind of support that they need and that would respect their faith values and their beliefs around sexuality and gender, marriage and family.

Lana: Well Dawn, please share your website details and also let people know how they can get your book and any upcoming speaking engagements you might have

Dawn: Well, I have a website I’ve had since 2006 and it is filled with news articles and research. It’s a very simple website. It’s not flashy . It’s not one of those expensive web sites, so when you go there, it’s really triple W
my first name and my last name so it’s triple W dot Dawn, D-a-w-n and then my last name, which is S-t-e-f-a-n-o-w-i-c-z

And if you can’t remember my last name, just put in “Dawn” and then “out from under” and you’ll be able to find my website. I’ve done a number of articles. I have done different media interviews, but as for speaking engagements, because of the political and legal risks, with what I am doing publicly, I usually do not announce publicly where I’m next speaking

Lana: Yeah, it makes sense.

Dawn: But if you’re associated with an event that is hosting me, they will tell you about me. I don’t even send out emails to advise where I’m going next, what I’m doing. And the reason for that is because we have anti-spam legislation and I’m not spamming anyone, but I could imagine that there’d be some people that want to easily take me down with a five hundred thousand dollar fine if I sent out an email and someone said “You know, I really didn’t sign up for this. I don’t want this” And so, I cant afford it. I don’t even put it on Facebook or Twitter where I’m next speaking because it’s extremely dangerous. There are risks when you’re sharing publicly what I share publicly and I’m only really speaking up for the child, for the children and sying they need to be raised in the best environment possible and that is, you know, a married father-mother household and it doesn’t mean that every household out there is going to be perfect. You know every marriage has challenges, every family has challanges, but we need to give children the best start we can in life. And we need to be real and not create fabricated ideas and try to brainwash children and say that every family structure out there, no matter how broken, it’s going to be good for you. We have to be honest because children do soon realize what they’re missing and they don’t need to be permanently deprived of either a mother or a father who’s biologically related to them. Children really, really need that connection going forward; that history; that ancestry; that heritage. Not just biologically, but their heritage, their religious background; their ethnicity, and the differnet nationalities that are connected in their history. They need to know that. They need to know the culture they came from

Lana: Absolutely.

Dawn: It’s very important to our whole identity and of course on the biology side, there’s going to be mannerisms and certain physical features that we have. All of that is so important

Lana: Very good. Well, thank you Dawn. I know you’re busy so we appreciate your time

Dawn: Thank you Lana. Thank you so much for giving me this opportunity and all the best to you and thank you for your courage in addressing some of these very challenging topics today.

Lana: Well, it's no secret, Leftists are destroying personal freedom to choose how we raise our children, how we want to live our life, and who we want to associate with. What does the phony Right have left to conserve? It's all being taken away by force. and still, they worry about looking like fascists. Well, sadly these people won't make it to the next level of evolution. These are serious times, folks. It's dire straits. We need to start becoming self-sufficient, less dependent on the system. How can we reorganize our lives to become more self-sufficient because it's a matter of time before you can't get access to what you need, especially if you're cut off for a "hate crime." Who can you buy property with? What business can you start up? Where's our co-op? What food can you grow? Where's your brotherhood or your sisterhood you can call up when you need them? Where is our tribe? Its time to become tribal and think tribally in everything we do. Is it good for our people should be the question on our mind at all times. Is this ensuring the survival of our European children? The difference with Europeans is we think long-term. Can you see the long term of where this is going? What are you doing now to leave your legacy for your future children? Pull out of public school. Can't afford it? Well, damn it make some sacrifices: sell that second car or go out to eat less. Connect with the home school network. Make it happen. The children are our future. We must raise them right and armor them with truth. Nature is on our side and there's nothing more powerful than Nature.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

One of the most recognized families within the United States and globally, is that of the Rockefeller family. In 1870, the families patriarch John D. Rockefeller founded the Standard Oil company. Through the acquisition or annihilation of his competitors, John D. Rockefeller established a monopoly on the oil industry in the United States. By 1890, Standard Oil was conducting business on a global scale when it started shipping kerosene to China.

In 1909, the company was sued under Federal anti-trust Laws, the Sherman Antitrust Act. The company, by this time controlled ninety one percent of production and eighty five percent of kerosene sales in the United States. In 1911, Standard Oil was forced by the United States government to dismantle the company in to thirty four different companies. Of these companies, three of them have the right to still use the Standard name (Exxon-Mobil, Chevron Corporation, and BP).

John D. Rockefeller lived in retirement for the last four decades of his life, during this time he engaged in many philanthropic endeavors. He established many foundations that worked in the areas of medical, education, and scientific research.

A benevolent philanthropist? Not really!

David Rockefeller is known for the establishing the Chase Manhattan Bank in 1946. Since that time the Chase Manhattan bank has been renamed as the J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, this occurred in 1955.

David Rockefeller has been an insider to every White House administration since Eisenhower. Another achievement of David was his founding of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. He is also a participant at the Bilderberg Group meetings. Both of these entities operate like a shadow government, behind the scenes of the legitimate American government.

Rumors state that David Rockefeller has been associated to the Central Intelligence Agency for many years. David has had working relationships with a variety of high powered figures such as Fidel Castro, Nikita Khrushchev, Mikhail Gorbachev and Saddam Hussein.

Nelson Rockefeller served as Vice-President under Gerald Ford from 1974-1977. He was also Governor of New York from 1959 through 1973. He ran for President of the United States three times unsuccessfully, this was in the years, 1960, 1964, and 1968. He was also very influential in his support for the Museum of Modern Art.

Rockefellers and alternative energy sources.

John D. Rockefeller wealth was earned through the kerosene industry. At the time whale oil was the preferred fuel for use in lamps, etc... John D. saw the opportunity to replace this fuel with the new alternative energy source known as kerosene.

Neva Rockefeller Goodwin, one of the heiress of the Rockefeller fortune made a statement in 2008 that criticized Exxon-Mobil for not investing in today’s alternative energy sources. Her claim is that the Standard Oil company led the field of alternative energy in the past, and should be doing the same investing today.

She stated that her great grandfather John D. Rockefeller realized that the future depended on the transition to more affordable and cleaner burning energy sources.

Does the Rockefeller family actually care about greener energy sources?

Although it was suggested that the companies created from the break-up of the Standard Oil corporation should invest in cleaner energy. The family is much more concerned with the financial prosperity of the families “trust funds” than they are with the human population.

During a press conference, Peter O’Neill, a descendant of John D. Rockefeller stated:

“I have a world of respect for what the company has done well.”In fact, if the next 20 years of the energy business were just going to be about oil and gas, we probably would not be here today.”

This does not stop the elite controlled media from portraying the family as a group of benevolent environmentalists. In 2008, the New York Times ran a story with the headline:

“Can Rockefeller Heirs Turn Exxon Greener?”

The elite controlled media still portrays John D. Rockefeller as:

“one of the first major philanthropists in the U.S. and the World” and the purpose of the family’s Rockefeller Foundation’s as “promot[ing] the well-being of mankind throughout the world.”

The Rockefeller families own constructed mythology deserves that some light be shed on the truth! The Standard Oil company was the first oil monopoly the world was exposed too. The greed of the Rockefeller family was and is unquenchable.

The success of the Rockefeller family is deeply entrenched with the United States dependence on both oil and gas burning vehicles.

Concerning the Rockefeller families search for philanthropic projects is very suspect. For some odd reason the family seems infatuated with the concept of population control. The most ludicrous part of these eugenic beliefs is that it should be done to benefit mankind. Really?

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
Jacques Cousteau “

All of this truth could be revealed by the media, but being controlled by elite families such as the Rockefellers, they succumb easily to reporting nothing but the families own self-edited version of the families history.

In 1975, Congressman Larry P. McDonald stated:

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super-capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control….Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

Did John D. Rockefeller have a conscience?

The Rockefeller family has went to extreme measures to control the biography of John D. Rockefeller, they have managed to disguise the convicted robber-baron, and made him out to be a benevolent philanthropist.

John D. Rockefeller himself stated:

“God gave me my money, Having been endowed with the gift I possess, I believe it is my duty to make money and still more money and to use the money I make for the good of my fellow man according to the dictates of my conscience.”

Unfortunately John D.’s conscience did not stop him from hiring private armies to disrupt labor disputes. Nor did it compel him to pay his employees more than a pauper wages. His conscience did not stop him from entering in to illegal contracts for the purpose of annihilating any competitors.

“I would rather earn 1 percent off a hundred people’s efforts than 100 percent off my own efforts.”

It was beliefs such as this that caused John D. Rockefeller to become the richest man in the world!

Those that hold John D. Rockefeller in high regard will talk about how he lowered the price of gasoline so that every American could afford to drive an automobile. He successfully lowered the price of fuel from an average of sixty cents per gallon, down to an average or ten cents a gallon.

What is not often said of John D. is how he ferociously used his own private military forces against his workers, beating them in to submission, and killing some of them. His employees feared the repercussions of demanding better working conditions, less working hours in a day, or the dreaded pay raise. John D. Rockefeller had a conscience which led him to pursue profit over the benefit of humanity. A real benevolent philanthropist, yeah right!

What? How did John D. Rockefeller violate the Law to achieve his goals?

In 1914, the Colorado Fuel & Iron company, owned by the Rockefeller family, used a military force of around twelve hundred armed mercenaries to break up a strike by the companies employees. Before the assault was finished there was between nineteen to twenty five workers and their family members killed. One incident involved two woman and eleven children, these fatalities were due to asphyxiation, they all were burned to death in the same tent.

Rather than acting as honorable and trustworthy businessman, the Rockefellers behaved more like an organized crime syndicate. Creating his oil empire after the Civil War, John D. Rockefeller used bribes, blackmail and betrayal to achieve his goals.

Using these sinister tactics, John D. was able to destroy any competition to his empire. Added to these nefarious deeds, John D. also entered in to contracts with railroad moguls that were completely illegal in nature. He received discounts in the form of rebates that were received off the official business ledgers. These tactics aided him in the destruction of smaller competitors that were unable to receive the same deals for their shipping needs.

Standard Oil controlled at least ninety percent of the oil refining industry in the United States by 1879. It was not until 1911 that the Supreme Court required Standard Oil to disband itself as a monopoly trust. Unfortunately, by this time devastation had already been done!

The fact is that the break up of the Standard Oil monopoly increased the value of the companies stock by fifty percent. The companies that were created by this Supreme Court decision were Mobil, Arco, Amoco, Penzoil, Chevron, and Conoco. Mobil has since become Exxon-Mobil. Arco and Amoco is now known as BP. Penzoil has become Shell.

Shortly after this decision John D. Rockefeller retired from the business. His remaining time was spent on his so called philanthropic endeavors and playing the game of golf.

How has the next generations of the Rockefeller family behaved?

True to the family history the next generation of the Rockefeller family has been quite content with carrying on with the agenda of the family patriarch John D. Rockefeller. The family goes to great lengths to portray the family history in their own words. John D. Rockefeller and his family practically invented the Public relations industry.

Every member of the Rockefeller family receives a trust fund so that actual work is not a requirement to a Rockefeller. The trust fund is in the millions for each descendant of John D.. The family also donates an enormous amount of money to the most elite colleges in the world. This allows any member of the Rockefeller family immediate admittance to the University of their choice, regardless of actual grades.

The family proves that their charitable donations are used as a Public Relation exercise by assuring that the buildings they finance carry the Rockefeller name. One of the most well known of the buildings bearing the Rockefeller name is that of Rockefeller Center in New York city. The construction of this building began in 1930 with a starting budget of 250 million dollars, a mind blowing amount for the time! Rockefeller Center is made up of fourteen buildings in all.

Next to Rockefeller Center is Radio City Music hall, This building was part of Rockefeller Center. The main building is known as the GE building, this structure formally carried the name of the RCA building. Another very well known piece of Rockefeller Center is the Statue of Atlas that faces Fifth Avenue.

The Rockefeller family also donated eighteen acres to what would become the United Nations building. This project was authorized by John D. Rockefeller Jr., the building was completed in 1952. It was in the hopes of achieving a One World Government that was the inspiration for the creation of a United Nations. This occurred after the United States and the world failed to form a similar organization that would have been called the League of Nations.

Rockefellers NWO government

The Rockefeller family and the conspiracy to monopolize transportation within the United States!

There are many companies within the United States that is part of the automotive industry. One out of every six companies by 1960 was dependent on the motor vehicle industry. The more individuals that owned their own automobile, the more profit these companies could generate.

Before 1940, many large cities had the privilege of operating successful trolley systems for their inhabitants. The people using the trolley systems had no need to own their own vehicles. Cities such as New York, Detroit, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, among many others saw these trolley systems completely dismantled. Over one hundred trolley systems were decimated between the years 1936 through 1950. These trolley systems were purchased for the sole purpose of dismantling them. The purchasers had names like, Standard Oil of California, GM, Firestone, and Phillips Petroleum.

By eliminating the trolley systems they also annihilated the competition these public transportation systems presented to their business models. The inhabitants of the cities containing the trolleys had no choice but to acquire their own vehicles for transportation. If they did not buy their own vehicles, their other choice would be to use the new gas burning public transportation systems known as buses.

The companies involved in this conspiracy used a company called National City Lines as a front to purchase the trolley lines. Another company involved in the scandal was known as Pacific City Line. Both of these companies were brought up on charges of engaging in a conspiracy to control a significant amount of transportation companies, and attempting to create a monopoly on all transportation. In 1949, the companies were found guilty on the first charge but acquitted on the second.

The punishment was minuscule, the companies involved in the Great American Streetcar Scandal were ordered to pay a measly five thousand dollar fine. The directors of these companies had to hand over a whole one dollar! Not much of a punishment considering the profits taken in by these companies in the years to come! Of course the Rockefeller family was given no scrutiny over this scandal.

To add an insult to the injury, Congress agreed to spend the peoples wealth to build the massive highway systems nation wide. This expenditure resulted in the purchase of more private vehicles, all good news to the conspiratorial corporations. While increasing spending on highways, things like public transportation and train systems saw their government financing dwindle in comparison.

The Rockefeller family and the agenda of eliminating a large portion of the world’s population!

The Rockefeller name has become well known for a global movement that is pursued by many of the worlds elites. This program is one of population control. Gaining momentum throughout the twentieth century, the believers of population control seek to decrease the instances of human births.

Proving that these programs are designed to target humans not of the Caucasian race is revealed by the prevalence of these programs within third world nations and minority communities in the United States. There is also the fact that many of the people targeted for population reduction are extremely poor. So it can be stated that the agenda of population control systematically targets those areas of the world full of poor human beings.

By 1920, the Rockefeller Foundation invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in Germany for the purpose of studying eugenics.

Working in unity with the German chemical company I.G. Farben, Rockefeller owned Standard Oil of New Jersey, cooperated in a multitude of agreements. The Warburg family, which controlled the I. G. Farben corporation, was a financial partner with the Rockefeller family. These families cooperated in the establishment of the NazI Germany Eugenics movement. Even after Germany invaded the sovereign nation of Poland in 1939, the Standard Oil company stated that they would continue to cooperate with I.G, Farben company regardless of whether or not the United States was dragged in to the conflict.

This was revealed to the public in 1942, Senator Harry Truman led a Congressional Investigating Committee which exposed U.S. companies supporting the regime of Adolph Hitler. President Roosevelt had to take a plethora of legal maneuvers to force the Standard Oil/I.G. Farben cabal from providing assistance to the Nazi Germany war mechanisms.

During the years of 1940 and 1941, I.G. Farben constructed an enormous factory located in Aushwitz, Poland. This factory was built to use the patents obtained by the Standard Oil/I.G. Farben cabal, this endeavor would utilize slave labor for the purpose of creating gasoline from coal.

The Nazi SS, was assigned to provide security at the factory, these same soldiers made the decision to terminate any individuals deemed to be unable to work in the slave labor camps, set up by the Nazi regime. Once the war was concluded the president of German-Standard, Emil Helfferich, testified that there was money supplied by Standard-Oil to be used to pay the SS guards at the Auschwitz camp!

Daniel O’Brian, a European Rockefeller Foundation official stated in a letter to the Foundation’s top medical officer in 1940:

``it would be unfortunate if it was chosen to stop research which has no relation to war issues‘’

This was the motivation for the Rockefeller Foundation to maintain the financing of the Nazi research in psychiatric studies. This financing occurred while the nation of Germany was engaged in warlike hostilities.. How Patriotic!

Even though the Rockefeller family ended the financing of German research prior to the beginning of the Second World War. The damage had already been wrought.

To understand the Rockefeller family in modern times, it is necessary to know their history!

The sanctimonious attitude of the current generation of Rockefellers should be understood based on the smug attitude that the family has taken against humanity throughout their history.

In 1989, an oil tanker named the Exxon-Valdez struck Bligh reef in Prince William Sound along the coast of Alaska. The tanker leaked ten million gallons of oil in to the water. It was an environmental disaster.

Once the investigation concluded, the Court ordered the Rockefeller owned Exxon-Mobil corporation to compensate the thirty three thousand Alaskan residents effected by the disaster. This decision came in 1994, the Court issued the judgement based on the companies “reckless behavior”, concerning the incident.

Did the Rockefellers pay their victims?

No, they refused!

Were they jailed for contempt of a Court order?

NO!

Why not?

The Rockefeller family has remained silent concerning this matter! As is their Right, yet the people should require Justice through their Department of Justice. Shouldn’t they?

The Rockefeller family hold the Exxon-Mobil company in high esteem, as it is the most profitable corporation in the history of the United States. In 2007 alone the company earned over forty billion dollars in profit.

As the globe enters in to a recession never seen before in history, with people having to sacrifice purchasing nutritious food and living in adequate dwellings simply so they can afford to put fuel in their cars, the Rockefeller family remains silent! It has been reported that the Exxon company earns over $910.2 million in profit itself, DAILY!

With a record number of families needing the assistance of charitable food pantries just to feed their children, the Rockefeller family continues to accumulate enormous sums of wealth. The cost of fuel skyrocketing, food almost double what it was only a few years ago, yet the family of Rockefeller is not effected by this global catastrophe.

Why not?

Because the people’s wealth is being siphoned out of their paychecks and savings accounts, while the Rockefeller family and others like them are reaping in the profits of other’s misery!

How do these societies fall under the control of the Illuminati?

The Rockefeller family is associated with several secret societies, many of which were founded by the Rockefellers themselves.

The primary secret society that should be discussed is the Council on Foreign Relations. This council is rumored to be operating as the American section of the Illuminati. The Illuminati is the shadow group conspiring to gain control of the world. They are planning on achieving this goal by erecting a One World Government which would end all national sovereignty. Bringing every aspect of life under the control of a small number of global elitists.

You will learn more about Illuminati here:

Aaron Russo talks about the Rockefeller Conspiracy

JFK Blows The Whistle on Secret Societies!

New World Order Plan to Kill 90% of the Worlds Population

David Rockefeller made the following statement in his book:

“ Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

In 1973, writing in the New York Times, David Rockefeller expressed the kind of society he would prefer prevailed over the world”

“One is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony.... Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution it has obviously succeeded... in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive....The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose.... The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in history.”

If this does not open your eyes to the realization that there is a secret cabal conspiring to control the world, enslave the people, and decide who gets to live and who is designated for termination, nothing will.

David Rockefeller expressing his admiration for Chairman Mao? A maniacal tyrant responsible for the deaths of millions of his own people.

To think, if these Elitists have their way, no one is safe.

At anytime armed individuals could round up the dissenters and eliminate them. Your children could be sterilized against their will, if they are allowed to live. Does it have to get that far before the people realize that the conspiracy is real. This is not theory, based on their quotes, it is FAR TO REAL!!

Courtesy: Reality Bytes

Support RevealedEye

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Get 7 day free trial

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Do the Bilderberg members seek to form a One World Government? Are they engaged in nefarious activities? Who are the Bilderbergers and what do they do at their meetings? Does the Bilderberg Group actually exist or are they just a part of some conspiracy theory?

After researching the Bilderberg Group, it is a fact that they exist. They also seem to be very influential on business and financial endeavors. They also involve themselves in politics all over the globe, they make decisions as to whether a Nation is engaged in war or live in peace. The Bilderberg Group controls the majority of the globes resources, they also have control of most Nations currencies.

It was in 1954 that the Bilderberg Group, which includes some of the most powerful people in the world as members, met for their first meeting. The meeting took place in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, the subject of the meeting was a debate on the worlds future. At that time the members agreed to hold an annual meeting that was to be kept secret.

Who are the Bilderbergers?

The members of the first meeting decided to call themselves the Bilderberg Group, their members consisted of some of the most powerful people on the planet. The membership was comprised of members from Nations worldwide. There are members from The United States of America, Canada, and many Nations in Western Europe.

Many of the members are well known throughout the world. Names such as David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, the membership also includes many Leaders of Nations, prominent Senators, several Congressmen, and members of British Parliament.

Also included in the membership are Pentagon and NATO brass, royalty from European countries, and powerful media moguls. There are also individuals that attend the meetings by invitation. Some of these individuals that attend by invitation, attend very quietly, such as Barack Obama and many of his highest ranking administration officials.

Another list of Bilderberg Group meeting attendees include members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, members of the Trilateral Commission, the European Union, and some of the most prominent central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the European Central Banks Jean-Claude Trichet and Mervyn King of the Bank of England.

New World Order Bilderberg Group - Open Your Eyes and See The TRUTH

How was the Bilderberg group exposed?

For fifty years, not one note of the Bilderberg agenda or any of the topics that are discussed was made available to the public. The Bilderbergers do not allow any press to cover any aspect of their meetings. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule which has its origins at the Chatham House. (which is an independent policy institute that is based in London) This rule was implemented to keep all members anonymous and advocates openness and the ability to participate in sharing information.

People that attend these meetings by invitation are sworn to secrecy. Daniel Estulin has dedicated his lifes work to revealing the secrets of the Bilderberg Group as an investigative journey.

Estulin has said that, “Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I could not have done this without the help of “conscientious objectors” from inside, as well as outside, the Group’s membership.”

In return for their information, Daniel Estulin has agreed to keep all of the informants names confidential. Without certainty of the groups initial mission, the Bilderberg Group is currently a secretive and shadow world government. Whether or not the Bilderberg Group is associated with the Illuminati is a subject that is often discussed.

The fear of many people concerning the Bilderberg Group is that they are a threat to the removal of our Rights to control our own future. This would result in the creation of a very frightening reality which would have harmful effects on the welfare of the worlds' population.

Bilderberg Agenda!

The theory concerning the Bilderberg Agenda is that they would like to create a borderless world. This would mean eradicating the indivudual Nation States Sovereignty with a very powerful Central Global Government. This Central Global Government could also be called a New World Order!

They would like to see this government controlled by corporations and protected by military police. This would be a private club for Presidents, Prime Ministers, International Bankers, and Military Leaders to congregate and network among themselves. They could be chaperoned by the new Royalty to ensure peace is upheld. The entities that are in control of the wars, the stock markets both in Europe and America would be able to speak things that they would never dare speak in a public arena.

When the Bilderberg Group was first formed, the group had already decided to create an “Aristocracy of Purpose” through Europe and America. This would be done for the purpose of achieving agreement on matters to rule the world using policy, economics, and strategic maneuvers.

Aristocracy of Purpose!

The global elitists have created an “Aristocracy of Purpose”. This purpose is to retain control over the currency and the resources of the entire planet. The Aristocrats that developed this “Aristocracy of Purpose“ have concentrated their energy, for the reason that without energy, currency quickly loses its value.

With petroleum becoming more and more valuable, the global elitists are frantically working to solidify control of this resource. They are striving to eradicate any National Sovereignty by creating a global governance which would leave all Nations incapable of being self-reliant and maintain the ability to survive on its own.

The Global Elitists also have the belief that the world is over-populated and the reduction of the worlds’ population is part of the Bilderberg Agenda. They would like to return the population back to the numbers that existed before the industrial revolution. One of the schemes that is discussed to reduce the population is by the destruction of the economies of the world.

Violations of the Logan Act!

The Logan Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 953 [1948]) is a Federal Statute making it a crime for any citizen to converse with foreign governments against the interests of the United States. Specifically, it prohibits citizens from negotiating with other nations on behalf of the United States without authorization from congress.

Does a citizen attending a Bilderberg group meeting without authorization from congress violate the Logan act?

Exact wording of the Logan Act!

Any citizen of the United States, it does not matter where he is or who he may be, who, without acquiring authority of the United States, whether directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or diplomatic relations with any foreign government or any officer or agent of a foreign government, with the intention to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.

How can the Bilderberg Group control the world?

The creation of NATO was a central part of the Bilderberg plans. Using a never-ending state of war combined with the ability to blackmail Nations combined with the threat of nuclear weapons. The next part of their agenda would be to acquire everything of value from the globe to attain enormous wealth and power. They also maintain the ability to destroy any challenges to their control mechanisms.

Not only is military dominance part of the plan but the true ability to control the world comes from the power to control the worlds’ currency. Having control of a Nations money supply guarantees that the Nation remains subservient to the controlling elite. This is something that the Rothschild family discovered early in the Nineteenth century.

Amschel Rothschild the patriarch of the Rothschild Empire was once reported as saying:

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”

More information about the Rothschild family 👇🏻

The Bilderberg Group is the most exclusive club on the planet. An individual cannot even buy their way in to the group. The Bilderberg Groups Steering Committee makes all decisions as to who to invite to the meetings. In every case anyone admitted in to the meetings are willing to succumb to a One World Government, that is to be controlled by the worlds most powerful elite.

Who attends Bilderberg meetings?

The Bilderberg Groups Steering Committee has very strict rules for invited guests. They must attend the meeting alone, they are not even allowed to bring their wives, girlfriends, husbands, even their bodyguards are not allowed in the meetings.

Any personal assistants, bodyguards, whether CIA or even Secret Service staff are refused the ability to enter the meeting. They cannot attend the conference and must even dine in a separate room from the meetings attendees.

Another rule applicable to Bilderberg guests is that they are forbidden from granting any interviews to journalists. Nor can they ever make public the activities or discussions of the meetings.

Whatever Nation that hosts the meeting is responsible for all security and to keep away any potential intruders. At least one third of those that attend the meetings are political figures.

The rest of the attendees come from industry, finance, academia, labor and communications. The procedures of the meetings are issued through the Chatham House Rules. These rules allow those in attendance to have freedom to express their opinions within an ambiance of relaxation in the knowledge that anything said in the meeting will never be quoted or divulged to the public.

Subscribe now

What is the benefit in being associated with the Bilderberg Group?

Discussion in the meetings are uninhibited, this does not mean that every discussion ends in unanimous decisions. The Groups membership is comprised of around eighty of the most prominent figures in the world, they regularly attend these meetings annually.

There are many others that attend the meetings by invitation due to their knowledge of, or involvement in, topics that are relevant to discussions which are part of the meetings’ agenda. Some of the invited guests receive invitations to attend future meetings, other attendees that are present at their first Bilderberger Group meeting are selected for the possibility that they may prove useful in the future.

One example of a first time attendee that has been invited to other meetings is Bill Clinton. He attended his first meeting in 1991 as Governor of Arkansas. It was at this first meeting in 1991 that David Rockefeller explained to Bill Clinton that the “North American Free Trade Agreement” was a major priority to the Bilderberg Group. Bill Clinton was told that the Bilderbergers would require that he would support the Treaty!

It was the very next year that Bill Clinton achieved the role of President of the United States, it was on January first 1994 that the “North American Free Trade Agreement” was put in place. There are many other examples which hold a resemblance to this occurrence. Many of the attendees of the Groups meetings are chosen to be placed in powerful positions, within politics, military and other prominent positions.

What are the goals of the Bilderberg Group?

One of the main pursuits of the Bildergerger Groups agenda is the creation of a One World Government that would be controlled by a global conglomerate of corporations. This One World Government would consist of one unified global market which would have the One World Governments military to provide policing for the globe. This would put the entire globe under control of this New World Order which would be financially regulated by a One World Central Bank that would use a new unified global currency.

The Bilderberg Groups agenda has a list of goals in which they are attempting to achieve. The list begins with a goal that is the creation of one International identity that would recognize a single set of universal values. They would also like to bring in central control of the population of the globe through mind control techniques. Meaning that they are seeking forms of control that would create and influence public opinion.

What are some of the plans of the Bilderberg Group?

There is also the plans of a New World Order that would contain no middle class in the population. There would be only two classes of people, those that are rulers and those that are servants. This New World Order would eliminate any forms of Democracy. This would create a zero growth society with the removal of any individual prosperity or the ability for the individual to progress. There would only be an accumulation of greater wealth and power for those in the ruling class.

All this can be accomplished by fabricating crisis and infinite wars. The Group also holds ambitions to have complete control of all forms of education. By controlling the mind of the public it would be easy to train their servants to perform assorted functions.

They would also like to have a centralized control of all policies, both foreign and domestic, a global unification. The United Nations would be for all practical purposes a world government with the ability to collect a United Nations global tax on what would become the worlds’ citizens.

Also on the list would be the expansion of both the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) would become the Global Military. There would also be the establishment of a universal legal system.

The creation of a global welfare state would also be part of the agenda. Under this Welfare State the submissive servants (slaves) would receive rewards while those that refuse to comply with the New World Order would be marked for termination!

What does the Council On Foreign Relations have to do with the Bilderberg Group?

When it comes to partners of the Bilderberg Group, many of the members identities are secret. In the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is a preeminent partner to the Group.

One of the main figures which created the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 was Edward Mandell House. Mr. House was a preeminent adviser to President Woodrow Wilson. Rumors exist which state that Edward Mandell House held the actual power in the nation from 1913 through 1921.

It was during the Edward Mandell House reigns of power that the Federal Reserve Act was passed and signed in to Law in the year 1913. This Act gave the power to print money to international bankers. The Sixteenth Amendment was sanctioned in February which was the basis for the creation of the Federal Income Tax. This Amendment was enacted to provide a revenue source for the Government for the reason to repay the service on the debt of the Country.

From the time of its inception, the Council on Foreign Relations’ main goal was to usher in a One world Government, which would have as its basis a Centralized global system of financing. In the modern world the Council on Foreign Relations has a membership in the thousands, with many of its members being some of the most important and influential people In the United States.

Many of the members of the Council on Foreign Relations also belong to the corporate media, as well as many other powerful positions within the political and private sector. The Council on Foreign Relations remains discrete, and extremely secretive concerning its actual agenda.

There are people that consider the Council on Foreign Relations to be a “front organization for the heart of the American Establishment”. The Council meets in private and only reveals to the public the knowledge that it desires for the population to be aware of existing.

What does the Trilateral Commission have to do with the Bilderberg Group?

The Trilateral Commission, a group similar to the Council on Foreign Relations also holds secretive meetings concerning the combination of the worlds elite in to one body, controlling the globe.

The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller, who is also a member of the Bilderberg Group, as well as the Council on Foreign Relations. He still holds an emeritus position on all three boards as well as continuing to give financial support.

Based on past and present members of the Group, it is easy to see the power behind the “think tanks“. Members of these secretive groups amass great power. This list would include almost every single Presidential candidate, regardless of party affiliation. It would also include some of the most powerful Senators and Congressmen. Many of the most powerful figures in the media, as well as the most prominent figures that belong to the FBI, CIA, NSA, as well as the rest of the defense establishment.

Even leading Government agencies are infiltrated. This would include employees of the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, even the Judiciary, and Department of Treasury. Leading figures in these departments have all been members of these Secretive Societies.

It is as though the entire Nation of the United States has been penetrated by Secret Society members, whose allegiance is unknown. Are they sworn to allegiance to their secret group? Does their Oath of Office have any merit in their life?

What are some of the things that the Council on Foreign Relations involved in?

Since its inception, the Council on Foreign Relations has served as an employment agency for the Federal Government of the United States. It does not matter what party the individual belongs to, many CFR members are offered high ranking positions within all aspects of Government, media, and control of major corporations.

It makes no difference which political party resides within the White House, the Council on Foreign Relations has not lost any power or altered their agenda since it was founded in 1921.

The Council supports the Global unification of a superstate, one in which the United States of America and all other Nations of the world would be required to surrender their Nations Sovereignty to a unified and centralized power.

The founder of the Council on Foreign Relations, Paul Warburg was previously a member of Franklin Roosevelt’s “brain trust“. This “brain trust“ was a group of advisers to FDR during his first Presidential campaign. In 1950, Paul Warburgs son John said to the Senate Foreign Relations’ Committee;

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it - by conquest or consent.”

Later, during a 1992 Bilderberg meeting, Henry Kissinger told the members of the meeting that;

“Today, Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful.”

This statement would be true if Americans believed there was a threat from enemies. Whether the threat was real or fabricated was irrelevant, as long as the American people held the belief that there was a threat to their existence.

United Nations | When did the plans for a One World Government begin?

Through threats to our safety whether real or simply fiction, both would end in the same result. Once a threat is perceived the population of the world will beg for the leaders of the world to save them from this perceived evil.

To guarantee safety many individuals would happily give up their Rights for the feeling of security. The population would eagerly consent to a One World Government if they felt that such a Government would keep them and their families safe.

It was the Council on Foreign Relations that started the planning for a New World Order before 1942. The United Nations inception began with a cartel of CFR members which was called at the time the “Informal Agenda Group.”

It was this group that created the framework for the original United Nations proposal. The group presented the proposition to Franklin Roosevelt. The President made the announcement of the United Nations the following day.

When it was founded in 1945, the Council on Foreign Relations was composed of over forty United States delegates. The Council on Foreign Relations performs its agenda in small groups containing around twenty-five people. These groups concentrate on leaders from six different conspiratorial categories, these categories are industrialists, financiers, ideologues, military, professional, specialists.

There were lawyers, medical doctors and members of organized labor which were brought together for the reason of engaging in detailed discussions on a wide variety of topics concerning Foreign Affairs.

The Council on Foreign Relations, although not financed by Government, works so intimately with the Government it is extremely difficult to differentiate between actions performed by the Council from Government actions done through Sovereign decisions.

During the 1930s through the 1940s, the United States of America was the most self sustaining country on the planet. It was during the great depression that this fact was recognized.

In 1937 an author named Eugene Staley that made statements concerning raw resources:

“United States is more nearly capable than any other great power (besides the Soviet Union) of meeting its normal demands from resources within its boundaries.”

Those in power used the Council on Foreign Relations to fortuitously pursue a distinct consideration concerning the interests of the United States of America.

This attitude did not have any basis in reality concerning the overall concerns of the citizens of the United States. Instead it was more meaningful to the capitalist economic system which was under their control and gave advantage to those who wielded the most power in the nation.

The theory behind the actions of the Council on Foreign Relations is that the United States of America would require more space to place inhabitants. This acquisition would need to be accomplished while perpetuating the prevailing system. Without the need of altering the foundations of the Nation into a Socialistic Society.

One of the Planning Council members, Mr. Henry R. Luce said quite candidly in an interview with Life magazine in 1941 that:

“Tyrannies may require a large amount of living space. But Freedom requires and will require far greater living space than Tyranny.”

How is the Bilderberg Group financed?

The most significant form of revenue comes from major corporations and key foundations. To name just three of the foundations are the Rockefeller, the Carnegie, and the Ford Foundations all of which are administered by essential corporate officers.

A major executive at CBS news gave an explanation as to what the medias role is in the New World Order would be, he stated:

“Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have.”

CBS among many other giant media conglomerates have control over everything that we see, everything we hear, and everything we read. They use tools such as television broadcasts, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, films, and a large part of the Internet to maintain this control.

Many top executives and journalists are regular attendees at Bilderberg Group meetings. Their agreement with the Bilderberg Group is that nothing that takes place within the meetings are ever reported through any media sources.

The Rockefeller family still holds a tremendous amount of power. In fact the families’ patriarch David Rockefeller is in his mid 90’s and nearly at the end of his worldly dominance. This does not change the fact that the Rockefeller family, led by David holds major control over the media in general.

With this power the Rockefeller family accumulated a huge supremacy over the opinions of the public. With this control over public opinion it gave the family the opportunity to accumulate a huge influence in the field of politics.

How does the Bilderberg Group and Council of Foreign Relations control the world?

Once the control of American politics was complete, these groups are seizing dominion over the Nation itself. Once that goal is achieved control of the world will be the next step on the agenda.

The Bilderberger-Rockefeller tactics is to assure that their beliefs become so tempting by disguising them, that they will eventually become public policy. They can then use their dominance to compel the leaders of the world to succumb to the wants and needs of the ‘Masters of the Universe.’

The free world press is their mechanism to publicize their “agreed-upon propaganda.” The Council of Foreign Relations control of the Presidents cabinet aided in the passage of “The National Security Act of 1947.” This act created the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Since its inception, fourteen Department of Defense Secretaries have been members of the Council of Foreign Relations. From 1940 to the present only one Secretary of State (James Byrnes) has not had a membership either in the Council of Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission.

Programming the Public Mind!

The sociologist Hadley Cantril stated in 1967 in his book titled, “ The Human Dimension - Experiences in Policy Research”, that governments

“Psycho-political operations are propaganda campaigns designed to create perpetual tension and to manipulate different groups of people to accept the particular climate of opinion the Council of Foreign Relations seeks to achieve in the world.”

Read more

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is smack dab in the middle of it all. Indeed, through its annual Davos meetings, the WEF attempts to legitimize and normalize its influence on the world’s democratic nations by having a panel of world leaders attending and speaking at the event.

A simple look at the list of attendees at these meetings reveals the organization’s incredible reach and influence. The biggest names in media, politics, business, science, technology, and finance are represented at the WEF.

According to mass media, the Davos meetings gather people to discuss issues such as “inequality, climate change, and international cooperation”. This simplistic description appears to be custom-made to cause the average citizen to yawn in boredom. But topics at the WEF go much further than “inequality”.

Throughout the years, people at the WEF have said some highly disturbing things, none of which garnered proper media attention. In fact, when one pieces together the topics championed by the WEF, an overarching theme emerges: The total control of humanity using media, science, and technology while reshaping democracies to form a global government.

If this sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory, keep reading. Here are the 10 most dystopian things that are being pushed by the WEF right now. This list sorted is in no particular order. Because they’re all equally crazy.

1. Penetrating Governments

The least one can say is that Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, is not a fan of democracy. In fact, he perceives it as an obstacle to a fully globalized world.

In the 2010 WEF report titled “Global Redesign”, Schwab postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a

“self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system), and select civil society organizations (CSOs)”.

This is the exact opposite of a democracy.

He argued that governments are no longer “the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage” and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance”. For this reason, the Transnational Institute (TNI) described the WEF as “a silent global coup d’état” to capture governance.

In 2017, at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, Schwab blatantly admitted what is continually dismissed as a “conspiracy theory” by mass media: The WEF is “penetrating” governments around the world.

Klaus Schwab in 2017 at Harvard: "What we are very proud of, is that we penetrate the global cabinets of countries with our WEF Young Global Leaders."

In this outstanding talk, Schwab blatantly stated that Angela Merkel of Germany, Vladimir Putin of Russia, Justin Trudeau of Canada, and Emmanuel Macron of France were “groomed” by the WEF. He even adds that at least half of Canada’s cabinet consists of representatives sold to the WEF’s agenda. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the absolute truth, confirmed by the head of the WEF himself.

2. Controlling Minds Using Sound Waves

In 2018, one of the topics of discussion at the WEF was “Mind Control Using Sound Waves” I did not alter this title for sensationalism, those are exactly the words used by the WEF.

The WEF’s Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils took place on November 11-12 in the United Arab Emirates. One of the topics discussed was “mind control using sound waves”. University of Oxford Professor Antoine Jérusalem describes the technology and the issues related to it:

Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?

Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.

If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves carefully.

In other words, there’s a difference between ultrasound stimulation used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the tissue.

Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but that we still don’t understand.

What social good can come of it?

The current buzzwords are Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, as well as traumatic brain injuries. But scientists are also looking at the spinal cord and peripheral nervous systems. As far as I am concerned, since the brain is the de facto centre of decision for so many processes, any of them could be targeted.

Is it safe?

When attempting to ‘control’ neuronal activity by providing minute mechanical vibrations to a region of the brain, it’s important that the focus of the ultrasound, frequency and amplitude are properly tuned, or the brain can potentially be damaged. The point is that we still don’t know how to tune all of this; and if I were to exaggerate a bit, I could say that our current approach is not that far off from fiddling around with the settings on a radio until we hear the right station.

One of the many difficulties is to know for sure that we are indeed controllingneurons with these sound waves, as opposed to damaging them. The truth is that we still don’t know how the process works. And if you don’t know how it works, you don’t know how much is “too much”.

What are the biggest ethical challenges?

The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.

From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.

I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.

How dystopian could it get?

I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.

What can we do to safeguard its potential?

I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s human nature, and not unique to scientists.

Either way, our job is to find something that is beneficial to humanity. And if you find a way to make somebody better, then you most likely also know how to do the contrary. The goal is to make sure that regulation prevents the latter, without impeding the former. I believe that this is the role of regulators. And I think that the European Union, where I work, is quite good at this.

Another role of politicians should be to provide a communication platform to explain the long vision of any given area of research. And it can be too early, or not a good idea, and the final decision might very well be to stop it. But in the long term, the public should have the potential benefits of a new technology explained to them in plain words, which is something that scientists are not necessarily good at.

Politicians should remember that if we don’t do it, then somebody somewhere will do it anyway…potentially unregulated.

In short, Antoine Jérusalem says that remote mind control is an incredibly powerful technology that has the power to possibly cure illnesses. However, in the wrong hands, the technology can completely take control of one’s brain. In his words, it can be the “perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak”.

Despite the technology’s admitted dystopian potential, Antoine Jérusalem believes that humanity cannot avoid developing it. He probably says that because a company developing this technology is part of the WEF. His solution to make sure that the technology is not used to turn humans into mind control slaves? Government regulation.

In short, the WEF states that this technology should be under the control of the global elite. Does that comfort you?

3. Pills That Contain Microchips

Once again, this title sounds like a far-fetched conspiracy theory cleverly worded for sensationalism. It is not. Here’s a video from the WEF’s 2018 meeting where Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, talks about pills that contain microchips.

Bourla says:

“FDA approved the first ‘electronic pill’, if I can call it like that. It is basically a biological chip that is in the tablet and, once you take the tablet, and it disolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that, the compliance. The insurance companies would know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.”

Is this field truly fascinating? Or utterly dystopian? As Bourla himself said: Imagine the compliance. This kind of technology could easily open the door to all kinds of nefarious applications. Since then, COVID put Pfizer in a position of power never seen before for a pharmaceutical company.

4. Praising Massive Lockdowns

In 2020 and 2021, cities around the world were subjected to massive and drastic lockdowns, causing job losses, suicides, drug overdoses, isolation, mental health issues, domestic abuse, bankruptcies, and homelessness. During this horrific period, children could not attend school for months and were essentially barred from interacting with other children. A slew of small and medium businesses was destroyed while large corporations strived.

Despite all of this, the WEF could not hide its love of drastic, life-destroying lockdowns. In fact, it released a video surrealistically called “Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world”. Here’s this piece of complete insanity.

The video states “Lockdowns significantly reduced human activity … leading to Earth’s quietest period in decades,” while showing dystopian images of empty cities and planes stuck on the ground.

Completely ignoring the immense human suffering caused by these lockdowns, the WEF considered it was all worth it because “carbon emissions were down 7% in 2020”.

When this thing was first posted, it garnered intense backlash. So the WEF deleted the video above and posted this tweet

As you can see, despite deleting the video, the WEF kept praising lockdowns. That’s because the WEF would love to see “covidian” life become permanent.

5. “Take a Peek at the Future”

Judging by comments on YouTube and social media, people absolutely hate videos created by the WEF. But they keep coming. Because they don’t care what you think. They just want to plant their seed of insanity into your mind. In a video titled “How our lives could soon look”, the WEF invites viewers to “take a peek at the future”. And it is BLEAK. It is all about making COVID life permanent. World Economic Forum on Twitter: "This is how our lives could soon look."

The video is filled with masked people, purell dispensers, and QR codes. This is the future they want. Then, there’s this nugget of insanity.

No. Go away.

The video proudly says:

“NASA has invented a system that can ID you from your heartbeat using a laser.”

As if that wasn’t enough, the video shows children stuck at home and being schooled through screens. The video ends by showing people wearing masks outside, like crazy people

6. Pushing For a Great Reset

As stated above, the WEF perceives the pandemic as an “opportunity”. It is not only an opportunity to reshape our personal existence but to restructure the entire world structure according to its principles. The WEF calls it “the Great Reset”. To promote this Reset (that absolutely nobody wants) the WEF released a propaganda video (it really fits the definition of “propaganda”). Here it is in all of its insanity.

This short video manages to contain an incredible amount of subversive messages. It even ridiculizes “conspiracy theories” while, astoundingly, confirming these theories.

A screenshot from the video. Are you serious?

The video also announced the “death of capitalism”.

Another surreal screenshot from the video.

While capitalism is based on a self-regulating system of offer and demand, the Great Reset looks to redefine the way businesses are evaluated through new parameters. The main one: Compliance with the elite’s social and political agendas.

Towards the end, the narrator utters this enigmatic sentence:

“And that’s all about getting the right people in the right place at the right time”.

While the video doesn’t quite explain what this sentence actually means in real-life situations, its implications are rather chilling. Instead of allowing successful individuals and businesses to grow organically, the elite’s system would interfere to “get the right people at the right place at the right time”, in accordance with its agenda. In other words, the system would be rigged and compliance with a wider agenda would be mandatory in a new economy.

The video ends with a call to viewers to get involved. However, of course, you’re not actually invited to the WEF. In fact, they’re actually looking to “recalibrate” your freedom of speech.

7. “Recalibrating” freedom of speech

An easy way to identify world leaders who are groomed by the WEF is through their incessant railing against free speech. They absolutely hate it and they’re constantly calling for the internet to be censored and highly regulated. At the 2022 Davos meeting, Australian “eSafety commissioner” Julie Inman Grant stated that we need a “recalibration of free speech”.

Grant said:

“We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.”

Here, Grant essentially calls for censorship. She even believes that freedom of speech as a human right should be “recalibrated” using “online violence” as an excuse. There is no such thing as “online violence”. They love to equate speech with violence. It is an extremely manipulative way of justifying China-style censorship.

Free speech is, in fact, binary. Either it exists or it doesn’t. And they clearly don’t want it to exist.

8. Tracking Your Clothes

The WEF wants to control your clothes. And they’ve made a video about it. Did I mention that people absolutely hate WEF videos? Here’s another one that got people’s blood boiling.

Using the environment as an excuse (as usual), the WEF announced the coming of clothing laced with “digital passports” that can be traced at all times. Backed by Microsoft (of course).

They really want RFID chips and QR codes everywhere.

According to the WEF, these chips will allow fashion brands to resell their clothes. I have no idea how that would work. The video makes sure NOT to mention that this technology would be a great way of tracking those who ditched their smartphones.

But ditching your smartphone might become … impossible.

9. “Smartphones will be in your body by 2030”

At the 2022 Davos meeting, Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark claimed that, by 2030, “smartphones will be implanted directly into the body.” This would coincide with the coming of 6G technology, which is expected to be launched by the end of the decade.

For years, this site has been documenting the elite’s incessant push for transhumanism, which is the merging of humans with machines. They’re looking to accelerate this transition by making things people cannot live without (such as smartphones) available in transhumanist form.

Are you noticing their creepy eagerness to insert things inside our bodies?

Subscribe now

10. “You’ll Own Nothing. And You’ll Be Happy.”

This is probably the most dystopian moment in WEF history. In 2016, Ida Auken, a Member of Parliament in Denmark said:

“Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better”.

The WEF loved that quote so much that it tweeted about it.

The WEF also created a video (that everybody absolutely hated) titled “8 Predictions for the World in 2030”.

The WEF loves to phrase its “predictions” in a non-conditional form, as if they’re an inevitability. But look at this smiling guy. He’s clearly happy. Thank you WEF!

An article on the WEF’s website explains:

“I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes,” writes Danish MP Ida Auken. Shopping is a distant memory in the city of 2030, whose inhabitants have cracked clean energy and borrow what they need on demand. It sounds utopian, until she mentions that her every move is tracked and outside the city live swathes of discontents, the ultimate vision of a society split in two.

In this dystopian future, there are no products you can own. Only “services” that are rented and delivered using drones. This system would make all humans completely dependent on WEF-controlled corporations for every single basic need. There would be absolutely no autonomy, no freedom, and no privacy. And you’ll be happy.

Honorable Mention: Individual carbon footprint tracker

At the 2022 Davos meeting, Alibaba Group president J. Michael Evans announced the development of an “individual carbon tracker”.

Once again, the WEF uses the environment to promote the micro-management of human behavior. Evans says that the tracker can monitor “where they’re traveling, how they’re traveling, what are they’re eating and what are they consuming on the platform”.

Notice that he used the pronoun “they” and not “we” because there is no way in hell he’s going to use that thing. Me neither.

In Conclusion

Upon reviewing this list, two common themes become obvious. The first theme is “penetration”. The WEF wants to penetrate governments using “Global Leaders” (aka Manchurian candidates). It also wants to penetrate our bodies through pills, microchips, and vaccines. It also wants to penetrate our minds using soundwaves, censorship, and propaganda.

The other theme is “control”. They want to control what we think, where we go, what we say, what we eat, and what we wear.

Do you know who agrees with the WEF? China. Censorship is widespread, a social credit system controls people’s behaviors and COVID is still used as an excuse for massive lockdowns and total population control. Not to mention the literal concentration camps. Despite all of this, Chinese officials are constantly present at WEF meetings. Why? Because China is basically a laboratory for the WEF’s policies.

With all of that being said, how can we counteract the WEF’s insanity? How can we vote them out if they were never voted in? A first step would be to elect – at all levels of government – representatives that want nothing to do with the WEF. If our elected officials treated the WEF as the rogue, illegitimate organization that it is, its influence would be greatly reduced.

Second, we can boycott every company that is part of the WEF. I realize this is easier said than done because many of these companies are virtual monopolies. However, if we stop giving them our money, they’ll stop using our money to poison our lives.

Then, they’ll own nothing. And we’ll all be happy.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Oil. From farm to pharmaceutical, diesel truck to dinner plate, pipeline to plastic product, it is impossible to think of an area of our modern-day lives that is not affected by the petrochemical industry. The story of oil is the story of the modern world.

Parts of that story are well-known: Rockefeller and Standard Oil; the internal combustion engine and the transformation of global transport; the House of Saud and the oil wars in the Middle East. Other parts are more obscure: the quest for oil and the outbreak of World War I; the petrochemical interests behind modern medicine; the Big Oil money behind the “Green Revolution” and the “Gene Revolution.”

But that story, properly told, begins somewhere unexpected. Not in Pennsylvania with the first commercial drilling operation and the first oil boom, but in the rural backwoods of early 19th century New York state. And it doesn’t start with crude oil or its derivatives, but a different product altogether: snake oil.

“Dr. Bill Livingston, Celebrated Cancer Specialist” was the very image of the traveling snake oil salesman. He was neither a doctor, nor a cancer specialist; his real name was not even Livingston. More to the point, the “Rock Oil” tonic he pawned was a useless mixture of laxative and petroleum and had no effect whatsoever on the cancer of the poor townsfolk he conned into buying it.

He lived the life of a vagabond, always on the run from the last group of people he had fooled, engaged in ever more outrageous deceptions to make sure that the past wouldn’t catch up with him. He abandoned his first wife and their six children to start a bigamous marriage in Canada at the same time as he fathered two more children by a third woman. He adopted the name “Livingston” after he was indicted for raping a girl in Cayuga in 1849.

When he wasn’t running away from them or disappearing for years at a time, he would teach his children the tricks of his treacherous trade. He once bragged of his parenting technique: “I cheat my boys every chance I get. I want to make ’em sharp.”

A towering man of over six feet and with natural good looks that he used to his advantage, he went by “Big Bill.” Others, less generously, called him “Devil Bill.” But his real name was William Avery Rockefeller, and it was his son, John D. Rockefeller, who would go on to found the Standard Oil monopoly and become the world’s first billionaire.

The world we live in today is the world created in “Devil” Bill’s image. It’s a world founded on treachery, deceit, and the naivety of a public that has never wised up to the parlor tricks that the Rockefellers and their ilk have been using to shape the world for the past century and a half.

This is the story of the oil-igarchy.

(This article is a transcript from the documentary, How Big Oil Conquered The World.)

Part One: Birth of the Oil-igarchy

Titusville, 1857. A most unlikely man alights from a railway car into the midst of this sleepy Western Pennsylvania town on the shores of Oil Creek: “Colonel” Edwin Drake. He’s from the Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company, and he’s here on a mission: to collect oil.

Like “Dr.” Bill, Drake isn’t really a Colonel. The title is bestowed on him by George Bissell and James Townsend, a lawyer and a banker who started the Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company after they discovered they could distill the region’s naturally occurring Seneca oil into lamp oil, or kerosene. Drake is actually an unemployed railroad conductor who talked himself into a job after staying at the same hotel as Bissel the year before. Calling him a Colonel, it is hoped, will help win the respect of the locals.

The locals think he’s crazy anyway. Seneca oil is indeed plentiful, bubbling out of seeps and collecting in the creek, but other than as a cure-all medicine or grease for the local sawmill’s machinery, it’s hardly seen as something valuable. In fact, it can be a downright nuisance, contaminating brine wells that supply Pittsburgh’s booming salt industry.

Still, Drake has a task to complete: finding a way to collect enough oil to make the distillation of Seneca oil into lamp oil profitable. He tries everything he can think of. The Native Americans had historically collected the oil by damming the creek near a seep and skimming the oil off the top. But Drake can only collect six to ten gallons of oil a day this way, even when he opens up extra seeps. He tries digging a shaft, but the groundwater floods in too quickly.

By the summer of 1859 he’s desperate. Drake’s running out of ideas, Bissell and Townsend are running out of patience and, most importantly, the company is running out of funds. He turns to “Uncle” Billy Smith, a Pittsburgh blacksmith who had experience drilling brine wells with steam-powered equipment. They get to work drilling down through the shale bedrock to reach the oil. It’s maddeningly slow work, with the crude equipment struggling to get through three feet of bedrock a day. By August 27th they’ve drilled down 69 and a half feet, Drake has used the last of his funds, and Bissell and his partners have decided to close up the operation.

Then on Sunday, August 28th, 1859, oil bubbled up the drive pipe. Uncle Billy and his son Sam bailed out several buckets of oil. On Monday, the very day that Colonel Drake received his final payment and an order to close down the operation, they hitched the walking beam to a water pump and the oil began to flow. The first oil was to sell for $40 a barrel. Years later a local newspaper interviewed Uncle Billy about the day they struck oil:

“I commenced drilling and at 4:00 I struck the oil. I says to Mr. Drake, ‘Look there! What do you think of this?’ He looked down the pipe and said, ‘What’s that?’ And I said, ‘That is your fortune!’”

Drake’s well proved that by drilling for it, oil could be found in abundance and produced cheaply. Overnight a whole new industry was born. Before long in millions of homes, farms and factories around the world, lamps would be lit with kerosene refined from West Pennsylvania crude.

“When the word came out that Drake had struck oil, the cry went up throughout the narrow valleys of Western Pennsylvania: ‘The crazy Yankee has struck oil! The crazy Yankee has struck oil!’ And it was the first great boom. It was like a gold rush.” ~ Daniel Yergin

Overnight the quiet farming backwoods of rural Pennsylvania was transformed into a bustling oil region, with prospectors leasing up flats, towns springing up from nowhere, and a forest of percussion rigs covering the land. The first oil boom had arrived.

Already poised to make the most of this boom was a young up-and-coming bookkeeper in Cleveland with a head for numbers: John Davison Rockefeller. He had two ambitions in life: to make $100,000 and to live to 100 years old. John D. set off to make his fortune in the late 1850s, armed with a $1000 loan from his father, “Devil” Bill.

Grandfather never finished high school and went to Cleveland having borrowed $1000 from his father to start a business — paid 9% interest on it incidentally. And he read about the oil business just beginning and got interested, and came to realize it was a very volatile business at the time.” ~ David Rockefeller

In 1863, seeing the oil boom and sensing the profits to be made in the fledgling business, Rockefeller formed a partnership with fellow businessman Maurice B. Clark and Samuel Andrews, a chemist who had built an oil refinery but knew little about the business of getting his product to market. In 1865 the shrewd John D. bought out his partners for $72,500 and, with Andrews as partner, launched Rockefeller & Andrews. By 1870, after five years of strategic partnerships and mergers, Rockefeller had incorporated Standard Oil.

The story of the rise of Standard Oil is an oft-told one.

In a move that would transform the American economy, Rockefeller set out to replace a world of independent oilmen with a giant company controlled by him. In 1870, begging bankers for more loans, he formed Standard Oil of Ohio. The next year, he quietly put what he called “our plan” — his campaign to dominate the volatile oil industry — into devastating effect. Rockefeller knew that the refiner with the lowest transportation cost could bring rivals to their knees. He entered into a secret alliance with the railroads called the South Improvement Company. In exchange for large, regular shipments, Rockefeller and his allies secured transport rates far lower than those of their bewildered competitors.

Ida Tarbell, the daughter of an oil man, later remembered how men like her father struggled to make sense of events: “An uneasy rumor began running up and down the Oil Regions,” she wrote. “Freight rates were going up. … Moreover … all members of the South Improvement Company — a company unheard of until now — were exempt. … Nobody waited to find out his neighbor’s opinion. On every lip there was but one word and that was ‘conspiracy.’”

“By 1879, when Rockefeller is 40, he controls 90 percent of the oil refining in the world. Within a few years, he will control 90 percent of the marketing of oil and a third of all of the oil wells. So this very young man controls what is not only a national but an international monopoly in a commodity that is about to become the most important strategic commodity in the world economy.” ~ Ron Chernow, Biographer [Source: The Rockefellers]

By the 1880s, the American oil industry was the Standard Oil Company. And Standard Oil was John D. Rockefeller. But it wasn’t long until a handful of similarly ambitious (and well-connected) families began to emulate the Standard Oil success story in other parts of the globe.

One such competitor emerged from the Caucasus in the 1870s, where Imperial Russia had opened up the vast Caspian Sea oil deposits to private development. Two families quickly combined forces to take advantage of the opportunity: the Nobels, led by Ludwig Nobel and including his dynamite-inventing prize-creating brother Alfred, and the French branch of the infamous Rothschild banking dynasty, led by Alphonse Rothschild.

In 1891, the Rothschilds contracted with M. Samuel & Co., a Far East shipping company headquartered in London and run by Marcus Samuel, to do what had never been done before: ship their Nobel-supplied Caspian oil through the Suez Canal to East Asian markets. The project was immense; it involved not only sophisticated engineering to construct the first oil tankers to be approved by the Suez Canal Company, but the strictest secrecy. If word of the endeavour was to get back to Rockefeller through his international intelligence network it would risk bringing the wrath of Standard Oil, which could afford to cut rates and squeeze them out of the market. In the end they succeeded, and the first bulk tanker, the Murex, sailed through the Suez Canal in 1892 en route to Thailand.

In 1897 “M. Samuel & Co.” became The Shell Transport and Trading Company. Realizing that reliance on the Rothschild/Nobel Caspian oil left the company vulnerable to supply shocks, Shell began to look to the Far East for other sources of oil. In Borneo they ran up against Royal Dutch Petroleum, established in The Hague in 1890 with the support of King William III of the Netherlands to develop oil deposits in the Dutch East Indies. The two companies, fearing competition from Standard Oil, merged in 1903 into the Asiatic Petroleum Company, jointly owned with the French Rothschilds, and in 1907 become Royal Dutch Shell.

Another global competitor to the Standard Oil throne emerged in Iran at the turn of the 20th century. In 1901 millionaire socialite William Knox D’arcy negotiated an incredible concession with the king of Persia: exclusive rights to prospect for oil throughout most of the country for 60 years. After 7 years of fruitless search, D’Arcy and his Glasgow based partner, Burmah Oil, were ready to abandon the country altogether. In early May of 1908 they sent a telegram to their geologist telling him to dismiss his staff, dismantle his equipment and come back home. He defied the order and weeks later struck oil.

Burmah Oil promptly spun off the Anglo-Persian Oil Company to oversee production of Persian oil. The British government took 51% majority control of the company’s shares in 1914 at the behest of Winston Churchill, then First Lord of the Admiralty, and survives today as BP.

The Rothschilds and Nobels. The Dutch royal family. The Rockefellers. These early titans of the oil industry and their corporate shells pioneered a new model for amassing and expanding fortunes hitherto unheard of. They were the scions of a new oligarchy, one built around oil and its control, from wellhead to pump.

But it was not just about money. The monopolization of this, the key energy resource of the 20th century, helped secure the oiligarchs not just wealth but power over the lives of billions. Billions who came to depend on black gold for the provision of just about every aspect of their daily lives.

In the late 19th century, however, it was by no means certain that oil would become the key resource of the 20th century. As cheap illumination from the newly-commercialized light bulb began to destroy the market for lamp oil, the oiligarchs were on the verge of losing the value from their monopoly. But a series of “lucky strikes” was about to catapult their fortunes even further.

The very next year after the commercial introduction of the light bulb, another invention came along to save the oil industry: German engineer Karl Benz patented a reliable, two-stroke internal combustion engine. The engine ran on gasoline, another petroleum byproduct, and became the basis for the Benz Motorwagen that, in 1888, became the first commercially available automobile in history. And with that stroke of luck, the business that Rockefeller and the other oiligarchs had spent decades consolidating was saved.

But more luck was needed to ensure the market for this new engine. In the early days of the automobile era it was by no means certain that gas-powered cars would come to dominate the market. Working models of electric vehicles had been around since the 1830s, and the first electric car was built in 1884. By 1897 there was a fleet of all-electric taxis shuttling passengers around London. The world land speed record was set by an electric car in 1898. By the dawn of the 20th century electric cars accounted for 28% of the automobiles in the United States. The electrics had advantages over the internal combustion engine: they required no gear shifting or hand cranking, and had none of the vibration, smell, or noise associated with gasoline-powered cars.

Perhaps John D.’s greatest stroke of luck, however, was not supposed to be luck at all. Rockefeller had come under increasing scrutiny by a public outraged by the unprecedented wealth he had amassed through Standard Oil. Muckraking reporters like Ida Tarbell began digging up the dirt on his rise to power through railroad conspiracies, secret deals with competitors and other shady practices. The press pictured him as a colossus with bribed politicians literally in the palm of his hand; Standard Oil was a menacing octopus with its tentacles strangling the lifeblood of the nation. Hearings began, investigations were launched, lawsuits were brought against him. And then, finally, in 1911 the Supreme Court made a monumental decision.

On May 15th, 1911, the Supreme Court of the United States declared that Standard Oil was a monopoly in restraint of trade and should be dissolved. Rockefeller heard of the decision while golfing at Kykuit with a priest from the local Catholic church, Father J.P. Lennon.

And Rockefeller reacted with amazing aplomb. He turned to the Catholic priest and said, “Father Lennon, have you some money?” And the priest was very startled by the question and said, “No.” And then he said, “Why?” And Rockefeller replied, “Buy Standard Oil.” ~ Ron Chernow, Biographer

As Rockefeller foresaw, the individual Standard Oil companies were worth more than the single corporation. In the next few years, their shares doubled and tripled in value. By the time the rain of cash was over, Rockefeller had the greatest personal fortune in history — nearly two percent of the American economy.

“And it was really losing the antitrust case that converted John D. Rockefeller into history’s first billionaire. So that Standard Oil was punished in the federal antitrust case, but John D. Rockefeller, Sr. most assuredly was not.” ~ Ron Chernow, Biographer [Source: The Rockefellers]

To the amazement of the world, Rockefeller’s punishment had in fact been his reward. Rather than being taken down a peg, the splitting up of the Standard Oil monopoly had launched him as the world’s only acknowledged billionaire at a time when the average annual income in America was $520.

Rockefeller’s story was perfectly mirrored by the story of Colonel Edwin Drake. Having struck oil in Titusville and given rise to a billion dollar global industry, Drake had not had the foresight to patent his drilling technique or even to buy up the land around his own well. He ended up in poverty, relying on an annuity from the state of Pennsylvania to scrape together a living and dying in 1880.

For the oiligarchy, the lesson of the rise and rise of Rockefeller was obvious: the more ruthlessly that monopoly was pursued, the tighter that control was grasped, the greater the lust for power and money, the greater the reward would be in the end.

From now on, no invention would derail the oil majors from their quest for total control. No competition would be tolerated. No threat to the oiligarchs would be allowed to rise.

Part Two: Competition is a Sin

When asked how he could justify the treachery and deceit with which he pursued the creation of the Standard Oil monopoly, John D. Rockefeller is reputed to have said: “Competition is a sin.” This is the mentality of the monopolist, and it is this justification, framed as religious conviction, that drove the oiligarchs to so ruthlessly eliminate anyone who would dare rise up as a pretender to their throne.

Ironically, it was the competition between the oiligarchs in the early 20th century that helped give rise to an early external threat to their empire: alcohol fuel.

As historian Lyle Cummins has noted of the period:

“The oil trust battles between Rockefeller, the Rothschilds, the Nobels and Marcus Samuel’s Shell kept prices in a state of flux, and engines often had to be adaptable to the fuel that was available.”

In many areas where oil wasn’t available, the alternative was alcohol. Ethyl alcohol had been used as a fuel for lamps and engines since the early 19th century. Although it was generally more expensive, alcohol fuel offered a stability of supply that was alluring, especially in areas like London or Paris that did not have predictable access to oil supplies.

Alcohol has a lower heat value, or BTU, than gasoline, but a series of tests by the US Geological Survey and the US Navy in 1907 and 1908 proved that the higher compression ratio of alcohol engines could perfectly offset the lower heat value, thus making alcohol and gasoline engines fuel economy equivalent.

One early supporter of alcohol fuel was Henry Ford, who designed his Model T to run on either alcohol or gasoline. Sensing an opportunity for new markets to boost the independent American farms that he felt were vital to the nation, Henry Ford told the New York Times:

“The fuel of the future is going to come from fruit like that sumach out by the road, or from apples, weeds, sawdust – almost anything. There is fuel in every bit of vegetable matter that can be fermented.”

Farmers, looking to capitalize on this, lobbied for the repeal of a $2.08 per gallon alcohol tax that had been imposed to help pay for the Civil War. They were aided by those who saw fuel alcohol as a way to break the oiligarchs’ monopoly. In support of a bill to repeal the alcohol tax, President Teddy Roosevelt told the US Congress in 1906:

“The Standard Oil Company has, largely by unfair or unlawful methods, crushed out home competition. It is highly desirable that an element of competition should be introduced by the passage of some such law as that which has already passed the House, putting alcohol used in the arts and manufactures upon the free list.”

The alcohol tax was repealed in 1906 and for a time corn ethanol at 14 cents a gallon was cheaper than gasoline at 22 cents a gallon. The promise of cheap, unpatentable, unmonopolizable fuel production, production open to anyone with raw vegetable matter and a still, swept the nation.

But cheap, plentiful fuel that can be grown and produced locally and independently is not what the oiligarchs had in mind.

A 1909 USGS report comparing gas and alcohol engines had noted that a significant point in alcohol fuel’s favour was that there were fewer restrictions on alcohol engines. For the oiligarchs, the answer was simple: find a way to place greater restrictions on alcohol engines. Thankfully for them, the answer to their problem was already gaining popular support.

In the 19th century, America had a drinking problem. By 1830, the average American over 15 years old drank seven gallons of pure alcohol per year, three times higher than today’s average. This led to the first anti-alcohol movements in the 1830s and 1840s, and the formation of the Prohibition Party in 1869 and the Women’s Christian Temperance Union in the 1870s. The movement enjoyed widespread and growing support but had few political successes; Maine flirted with prohibition by outlawing the sale and manufacture of liquor in 1851, but the ban only lasted five years.

This changed with the formation of the Anti-Saloon League in Standard Oil’s birth state of Ohio in 1893. The ASL was started by John D. Rockefeller’s long-time personal friend Howard Hyde Russell and was bankrolled in part by generous annual donations from Rockefeller himself. The ASL, with Rockefeller’s backing, quickly became the driving force behind a national movement to outlaw the production and sale of alcohol.

Rockefeller was a teetotaler himself, not from moral concern but because he was afraid that “good cheer among friends” would lead to his downfall in business. Stephen Harkness, one of the silent partner investors in Standard Oil and a director in the company until his death, had caught Rockefeller’s eye when he made a fortune buying up whiskey in advance of a new excise tax that he had been tipped about and selling it at a huge profit after the tax kicked in.

No, Rockefeller and Standard Oil were not concerned about the moral state of the nation…except as far as it impacted their bottom line. But when prohibition did come in 1920, it had an interesting side effect: although it didn’t ban the use of ethanol as a fuel directly, it did lead to increasingly burdensome restrictions requiring producers to add petroleum products to their ethanol to make it poisonous before it could be sold. Alcohol fuel, now completely unable to compete with gasoline, was abandoned altogether by the automobile industry.

Another existential threat to the vast fortunes of the early oiligarchs was to require an even greater effort at social engineering: public transportation.

By the end of World War I, private car ownership was still a relative rarity; only one in 10 Americans owned a car. Rail was still the transportation of choice for the vast majority of the public, and city-dwellers in most major cities relied on electric trolley networks to transport them around town. In 1936, General Motors formed a front company, “National City Lines,” along with Firestone Tire and Standard Oil of California, to implement a process of “bustitution”: scrapping streetcars and tearing up railways to replace them with GM’s own buses running on Standard Oil supplied diesel. The plan was remarkably successful.

As historian and researcher F. William Engdahl notes in “Myths, Lies and Oil Wars”:

“By the end of the 1940s, GM had bought and scrapped over one hundred municipal electric transit systems in 45 cities and put gas-burning GM buses on the streets in their place. By 1955 almost 90% of the electric streetcar lines in the United States had been ripped out or otherwise eliminated.”

The cartel had been careful to hide their involvement in National City Lines, but it was revealed to the public in 1946 by an enterprising retired naval lieutenant commander, Edwin J. Quinby. He wrote a manifesto exposing what he called “a careful, deliberately planned campaign to swindle you out of your most important and valuable public utilities – your Electric Railway System.” He uncovered the oiligarchs’ stock ownership of National City Lines and its subsidiaries and detailed how they had step by step bought up and destroyed the public transportation lines in Baltimore, Los Angeles, St. Louis and other major urban centres.

Subscribe now

Quinby’s warning caught the attention of federal prosecutors and in 1947 National City Lines was indicted for conspiring to form a transportation monopoly and conspiring to monopolize sales of buses and supplies. In 1949, GM, Firestone, Standard Oil of California and their officers and corporate associates were convicted on the second count of conspiracy. The punishment for buying up and dismantling America’s public transportation infrastructure? A $5,000 fine. H. C. Grossman, who had been the director of Pacific City Lines when it oversaw the scrapping of LA’s $100 million Pacific Electric system, was fined exactly $1.

Unsurprisingly, GM and its associates did not remain in the doghouse for long. In 1953 President Eisenhower appointed Charles Wilson, then the President of General Motors, as Secretary of Defense. Wilson, with Francis DuPont of the Rockefeller-connected DuPont family as Chief Administrator of Federal Highways, oversaw one of the largest public works projects in American history: the creation of the interstate highway system. With a war-era excise tax on train tickets still in place and federally funded highways and airports providing cheaper alternatives, rail travel declined a startling 84% between 1945 and 1964.

This social engineering paid off well for Standard Oil and its growing list of petrochemical associates. In the two and a half decades after the outbreak of World War II, vehicle production in Detroit almost tripled, from 4.5 million cars a year in 1940 to over 11 million in 1965. As a result, sales of refined gasoline over the same period rose 300%.

But Rockefeller was not the only oiligarch working to crush all opposition to his monopoly. Across the pond, the European oiligarchs were working to protect their own oil investments from upstart competitors.

In 1889, a consortium of German investors led by Siemens’ Deutsche Bank obtained a concession from the Turkish government for extension of a railway line connecting Berlin to Basra on the Persian Gulf via Baghdad in what was then part of the Ottoman Empire. The Berlin-Baghdad Railway concession was for ninety-nine years and came with mineral rights for twenty kilometers on either side of the line…an especially lucrative deal since the rail cut right through the heart of the still untapped Mesopotamian oil regions south of Mosul along the Tigris River.

For the powers behind the British empire, concerned with the military rise of Germany, this deal was unacceptable. Explains historian and journalist William Engdahl:

Read more

What if the sinking of the Titanic in 1912 was yet another event in our history books – alongside virtually every event other of major significance – that was not an accident but was instead intentionally created and orchestrated by the elite? We know that the Rothschilds and other elite New Word Order families had their hand in funding, organizing and carrying out the American, French and Russian Revolutions; the political assassinations (attempted and real) of Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, MLK and JFK; and the false flag events of the sinking of the Lusitania in 1916, Pearl Harbor, and the fake Gulf of Tonkin Incident, all of which embroiled the US in wars the public would not otherwise have allowed. Was the sinking of the Titanic another Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan conspiracy? What follows below is a hypothesis or educated guess about what might have transpired. Read the evidence and decide for yourself.

The Background to the sinking of the Titanic

Before we begin to describe how it happened, you need to know the background to the sinking of the Titanic. In those days of the early 20th century, many passengers on ocean liners were poor immigrants. The ships were frequently overloaded, and there were many overinsured ships, as insurance scams were common.

Wealthy banker and industrialist JP Morgan was in charge of White Star Line, the company that built ocean liner ships such as the RMS Titanic and the RMS Olympic. Those familiar with conspiracy history may be aware of Morgan’s role in the life of Nikola Tesla, and how he bankrolled Tesla to develop new forms of energy, but pulled the funding after he discovered that Tesla was thinking about providing free energy to the whole world – unmetered.

The Titanic and the Olympic was sister ships, almost identical in design. The Olympic was the first to set sail of the two, but right from the start was beset with problems. On her maiden voyage, she had a collision in the September of 1911, followed by another accident. She was repaired for 4 days in Belfast for a propeller that could have taken only hours to repair. The repairs involved taking a propeller from the Titanic for the Olympic. This fact is suspicious as you will later see.

JP Morgan had a big problem. The Olympic was quite probably uninsurable, at least for the amount of money he wanted.

Anyone Who Was Anyone Was On the Titanic …

The newspapers of the day – owned by Morgan and other rich financiers – talked up the Titanic and heaped praise upon her, saying she was of “unrivalled extent and magnificence.” They managed to attract the top movers and shakers of society, and entice them to take the trans-atlantic journey. Among the passengers were 3 very wealthy and influential men at the time: Benjamin Guggenheim, John Jacob Astor and Isador Strauss. All were millionaires and all were opposed to the plan to create a private central bank in the USA, because it would negatively affect their personal fortunes. This of course was a big problem for the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan cartel. The Rothschilds has risen to power and wealth, and had become the masters of Europe, by introducing private, central, government-sanctioned banks in England, France, Germany, Italy and Austria, and they weren’t about to let anybody stand in their way of capturing the grand prize and doing the same in America.

The Switching of the Olympic and Titanic

It is quite likely at this point that JP Morgan hatched a wicked scheme that would kill 2 birds with 1 stone. He needed to get the Olympic insured and preferably off his hands to receive the insurance payout. He also needed to eliminate Guggenheim, Astor and Strauss so that there would be no opposition to his plan to be part of a new central bank in America. So what did he do? He switched the Olympic and Titanic ships!

In the video below, John Hamer presents impressive photographic evidence of the switch, including a picture of the “Titanic” sailing off on its “maiden voyage” with 16 portholes (the Olympic had 16 portholes and the Titanic 14 portholes). Hamer also presents other evidence such as from the 1986 Titanic wreckage discovery by Robert Ballard, who found a grey underboard (originally the Olympic’s was grey and the Titanic’s was black). He also found a propeller with the number “401” (originally from the real Titanic, but switched and given to the Olympic during the Belfast repairs).

Just Before Departure of the Olympic Titanic

The Olympic’s maiden voyage was full, yet the Titanic’s was half full. Around 50 first class passengers cancelled their reservations on the Titanic at the last moment, all of whom were friends or colleagues of JP Morgan. He himself was due to ride but did not show up, claiming he was ill, yet was seen 2 days later at a French Resort in good health with his mistress. The chief officer in command (second only to the captain), a man by the name of Henry Wilde, wrote a letter to his sister in which he stated: “I still don’t like this ship.” Why still?

Captain Smith was chosen to pilot the vessel, despite his atrocious track record of safety with previous ships he had commandeered.

The SS Californian

There was another massive ship patrolling the Atlantic when the Titanic was setting off. It was called the Californian, and its captain was a man named Ward. He appears to have been in on the conspiracy. Strangely (or not), the night before the Titanic hit the iceberg, Captain Ward slept fully clothed all night on the sofa, kept the ship’s boilers going (using precious fuel; standard practice was to turn them off at night), kept the crew on standby all night, and ordered his ship be dead stopped in the middle of the night, in a sea of ice.

The Fateful Iceberg

The Titanic received 6 messages on the night of April 14, 1912. Of these, 3 were warnings of icebergs, and 3 were from Captain Ward to Captain Smith. It was recorded that the Titanic’s stopping distance from full speed was 850 yards (around 1/2 mile), and we know from the testimony of the 2nd officer Charles Lightoller that the iceberg was visible from 2 miles. Therefore, it should have been relatively easy to avoid. Yet, incredibly, once the iceberg was sighted and the order was given to port around it, the engines of the Titanic were inexplicably reversed, so a collision could not be avoided. Were the engines tampered with in Belfast before departure?

It is also strange to consider what happened with the distress signals. The Californian was only 19 miles away from the Titanic when it hit the iceberg, yet due to the curvature of the Earth in that part of the Atlantic, the ships couldn’t see each other. The Titanic sent out distress signal rockets, in red, blue and white, yet the Californian only saw white rocket signals, which it chose to ignore. At the exact same time of the sinking of the Titanic, there was illegal seal-fishing boat called Samson in the vicinity, which was sending up white rocket signals, thus confusing the matter. The Samson was directly in between the Californian and Titanic. What are the chances that another boat would be in that exact part of the ocean at that time sending off different-clored rocket signals?

As with many other conspiracies, key witnesses seem to have magically disappeared. We are told that the 1st officer William Murdoch committed suicide, and that the 6th officer James Paul Moody drowned.

Whitewash: The American and British Inquiries

The 2nd officer Lightoller was the highest in command to survive, yet at both the American and British inquiries after the event, he was very evasive. He was repeatedly caught lying; for instance, he said he was in the water at the time of the collision for an hour, yet life expectancy at that temperature (28 to 30°F or -2 to -1°C) is only 4 minutes! Lightoller actually wrote: “it was very necessary to keep one’s hand on the whitewash brush”, referring to the inquiries.

At these inquiries, experienced sea captains said that icebergs of the size that collided with Titanic can be seen 3.5 miles away on a moonless night. It was normal procedure to maintain full speed during an iceberg sighting, so why did the Titanic stop?

After the survivors made it back to land at Plymouth, the crew was immediately detained and held against their will overnight with no access to Union representatives. They were coerced or bribed to sign a document called the “Official Secret Act”.

John Hamer concludes his above presentation by saying that the coverup could not have happened without collusion of the Government.

More Than 100 Years Later, We’re Still Suffering from the Fallout of the Sinking of the Titanic

It is now 2026, and we are more than 100 years past that fateful date of the sinking of the Titanic in 1912. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed without opposition, the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan cartel has cemented their own personal central bank in the “Land of the Free”, and US debt now surpasses $38 trillion. We are, unfortunately, still some distance away from reaching a critical mass of people who understand how the current banking system enslaves us, and who have enough knowledge, desire and power to change this system.

I hope that the truth around the sinking of the Titanic becomes widely known, and serves as a wake up call to those who value freedom.

Thanks to John Hamer for doing the research on this important historical event, and uncovering some of the deeper truth behind the sinking of the Titanic.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

However, before you jump to the timeline, please read this invaluable introduction which will tell you who the Rothschilds are as oppose to who they claim to be.

Definition of Zionism:

An organization of Jews whose goal is to create a nation for Jews.

Definition of Judaism:

Jews collectively who practice a religion based on the Torah and the Talmud.

The Rothschilds claim that they are Jewish, when in fact they are Khazars. They are from a country called Khazaria, which occupied the land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea which is now predominantly occupied by Georgia. The reason the Rothschilds claim to be Jewish is that the Khazars under the instruction of the King, converted to the Jewish faith in 740 A.D., but of course that did not include converting their Asiatic Mongolian genes to the genes of the Jewish people.

You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews. These people knowingly lie to the world with their claims that the land of Israel is theirs by birthright, when in actual fact their real homeland is over 800 miles away in Georgia.

So, next time you hear an Israeli Prime Minister bleating about the so-called persecution of the Jews, consider this, every Prime Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Therefore when all these Prime Ministers have curried favor with the West for their re-establishment of a Jewish homeland, they have knowingly and deliberately lied to you, as they were never from that region, and they well know it, because it is they who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews.

The most wealthy bloodline in the world bar none and the leader of the Ashkenazi Jews in the world today is the Rothschild family. As you will see in the timeline, the Rothschilds have obtained this position through lies, manipulation and murder.

Their bloodline also extends into the Royal Families of Europe, and the following family names: Astor; Bundy; Collins; duPont; Freeman; Kennedy; Morgan; Oppenheimer; Rockefeller; Sassoon; Schiff; Taft; and Van Duyn.

However, these are not the only bloodlines to worry about. You are probably aware of the centuries old pratice undertaken by many Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country, which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere. There is plenty of evidence to prove the Rothschilds continue that deceptive tradition.

Furthermore the Rothschilds are known to sire many children secretly that they can put into positions of power when required. This started with the very first man who took the name Rothschild, who had a secret sixth son. Finally, remember the world is a diverse place, I could if I wanted change my name to Rothschild, or any of the names listed above, and that would not make me part of this family anymore than converting to Judaism in 740 A.D. will make these Ashkenazis Jewish.

Please, therefore, do not automatically assume someone you see with the name Rothschild or any of the names listed above are part of the Rothschild criminal network. Furthermore and most importantly, the majority of Ashkenazi Jews are innocent and not part of this network.

Check the facts out for yourself first, this article is designed to inform people who the enemy is, not single out people of a particular race or people with a particular surname, who may have nothing to do with this Rothschild criminal network.

1743: Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house.
Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house.

This sign is a red hexagram (which geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666) which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later.

1753: Gutle Schnaper, an Ashkenazi Jew (future wife of Mayer Amschel Bauer), born to respected merchant, Wolf Salomon Schnaper.

1760: During this decade Mayer Amschel Bauer works for a bank owned by the Oppenheimers’ in Hanover, Germany. He is highly successful and becomes a junior partner. Whilst working at the bank he becomes acquainted with General von Estorff.

Following his father’s death, Bauer returns to Frankfurt to take over his father’s business. Bauer recognises the significance of the red hexagram and changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram or sign signifying 666 hanging over the entrance door (“Rot,” is German for, “Red,” “Schild,” is German for, “Sign”).

Now Mayer Amschel Rothschild, he discovers that General von Estorff is now attached to the court of Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, one of the richest royal houses in Europe, which gained its’ wealth by the hiring out of Hessian soldiers to foreign countries for vast profits (a practice that continues today in the form of exporting, “peacekeeping,” troops throughout the world).

He therefore makes the General’s re-acquaintance on the pretext of selling him valuable coins and trinkets at discounted prices. As he plans, Rothschild is subsequently introduced to Prince William himself who is more than pleased with discounted prices he charges for his rare coins and trinkets, and Rothschild offers him a bonus for any other business the Prince can direct his way.

Rothschild subsequently becomes close associates with Prince William, and ends up doing business with him and members of the court. He soon discovers that loaning money to governments and royalty is more profitable than loaning to individuals, as the loans are bigger and are secured by the nation’s taxes.

1769: Mayer Amschel Rothschild is given permission by Prince William to hang a sign on the front of his business premises declaring that he is, “M. A. Rothschild, by appointment court factor to his serene highness, Prince William of Hanau.”

1770: Mayer Amschel Rothschild draws up plans for the creation of the Illuminati and entrusts Ashkenazi Jew, Adam Weishaupt, a Crypto-Jew who was outwardly Roman Catholic, with its organization and development.

The Illuminati is to be based upon the teachings of the Talmud, which is in turn, the teachings of Rabbinical Jews. It was to be called the Illuminati as this is a Luciferian term which means, keepers of the light.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild marries Gutle Schnaper.

1773: Amschel Mayer Rothschild born, the first of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons. He like all his brothers who follow him, will enter the family business at the age of 12.

1774: Salomon Mayer Rothschild born.

1776: Adam Weishaupt officially completes his organization of the Illuminati on May 1 of this year. The purpose of the Illuminati is to divide the goyim (all non-Jews) through political, economic, social, and religious means. The opposing sides were to be armed and incidents were to be provided in order for them to: fight amongst themselves; destroy national governments; destroy religious institutions; and eventually destroy each other.

Weishaupt soon infiltrates the Continental Order of Freemasons with this Illuminati doctrine and establishes lodges of the Grand Orient to be their secret headquarters. This was all under the orders and finance of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the concept has spread and is followed within Masonic Lodges worldwide to the present day.

Weishaupt also recruits 2,000 paid followers including the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science, finance,and industry. They were instructed to follow the following methods in order to control people.

1) Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control of men already in high places, in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavour. Once influential persons had fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati they were to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even death to themselves and loved members of their families.

2) The faculties of colleges and universities were to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability belonging to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in internationalism, or rather the notion that only a one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife. Such training was to be provided by granting scholarships to those selected by the Illuminati.

3) All influential people trapped into coming under the control of the Illuminati, plus the students who had been specially educated and trained, were to be used as agents and placed behind the scenes of all governments as experts and specialists. This was so they would advise the top executives to adopt policies which would in the long-run serve the secret plans of the Illuminati one-world conspiracy and bring about the destruction of the governments and religions they were elected or appointed to serve.

4) To obtain absolute-control of the press, at that time the only mass-communications media which distributed information to the public, so that all news and information could be slanted in order to make the masses believe that a one-world government is the only solution to our many and varied problems.

1777: Nathan Mayer Rothschild born.

1784: Adam Weishaupt issues his order for the French Revolution to be started by by Maximilien Robespierre in book form. This book was written by one of Weishaupt’s associates, Xavier Zwack, and sent by courier from Frankfurt to Paris. However en route there, the courier is struck by lightning, the book detailing this plan discovered by the police, and handed over to the Bavarian authorities.

As a consequence, the Bavarian government orders the police to raid Weishaupt’s masonic lodges of the Grand Orient, and the homes of his most influential associates. Clearly, the Bavarian authorities were convinced that the book that was discovered was a very real threat by a private group of influential people, to use wars and revolutions to achieve their political ends.

1785: The Bavarian government outlaw the Illuminati and close all the Bavarian lodges of the Grand Orient.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild moves his family home to a five storey house in Frankfurt which he shares with the Schiff family.

1786: The Bavarian government publish the details of the Illuminati plot in a document entitled, “The Original Writings of The Order and Sect of The Illuminati.” They then send this document to all the heads of church and state throughout Europe, but sadly their warning is ignored.

1788: Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild Born.

1789: Due to the European ignorance of the Bavarian government’s warning, the Illuminati’s plan for a French Revolution succeeded from this year to 1793. This revolution was a bankers’ dream, it established a new constitution and passed laws that forbade the Roman Church from levying tithes (taxes) and also removed its exemption from taxation.

1790: Mayer Amschel Rothschild states,

“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.”

1791: The Rothschilds get, “control of a nation’s money,” through Alexander Hamilton (their agent in George Washington’s cabinet) when they set up a central bank in the USA called the First Bank of the United States. This is established with a 20 year charter.

1792: Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild born.

1796: Amschel Mayer Rothschild marries Eva Hanau.

1798: John Robison publishes a book entitled, “Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies.” In this book, Professor Robison of the University of Edinburgh, one of the leading intellects of his time, who in 1783 was elected general secretary of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, gave details of the whole Rothschild Illuminati plot.

He advised how he had been a high degree mason in the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and had been invited by Adam Weishaupt to Europe, where he had been given a revised copy of Weishaupt’s conspiracy. However, although he pretended to go along with it, Professor Robison did not agree with it and therefore published his aforementioned book. The book included details of the Bavarian government’s investigation into the Illuminati and the French Revolution.

That same year on July 19th, David Pappen, President of Harvard University, lectured the graduating class on the influence illuminism was having on American politics and religion.

At the age of 21, Nathan Mayer Rothschild leaves Frankfurt for England, where with a large sum of money given to him by his father, he sets up a banking house in London.

1800: Salomon Mayer Rothschild marries Caroline Stern.

1806: Napolean states that it is his,

“Object to remove the house of Hess-Cassel from ruler-ship and to strike it out of the list of powers.”

On hearing this, Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau, flees Germany, goes to Denmark and entrusts his fortune valued at $3,000,000 at that time to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild marries Hannah Barent Cohen the daughter of a wealthy London merchant.

1808: Nathan Mayer Rothschild has his first son born Lionel Nathan de Rothschild.

1810: Sir Francis Baring and Abraham Goldsmid die. This leaves Nathan Mayer Rothschild as the remaining major banker in England.

Salomon Mayer Rothschild goes to Vienna, Austria and sets up the bank, M. von Rothschild und Söhne.

1811: The charter for the Rothschilds Bank of the United States runs out and Congress votes against its renewal. Nathan Mayer Rothschild is not amused and he states,

“Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.”

However the United States stands firm and the Charter is not renewed, which causes Nathan Mayer Rothschild to issue another threat,

“Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status.”

1812: Backed by Rothschild money, and Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s orders, the British declare war on the United States. The Rothschilds plan was to cause the United States to build up such a debt in fighting this war that they would have to surrender to the Rothschilds and allow the charter for the Rothschild owned First Bank of the United States to be renewed.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild dies. In his will he lays out specific laws that the House of Rothschild were to follow: all key positions in the family business were only to be held by family members; only male members of the family were allowed to participate in the family business, this included a reported sixth secret bastard son (It is important to note that Mayer Amschel Rothschild also has five daughters, so today the spread of the Rothschild Zionist dynasty without the Rothschild name is far and wide, and Jews believe the mixed offspring of a Jewish mother is solely Jewish);

The family was to intermarry with it’s first and second cousins to preserve the family fortune (of the 18 marriages by Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s grandchildren, 16 were between first cousins – a practice known today as inbreeding);

No public inventory of his estate was to be published; no legal action was to be taken with regard to the value of the inheritance; the eldest son of the eldest son was to become the head of the family (this condition could only be overturned when the majority of the family agreed otherwise).

This was straightaway the case and Nathan Mayer Rothschild was elected head of the family following his father, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s death.

Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild goes to Paris, France to set up the bank, de Rothschild Frères.

Nathaniel de Rothschild, the son in law of Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild, born.

1814: With regard to the $3,000,000 Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau had entrusted to Mayer Amschel Rothschild for safekeeping, for an account of what happened next we turn to the Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1905 edition, Volume 10, page 494, which states,

“According to legend this money was hidden away in wine casks, and, escaping the search of Napoleon’s soldiers when they entered Frankfurt, was restored intact in the same casks in 1814, when the elector (Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau) returned to the electorate (Germany). The facts are somewhat less romantic, and more businesslike.”

This last line indicates the money was never returned by Rothschild to Prince William IX of Hesse-Hanau. The encyclopaedia goes on to state,

“Nathan Mayer Rothschild invested this $3,000,000 in, gold from the East India Company knowing that it would be needed for Wellington’s peninsula campaign.”

On the stolen money Nathan made,

“no less than four profits:

i) On the sale of Wellington’s paper which he bought at 50 cents on the dollar and collected at par;
ii) on the sale of gold to Wellington;
iii) on its repurchase; and
iv) on forwarding it to Portugal.”

1815: The five Rothschild brothers work to supply gold to both Wellington’s army (through Nathan in England) and Napoleon’s army (through Jacob in France), and begin their policy of funding both sides in wars. The Rothschilds love wars because they are massive generators of risk free debt.
This is because they are guaranteed by the government of a country, and therefore the efforts of the population of that country, and it doesn’t matter if that country loses the war because the loans are given on the guarantee that the victor will honor the debts of the vanquished.

Whilst the Rothschilds are funding both sides in this war, they use the banks they have spread out across Europe to give them the opportunity to set up an unrivaled postal service network of secret routes and fast couriers. The post these couriers carried was to be opened up by these couriers and their details given to the Rothschilds so they always were one step ahead of current events.

Furthermore, these Rothschild couriers were the only merchants allowed to pass through the English and French blockades. It was these couriers who also kept Nathan Mayer Rothschild up to date with how the war was going so he could use that intelligence to buy and sell from his position on the stock exchange in accordance with that intelligence.

One of Rothschild’s couriers was a man named Rothworth. When the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo was won by the British, Rothworth took off for the Channel and was able to deliver this news to Nathan Mayer Rothschild, a full 24 hours before Wellington’s own courier.

At that time British bonds were called consuls and they were traded on the floor of the stock exchange. Nathan Mayer Rothschild instructed all his workers on the floor to start selling consuls. The made all the other traders believe that the British had lost the war so they started selling frantically.

Therefore the consuls plummeted in value which was when Nathan Mayer Rothschild discreetly instructed his workers to purchase all the consuls they could lay their hands on.

When news came through that the British had actually won the war, the consuls went up to a level even higher than before the war ended leaving Nathan Mayer Rothschild with a return of approximately 20 to 1 on his investment.

This gave the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy, now the financial center of the world following Napolean’s defeat, and forced England to set up a new Bank of England, which Nathan Mayer Rothschild controlled.

Interestingly 100 years later the New York Times would run a story stating that Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s grandson had attempted to secure a court order to suppress publication of a book which had this insider trading story in it. The Rothschild family claimed the story was untrue and libellous, but the court denied the Rothschilds request and ordered the family to pay all court costs.

Back to 1815, this is the year Nathan Mayer Rothschild makes his famous statement,

“I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”

He would go onto brag that in the 17 years he had been in England he had increased the £20,000 stake given to him by his father, 2500 times to £50 million.
The Rothschilds also use their control of the Bank of England to replace the method of shipping gold from country to country and instead used their five banks spread across Europe to set up a system of paper debits and credits, the banking system of today.
By the end of this century, a period of time that was known as the, “Age of the Rothschilds,” it is estimated that the Rothschild family controlled half the wealth of the world.

However something that did not go well for the Rothschilds this year was the Congress of Vienna, which started in September, 1814 and concluded in June of this year. The reason for this Congress of Vienna, was for the Rothschilds to create a form of world government, to give them complete political control over much of the civilized world.

Many of the European governments were in debt to the Rothschilds, so they figured they could use that as a bargaining tool. However the Tsar Alexander I of Russia, who had not succumbed to a Rothschild central bank, would not go along with the plan, so the Rothschild world government plan failed.

Enraged by this, Nathan Mayer Rothschild swore that some day he or his descendants would destroy the Tsar Alexander I’s entire family and descendants. Unfortunately he was true to his word and 102 years later Rothschild funded Bolsheviks would act upon that promise.

Interestingly, world government fanatic and Ashkenazi Jew, Henry Kissinger, did his doctoral dissertation on the Congress of Vienna.

1816: The American Congress passes a bill permitting yet another Rothschild dominated central bank, which gives the Rothschilds control of the American money supply again. This is called the Second Bank of the United States and is given a twenty year charter. The British war against the America therefore ends with the deaths of thousands of British and American soldiers, but the Rothschilds get their bank.

1818: Following the French securing massive loans in 1817 in order to help rebuild after their disastrous defeat at Waterloo, Rothschild agents bought vast amounts of French government bonds causing their value to increase.

On November 5th they dumped the lot on the open market causing their value to plummet and France to go into a financial panic. The Rothschilds then stepped in to take control of the French money supply. This was the same year the Rothschilds were able to loan £5,000,000 to the Prussian government.

1821: Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild was sent to Naples, Italy. He would end up doing a lot of business with the Vatican and Pope Gregory XVI subsequently conferred upon him the Order of St. George.

Also, whenever the Pope received Kalmann, he would give him his hand rather than the customary toe to kiss, which showed the extent of Kalmann’s power over the Vatican.

1822: The emperor of Austria made the five Rothschild brothers Barons. Nathan Mayer Rothschild chose not to take up the title.

1823: The Rothschilds take over the financial operations of the Catholic Church, worldwide.

1827: Sir Walter Scott publishes his nine volume set, The life of Napolean and in volume two he states that the French Revolution was planned by the Illuminati (Adam Weishaupt) and was financed by the money changers of Europe (The Rothschilds).

1832: President Andrew Jackson (the 7th President of the United States from 1829 to 1837), runs the campaign for his second term in office under the slogan, “Jackson And No Bank!” This is in reference to his plan to take the control of the American money system to benefit the American people, not for the profiteering of the Rothschilds.

1833: President Andrew Jackson starts removing the government’s deposits from the Rothschild controlled, Second Bank of the United States and instead deposits them into banks directed by democratic bankers.

This causes the Rothschilds to panic and so they do what they do best, contract the money supply causing a depression. President Jackson knows what they are up to and later states,

“You are a den of thieves vipers, and I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out.”

1834: The Italian revolutionary leader, Guiseppe Mazzini, is selected by the Illuminati to direct their revolutionary program throughout the world and would serve in that capacity until he died in 1872.

1835: On January 30, an assassin tries to shoot President Jackson, but miraculously both of the assassin’s pistols misfired. President Jackson would later claim that he knew the Rothschilds were responsible for that attempted assassination. He is not the only one, the assassin, Richard Lawrence, who was found not guilty by reason of insanity, later bragged that powerful people in Europe had hired him and promised to protect him if he were caught.

The Rothschilds acquire the rights in the Almadén quicksilver mines in Spain. This was at the time the biggest concession in the world and as quicksilver was a vital component in the refining of gold or silver this gave the Rothschilds a virtual world monopoly.

1836: Following his years of fighting against the Rothschilds and their central bank in America, President Andrew Jackson finally succeeds in throwing the Rothschilds central bank out of America, when the bank’s charter is not renewed. It would not be until 1913 that the Rothschilds would be able to set up their third central bank in America, the Federal Reserve, and to ensure no mistakes are made, this time they will put one of their own bloodline, Jacob Schiff, in charge of the project.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild dies and the control of his bank, N. M. Rothschild & Sons is passed on to his younger brother, James Mayer Rothschild.

1837: The Rothschilds send one of their own, August Belmont, an Ashkenazi Jew, to America to salvage their banking interests defeated by President Andrew Jackson.

1840: The Rothschilds become the Bank of England’s bullion brokers. They set up agencies in California and Australia.

1841: President John Tyler (the 10th President of the United States From 1841 to 1845) vetoed the act to renew the charter for the Bank of the United States. He goes on to receive hundreds of letters threatening him with assassination.

1844: Salomon Mayer Rothschild purchases the United Coal Mines of Vítkovice and Austro-Hungarian Blast Furnace Company that would go on to be one of the top ten global industrial concerns.

Benjamin Disraeli, an Ashkenazi Jew (who would go on to become British Prime Minister twice – the only admitted Ashkenazi Jew to do so) publishes Coningsby, in which he characterises Nathan Mayer Rothschild as,

“the Lord and Master of the money markets of the world, and of course virtually Lord and Master of everything else. He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and Monarchs and Ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions.”

1845: The Great American Patriot, Andrew Jackson (7th President of the United States) dies.Before his death he is asked what he regarded his as greatest achievement. He replies without hesitation,

“I Killed The Bank,”

This is in reference to the fact he banished the Rothschilds Second Bank of the United States in 1836.
Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild (who by now had married his niece, Betty, Salomon Mayer Rothschild’s daughter), now known as Baron James de Rothschild, wins the contract to build the first major railway line across the country.

This was called the Chemin De Fer Du Nord and ran initially from Paris to Valenciennes and then joined with the Austrian rail network built by his brother (and wife’s father – all sounds a bit sordid doesn’t it) Salomon Mayer Rothschild.

1847: Lionel De Rothschild now married to the daughter of his uncle, Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild, is elected to the parliamentary seat for the City of London.
A requirement for entering parliament was to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian. Lionel De Rothschild refused to do this as he was Jewish and his seat in parliament remained empty for 11 years until new oaths were allowed.

He must have been an invaluable representative for his constituency, bearing in mind he could never vote on any bill as he never entered parliament! I wonder how he managed to keep his parliamentary seat for 11 years?

1848: Karl Marx, an Ashkenazi Jew, publishes, “The Communist Manifesto.” Interestingly at the same time as he is working on this, Karl Ritter of Frankfurt University was writing the antithesis which would form the basis for Freidrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s, “Nietzscheanism.” This Nietzecheanism was later developed into Fascism and then into Nazism and was used to forment the first and second world wars.

Marx, Ritter, and Nietzsche were all funded and under the instruction of the Rothschilds. The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies to enable them to divide larger and larger factions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other, and particularly, to destroy all political and religious institutions. The same plan put forward by Weishaupt in 1776.
Eva Hanau, Amschel Mayer Rothschild’s wife dies.

1849: Gutle Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife dies. Before her death she would nonchalantly state,

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.”

1850: Construction begins this decade on the manor houses of Mentmore in England and Ferrières in France, more Rothschilds Manors will follow throughout the world, all of them filled with works of art.
Jacob (James) Rothschild in France is said to be worth 600 million francs, which at the time was 150 million francs more than all the other bankers in France put together.

1852: N.M. Rothschild & Sons begins refining gold and silver for the Royal Mint and the Bank of England and other international customers.

1853: Nathaniel de Rothschild, the son in law of Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild, purchases Château Brane Mouton, the Bordeaux vineyard of Mouton, and renames it Château Mouton Rothschild.

1854: Caroline Stern, Salomon Mayer Rothschild’s wife, dies.

1855: Amschel Mayer Rothschild dies.

Salomon Mayer Rothschild dies.

Kalmann (Carl) Mayer Rothschild dies.

1858: Lionel De Rothschild finally takes his seat in parliament when the requirement to take an oath in the true faith of a Christian is broadened to include other oaths. He becomes the first Jewish member of the British parliament.

1861: President Abraham Lincoln (16th President of the United States from 1860 till his assassination in 1865) approaches the big banks in New York to try to obtain loans to support the ongoing American civil war. As these large banks were heavily under the influence of the Rothschilds, they offer him a deal they know he cannot accept, 24% to 36% interest on all monies loaned.

Lincoln is very angry about this high level of interest and so he prints his own debt free money and informs the public that this is now legal tender for both public and private debts.

1862: By April $449,338,902 worth of Lincoln’s debt free money has been printed and distributed. He states of this,

“We gave the people of this republic the greatest blessing they ever had, their own paper money to pay their own debts.”

That same year The Times of London publishes a story containing the following statement,

“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce.

It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

1863: President Abraham Lincoln discovers the Tsar of Russia, Alexander II (1855 – 1881), was having problems with the Rothschilds as well as he was refusing their continual attempts to set up a central bank in Russia. The Tsar then gives President Lincoln some unexpected help.
The Tsar issued orders that if either England or France actively intervened in the American Civil War, and help the South, Russia would consider such action a declaration of war, and take the side of President Lincoln. To show that he wasn’t messing about, he sent part of his Pacific Fleet to port in San Francisco and another part to New York.

The Rothschild banking house in Naples, Italy, C. M. de Rothschild e figli, closes following the unification of Italy. The Rothschilds use one of their own in America, John D. Rockefeller, to form an oil business called Standard Oil which eventually takes over all of its competition.

1864: Rothschild, August Belmont, who by now is the Democratic Party’s National Chairman, supports General George McClellan as the Democratic nominee to run against President Abraham Lincoln in this year’s election. Much to the anger of Belmont, President Lincoln wins the election.

1865: In a statement to Congress, President Abraham Lincoln states,

“I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me, and the financial institutions in the rear. Of the two, the one in my rear is my greatest foe.”

Later that year, on April 14, President Lincoln is assassinated, less than two months before the end of the American Civil War.
Following a brief training period in the Rothschilds London Bank, Jacob Schiff, a Rothschild, born in their house in Frankfurt, arrives in America at the age of 18, with instructions and the finance necessary to buy into a banking house there. The purpose of this was to carry out the following tasks.

1. Gain control of America’s money system through the establishment of a central bank.
2. Find desirable men, who for a price, would be willing to serve as stooges for the Illuminati and promote them into high places in the federal government, the Congress, Supreme Court, and all the federal agencies.
3. Create minority group strife throughout the nations, particularly targeting the whites and blacks.
4. Create a movement to destroy religion in the United States, with Christianity as the main target.

Nathaniel de Rothschild becomes Member of Parliament for Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire.

1868: Jacob (James) Mayer Rothschild dies, shortly after purchasing Château Lafite, one of the four great premier grand cru estates of France. He is the last of Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s sons to die.

1870: Nathaniel de Rothschild dies.

1871: An American General named, Albert Pike, who had been enticed into the Illuminati by Guissepe Mazzini, completes his military blueprint for three world wars and various revolutions throughout the world, culminating into moving this great conspiracy into its final stage.

Read more

At the 2:50 mark, Hunter S. Thompson addresses George Bush on Late Night with David Letterman on NBC in 1988: “George Bush is the guiltiest man in politics.”

Go to the 6:55 mark, Hunter says “You want to talk about guilt? You want to talk about religion? I went to Hillbilly. I don’t know too much about (unintelligible) but we share one thing in common, which is a sense of justice.”

Hillbilly was the name of the Bush camp at Bohemian Grove, which included such luminaries as Walter Cronkite, William F. Buckley, Donald Rumsfeld, and the commander of Apollo 8, the first U.S. human space mission that went to the moon but did not land in 1968.

Some of these men have dark, disturbing ties to secret societies and lies that were told to the people over the decades.

“Meet the Press” host Tim Russert asked George W. Bush and John Kerry about their membership in Skull and Bones, the secret society at Yale University, and both men avoid the question.

Russert even mentions “322,” the secret number in Skull and Bones that stands for the year 322 B.C. when Greek populist Demosthenes died and with it Greek democracy, ushering in the rise of a class of unelected plutocrats who rule the commoners.

Tim Russert suffered a surprise heart attack at age 58 in the NBC Washington Bureau and died on June 13, 2008.

At the Skull and Bones initiation ceremony, captured briefly on video, participants chant "The devil equals death. Death equals death."

Skull and Bones steals the skulls of various American populists through history. George H.W. Bush’s father Prescott Bush was part of the Skull and Bones crew that stole American Indian warrior Geronimo’s skull.

The History Channel finally ran a segment about it

In 1999, after many years, victim Paul Bonacci won $1 million in federal civil court against”Franklin Cover-Up” pedo pimp Lawrence King, who was operating out of Omaha, Nebraska in the ‘80s.

Bonacci claimed that George H.W. Bush was a participant at child rape parties in Washington, D.C. and that a man named Hunter Thompson directed a child snuff film at Bohemian Grove.

Here is Paul Bonacci’s 30+ minute testimony:

“Homosexual prostitution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush: ‘Call boys’ took midnight tour of White House” blared the headline of The Washington Times on June 29, 1989.

The scandal involved the Franklin Child Sex Slave Ring, operating out of Omaha, which Paul Bonacci proved in court that he was a victim of. Paul Bonacci accused George H.W. Bush of being involved in child rape parties in Washington, D.C.

A foster child named Eulice “Lisa” Washington came forward to Nebraska social worker Julie Walters and also the FBI. Lisa explained that she saw George H.W. Bush at a gay sex party in D.C. and another in Chicago where he left with a 19-year old black male named Brent.

This is documented in the book “The Franklin Cover-Up” by journalist John DeCamp

Paul Bonacci (who accused George H.W. Bush of being involved with the Franklin Pedo Ring) said that he helped kidnap 12-year old paperboy Johnny Gosch in Iowa in 1982. Gosch was the original "Boy on the Milk Carton." His mother Noureen always believed it.

A man named Jeff Gannon went viral on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart in 2005 when he asked George W. Bush a softball question for an outlet called Talon News. Gannon turned out to be a fake name used by male escort James Guckert of http://HotMilitaryStud.com. Gannon appeared on Bo Dietl’s show on MSNBC in one of the weirdest segments in TV history to claim that he is not Johnny Gosch, the kidnapped boy from the milk carton, despite allegations on the Internet

Johnny Gosch's mother Noureen Gosch said that she was visited by two men, including an adult Johnny and an apparent handler, years later and she kept the meeting secret out of fear that Johnny's abductors would hurt him. Noureen went to the FBI but the case remains unsolved. True Crime Recaps covered the story:

The Bushes have long been accused of occult practices.

After Barbara Bush had a miscarriage, she showed George “the fetus in the jar”

George H.W. Bush presented the “New World Order” on September 11, 1990 and brought it back in his 1991 State of the Union to push diverse globalism.

But the New World Order began long before George...

Gary Caradori, an investigator who interviewed George H.W. Bush pedophilia accuser Paul Bonacci and other victims, was about to break big news in the Nebraska Legislature.

In 1990, a self-piloted plane he was flying with his son from Nebraska to Chicago crashed and he died.

Lobbyist and ex-ABC News reporter Craig Spence, who was part of the D.C. pedo ring that allegedly involved George H.W. Bush, mysteriously died at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Boston in 1989.

The Bush Secret Service and other intel agencies discouraged reporters in D.C. from pursuing the story of the pedo ring tied to George H.W. Bush, according to an archived 1989 Washington Post article trying to downplay the scandal

In August 1989, shortly before he died, pedo-ring member Craig Spence consented to an interview with the Washington Times in which he fingered George H.W. Bush adviser Donald Gregg (longtime CIA spook) as the facilitator of the call-boy tours of the White House

In August 1989, amid the Bush pedo scandal, news broke that Rep. Barney Frank had a gay prostitution ring in his brownstone home in D.C.

This scandal became known as “Project Brownstone” due to allegations of CIA “brownstoning” blackmail ops

Subscribe now

“The Finders” kidnapping cult got busted in 1987 with children in Florida. The group was based out of a duplex in northwest D.C. But the case got squashed.

In 1993, after Bush left the White House, DOJ opened a probe based on info that the Finders were a CIA front. According to US News and World Report, the CIA admitted “A firm that provided computer training to CIA officers also employed several members of the Finders.”

At least eight women accused George H.W. Bush of groping them, including one when she was 16 years old. Bush reportedly called himself “David Cop-a-feel” when he did it.

Powerful men are protected in politics. So where does the Bush clan’s power and privilege really come from?

Samuel Prescott Bush (grandfather of George H.W.) got hired by John Rockefeller's brother Frank in 1901 to run Buckeye Steel Castings Company, which built railroad parts to help the Rockefellers move their oil. Bush took over the company from Frank in 1908

George H.W. Bush's father Prescott Bush (seen here with Hitler) was a director of the Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that held Nazi financier Fritz Thyssen's assets, which led to Bush's bank getting its assets seized in 1942 for violating the Trading with the Enemy Act.

In August 2004, more than 3 years into his presidency, neocon president George W. Bush asked his father what “neocon” means.

Elder neocon George Bush described it thusly: “Israel.”

According to Andrew Cockburn’s book on Donald Rumsfeld:

The Rockefeller Foundation funded Nazi eugenics research in a bid to push mass sterilization. Josef Mengele even worked at a lab funded by the Rockefellers.

Standard Oil had a patent-sharing deal with Germany’s top chemical company, even after the U.S. got into the war.

The Bush family was a very early supporter of Zionism. George Bush, an NYU Hebrew Lit professor, wrote the 1844 book "The Valley of Vision; or, The Dry Bones of Israel Revived," which advocated for a Jewish nation in Palestine to give Jews "honorable repute among the nations"

In 1953, George H.W. Bush used his dad's money to start the oil company Zapata Petroleum with his partner/handler Thomas Devine, a CIA staff officer who served as a "commercial asset" for the CIA for many years, according to internal CIA memos

A J. Edgar Hoover memo from 1963 identified George H.W. Bush as CIA and said the FBI briefed Bush after the JFK assassination.

Bush, who used his “oil business as a cover,” spread his reach to the Caribbean (around Cuba) and the Middle East.

Little more than an hour after JFK was shot, George Bush called the FBI to register a tip that he heard "James Parrot," a possible college student, was plotting to kill JFK, according to a stunning FBI memo made public in the 1980's. Bush then flew to Dallas.

James Parrot, the man George Bush tried to make a patsy for JFK’s killing, was a conservative activist with the John Birch Society. He had an alibi and FBI cleared him.

Bush had won the chairmanship of the Harris County GOP months earlier specifically to stop the Birchers

In 1971, George Bush became Nixon's UN ambassador and spearheaded the Zionist cause of letting Soviet Jews emigrate. He cancelled a Dick Cavett appearance at the behest of "Jewish leaders" and had a 1973 NYC dinner thrown in his honor by the "Let My People Go" movement. Later, as president, he got rid of the UN resolution that Zionism is racism.

Nixon appointed George Bush RNC chairman in 1973. Bush made Nixon think he was on his side, then Bush flipped and called for Nixon to resign 2 days before it happened. Bush went on to become ambassador to Mao, working with Zionist Kissinger to help make China a superpower

In 1971, George Bush joined the globalist Council on Foreign Relations and later served on its board of directors. He was an early member of David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission, formed in 1973. In 1976, he became Gerald Ford's CIA director, where his power skyrocketed

As CIA director, George Bush oversaw "Operation Condor," in which CIA-friendly Latin American dictators killed their opponents. When Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet ordered a deadly car-bombing in Washington, D.C., Bush leaked Fake News to dupe the FBI and cover for Pinochet

Subscribe now

Share

In October 1976, the month after the car bombing in D.C., George Bush told then-congressman Ed Koch that Operation Condor put out a contract on Koch's life for trying to cut funding to Uruguay. Bush's CIA knew about the assassination plot months earlier but did not tell Koch.

In 1976, George Bush first met Manuel Noriega, a longtime CIA asset. Bush was photographed with Noriega in 1983, the same year Noriega was installed as dictator of Panama. Together, Bush and Noriega oversaw a drug-trafficking empire that ended when Noriega defied CIA policy and backed the Sandinistas, leading Bush to invade Panama in 1989 in one of the numerous controlled wars that Bush helped engineer.

In 1980, George Bush lost a bitter primary to Ronald Reagan. On the trail, Reagan called the Trilateral Commission “a group of multilateral corporations and international bankers...not directed towards the general problems of the people of this country.”

Even Reagan had no clue what Bush had in store for him next...

George Bush squeezed himself onto Reagan’s ticket as running mate in 1980 despite their mutual hatred. The people around Bush were determined to keep Reagan in line and suppress the conservative movement.

Reagan soon found out the lengths they were willing to go...

George Bush's distant cousin John Hinckley Jr. shot Reagan in 1981. Hinckley's father was a Texas oilman, Bush donor, and frequent Bush dinner companion. Dubya's brother Neil was set to have dinner with Hinckley Jr.'s brother the next day.

George Bush oversaw Saddam Hussein. Donald Rumsfeld met with Saddam in 1983 to work together against Iran, and returned to Iraq the next year to assure the Iraqis not to worry about their chemical weapons use.

When Saddam defied handlers’ orders, he got the Noriega treatment

Post-White House, George Bush spent a decade working for the Carlyle Group, a private equity fund that received millions in investments from the bin Laden family.

On 9/11, as Howard Lutnick was late to work, George Bush was watching the attack on TV with Osama bin Laden’s half-brother Shafiq.

Though he is cringe, Michael Moore had a good bit on this in “Fahrenheit 9/11”

Subscribe now

Hunter S. Thompson was among the first to publicly question the official story of 9/11. In a 2002 Australian radio interview he said “The public version of the news or whatever event is never really what happened.” He also predicted an invasion of Iraq in his ESPN column one week after the attack.

Hunter died of a “suicide” in 2005.

The night before he died, Hunter S. Thompson (who claimed that he attended George Bush's "Hillbilly" camp at Bohemian Grove) called journalist Paul William Roberts to tell him that he had proof 9/11 was a controlled explosion. Hunter said, "They're gonna make it look like suicide. I know how these bastards think."

College dropout Jeffrey Epstein started teaching at the elite Dalton School immediately after the 1974 departure of headmaster Donald Barr, father of William Barr and author of “Space Relations,” a 1973 sci-fi novel about sex slavery.

William Barr worked for George Bush at the CIA and as attorney general, helping to cover up Iran-Contra.

In the 1980’s, Jeffrey Epstein worked with British arms dealer Douglas Leese to funnel Chinese weapons to Iran, according to @_whitneywebb‘s book “One Nation Under Blackmail.” This operation ran parallel to George Bush’s Iran-Contra scheme...

Jeffrey Epstein worked for arms dealer and Iran-Contra “middleman” Adnan Khashoggi and was partners and roommates with J. Stanley Pottinger, who helped ship weapons to Iran prior to Iran-Contra.

Israeli intelligence was heavily involved in Iran-Contra

The CIA's infamous "Air America" airline used to carry out the Iran-Contra scheme was purchased by Les Wexner and converted into a private airline by none other than Jeffrey Epstein, who claimed to be a CIA asset during Reagan-Bush according to Epstein crony Steven Hoffenberg

Jeffrey Epstein reportedly had dinner in New York City with President George W. Bush two months before 9/11.

When Jeffrey Epstein got arrested for pedophilia the first time he visited Israel and then got a sweetheart plea deal from the Bush administration's Alex Acosta, who was told Epstein "belonged to intelligence" according to Vicky Ward.

Here is George Bush at the Satanic Bohemian Grove with TV icon Art Linkletter in 1993. His son Dubya reportedly went to the Grove around the year 1995. Bush's "Hill Billies" camp at the Grove included Walter Cronkite, William F. Buckley, and Donald Rumsfeld

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Disney has been able to achieve this by skillfully creating characters, screenplay and plots carefully crafted to lead people to think along certain lines, using powerful subliminal messages, imagery and symbolism, of occult, witchcraft, pagan, Illuminati, masonic, sexual and other satanic origins. The borders separating good and evil are blurred and often good is subtly or overtly made to seem evil, boring or just plain wrong, while evil is presented as good, or somehow interesting, fascinating, glamorous, exciting and desirable.

Disney has taken fairy tales, fables, myths, legends and stories from all over the world, and applying various themes to places, nature, animals, and characters both real and fantasy, along with appealing music and lyrics, creatively manipulated and packaged them to cater for their evil agenda. Many of these fairy stories are quite dark anyway, but Disney has cultivated the expertise to make them even darker, ingenuously disguised as wholesome family entertainment.

Colourful witches and wizards abound in Disney productions. From Queen Grimhilde in the first Disney film Snow White in 1938, through Madam Mim in The Sword in the Stone, Cruella De Vil in 101 Dalmations, to the 2014 film dedicated to the story of the witch Maleficent, almost every Disney movie has some type of witch as a central figure.

In Disney’s Little Mermaid, Ariel signs a contract with the evil witch Ursula – or sells her soul to her? – in exchange for being human so she can marry her prince.

Fantasia is full of demonic imagery and mythological characters. In this cartoon, the third that Disney made, and in its sequel, even good beings are depicted as creatures connected with mythology – which is, in fact, demonology – such as satyrs, aka centaurs or fauns, a half-human half-goat creature which is a representation of the ‘god’ Pan, who is actually the devil.

Mulan has a guardian which is a red dragon, thus leading adults and children to believe that Satan, who is portrayed as a red dragon in the Bible – and elsewhere – will guard, help and protect them rather than destroy them.

In the Aladdin song, “A Whole New World” Aladdin wants to take the Princess away with him and sings: “I can open your eyes, Take you wonder by wonder, Over sideways and under, On a magic carpet ride, A whole new world, A new fantastic point of view, No one to tell us no, Or where to go, Or say we’re only dreaming”.

Disney’s “Magic Kingdom” is in fact – in line with the devil’s compulsion to imitate God – a satanic counterfeit of God’s Kingdom.

Far from being sound family entertainment, in Disney stories, unhealthy relationship models abound. Frozen is one of the most popular animated Disney films of all time and many know some of the songs by heart, especially “Let it Go”. The message given is that children should not be afraid to be themselves and should never apologize for who they are, which seems fine. Only Elsa did almost kill her sister and then, with the help of her parents, simply erase her memory.

In the hugely successful Pirates of The Caribbean movies, Disney has presented pirates, who are in reality thieves, plunderers and murderers, etc. as something glamorous that children want to imitate, to act out and dress up like them, and even want to be one.

Walt Disney himself was adopted from an abusive home and lost his adoptive mother when she died from asphyxiation due to faulty workmanship in a house that he had bought her. It is fairly well documented that Walt Disney was not only a paedophile who liked little boys but a satanist, a type of male witch, a 33rd-degree freemason and member of the Illuminati.

A well-known picture of the summer camp in Bohemian Grove attended every year by the wealthy, influential and famous, often termed ‘the elite’. The owl statue “Moloch” presides over an altar created for human sacrifices, although it is claimed they only use an effigy. This same altar is used for the annual “Cremation of Care” ceremony, as covertly filmed in 2000 by Alex Jones and available to view on the internet. Presidents who have been members of Bohemian Grove include Hoover, Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Raegan and the Bush family, Colin Powell, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich, and White House chiefs of staff, senators, secretaries of state, secretaries of defence, army generals and so on. Henry Kissinger was also a member, along with many of the Rockefeller family, Walter Cronkite, Clint Eastwood and Charlton Heston, Mark Twain, Bing Crosby, and Mery Griffin.

Although Walt Disney was not an official member of the Bohemian Club, he is known to have visited the club as a guest in 1936. It is however well documented with dozens of photographs in the public domain, that Walt Disney was a member of a similar and related but smaller club for the elite, also located in California and also with an exclusive white male membership (of only 700), “Rancheros Visitadores”.

At Walt Disney World there is a ‘secret’ exclusive club called Club 33, the only place at Disneyland where alcohol can be bought. Lavishly furnished, Club 33 contains an amazing collection of top-notch Disney movie memorabilia, a beautiful reproduction antique French glass lift, and a gruesome trophy hunting collection.

There are many rooms and exclusive areas within the club – as there is elsewhere at Walt Disney World – with various levels of access that are strictly controlled. According to one Club 33 member, there is a $25,000 to $100,000 initiation fee and $12,500 to $30,000 annual fee, depending on the level of membership. There is said to be a 14-year waiting list for membership which is by invite only. Clearly, Club 33 is a place only for the connected rich.

Club 33 was said to have been originally designed as a place for Walt Disney to entertain guests and business associates, but he died from lung cancer at 67, only six months before it was officially opened. Club 33 is said to be a Freemasonic club and we know ’33’ is certainly a number that is very important to freemasons. Pictures of Club 33 show the trademark black and white chequered floor, and other indicators of freemasonry – which is essentially witchcraft.

“The 33rd degree is a supreme honour bestowed only on those who have demonstrated outstanding service to the Brotherhood, as well as professional and personal accomplishments”.

Disney is one of the six major organisations which control the world’s media

Occult Symbolism and Mickey Mouse

Disney’s first character was Mickey Mouse, voiced by Walt Disney himself for 20 years from 1927 to 1947.

Mickey Mouse is perhaps best known as the apprentice wizard left to take care of a wizard’s workshop while he is away in the Disney short fantasy film “The Sorceror’s Apprentice”.

There is at least one tragic death in almost every Disney film and according to a study published in “The Social Science Journal” there were 561 incidents of child abuse and mistreatment in Disney movies released between 1937 and 2006, with 62% of the main child characters being subjected to abuse on one or more occasions during the film.

Often in Disney stories, one or both parents are dead and children are left to their own devices, while in others the parents are somehow inadequate or an object of ridicule.

Subscribe now

The list is extensive:

Walt Disney World

Disney is full of magicians and magic often involves things vanishing. Disney World theme parks are no exception, with more than their fair share of stories of deaths, accidents, disappearances, ghosts and hauntings.

Walt Disney World’s Magic Kingdom in Florida covers 30,000 acres (47 square miles). This is the same size as San Francisco, California, twice the size of Manhattan, or 80 times the size of the European nation of Monaco. Only 7,000 acres of that land has been developed, with the four theme parks taking up just over 1,000 acres. Underneath this is a network of 9 acres (36,000 m²) of tunnels known as utilidors (utility corridors) which are accessed from unmarked doors throughout the Magical Kingdom including some shops, restaurants and attractions.

The utilidors are used for personnel and deliveries to move unseen from one area to the other. The utilidors also house a system of pumps and vents to control smells in different areas of the park known as the “Smellitizer System” used to manipulate people to buy food or other merchandise, or go on a certain ride, etc. The corridors also house Disney’s extensive security systems which monitor the whole area.

Tight management and security systems are in place so they are adept at hiding anything that they don’t want to be seen. Security personnel operate out of the tunnels to make sure that unwanted people – whether due to illness or accidents, death, suicide, or just drunken or abusive behaviour – ‘disappear’, as if by magic. Magic Bands must be worn by all guests and used as a credit card, parking ticket, room key, etc. The Magic Band system also incorporates a tracking and recording device so everyone’s whereabouts at any given time are always known.

It is rumoured that there are terrible things going on in these utilidors as they are the perfect place to hide the production of child pornography and child trafficking. People have reported being taken to Disneyland as children – some at night-time – where they have been terrorised and abused.

According to an investigation by CNN, dozens of Disney employees in Florida were arrested for alleged child sex offences in the period between 2006 and 2014. The crimes involved offences such as trying to meet a minor for sex and possession of child pornography and were all committed by men who worked there including security guards, tour guides, cashiers, maintenance workers and costumed characters.

Witchcraft and a dark agenda

Disney promulgates the idea that there is good witchcraft and bad witchcraft, but all witchcraft is evil. Many Disney productions such as Disney’s Bewitched, or the 1971 “Bedknobs and Broomsticks” – with the brilliant Angela Lansbury playing the starring role as a glamorous and likeable witch – feature blatant witchcraft. In others, it is more covert. Such as “Escape to Witch Mountain” and its sequel “Race to Witch Mountain” – not escape or race from, but race to! Why would anyone want to escape to a place where there is witchcraft?

Mary Poppins is one of the most beloved films of all time and is generally regarded as being entirely wholesome and good for children. Yet looked at more closely it can be clearly seen that “Mary Poppins” is in fact about a witch with a dark agenda.

Witchcraft is the manipulation of reality with the intent to control. In the film, Mary Poppins has a spellbinding effect on people, especially the children. She seems very nice, proper and wholesome, yet she has some traits that are not so pleasant. She is quite rude, abrupt and critical of the children and at times quite unreasonable. Also, she also appears to be vain, describing herself as “practically perfect in every way”. In fact, Mary Poppins has many of the hallmarks of a witch, albeit somewhat disguised. What else is “supercalifragilisticexpialidocious” but a spell or incantation, like “hocus-pocus” or “abracadabra”? How else could she pull all sorts of things out of her magic carpetbag?

Mary Poppins leads the children to journey to magical realms, like the Pied Piper. Rather than a broom, she flies with an umbrella, but she does manipulate and control reality. She ‘gaslights’ the children, telling them they had imagined their journeys to other realms and even threatens to report them to the police if they don’t stop talking about it. This is on the pretext that she doesn’t want the children to tell anyone about her ability to perform magical tricks – but why let the children experience these things and then make out they are imagining it all?

Does this not almost exactly mirror what pedophiles do to children lead them into places they should never go and then pretending it never happened and coercing them into silence about it?

Pedophiles want children to be comfortable with sex as if that is something that should be part of their daily routine. The aim of the majority of pedophiles – although by no means all – is to open children up to be receptive to sex and their perverted sexual advances and not be scared or upset. Generally speaking, while there are some pedophiles who enjoy the element of inducing horror and traumatisation, many pedophiles want children to be willing. They want children who believe that sex is natural and normal. They don’t want children who reject them. That’s why they work so hard to sexualise and groom children because they want them to be willing participants in pedophilia.

In Disney’s Pinocchio, a coachman pays a fox to capture ‘stupid little boys’. The fox is afraid of being caught but the coachman insists there is no risk. He says; “They never come back as boys”. The children are trafficked to “Pleasure Island”, thereby hinting at sexual pleasure. At Pleasure Island, there are no rules, echoing the satanic mindset: “Do what thou wilt…”.

And the list goes on….

There are many articles about Disney on the internet along with videos on Youtube which reveal the truly shocking extent of the damaging occult indoctrination we have been subjected to. Some may – perhaps wisely – choose not to have anything to do with Walt Disney or any other such stories, nor have any related items in their home.

Author’s note: If you find value in what I write - if it supports your research, challenges your assumptions, or helps you see things most people never question - I want you to know that it truly matters to me.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Walt Disney was born in Chicago, in 1901 and moved with his family to Kansas City in 1910. Walt’s obsession with escapism, imagination, magic, and animals were forged on their Kansas City farm under the repressive, abusive, cruel and loveless tyranny of his father who would allegedly march them to the woodshed and dispense his brutal punishments daily.

“Young Disney joined DeMolay in 1920, as the 107^th member of the original Mother Chapter of DeMolay in Kansas City, Missouri. He was 19 years old.” DeMolay International, founded in 1919, is an international fraternal organization for boys 12 to 21. It was named for Jacques de Molay, the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar. DeMolay is considered to be part of the general “family” of Masonic organizations.

Frank “Dad” Land, the founder of the Order of DeMolay, was honored with the Knight Commander of the Court of Honor of the Scottish Rite and coroneted a 33^rd degree in 1925. Each DeMolay chapter must be sponsored by a local masonic body. The sponsoring body is responsible for providing the chapter with adult advisors. Walt received the DeMolay Legion of Honor in 1931, the highest attainable degree, corresponding to that of a 33rd degree Mason.

It was in the mid-1930s that Walt Disney Studios began sending DeMolay International a Mickey Mouse comic strip entitled “Mickey Mouse Chapter” for DeMolay’s national newsletter.

Commemorative coins are available for purchase to this day, featuring Mickey, Walt, as well as the DeMolay and Freemason emblems.

In 1935, Walt Disney was summoned to Paris, France to receive a medal for the creation of Mickey Mouse from the League of Nations. During his European tour, Disney dined with the British royal family, had a private audience with the Pope, and had a long interview with Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini. It was during this European trip, that Disney had a lunch with writer and prophet, H.G. Wells (a major inspiration for Disney’s Tomorrowland), who, through his predictions of the future, conditioned the public to prepare for, and accept the stages of the New World Order.

In addition to sponsoring a Masonic Club for Disneyland employees, Walt Disney also created the infamous Club 33, located at 33 Royal Street in Disneyland, which is located on the 33rd parallel north. The secretive club’s décor is reminiscent of a Masonic lodge, with its black and white checkered floor (representing duality) and blue and gold draperies (the colors of the Masonic emblem). The “Disney club that’s so exclusive you’ve never even heard of it: Club 33, ‘named after Walt Disney’s Masonic ties’, has an invite-only membership, a 14-year wait list, and a $100k initiation fee.”

A quick internet search of various sites on the 33^rd parallel of significance to the Freemasons will pull up a wealth of information, with perhaps the most notable location being Mount Hermon, the site from which the book of Enoch states 200 Watchers, or fallen angels, descended to Earth.

The Magic Keys of King Solomon

King Solomon is a central figure among illuminated Freemasons. They believe that King Solomon held the ‘keys’ to the mysteries of dark magic, and with a “magic ring bearing the six pointed star, or seal of Solomon, gained the power to summon demons and spirits using his will to control them and command them to complete tasks.”

The number 33 was not just selected at random by the originators of the Scottish Rite. The Seal of Solomon, made up of two intersecting triangles, is considered a graphic representation of 3+3. It also plays a prominent role in Kabbalah. The number 33 is significant to Freemasons, as it represents “illumination” or enlightenment.

As a DeMolay Legion of Honor recipient, there is little doubt that Disney understood the significance of the number 33 in Freemasonry, and the creation of Club 33 was intentionally designed in honor of the Freemasons.

Walt Disney is evil!!!

Subliminal messages are words, images, or sounds that might appear in television or radio commercials, TV shows or movies, print ads or recorded music. Usually when subliminal messages are seen or heard, they’re not recognized for what they are. In fact they may be ignored by the conscious brain and be beyond the level of conscious perception.

The above shameful Disney pictures from “The Little Mermaid” speak for themselves!
This is the sicko humor of Disney’s perverted employees, and it’s aimed at children.

Notice the woman at the window ("The Rescuers"). I added the white spots to cover her bare breasts. Walt Disney's perverts thinks it's cute to place porno in their movies.

A scene from Roger Rabbit. I had to block out a big section to hide the indecency.

The FBI Key

Read more

What is Occultism?

In the Western tradition, occultism is the study or pursuit of hidden knowledge and information, particularly for the purported purpose of gaining spiritual insight or acquiring personal power. The term is derived from the Latin word occultus, which is usually translated into English as “concealed,” “hidden,” or “secret.” Its close association with esoteric, mystical, and supernatural practices dates to the early seventeenth century. The terms occult and cult are sometimes confused, as sects dedicated to occult practices are often referred to as cults. However, the two words are etymologically unrelated.

The opening ceremony of the 2022 Commonwealth Games contained some bizarre scenes involving people revering a giant bull. Was this ritualistic ceremony actually Baal worship in plain sight? Here’s a look at this symbolic event.

The plans are “devious” because they brazenly go against the well-being of the masses. They revolve around using fear, control, and relentless propaganda to coerce people into accepting a global culture that leads the way toward a global government.

The beliefs are “dark” because they involve the evilest and most depraved practices known to man. They’re about dark rituals, blood sacrifices, and, most disgustingly, preying on the innocence of children. In short, they’re all about satanism – in the truest sense of the word.

Amazingly enough, all of this madness is incorporated into ceremonies that are watched by millions. And most viewers do not even realize it.

The opening ceremony of the Commonwealth games began rather … normally. Some vintage cars owned by local residents were driven into the stadium to form the shape of the Union Jack – a tribute to Birmingham’s role in automotive history. This portion of the show culminated with Prince Charles driving his own Aston Martin into the stadium.

Then, things got dark.

The mood suddenly changed when the lights turned red and the dancers moved in unison, raising their hands to their heads—a stark visual break from celebration that felt deliberate, unsettling, and meant to signal a darker turn in the spectacle.

Then, it arrived.

A massive, fuming bull with red eyes is carried into the stadium by women pulling chains.

What does this thing represent? First, Birmingham has a long history with bulls. The city is home to the Bull Ring market where, since the Middle Ages, bulls were once held before slaughter.

However, Birmingham 2022 provides more interpretation to this bull scene:

Faced with this explanation, a few questions immediately come to mind. First: What do the working conditions of people in the 19th century have to do with a sporting event?

The second question would be: In this context, what does the bull actually represent? The industrial revolution? The oppression of men (even though their working conditions were not better)? That’s not quite clear.

However, as one watches the entire ceremony, it becomes clear that this bull scene represents much more than a worker strike.

When the women drop the chains, the bull gets angry and starts trampling around as everyone cowers in fear.

Then, a woman holding a shard of light (a recurring symbol throughout the ceremony) “tames” the bull.

Then, for several awkward minutes, people gather around the bull to literally worship it. There are no other words to describe what is happening.

The woman who stopped to bull is now “riding” it while holding a shard of light above her head. People around the bull do the same.

This is an appropriate time to note that Lucifer means “light bearer”. And these people are literally “bearing light” to honor the bull. This is all pure Luciferian symbolism.

Then they prostrate themselves to the bull.

This is highly symbolic and proof that the bull represents more than a worker strike (or whatever). The definition of “to prostrate” is:

stretched out with face on the ground in adoration or submission.

Here’s another image of people prostrating themselves to a bull-like figure. His name: Baal.

Baal is offered a child sacrifice as people prostrate themselves.

People have been fearing, revering, and carrying sacrifices to this bull for thousands of years. It is still happening today.

Baal

Molech, or Moloch, is mentioned in the Bible as the god to whom child sacrifices were made in a shrine outside the city of Jerusalem. Although Molech is mentioned several times in the Old Testament, his name is less well-known in the archaeological and historical records leading to disagreements over the identity of the god as well as the exact nature of the cult of Molech. The name “Molech” or “Moloch” most likely comes from the Hebrew word Melekh, meaning king.

For a long time, it was believed that Molech was another name for Milcom, the chief deity of the Ammonites, but this view has fallen out of favor because of more recent research. The name of Molech was most likely a title or epithet for a deity rather than an actual name. It is common in Phoenician and Canaanite inscriptions for deities to be referred to as king or lord of something or another.

Are Molech and Baal one and the same?

“Some people say that Baal and Moloch were actually the same god, just with different names and faces. They say that the word “Molech” means “king”, and that Baal was also called “king”. They say that some of the stories and rituals of Baal and Moloch were similar, and that they were both worshiped in the same places and times. They say that Baal and Moloch were both aspects of the same divine power, and represented the two sides of the same coin.” ~ from “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Baal and Moloch as Contrasting Figures in Canaanite Religion” by Zacharias Hendrik

When monotheistic religions spread across the Mediterranean, Baal became nothing less than the face of evil. For instance, Numbers 25:1-3 in the Old Testament states:

While Israel was staying in Shittim, the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with Moabite women, who invited them to the sacrifices to their gods. The people ate and bowed down before these gods. So Israel joined in worshiping the Baal of Peor. And the Lord’s anger burned against them.

In the New Testament, Jesus calls Satan Beelzebub (Baʿal Zebub), forever associating Baal with Satan and the “prince of demons”.

The story of Baal worship is long, complex, and related to other figures such as Moloch. With that being said, one thing about Baal is clear: He is identified as an enemy of God in the holy books of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

And it is exactly for this reason that the occult elite still reveres Baal to this day. He represents the ancient gods of the past who were appeased using child sacrifices and sacred prostitution. Things the elite still practice today.

Satanic Ritual Abuse

Many have not heard of other aspects of Baal worship where people, especially children, are tortured, raped and murdered as part of satanic ritual ceremonies, where they may drink their blood and sometimes also eat their flesh. The blood of those severely traumatised before death is particularly valued as it contains adrenochrome which is a natural drug produced by the pineal gland.

Worldwide, children are stolen to be sold to elite pedophile rings. Women are used as breeders to produce babies that are never documented and effectively do not exist.
Children are trafficked to create child porn which is a massive industry thought to generate $20 billion a year in the US alone but the real figure could be much higher.

We know from testimonies of those who have experienced satanic ritual abuse that they are put through terrible experiences and tortured mercilessly to break them down. They may be locked in cages for long periods of time and forced to watch terrible things, or put in boxes with snakes and spiders and put through other such nightmarish experiences. They may be involved in sacrifices of babies and animals intended to keep them quiet.

Today, Government officials and leaders of society, doctors, judges, police chiefs, and neighbours can be involved at different levels, some only as part of a conspiracy of silence.

This is only the beginning. More articles—both free and paid—are on the way, so subscribe if you want to see them the moment they’re published.
The next article, titled “Exposing the ‘Keys’ to Disney’s Operations and Agenda.”

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

1. The timestamps on the photos tell the whole story. The first shot was taken at 7:24:12 a.m. Epstein has no tube in his mouth. Eight seconds later, a new photo, suddenly there is a tube. Then the edited version hits the media by 9:49 a.m.

2. This means that The New York Post reversed the photo order. The image with the breathing tube came after the one without it. That alone proves the narrative was scripted. The media didn’t document what happened. They helped stage what didn’t.

3. Also Epstein’s arm is bent in a way no unconscious body could hold. The tube looks misplaced, if it’s even real. The guy doing “CPR” wasn’t in the shot seconds earlier. It’s looking rather like a staged performance, and clearly not a resuscitation.

4. The whole thing happened in the ambulance bay. Look at the red boards, electrical panel, sliding door. No movement. No hallway. He was never taken inside. He was displayed, photographed, and mysteriously disappeared.

5. What’s astonishing is that, within 11 seconds, the real paramedics are replaced by clean-cut guys without EMS patches. Remember these FBI sightseeing tourists at the “Justice for J6” in Sept 2021? Same vibes.

6. Months later, Bill Farrington quietly drops another photo. It shows the original medics, seconds earlier. Why hold it back? Because it shows the swap. The original crew was real. The ones who followed weren’t.

7. The autopsy pics are also a joke. The face has a clear mask line by the ear. The body is hairier, slimmer, wrong. The tube is back in his mouth, reinserted just for the shot. This doesn’t make any sense.

8. What matters most is this: two vans left the hospital that day. One out front, one out back. The press followed the decoy. The real hand-off happened where no one was watching. They didn’t kill but moved him. And the footage they dropped last year only makes that more obvious.

9. The 10 hours of the Epstein cell footage released by the DOJ shows that they cut out a full 60 seconds. The feed jumps clean from 11:59:00 to 12:00:00. No explanation… just gone. That’s probably the exact moment he was calmly walked out of his cell. Alive.

10. First they broke the cams, then they faked the pics and lost the footage. And years later, they still can’t explain who signed off on what, or why someone is still using Epstein’s bank account. And The New Work Post’s Bill Farrington never wanted to talk about his world famous coup.

11. If you still think the official story holds up, watch the clip of Dan Bongino and FBI Director Kash Patel saying Epstein killed himself. Look at their faces. Someone told them to say it. Someone else is holding the strings.

Share

12. This was never just about Epstein. He worked for intelligence. He ran a blackmail operation using sex trafficking, same playbook as Robert Maxwell. Mossad asset, just like the man who made Ghislaine. The people in charge weren't Bongino or Patel. They’re Israeli puppets too.

13. Some additional context. Our society is run by pedophiles, and they are STILL being protected at all costs.

The individual who anonymously posted on 4Chan the morning of Epstein’s death, August 10, 2019 claiming he witnessed weird happenings at the prison before Epstein’s death has been identified in the Epstein files.

Roberto Grijalva, an officer at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York has been identified as the anonymous prison employee who posted on 4Chan claiming Epstein left his cell Friday evening shackled in a medical wheelchair while at the same time an unauthorized trip van arrived at the prison, which he believes took Epstein away the night BEFORE news broke of his death.

The day after Epstein’s death, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the SDNY opened a Grand Jury proceeding and subpoenaed 4Chan, Apple, AT&T and Citibank for records aiming to uncover Grijalva’s identity following the anonymous 4Chan post.

Grijalva’s name is not redacted on his bank records included in the SDNY subpoena response from Citibank for his 4Chan post, and ties to the same Prison Officer Roberto Grijalva whose statements were released as part of the prison’s investigation into Epstein’s death.

This is HUGE. We now have validation the 4Chan post from 8/10/2019 is a legitimate eyewitness account from an MCC prison officer that Epstein may have been switched out before news broke of his alleged suicide.

Author’s note: If you find value in what I write - if it supports your research, challenges your assumptions, or helps you see things most people never question - I want you to know that it truly matters to me.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

Deliberate mind manipulation of the masses is, by itself, nothing new. Nearly a hundred years ago, our global mania for consumption was unleashed by the malevolent brilliance of Edward Bernays, known as the “father of public relations.” Bernays was Sigmund Freud’s nephew and used his uncle’s insights into the subconscious to develop his new methods of mind control, designed to create the modern American consumer.

“We must shift America from a needs to a desires culture,” declared Bernays’ business partner, Paul Mazur. “People must be trained to desire, to want new things, even before the old have been entirely consumed. We must shape a new mentality. Man’s desires must overshadow his needs.” In 1928, Bernays proudly described how his techniques for mental manipulation had permitted a small elite to control the minds of the American population:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government that is the true ruling power of this country. We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of… In almost every act of our daily lives… we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons … who pull the wires which control the public mind.

Bernays set in motion what we have all come to know as an essential part of our capitalist ecosystem: the use of mass media to promote roles, desires and status symbols that rake in profits for corporations. The chilling words of Wayne Chilicki, chief executive of General Mills, show how faithfully Bernays’ vision has been followed: “When it comes to targeting kid consumers, we at General Mills follow the Procter & Gamble model of ‘cradle to grave.’ We believe in getting them early and having them for life.”

What’s changed is that a new generation of mind controllers are using the burgeoning technologies of data mining and social media to inject their power even deeper into our minds than their forebears could have dreamed possible. A modern-day Bernays named B.J. Fogg has founded a field called “captology,” derived from the acronym CAPT or “Computers As Persuasive Technology.” At the ominously named Stanford Persuasive Tech Lab, he teaches freshly minted graduate students how to use technology to “change people’s attitudes or behaviors.”

His teachings have spawned the interfaces of our new daily routines: the chimes from our smartphones diverting our attention, the thumbs-up icon on our news feeds, and the Like statistics telling us how popular we are today. These are known as “hot triggers” which kick off behavioral loops in our subconscious. Successful apps, they teach, are those that trigger a momentary need, and then provide us with an instant solution. The solution sparks a microdose of endorphins in our brains. That feels good. So, like rats on a wheel, we find ourselves getting addicted, going back for more.

What Is The Subconscious Mind?

The subconscious mind is a fascinating and complex aspect of our mental processes that influences our thoughts, emotions, and behavior. Despite its importance in shaping our experiences, it remains largely unknown to our conscious awareness. Before we continue, it’s important to understand what the subconscious mind is. Once you do, the entire article will become clearer.

The subconscious mind is the part of your mind that works quietly in the background. You don’t actively think with it, but it shapes how you feel, react, and make decisions. It stores memories, habits, fears, beliefs, and patterns you’ve picked up since childhood. While your conscious mind is logical and questioning, your subconscious mind is emotional and accepting. It doesn’t argue. It absorbs.

This is why the subconscious mind is so powerful and so easy to influence. When an idea is repeated again and again, especially through emotion, authority, fear, or comfort, the subconscious begins to accept it as normal. Not necessarily true, just familiar. Over time, repetition turns into belief. Belief turns into behavior. Eventually, people defend ideas they never consciously chose, simply because those ideas feel “normal” to them.

This is how control often works. Media, education systems, advertising, and social pressure don’t need to force people anymore. They just repeat messages until resistance fades. When you hear the same narrative every day on screens, in headlines, in conversations, your subconscious stops questioning it. It starts to feel safe. Anything that challenges it then feels wrong, dangerous, or extreme, even if it’s factual.

The most effective influence doesn’t look like control. It looks like routine. It looks like “this is just how things are.” Once something is embedded in the subconscious, people self-police. They mock opposing views. They feel emotional discomfort when confronted with new information. That’s not logic reacting, it’s conditioning.

Facebook has built its global empire of 3.1 billion monthly active users on this addictive routine. According to one of Fogg’s students, Nir Eyal, Facebook’s key trigger is FOMO: fear of missing out. Humans evolved in hunter-gatherer bands, where survival meant being part of the community. The social anxiety of missing what our friends are doing arises from deep within our hormonal system. Meanwhile, as psychologist Sherry Turkle has pointed out in her book Alone Together, we sacrifice our daily physical intimacy with those around us by focusing our attention on the screen in our hands. This has been brilliantly captured by artist Eric Pickerskill in his photography series, “Removed,” which documents the feeling of everyday social situations – after removing people’s smartphones from the picture.

Facebook has been researching the extent of its power over our behavior, manipulating its own users as guinea pigs. On election day in 2010, it sent “Go out and vote” reminders to more than 60 million users, causing an estimated 340,000 to vote who otherwise wouldn’t have. If it chose to send these reminders to supporters of a particular party or candidate, it could easily flip an election without anyone knowing about it. Under current law, it wouldn’t have to tell anyone what it was doing. In another experiment, which caused a public outcry, Facebook successfully manipulated the emotional state of 689,000 users by sending them either an excess of positive or negative terms in their news feeds.

The mind control doesn’t stop at social media. Do you believe in your autonomy when you’re carefully conducting research on a topic and use Google to search for something? Think again.

The new mind control

The soothing music we all hear overhead in supermarkets causes us to walk more slowly and buy more food, whether we need it or not. Most of the vacuous thoughts and intense feelings our teenagers experience from morning till night are carefully orchestrated by highly skilled marketing professionals working in our fashion and entertainment industries. Politicians work with a wide range of consultants who test every aspect of what the politicians do in order to sway voters: clothing, intonations, facial expressions, makeup, hairstyles and speeches are all optimised, just like the packaging of a breakfast cereal.

Fortunately, all of these sources of influence operate competitively. Some of the persuaders want us to buy or believe one thing, others to buy or believe something else. It is the competitive nature of our society that keeps us, on balance, relatively free.

But what would happen if new sources of control began to emerge that had little or no competition? And what if new means of control were developed that were far more powerful – and far more invisible – than any that have existed in the past? And what if new types of control allowed a handful of people to exert enormous influence not just over the citizens of the US but over most of the people on Earth?

It might surprise you to hear this, but these things have already happened.

Google decides which web pages to include in search results, and how to rank them.

To understand how the new forms of mind control work, we need to start by looking at the search engine – one in particular: the biggest and best of them all, namely Google. The Google search engine is so good and so popular that the company’s name is now a commonly used verb in languages around the world. To ‘Google’ something is to look it up on the Google search engine, and that, in fact, is how most computer users worldwide get most of their information about just about everything these days. They Google it. Google has become the main gateway to virtually all knowledge, mainly because the search engine is so good at giving us exactly the information we are looking for, almost instantly and almost always in the first position of the list it shows us after we launch our search – the list of ‘search results’.

That ordered list is so good, in fact, that about 50 per cent of our clicks go to the top two items, and more than 90 per cent of our clicks go to the 10 items listed on the first page of results; few people look at other results pages, even though they often number in the thousands, which means they probably contain lots of good information. Google decides which of the billions of web pages it is going to include in our search results, and it also decides how to rank them.

Psychologist Robert Epstein has unearthed the massive subliminal power of what he’s called the Search Engine Manipulation Effect, or SEME.

Epstein and his associate Ronald Robertson wanted to test whether SEME could impact how people decided to vote in an election. They asked a sample of Americans to research candidates for an Australian election (to minimize preconceived notions about the candidates) using their own mock search engine, “Kadoodle.” They randomly divided the sample “voters” into three groups, and served up the same results to each group. The only difference was the ordering of the results: one group’s results favored one candidate; another group’s results favored the opposing candidate, and the third group saw results that favored neither candidate.

The results were staggering. The proportion of people favoring Kadoodle’s “favored” candidate increased by 48%. Disturbingly, three quarters of the people in the manipulated groups were completely unaware of any bias in their search results. In the “neutral” control group, there was no significant shift of opinion.

Since then, they’ve replicated these findings in larger tests conducted across the U.S. They’ve discovered that using simple techniques, they can mask the manipulation so that virtually no-one is aware they’re seeing biased rankings. In 2014, they took their testing to India during the election for prime minister, where people were already very familiar with the candidates. Even so, they were able to shift the proportion of people favoring a chosen candidate by 20%, with 99.5% of people showing no awareness they were being manipulated.

In many countries of the world, including the U.S., Google has a near monopoly over internet searches. The search-ranking business is entirely unregulated, and courts have ruled that Google’s right to rank search results however it pleases is protected as a form of free speech. If Google chose to swing the U.S. election, they could probably do so without anyone knowing about it.

Five Modern Methods of Mind Control

Modern mind control is both technological and psychological. Tests show that simply by exposing the methods of mind control, the effects can be reduced or eliminated, at least for mind control advertising and propaganda.

1. Education — This is the most obvious, yet still remains the most insidious. It has always been a would-be dictator’s ultimate fantasy to “educate” naturally impressionable children.

2. Advertising and Propaganda — Edward Bernays has been cited as the inventor of the consumerist culture that was designed primarily to target people’s self-image (or lack thereof) in order to turn a want into a need. This was initially envisioned for products such as cigarettes, for example. However, Bernays also noted in his 1928 book, Propaganda, that “propaganda is the executive arm of the invisible government.” This can be seen most clearly in the modern police state and the growing citizen snitch culture, wrapped up in the pseudo-patriotic War on Terror. The increasing consolidation of media has enabled the entire corporate structure to merge with government, which now utilizes the concept of propaganda placement. Media; print, movies, television, and cable news can now work seamlessly to integrate an overall message which seems to have the ring of truth because it comes from so many sources, simultaneously. When one becomes attuned to identifying the main “message,” one will see this imprinting everywhere. And this is not even to mention subliminal messaging.

3. Predictive Programming — Many still deny that predictive programming is real. I would invite anyone to examine the range of documentation put together by Alan Watt and come to any other conclusion. Predictive programming has its origins in predominately elitist Hollywood, where the big screen can offer a big vision of where society is headed. Just look back at the books and movies which you thought were far-fetched, or “science fiction” and take a close look around at society today.

4. Sports & Politics — Some might take offense at seeing politics put alongside sports as a method of mind control. The central theme is the same throughout: divide and conquer. The techniques are quite simple: short circuit the natural tendency of people to cooperate for their survival, and teach them to form teams bent on domination and winning. Sports has always had a role as a key distraction that corrals tribal tendencies into a non-important event, which in modern America has reached ridiculous proportions where protests will break out over a sport celebrity leaving their city, but essential human issues such as liberty are giggled away as inconsequential. Political discourse is strictly in a left-right paradigm of easily controlled opposition.

5. Food, Water, and Air — Additives, toxins, and other food poisons literally alter brain chemistry to create docility and apathy. Fluoride in drinking water has been proven to lower IQ; Aspartame and MSG are excitotoxins which excite brain cells until they die; and easy access to the fast food that contains these poisons generally has created a population that lacks focus and motivation for any type of active lifestyle. Most of the modern world is perfectly groomed for passive receptiveness — and acceptance — of the dictatorial elite. And if you choose to diligently watch your diet, they are fully prepared to spray the population from above.

When most people hear about government mind control experiments, they think of MKUltra — the CIA’s notorious program that dosed unwitting citizens with LSD in the 1950s and 60s. But MKUltra was merely the tip of an iceberg, the most publicized program in a vast, interconnected web of psychological warfare research that spanned decades and crossed international borders.

Intelligence agencies on both sides of the Cold War believed that whoever could crack the code of human consciousness would possess the ultimate weapon.

The Cold War wasn’t just fought with missiles and spies — it was a battle for the human mind itself. This belief drove governments to commit some of the most unethical experiments in modern history, involving prestigious universities, respected psychiatrists, and cutting-edge scientists. The subjects were prisoners, mental patients, soldiers, drug addicts, prostitutes, and ordinary citizens who never consented and often never knew what was done to them.

Most disturbingly, these programs were only exposed by accident. When the Watergate scandal broke in the 1970s, it triggered investigations that unearthed a small fraction of the evidence — much had already been systematically destroyed. The Church Committee hearings of 1975–76 pulled back the curtain just enough to reveal the horrifying scope of these operations, but countless details remain classified or lost forever.

Manipulation Techniques

“Publicity is the deliberate attempt to manage the public’s perception of a subject. The subjects of publicity include people (for example, politicians and performing artists), goods and services, organizations of all kinds, and works of art or entertainment.”

The drive to sell products and ideas to the masses has to lead to an unprecedented amount of research on human behavior and on the human psyche. Cognitive sciences, psychology, sociology, semiotics, linguistics and other related fields were and still are extensively researched through well-funded studies.

“No group of sociologists can approximate the ad teams in the gathering and processing of exploitable social data. The ad teams have billions to spend annually on research and testing of reactions, and their products are magnificent accumulations of material about the shared experience and feelings of the entire community.”
– Marshall McLuhan, The Extensions of Man

The results of those studies are applied to advertisements, movies, music videos and other media in order to make them as influential as possible. The art of marketing is highly calculated and scientific because it must reach both the individual and the collective consciousness. In high-budget cultural products, a video is never “just a video,” Images, symbols, and meanings are strategically placed in order to generate a desired effect.

“It is with knowledge of the human being, his tendencies, his desires, his needs, his psychic mechanisms, his automatisms as well as knowledge of social psychology and analytical psychology that propaganda refines its techniques.”

Today’s propaganda almost never uses rational or logical arguments. It directly taps into a human’s most primal needs and instincts in order to generate an emotional and irrational response. If we always thought rationally, we probably wouldn’t buy 50% of what we own. Babies and children are constantly found in advertisements targeting women for a specific reason: studies have shown that images of children trigger in women an instinctual need to nurture, to care and to protect, ultimately leading to a sympathetic bias towards the advertisement.

Sex is ubiquitous in mass media, as it draws and keeps the viewer’s attention. It directly connects to our animal need to breed and to reproduce, and, when triggered, this instinct can instantly overshadow any other rational thoughts in our brain.

Subliminal Perception

What if the messages described above were able to reach directly the viewers’ subconscious mind, without the viewers even realizing what is happening? That is the goal of subliminal perception. The phrase subliminal advertising was coined in 1957 by the US market researcher James Vicary, who said he could get moviegoers to “drink Coca-Cola” and “eat popcorn” by flashing those messages onscreen for such a short time that viewers were unaware.

“Subliminal perception is a deliberate process created by communications technicians, by which you receive and respond to information and instructions without being consciously aware of the instructions”
– Steve Jacobson, Mind Control in the United States

This technique is often used in marketing and we all know that sex sells.

Although some sources claim that subliminal advertising is ineffective or even an urban myth, the documented usage of this technique in mass media proves that creators believe in its powers. Recent studies have also proven its effectiveness, especially when the message is negative.

” A team from University College London, funded by the Wellcome Trust, found that it [subliminal perception] was particularly good at instilling negative thoughts. There has been much speculation about whether people can process emotional information unconsciously, for example pictures, faces and words,” said Professor Nilli Lavie, who led the research. We have shown that people can perceive the emotional value of subliminal messages and have demonstrated conclusively that people are much more attuned to negative words.”
– Source

A famous example of subliminal messaging in political communications is in George Bush’s advertisement against Al Gore in 2000. Right after the name of Gore is mentioned, the ending of the word “bureaucrats” – “rats” – flashes on the screen for a split second.

The discovery of this trickery caused quite a stir and, even if there are no laws against subliminal messaging in the U.S., the advertisement was taken off the air.

When Does it Become Mind Control?

By now you’re probably used to how predictive advertising has become, but it probably felt intrusive at first. Advertisers have always used subtle tactics to convince you to buy things, but now the privacy boundary is increasingly blurred. While it’s somewhat known that advertising finds its roots in propaganda, are developments in technology and neuroscience changing the fundamental nature of marketing into something that borders on mind control or manipulation?

The foundational elements of public relations and advertising were developed by a man named Edward L. Bernays, who happened to be the nephew of none other than Sigmund Freud. Freud gave a copy of his General Introductory Lectures, his seminal work on psychoanalysis, to Bernays as a gift in the nascent phase of his career.

Bernays was intrigued by Freud’s research, notably the idea that irrational forces drive human behavior. He took the idea and parlayed it into what he referred to as “engineering consent,” a concept that instead of bowing to consumer demands, cultivated them.

Bernays was first hired for a Lucky Strike campaign in which he created social trends to convince more people, particularly women, to smoke. He realized cigarettes exemplified male power, so he staged a campaign to empower women to smoke cigarettes by inviting a group of young female Vogue employees to light up on New York’s 5^th avenue in a show of protest.

He referred to the campaign and the cigarettes involved as “Torches of Freedom.” Later, when the ladies expressed distaste for the green color of the packaging, he staged a number of events to make the color green fashionable.

This type of consent engineering was manipulative. And there’s evidence that Bernays likely knew of the dangers of smoking in those days as he would destroy his wife’s cigarettes whenever he found them at home. Despite this knowledge, and later becoming a public opponent of tobacco, he pitched Lucky Strikes as having a slimming effect and claimed they were soothing on the throat. He even wrote a book on his tactics blatantly titled, Propaganda, that would later inspire the Nazis.

Bernays used fear tactics, false or deceptive advertising, and what can only be referred to as social mind control tactics to sell products, even if they were dangerous or disingenuous.

This set the framework for the modern tactics that continue to perpetuate this trend, and while false or misleading advertising is pretty well-regulated by the FTC, the idea of engineering consent still persists. So is it possible consent may be engineered against our own will?

The World Economic Forum Talks About “Mind Control Using Sound Waves”

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is one of the most influential elite organizations, alongside the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg group, and the Trilateral Commision. Every year, the forum brings together some 2500 top business leaders, international political leaders, economists, celebrities and journalists to discuss world issues.

Not unlike other powerful organizations that claim to “help the world”, the WEF is accused of actually promoting the interests of the world elite.

Remote Mind Control

The WEF’s Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils took place on November 11-12 in the United Arab Emirates. One of the topics discussed was “mind control using sound waves”. University of Oxford Professor Antoine Jérusalem describes the technology and the issues related to it.

Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?

Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.

If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves carefully.

In other words, there’s a difference between ultrasound stimulation used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the tissue.

Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but that we still don’t understand.

What social good can come of it?

The current buzzwords are Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, as well as traumatic brain injuries. But scientists are also looking at the spinal cord and peripheral nervous systems. As far as I am concerned, since the brain is the de facto centre of decision for so many processes, any of them could be targeted.

Is it safe?

When attempting to ‘control’ neuronal activity by providing minute mechanical vibrations to a region of the brain, it’s important that the focus of the ultrasound, frequency and amplitude are properly tuned, or the brain can potentially be damaged. The point is that we still don’t know how to tune all of this; and if I were to exaggerate a bit, I could say that our current approach is not that far off from fiddling around with the settings on a radio until we hear the right station.

One of the many difficulties is to know for sure that we are indeed controllingneurons with these sound waves, as opposed to damaging them. The truth is that we still don’t know how the process works. And if you don’t know how it works, you don’t know how much is “too much”.

What are the biggest ethical challenges?

The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.

From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.

I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.

How dystopian could it get?

I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.

What can we do to safeguard its potential?

I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s human nature, and not unique to scientists.

Either way, our job is to find something that is beneficial to humanity. And if you find a way to make somebody better, then you most likely also know how to do the contrary. The goal is to make sure that regulation prevents the latter, without impeding the former. I believe that this is the role of regulators. And I think that the European Union, where I work, is quite good at this.

Another role of politicians should be to provide a communication platform to explain the long vision of any given area of research. And it can be too early, or not a good idea, and the final decision might very well be to stop it. But in the long term, the public should have the potential benefits of a new technology explained to them in plain words, which is something that scientists are not necessarily good at.

Politicians should remember that if we don’t do it, then somebody somewhere will do it anyway…potentially unregulated.

In short, Antoine Jérusalem says that remote mind control is an incredibly powerful technology that has the power to possibly cure illnesses. However, in the wrong hands, the technology can completely take control of one’s brain. In his words, it can be the “perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak”.

That being said, remote mind control is nothing new and the elite had access to this kind of technology for years.

This publication isn’t powered by sponsors or institutions. It’s powered by you. Revealed Eye exists entirely because of its readers. You read, you question, you engage and that support is what allows me to go deeper.

If this article gave you something to think about, please leave a like, share your thoughts in the comments, and consider becoming a paid subscriber to directly support this investigation. Your support is what allows me to keep doing this work full-time on this platform.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

The core idea behind MONARCH rests on extreme trauma. Victims are allegedly taken as infants or very young children and subjected to intense psychological and physical abuse—electroshock, drugs, sexual violence, hypnosis, and prolonged fear. The purpose, according to these accounts, is to fracture the mind. Under unbearable pain, the brain dissociates. A new identity forms to “take the hit,” while the original personality retreats.

The victim imagines that someone else is being tortured and the mind is forced to split. Each personality (or alter, as in ‘alternate personality’ ) is then programmed and trained to perform specific tasks and missions. One alter can be a deadly assassin, trained in martial arts, explosives, and weaponry. While another, an innocent looking courier carrying clandestine messages between world leaders, mob bosses, puppet dictators, and Hollywood insiders. Alters perform their assignments without the knowledge of the host’s main or front personality. The traumas create amnesia walls between the different personalities, meaning that each alter is totally unaware of the existence of the others.

Accounts differ on the details, but one element shows up again and again: trauma is the mechanism. Repeated trauma is said to create deep amnesia barriers inside the mind, keeping each identity compartmentalized and controllable.

"Monarch mind control is named after the Monarch butterfly – an insect who begins its life as a worm (representing undeveloped potential) and, after a period of cocooning (programming) is reborn as a beautiful butterfly (the Monarch slave)"

A user in Quora said, “Project Monarch… which is an alleged program operated as a sub-program of MKULTRA…. during the 1960s and into the early 1970s, the CIA operated a pleasant little program called MKULTRA, which was an attempt at mind control. Although MKULTRA is part of the established record, Monarch comes to us through second-hand sources, which does not mean it is not true… MKULTRA was ghastly…. the kind of thing that the average person would not even believe, if it weren’t true. The CIA paid Canadian psychiatrist Donald Ewen Cameron to conduct “research” involving doing people with LSD, then playing endless hours of recordings in an attempt to wipe memories clean. A number of women who were victims of the program sued, and won, the US government for damages. The women can’t remember entire decade-long portions of their lives. They were driven insane.. the bashed their heads against walls, and were driven mad. This was Nazi science. The CIA sprayed LSD in gay bars in San Francisco to ‘observe’ what would happen. They collaborated with prostitutes who dosed Johns with LSD. The CIA destroyed records of the program, but one box of material was forgotten, and thus did the public discover info about the program during the Church Committee hearing of the 1970s.

Origins

Throughout the course of history, several accounts have been recorded describing rituals and practices resembling mind control. One of the earliest writings giving reference to the use of occultism to manipulate the mind can be found in the Egyptian Book of the Dead. It is a compilation of rituals, heavily studied by today’s secret societies, which describes methods of torture and intimidation (to create trauma), the use of potions (drugs) and the casting of spells (hypnotism), ultimately resulting in the total enslavement of the initiate. Other events ascribed to black magic, sorcery and demon possession (where the victim is animated by an outside force) are also ancestors of Monarch programming.

It is, however, during the 20th century that mind control became a science in the modern sense of the term, where thousands of subjects have been systematically observed, documented and experimented on.

One of the first methodical studies on trauma-based mind control was conducted by Josef Mengele, a physician working in Nazi concentration camps. He initially gained notoriety for being one of the SS physicians who supervised the selection of arriving prisoners, determining who was to be killed and who was to become a forced laborer. However, he is mostly known for performing grisly human experiments on camp inmates, including children, for which Mengele was called the “Angel of Death”.

Mengele is infamous for his sordid human experiments on concentration camps prisoners, especially on twins. A part of his work that is rarely mentioned however, is his research on mind control. Much of his research in this field was confiscated by the Allies and is still classified to this day.

Mengele’s research served as a basis for the covert, illegal CIA human research program named MK-ULTRA.

MK-ULTRA

The published evidence indicates that Project MK-ULTRA involved the use of many methodologies to manipulate individual mental states and alter brain functions, including the surreptitious administration of drugs and other chemicals, sensory deprivation, isolation, and verbal and physical abuse.

The most publicized experiments conducted by MK-ULTRA involved the administration of LSD on unwitting human subjects, including CIA employees, military personnel, doctors, other government agents, prostitutes, mentally ill patients, and members of the general public, in order to study their reactions.

However, the scope of MK-ULTRA does not however stop. Experiments involving violent electroshocks, physical and mental torture and abuse were used in a systematic matter on many subjects, including children.

Although the admitted goals of the projects were to develop torture and interrogation methods to use on the country’s enemies, but the project used to create “Manchurian Candidates”, programmed to perform various acts such as assassinations and other covert missions.

MK-ULTRA was brought to light by various commissions in the 1970s. Although it is claimed that the CIA stopped such experiments after these commissions, some whistle-blowers have come forth stating that the project simply went “underground” and Monarch Programming has become the classified successor of MK-ULTRA.

The most incriminating statement to date made by a government official as to the possible existence of Project MONARCH was extracted by Anton Chaitkin, a writer for the publication The New Federalist. When former CIA Director William Colby was asked directly, “What about monarch?” he replied angrily and ambiguously, “We stopped that between the late 1960s and the early 1970s.” [3. Anton Chaitkin, “Franklin Witnesses Implicate FBI and U.S. Elites in Torture and Murder of Children”, The New Federalist]

Levels of MONARCH Programming

Major program levels are often named after Greek letters but these can be unique to each programmer or for each individual mind-controlled slave.

ALPHA – General Programming – This is the first programming put in. It includes giving slaves a photographic memory that record everything every alters see or hear.

BETA – Sexual Programming – These alters are instructed in the art of seduction and sexual pleasure. Betas take part in ritual sex, acting and directing child pornography, and prostitution. Those trained as sex kittens often see themselves as cats

Top BETAS are known as Presidential Models; as the title implies, they discretely service Presidents, Royalty, and other high-ranking government officials. They regularly hang around the White House.

DELTA – Assassination Programming – Alters trained in combat, assassination, and espionage.

THETA – Psychic Killer Programming – Psychic assassins able to cause aneurysms from anywhere. Anytime. They telepathically communicate with “Mother”.

GAMMA – Deception Programming – These alters are trained as deceivers. They spread disinformation and are able to throw a therapist off track.

OMEGA – Suicide Programming – Alters programmed for self-mutilation and self-destruction.

“One of the primary reasons that the Monarch mind-control programming was named Monarch programming was because of the Monarch butterfly. The Monarch butterfly learns where it was born (its roots) and it passes this knowledge via genetics on to its offspring (from generation to generation). This was one of the key animals that tipped scientists off, that knowledge can be passed genetically. The Monarch program is based upon Illuminati and Nazi goals to create a Master race in part through genetics. If knowledge can be passed genetically (which it is), then it is important that parents be found that can pass the correct knowledge onto those victims selected for the Monarch mind control.”

Through systematic abuse and terrifying occult rituals, a split in the core personality is induced. From there, an “internal world” can be constructed, and alter personas programmed using tools such as music, movies—especially Disney productions—and fairy tales. These visual and audio aids enhance the programming process using images, symbols, meanings, and concepts. Created alters can then be accessed using trigger words or symbols programmed into the subject’s psyche by the handler. Some of the most common internal images seen by mind control slaves are trees, Cabalistic Tree of life, infinity loops, ancient symbols and letters, spider webs, mirrors, glass shattering, masks, castles, mazes, demons, butterflies, hour glasses, clocks, and robots. These symbols are commonly inserted in popular culture movies and videos for two reasons: to desensitize the majority of the population, using subliminals and neuro-linguistic programming and to deliberately construct specific triggers and keys for base programming of highly-impressionable MONARCH children. Some of the movies used in Monarch programming include The Wizard of Oz, Alice in Wonderland, Pinocchio and Sleeping Beauty.

In each case, the slave is given a particular interpretation of the movie’s storyline in order to enhance programming. For example, a slave watching The Wizard of Oz is taught that “somewhere over the rainbow” is the “happy place” dissociative trauma slaves must go to in order to escape the unbearable pain being inflicted upon them. Using the movie, programmers encourage slaves to go “over the rainbow” and dissociate, effectively separating their minds from their bodies.

“As mentioned before, the hypnotist will find children easier to hypnotize if they know how to do it with small children. One method that is effective is to say to the small children, “Imagine you are watching a favorite television show.” This is why the Disney movies and the other shows are so important to the programmers. They are the perfect hypnotic tool to get the child’s mind to dissociate in the right direction. The programmers have been using movies since almost day one to help children learn the hypnotic scripts. For children they need to be part of the hypnotic process. If the hypnotist allows the child to make up his own imagery, the hypnotic suggestions will be stronger. Rather than telling the child the color of a dog, the programmer can ask the child. This is where the books and films shown the child assist in steering its mind in the right direction. If the hypnotist talks to a child, he must take extra precaution not to change the tone of his voice and to have smooth transitions. Most of the Disney films are used for programming purposes. Some of them are specifically designed for mind-control.”

Walt Disney and Hollywood Mind Control

Disney, the man, the studio, and the theme parks are often cited by Monarch victims as an essential part of the government’s mind control program. Programmers use electroshock in combination with Fantasia’s imagery to induce dissociative personalities and for programming. Program runners realized that bringing in people from all over the world to military facilities would eventually give rise to suspicions, so they worked with Walt Disney in designing his theme parks to include facilities for mind control programming. Many of the rides are designed for use in mind control and to traumatize young children.

MGM’s Wizard of Oz and Disney’s Alice in Wonderland are favorites of Monarch programmers. Victims are told to go “over the rainbow”, or “there’s no place like home” to reach a safe place in Wizard of Oz programming or “go through the looking-glass” if using Alice in Wonderland. “Follow the yellow Brick Road.” or “Follow the White Rabbit” are triggers to follow the programmer’s commands.

Illuminati programmers designed Star Wars for use in trauma-base mind control programming.

Monarch programming is also used on the masses via movies, televisions, and music. They are used to desensitize the public or to trigger programs in mind-controlled slaves.

Dissociative Personalities in Movies and TV

Dissociative Personalities in Music

This video includes actual research footage and project handlers during the CIA MKUltra Monarch Mind control project. Comprised of 149 subprojects, the goal was to study the effects of mind control programming on unwitting civilians.

This publication isn’t powered by sponsors or institutions. It’s powered by you.

Revealed Eye exists entirely because of its readers. You read, you question, you engage and that support is what allows me to go deeper.

If this article gave you something to think about, please leave a like, share your thoughts in the comments, and consider becoming a paid subscriber to directly support this investigation. Your support is what allows me to keep doing this work full-time on this platform.

Subscribe now

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

A lifelong master craftsman, machinist, and engineer with experience in aerospace and a focus on precision and laser application, Dunn became fascinated with the Great Pyramid at Giza after reading Peter Tompkins’ iconic book The Secrets of the Great Pyramid. He spent more than 20 years studying the Great Pyramid and other Egyptian sites.

Due to his engineering background, Dunn saw things in the Pyramid’s construction that others missed. Most people marvelled at the Pyramid’s size and asked, “How did they do it?” Dunn examined its precision and asked, “Why was it necessary?”

Dunn burst into the limelight with the 1998 publication of The Giza Power Plant: Technologies of Ancient Egypt. Dunn revealed that the Great Pyramid was a giant power generator – an acoustical device that created harmonic resonance with the Earth and converted the planet’s natural vibrations into usable energy for an ancient civilisation. He showed that the Pyramid’s numerous chambers and passageways were positioned with deliberate precision to maximise acoustical qualities.

In 2010, he followed up with Lost Technologies of Ancient Egypt: Advanced Engineering in the Temples of the Pharaohs, a unique study of the engineering and tools used to create Egyptian monuments, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that advanced knowledge and machining was utilised.

Dunn’s new 2024 book, Giza: The Tesla Connection: Acoustical Science and the Harvesting of Clean Energy, expands his hypothesis that the Great Pyramid at Giza was built as an advanced energy-harvesting machine.

Dunn proposes that the Ancient Egyptians used the Great Pyramid to generate clean free energy, similar to what genius inventor Nikola Tesla later envisioned, as indicated in the title of his new book.

Today, the world is suffering an energy crisis. The solution to our woes might be literally staring us in the face – on the Giza plateau. Will anyone listen?

In an interview with New Dawn magazine, Christopher Dunn said many things. Here is part of his interview.

NEW DAWN: What discoveries have been made since the publication of The Giza Power Plant?

Christopher Dunn said: For those not familiar with the book, The Giza Power Plant: Technologies of Ancient Egypt is a reverse engineering exercise that began in 1977. The objective was to find a reason why every feature discovered in and around the pyramid exists. In a nutshell, it describes the Great Pyramid as a machine, the function of which was to draw energy from the Earth and distribute it to the inhabitants at that time. This ultimately led to the publication of the book in 1998.

While there has been a lot of discussion about lost civilisations and ancient cataclysms, my intention while writing the book was to focus primarily on the physical evidence inside and around the Great Pyramid. Having said that, it is becoming clearer now, with the fine work of other investigators and their introduction of new evidence, that a cataclysm occurred in antiquity and the Great Pyramid, along with everything else existing in physical form that sustained a sophisticated society, was damaged beyond repair, as was the civilisation that built it.

Since The Giza Power Plant was published, quite a few discoveries have been made in and around the Great Pyramid that support and allow refinements and strength to the theory. In chronological order, they are:

• In 2001, while being filmed for a documentary on the Giza Plateau near Cairo, Egypt, I received permission from Zahi Hawass [Egypt’s Minister of State for Antiquities Affairs at that time] to go inside the Great Pyramid, which had been closed for cleaning. While inside the Grand Gallery, I noticed and photographed scorch marks on the ceiling. The pattern matched my theorised design of the frames that held a series of acoustic resonators. In The Giza Power Plant, I posited there was a hydrogen explosion inside the King’s Chamber that pushed out the walls and cracked the ceiling beams. I did not believe that evidence to support this theory would exist in the Grand Gallery, but in consideration of all other evidence, it would have been perfectly reasonable to do so. I just didn’t think of it at the time.

• In 2002, the Queen’s Chamber South Shaft was explored by a robot named Pyramid Rover, designed and built by iRobot in Massachusetts, USA. The hydrogen that exploded, I theorised, was created in the Queen’s Chamber. This conclusion was reached by examining evidence that had been discovered related to the chamber and its North and South Shafts.

With much fanfare and an audience that had been primed to be glued to their televisions for the intended broadcast of new pyramid discoveries, the Pyramid Rover prepared to climb the shaft and drill through a limestone block at the end. This blockage was first discovered by robotics engineer Rudolph Gantenbrink in 1993 and subsequently labelled “Gantenbrink’s Door.” While preparing to drill through the blockage, the thickness of the door was measured using an impact-echo probe and determined to be 3.25 inches thick. My illustration of this “door” showed a thickness of 3.6 inches.

The image captured by an endoscopic camera inserted through the hole showed another blockage approximately 10 inches from the “door.” Not much else that was remarkable was revealed in the South Shaft at this time. No other theory offered at the time regarding what would be revealed was correct. However, what was revealed did not negate my theory, but for it to be proven 100% correct, more information was needed.

Little did I know at the time that further validation of the theory was discovered after the iRobot team completed their work in the South Shaft and the documentary production crew departed. Before packing up their equipment and exiting the pyramid, the iRobot crew sent the Pyramid Rover robot up the North Shaft. Gantenbrink had attempted to explore the North Shaft in 1993, but could not navigate beyond two long exploratory rods that had somehow become stuck where the shaft turns on an angle to the left. Using a different tactic, by turning their robot 90 degrees so that it gripped the walls instead of the floor and ceiling, the Pyramid Rover was able to ride over these obstructions.

Pyramid Rover revealed two pieces of evidence supporting my theory about using these shafts. One was an opening in the East wall near one of the bends approximately 90 feet up the shaft from the Queen’s Chamber. I theorise that chemicals were introduced into the shaft behind the blockage, but this evidence showed that the entrance for the chemicals was lower down.

The other evidence revealed was the existence of another blockage, similar to the South Shaft, but with electrodes that were not corroded and with one that was recessed and showed signs of electroplating.

• In 2006, Dr. Friedemann Freund, a NASA physicist, completed his laboratory experiment confirming his theory that earthquake lights were the result of electron flow propagating through the lithosphere when peroxy defects in their minerals were subjected to stress. His conclusion was that under certain conditions, igneous rock beneath our feet turns into a giant battery.

• In 2010, another robot team from Leeds University in the UK, and headed by Chinese dentist Dr. TC Ng, fashioned a different style of robot which Dr Zahi Hawass named Djedi, the name of Khufu’s magician [in reference to Pharaoh Khufu of the 4th Dynasty who is said to have commissioned the Great Pyramid]. The Djedi robot was equipped with a snake camera that was able to look around the small space and even look behind Gantenbrink’s “door.” The images it captured allowed me to slightly modify my engineering design, but overall supported my proposed function for these features.

Read more

Whitney Webb gives a history of Palantir. Palantir essentially started as a DARPA project. It was going to completely destroy our constitutional protections so it was quietly taken out of government and rebranded as a private company to do the same thing

What is Palantir?👇🏻

Who founded Palantir - and where they came from

Palantir Technologies was founded in 2003, not by random programmers, but by people already deeply connected to power, money, and intelligence networks.

The key founders were:

Peter Thiel

Peter Thiel is the most important name behind Palantir.

Before Palantir:

• He co-founded PayPal

• Became a billionaire very early

• Built close relationships in Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and U.S. political circles

Peter Thiel has long believed that democracy is inefficient and that society should be run by “competent elites,” not by mass public opinion. Palantir was his answer to a problem he openly talked about after 9/11:

how to give governments more power to detect threats before they happen, without public oversight getting in the way.

He’s behind the scenes of plans to remake America from mass surveillance to authoritarian policy blueprints. His companies profit from control. His vision? A future where data rules, privacy dies, and power is centralized in the hands of a few. Peter Thiel isn’t just rich. He’s dangerous because he’s strategic. He’s building a future where democracy is optional, surveillance is constant, and dissent is punished. Ignore him at your peril — he’s already rewriting the rules.

Alex Karp

Alex Karp is Palantir’s public face and CEO.

Background:

• PhD in philosophy (not computer science)

• Spent years in Europe

• Comfortable talking about power, order, and authority

You can watch him in a recent shareholder briefing saying that we have ‘dedicated our company to the service of the West and the United States of America…especially in places we can’t talk about’ and ‘Palantir is here to help institutions we partner with be the best in the world…and when necessary to scare enemies and on occasion kill them…We hope you’re in favour of that…[and] are enjoying being a partner…we’re really happy and enjoying what we’re doing’:

The CIA’s involvement - not a rumor, not a theory

Palantir’s connection to the CIA is not something critics “discovered later.” It was there from the beginning.

In its early years, Palantir received funding and support from In-Q-Tel, the official venture capital arm of the Central Intelligence Agency.

In-Q-Tel does not invest like a normal VC. It exists for one reason: to identify, shape, and secure technologies useful to U.S. intelligence and national security before those tools reach the public market.

When In-Q-Tel backs a company, it means:

• Intelligence agencies already see a use for the technology

• The product is being built to solve intelligence problems

• The company is being guided toward government adoption early

Palantir was not a startup that later “won” CIA contracts. It was developed with intelligence use in mind from the start.

What problem the CIA was trying to solve

After 9/11, U.S. intelligence agencies faced a problem they openly admitted:

They had too much data, spread across:

• phone records

• travel data

• financial transactions

• surveillance reports

• human intelligence notes

The failure, they said, was not lack of information — it was lack of integration. Palantir’s job was to fix that.

Its software allowed analysts to:

• merge disconnected databases

• map relationships between people, places, and events

• spot patterns humans would miss

• flag individuals and networks faster

In short: turn data into actionable suspicion.

Gotham: for militaries, police, and intelligence agencies. Think of it as Google for spies. It can:

• Map terrorist networks

• Track targets in real time

• Uncover hidden relationships

Palantir is often described as:

“A private tech company that happens to work with governments.”

That is misleading.

Palantir grew inside the intelligence ecosystem. Its first major users were not businesses or hospitals — they were spies, analysts, and security agencies.

The company learned early how to:

• operate behind secrecy

• avoid public scrutiny

• frame its work as “necessary”

• treat oversight as an obstacle, not a safeguard

Those habits stayed with it as it expanded into policing, immigration, health, and corporate systems.

Most tech companies need public trust to survive. Palantir does not. It doesn’t need users to love it. It needs institutions with power to depend on it. That dependency, once built, is very hard to undo.

And that is why Palantir rarely advertises, rarely explains itself clearly, and rarely appears in mainstream debates about surveillance. By the time the public notices, the system is already in place.

The UK health data scandal

During the COVID-19, Palantir Technologies was brought in to help run the NHS COVID-19 data store in the UK. Officials described it as an emergency response: a temporary system to help manage hospital capacity, ventilators, and resources during a national crisis.

What the public was not clearly told at the time was how much power that arrangement quietly handed over.

Under the original contracts and data-sharing terms, private companies working on the NHS COVID-19 datastore were allowed to access and use massive amounts of sensitive health data — including records tied to real patients. Legal challenges later revealed that these companies could potentially use the data to develop and train AI systems, systems that could later be commercialized and sold for profit.

In simple terms: private firms were positioned to turn public health records into private assets.

Palantir has 24 contracts with key UK public institutions, including the NHS, the Ministry of Defence, the police forces, the Cabinet Office, the DLUHC, and Coventry City Council.

Predictive policing — when software decides who looks suspicious

One of the most controversial uses of Palantir Technologies software has been in predictive policing.

Using platforms like Palantir Gotham and Metropolis, police departments were able to combine arrest records, field interviews, social connections, phone data, and location history into single profiles. The software then flagged people as potential “risks” — not because of a crime they committed, but because of patterns, associations, and probabilities.

In practice, this meant:

• You could be flagged because of whoa few people you know

• Because you live in a certain area

• Because an algorithm decided your behavior resembled past crime data

There was no clear explanation given to those flagged. No way to challenge the label. No requirement to prove wrongdoing.

Los Angeles and New Orleans — real examples, real secrecy

In Los Angeles, Palantir tools were used by the LAPD to analyze large volumes of policing data and generate leads. Civil rights groups later warned that the system reinforced existing bias by recycling historical arrest data — meaning past discrimination became future prediction.

But New Orleans revealed something even more serious.

Between 2012 and 2018, the New Orleans Police Department secretly deployed Palantir’s predictive policing software without public knowledge or approval. The system used data-mining algorithms to identify people labeled as potential crime risks by analyzing personal data such as criminal records, social media activity, and alleged gang affiliations. Individuals were flagged not for what they had done, but for how the software interpreted their associations and behavior.

The bigger agenda

Seen on its own, Palantir looks like just another data company. Seen in context, it fits into something much larger.

Across governments and financial systems, the same direction keeps appearing: centralized identity, centralized data, and centralized control.

Programs like REAL ID, expanding digital ID systems, and the push toward CBDCs and regulated stablecoins all move society toward a single structure where identity, money, and behavior are tightly linked.

The logic is simple:

• A centralized digital ID defines who you are

• Programmable money defines what you can do

• Data analytics decides whether your behavior is acceptable

Why companies like Palantir matter here

Systems like this don’t work without powerful data platforms.

Someone has to:

• integrate identity data

• track behavior across systems

• flag “risk” or “non-compliance”

• turn policy into automated decisions

That is exactly what Palantir specializes in. This doesn’t mean Palantir controls these systems alone. It means it provides the infrastructure logic that makes them possible. Once built, these systems don’t need constant political justification. They run quietly in the background.

Why the public rarely hears about Palantir

Most powerful companies need public attention to grow. Palantir is the opposite.

It doesn’t sell products to ordinary people. It doesn’t rely on brand loyalty, downloads, or public approval. Its customers are governments, militaries, police forces, and large institutions - organizations that operate behind closed doors by default. Because of that, Palantir has no reason to explain itself to the public.

Its contracts are often buried in procurement documents, framed as “data integration” or “operational support.” Its work is described in technical language that sounds boring and harmless. And when people raise concerns, the response is usually the same: national security, confidentiality, or complexity.

There is also another reason Palantir stays out of headlines.

It doesn’t act alone. It embeds itself inside existing institutions, becoming part of how decisions are made rather than a visible decision-maker. When harm occurs - wrongful surveillance, biased targeting, data misuse - responsibility is diffused. Officials blame the system. The system blames the data. And the company stays in the background.

Unlike social media platforms, Palantir doesn’t provoke public outrage because most people never interact with it directly. You don’t log into Palantir. You don’t agree to its terms of service. You only feel its effects indirectly - when you’re flagged, delayed, questioned, denied, or quietly monitored.

Power that doesn’t need your attention is the hardest power to challenge.

That is why Palantir Technologies can shape public life so deeply while remaining largely unknown. The less visible the system, the fewer people ask who built it and why.

For those who have seen the famously dystopian movie Minority Report, Palantir is the company that is most likely to make this kind of scene a reality in the near future:

Conclusion

Palantir is not dangerous because it is secret. It is dangerous because it is normalized.

At every stage, its expansion has been justified as necessary, temporary, or technical. Emergency responses become permanent infrastructure. Surveillance becomes “data integration.” Prediction replaces evidence. And accountability dissolves into systems no one person controls and no one person can be questioned.

This is not about one company breaking the law. It is about a model of power that no longer needs public consent to function. When identity, behavior, and access are mediated through data systems, control does not have to announce itself. It simply operates.

You do not need to believe in conspiracies to see the pattern. It is visible in policing, in health data, in national security, and in the quiet merging of identity and money into programmable systems. None of this requires dictatorship. It only requires complexity, outsourcing, and silence.

The most effective forms of control are not enforced with force. They are enforced with software.

By the time people ask whether this is the future they agreed to, the system will already be in place - efficient, automated, and very difficult to undo.

The question is no longer whether this kind of power could be abused. The question is who gets to decide when prediction becomes punishment and why that decision was never ours to make.

Author’s note: If you find value in what I write - if it supports your research, challenges your assumptions, or helps you see things most people never question - I want you to know that it truly matters to me.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters and to focus entirely on researching and writing.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content.

Get 7 day free trial

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

The Overhauling of Straight America by Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill

The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights. To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register differences in sexual preference the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games: she likes strawberry and I like vanilla; he follows baseball and I follow football. No big deal.

At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full "appreciation" or "understanding" of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing, with a shrug of their shoulders, then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won. And to get to shoulder-shrug stage, gays as a class must cease to appear mysterious, alien, loathsome and contrary. A large-scale media campaign will be required in order to change the image of gays in America. And any campaign to accomplish this turnaround should do six things.

1. Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible.

The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances. The acceptability of the new behavior will ultimately hinge on the number of one's fellows doing it or accepting it. One may be offended by its novelty at first--many, in times past, were momentarily scandalized by "streaking,'' eating goldfish, and premarital sex. But as long as Joe Six-pack feels little pressure to perform likewise, and as long as the behavior in question presents little threat to his physical and financial security, he soon gets used to it and life goes on. The skeptic may still shake his head and think "people arc crazy these days," but over time his objections are likely to become more reflective, more philosophical, less emotional.

The way to benumb raw sensitivities about homosexuality is to have a lot of people talk a great deal about the subject in a neutral or supportive way. Open and frank talk makes the subject seem less furtive, alien, and sinful, more above-board. Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizable segment accepts or even practices homosexuality. Even rancorous debates between opponents and defenders serve the purpose of desensitization so long as "respectable" gays are front and center to make their own pitch. The main thing is to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome.

And when we say talk about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent--only later his unsightly derriere!

Where we talk is important. The visual media, film and television, are plainly the most powerful image-makers in Western civilization. The average American household watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open up a gateway into the private world of straights, through which a Trojan horse might be passed. As far as desensitization is concerned, the medium is the message--of normalcy. So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best covert weapon in the battle to desensitize the mainstream. Bit by bit over the past ten years, gay characters and gay themes have been introduced into TV programs and films (though often this has been done to achieve comedic and ridiculous affects). On the whole the impact has been encouraging. The prime-time presentation of Consenting Adults on a major network in 1985 is but one high-water mark in favorable media exposure of gay issues. But this should be just the beginning of a major publicity blitz by gay America.

Would a desensitizing campaign of open and sustained talk about gay issues reach every rabid opponent of homosexuality? Of course not. While public opinion is one primary source of mainstream values, religious authority is the other. When conservative churches condemn gays, there are only two things we can do to confound the homophobia of true believers. First, we can use talk to muddy the moral waters. This means publicizing support for gays by more moderate churches, raising theological objections of our own about conservative interpretations of biblical teachings, and exposing hatred and inconsistency. Second, we can undermine the moral authority of homophobic churches by portraying them as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the times and with the latest findings of psychology. Against the mighty pull of institutional Religion one must set the mightier draw of Science & Public Opinion (the shield and sword of that accursed "secular humanism"). Such an unholy alliance has worked well against churches before, on such topics as divorce and abortion. With enough open talk about the prevalence and acceptability of homosexuality, that alliance can work again here.

2. Portray gays as victims rather than as aggressive challengers.

In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and prideful tribe promoting a rigidly nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that justifies resistance and oppression. For that reason, we must forego the temptation to strut our "gay pride" publicly when it conflicts with the Gay Victim image. And we must walk the fine line between impressing straights with our great numbers, on the one hand, and sparking their hostile paranoia-"They are all around us!"--on the other.

A media campaign to promote the Gay Victim image should make use of symbols which reduce the mainstream's sense of threat, which lower it's guard, and which enhance the plausibility of victimization. In practical terms, this means that jaunty mustachioed musclemen would keep very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations, while sympathetic figures of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured. (It almost goes without saying that groups on the farthest margin of acceptability such as NAMBLA, [Ed note -- North American Man-Boy Love Association] must play no part at all in such a campaign: suspected child-molesters will never look like victims.)

Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read: "As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!"

Straight viewers must be able to identify with gays as victims. Mr. and Mrs. Public must be given no extra excuses to say, "they are not like us." To this end, the persons featured in the public campaign should be decent and upright, appealing and admirable by straight standards, completely unexceptionable in appearance--in a word, they should be indistinguishable from the straights we would like to reach. Only under such conditions will the message be read correctly: "These folks are victims of a fate that could have happened to me."

By the way, we realize that many gays will question an advertising technique, which might threaten to make homosexuality look like some dreadful disease, which strikes fated "victims". But the plain fact is that the gay community is weak and must manipulate the powers of the weak, including the play for sympathy. In any case, we compensate for the negative aspect of this gay victim appeal under Principle 4. (Below)

The second message would portray gays as victims of society. The straight majority does not recognize the suffering it brings to the lives of gays and must be shown: graphic pictures of brutalized gays; dramatizations of job and housing insecurity, loss of child custody, and public humiliation: and the dismal list goes on.

"... In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector."

3. Give protectors a just cause

A media campaign that casts gays as society's victims and encourages straights to be their protectors must make it easier for those to respond to assert and explain their new protectiveness. Few straight women, and even fewer straight men, will want to defend homosexuality boldly as such. Most would rather attach their awakened protective impulse to some principle of justice or law, to some general desire for consistent and fair treatment in society. Our campaign should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme. The right to free speech, freedom of beliefs, freedom of association, due process and equal protection of laws-these should be the concerns brought to mind by our campaign.

It is especially important for the gay movement to hitch its cause to accepted standards of law and justice because its straight supporters must have at hand a cogent reply to the moral arguments of its enemies. The homophobes clothe their emotional revulsion in the daunting robes of religious dogma, so defenders of gay rights must be ready to counter dogma with principle.

4. Make gays look good

In order to make a Gay Victim sympathetic to straights you have to portray him as Everyman. But an additional theme of the campaign should be more aggressive and upbeat: to offset the increasingly bad press that these times have brought to homosexual men and women, the campaign should paint gays as superior pillars of society. Yes, yes, we know--this trick is so old it creaks. Other minorities use it all the time in ads that announce proudly, "Did you know that this Great Man (or Woman) was _________?" But the message is vital for all those straights who still picture gays as "queer" people-- shadowy, lonesome, fail, drunken, suicidal, child-snatching misfits.

The honor roll of prominent gay or bisexual men and women is truly eyepopping. From Socrates to Shakespeare, from Alexander the Great to Alexander Hamilton, from Michelangelo to Walt Whitman, from Sappho to Gertrude Stein, the list is old hat to us but shocking news to heterosexual America. In no time, a skillful and clever media campaign could have the gay community looking like the veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization.

Along the same lines, we shouldn't overlook the Celebrity Endorsement. The celebrities can be straight or gay.

5. Make the victimizers look bad

At a later stage of the media campaign for gay rights-long after other gay ads have become commonplace-it will be time to get tough with remaining opponents. To be blunt, they must be vilified. (This will be all the more necessary because, by that time, the entrenched enemy will have quadrupled its output of vitriol and disinformation.) Our goal is here is twofold. First, we seek to replace the mainstream's self-righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt. Second, we intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.

The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demanding that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and deranged; menacing punks, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly about the "fags" they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed.

A campaign to vilify the victimizers is going to enrage our most fervid enemies, of course. But what else can we say? The shoe fits, and we should make them try it on for size, with all of America watching.

6. Solicit funds: the buck stops here

Any massive campaign of this kind would require unprecedented expenditures for months or even years--an unprecedented fundraising drive.

Effective advertising is a costly proposition: several million dollars would get the ball rolling. There are 10-15 million primarily homosexual adults in this country: if each one of them donated just two dollars to the campaign, its war chest would actually rival that of its most vocal enemies. And because those gays not supporting families usually have more discretionary income than average, they could afford to contribute much more.

"... We intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types."

But would they? Or is the gay community as feckless, selfish, uncommitted, and short-sighted as its critics claim? We will never know unless the new campaign simultaneously launches a concerted nationwide appeal for funding support from both known and anonymous donors. The appeal should be directed both at gays and at straights who care about social justice.

In the beginning, for reasons to be explained in a moment, the appeal for funds may have to be launched exclusively through the gay press--national magazines, local newspapers, flyers at bars, notices in glossy skin magazines. Funds could also come through the outreach of local gay organizations on campuses and in metropolitan areas. Eventually, donations would be solicited directly alongside advertisements in the major straight media.

There would be no parallel to such an effort in the history of the gay community in America. If it failed to generate the needed capital to get started; there would be little hope for the campaign and l little hope for major progress toward gay rights in the near future. For the moment let us suppose that gays could see how donations would greatly serve their long-term interest, and that sufficient funds could be raised. An heroic assumption.

Share

Getting on the air, or: you can’t get there from here

Without access to TV, radio, and the mainstream press, there will be no campaign. This is a tricky problem, became many impresarios of the media simply refuse to accept what they call "issue-advertising" -- persuasive advertising can provoke a storm of resentment from the public and from sponsors, which is bad for business. The courts have confirmed the broadcaster's right to refuse any "issue advertising" he dislikes.

What exactly constitutes "issue advertising"?

• It evidently does not include platitudinous appeals to the virtues of family unity (courtesy of the Mormons)

• neither does it include tirades against perfidious Albion courtesy of Lyndon LaRouche);

• neither does it include reminders that a Mind-Is-a Terrible Thing to Waste (courtesy of the United Negro College Fund);

• neither does it include religious shows which condemn gay "sinners";

• neither does it include condemnations of nuclear war or race discrimination--at least not in Massachusetts.

Some guys get all the breaks.

What issue advertising does include these days is almost any communiqué presented openly by a homosexual organization. The words "gay" and "homosexual"' are considered controversial whenever they appear. Because most straightforward appeals are impossible, the National Gay Task Force has had to cultivate quiet backroom liaisons with broadcast companies and newsrooms in order to make sure that issues important to the gay community receive some coverage; but such an arrangement is hardly ideal, of course, because it means that the gay community's image is controlled by the latest news event instead of by careful design--and recently most of the news about gays has been negative.

So what can be done to crash the gates of the major media? Several things, advanced in several stages.

Start with the fine print

Newspapers and magazines may very well be hungrier for gay advertising dollars than television and radio arc. And the cost of ads in print is generally lower. But remember that the press, for the most part, is only read by better-educated Americans, many of who are already more accepting of homosexuality in any case. So to get more impact for our dollars, we should skip the New Republic and New Left Review readers and head for Time, People, and the National Enquirer. (Of course, the gay community may have to establish itself as a regular advertising presence in more sophisticated forums first before it is accepted into the mass press.)

While we're storming the battlements with salvos of ink, we should also warm the mainstream up a bit with a subtle national campaign on highway billboards. In simple bold print on dark backgrounds, a series of unobjectionable messages should be introduced:

In Russia, they tell you what to be. In America, we have the freedom to be ourselves—and to be the best.

or

People helping instead of hating—that’s what America is all about.

And so on. Each sign will tap patriotic sentiment, each message will drill a seemingly agreeable proposition into mainstream heads - a "public service message" suited to our purposes. And, if their owners will permit it, each billboard will be signed, in slightly smaller letters, "Courtesy of the National Gay Task Force" - to build positive associations and get the public used to seeing such sponsorship.

Visual stage 1: You really oughtta be in pictures

As for television and radio, a more elaborate plan may be needed to break the ice. For openers, naturally, we must continue to encourage the appearance of favorable gay characters in films and TV shows. Daytime talk shows also remain a useful avenue for exposure.

But to speed things up we might consider a bold stratagem to gain media attention. The scheme we have in mind would require careful preparations, yet it would save expense even while it elevated the visibility and stature of the gay movement overnight.

Well before the next elections for national office, we might lay careful plans to run symbolic gay candidates for every high political office in this country. (Such plans would have to deal somehow with the tricky problem of inducing gays and straights to sign enough endorsement petitions to get us on the ballot.) Our 50-250 candidates would participate in such debates as they could, run gay-themed advertisements coordinated at our national headquarters, and demand equal time on the air. They could then graciously pull out of the races before the actual elections, while formally endorsing more viable straight contenders. (With malicious humor, perhaps, in some states we could endorse our most rabid opponents.) It is essential not to ask people actually to vote Yea or Nay on the gay issue at this early stage: such action would end up committing most to the Nay position and would only tally huge and visible defeats for our cause.

Through such a political campaign, the mainstream would get over the initial shock of seeing gay ads, and the acceptability of such ads would be fortified by the most creditable context possible; and all this would be accomplished before non-electoral advertising was attempted by the gay community. During the campaign all hell would break loose, but if we behaved courageously and respectable our drive would gain legitimacy in and case and might even become a cause celebre. If all went as planned, the somewhat desensitized public and the major networks themselves would be 'readied for the next step of our program.

Visual stage 2: Peekaboo advertising

At this point the gay community has its foot in the door, and it is time to ask the networks to accept gay sponsorship of certain ads and shows. Timing is critical: The request must be made immediately after our national political ads disappear. Failing that, we should request sponsorship the next time one of the networks struts its broad-mindedness by televising a film or show with gay characters or themes. If they wish to look consistent instead of hypocritical, we'll have them on the spot.

But the networks would still be forced to say No unless we made their resistance look patently unreasonable, and possibly illegal. We'd do just that by proposing "gay ads" patterned exactly after those currently sponsored by the Mormons and others. As usual, viewers would be treated to squeak-clean skits on the importance of family harmony and understanding --this time the narrator would end by saying, "This message was brought to you by --the National Gay Task Force." All very quiet and subdued. Remember: exposure is everything, and the medium is the message.

"... Exposure is everything and the medium is the message."

The gay community should join forces with other civil liberties groups of respectable cast to promote bland messages about America the Melting Pot, always ending with an explicit reference to the Task Force of some other gay organization. Making the best of a bad situation, we can also propose sympathetic media appeals for gifts and donations to fund AIDS research--if Jerry Lewis and the March of Dimes can do it, so can we. Our next indirect step will be to advertise locally on behalf of support groups peripheral to the gay community: frowzy straight moms and dads announcing phone numbers and meeting times for "Parents of Gays" or similar gatherings. Can't you just see such ads now, presented between messages from the Disabled Vets and the Postal Workers Union?

Visual stage 3: Roll out the big guns

By this point, our salami tactics will have carved out, slice by slice, a large portion of access to the mainstream media. So what then? It would finally be time to bring gay ads out of the closet. The messages of such ads should directly address lingering public fears about homosexuals as loathsome and contrary aliens. For examples, the following are possible formats for TV or radio commercials designed to chip away at chronic misperceptions.

Format A for Familiarization: The Testimonial

To make gays seem less mysterious, present a series of short spots featuring the boy-or girl-next-door, fresh and appealing, or warm and lovable grandma grandpa types. Seated in homey surroundings, they respond to an off camera interviewer with assurance, good nature, and charm. Their comments bring out three social facts:

1. There is someone special in their life, a long-term relationship (to stress gay stability, monogamy, commitment);

2. Their families are very important to them, and are supportive of them (to stress that gays are not "anti-family," and that families need not be anti-gay.)

3. As far as they can remember they have always been gay, and were probably born gay; they certainly never decided on a preference one way or the other (stressing that gays are doing what is natural for them, and are not being willfully contrary). The subjects should be interviewed alone, not with their lovers or children, for to include others in the picture would unwisely raise disturbing questions about the complexities of gay social relations, which these commercials could not explain. It is best instead to take one thing at a time.

Format B for Positive associations: The Celebrity Spot.

While it might be useful to present celebrity endorsements by currently popular gay figures and straight sympathizers (Johnny Mathis? Marlo Thomas?), the homophobia climate of America would make such brash endorsements unlikely in the near future. So early celebrity spots will instead identify historical gay or bisexual personalities who are illustrious and dignified...and dead. The ads could be sardonic and indirect. For example, over regal music and a portrait or two, a narrator might announce simply:

Michelangelo (an art class), Tchaikovsky (a music class), Tennessee Williams (a drama class), etc.

Subscribe now

Format C for Victim Sympathy: Our Campaign to Stop Child Abuse.

As we said earlier, there are many ways to portray gays as victims of discrimination: images of brutality, tales of job loss and family separation, and so on. But we think something like the following 30-sccond commercials would get to the heart of the matter best of all.

The camera slowly moves in on a middle-class teenager, sitting alone in his semidarkened bedroom. The boy is pleasing and unexceptional in appearance, except that he has been roughed up and is staring silently, pensively, with evident distress. As the camera gradually focuses in on his face, a narrator comments: It will happen to one in every ten sons. As he grows up he will realize that he feels differently about things than most of his friends. If he lets it show, he'll be an outsider made fun of, humiliated, attacked. If he confides in his parents, they may throw him out of the house, onto the streets. Some will say he is "anti-family." Nobody will let him be himself. So he will have to hide. From his friends, his family. And that's hard. It's tough enough to be a kid these days, but to be the one in ten... A message from the National Gay Task Force.

What is nice about such an ad is that it would economically portray gays as innocent and vulnerable, victimized and misunderstood, surprisingly numerous yet not menacing. It also renders the "anti-family" charge absurd and hypocritical.

Format D for Identification with Victims: The Old Switcheroo.

The mainstream will identify better with the plight of gays if straights can, once in a while, walk a mile in gay shoes. A humorous television or radio ad to help them do this might involve a brief animated or dramatized scenario, as follows.

The camera approaches the mighty oak door of the boss's office, which swings open, and the camera (which represents you the viewer) enters the room. Behind the oversized desk sits a fat and scowling old curmudgeon chomping on a cigar. He looks up at the camera (i.e. at the viewer) and snarls, " So it's you, Smithers. Well you're fired!" The voice of a younger man is heard to reply with astonishment, "But--but--Mr. Thomburg, I've been with your company for ten years. I thought you liked my work." The boss responds, with a tone of disgust, "Yes, yes, Smithers your work is quite adequate. But I've heard rumors that you've been seen around town with some kind of girlfriend. A girlfriend! Frankly I'm shocked. We're not about to start hiring any heterosexuals in this company. Now get out." The younger man speaks once more: "But boss, that's just not fair! What if it were you?" The boss glowers back as the camera pulls quickly out of the room and the big door slams shut. Printed on the door: "A message from the National Gay Task Force."

One can easily imagine similar episodes involving housing or other discrimination.

Format E for Vilification of Victimizers: Damn the Torpedoes.

We have already indicated some of the images which might be damaging to the homophobic vendetta: ranting and hateful religious extremists neo-Nazis, and Ku Klux Klansmen made to look evil and ridiculous (hardly a difficult task).

These images should be combined with those of their gay victims by a method propagandists call the "bracket technique." For example, for a few seconds an unctuous beady-eyed Southern preacher is seen pounding the pulpit in rage about "those sick, abominable creatures." While his tirade continues over the soundtrack, the picture switches to pathetic photos of gays who look decent, harmless, and likable; and then we cut back to the poisonous face of the preacher, and so forth. The contrast speaks for itself. The effect is devastating.

"...it would portray gays as innocent and vulnerable, victimized and misunderstood, surprisingly numerous, yet not menacing."

Format F for Funds: SOS

Alongside or during these other persuasive advertisements, we would have to solicit donations so that the campaign might continue. Direct appeals from celebrities (preferable living ones, thank you) might be useful here. All appeals must stress that money can be given anonymously (e.g. via money orders) and that all donations are confidential. "We can't help unless you help," and all that.

Get 7 day free trial

The Time Is Now

We have sketched out here a blueprint for transforming the social values of straight America. At the core of our program is a media campaign to change the way the average citizens view homosexuality. It is quite easy to find fault with such a campaign. We have tried to be practical and specific here, but the proposals may still have a visionary sheen.

There are one hundred reasons why the campaign could not be done or would be risky. But there are at least 20 million good reasons why some such program must be tried in the coming years: the welfare and happiness of every gay man and woman in this country demand it. As the last large, legally oppressed minority in American society, it is high time that gays took effective measures to rejoin the mainstream in pride and strength. We believe that, like it or not, such a campaign is the only way of doing so anytime soon.

And, let us repeat, time may be running out. The AIDS epidemic is sparking anger and fear in the heartland of straight America. As the virus leaks out of homosexual circles and into the rest of society, we need have no illusions about who is receiving the blame. The ten years ahead may decide for the next forty whether gays claim their liberty and equality or are driven back, once again, as America's caste of detested untouchables. It's more than a quip: speak now or forever hold your peace.

Author’s note: If you find value in what I write—if it supports your research, challenges your assumptions, or helps you see things most people never question—I want you to know that it truly matters to me.

Revealed Eye is my full-time, independent work. This platform allows me to stay free from corporate influence, sponsors, and filters, and to focus entirely on researching, writing, and publishing honestly.

If you’d like to support this work and help keep Revealed Eye alive, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes it possible for me to keep digging deeper, sharing in-depth investigations, and publishing exclusive content for those who stand behind this project.

Get 7 day free trial

To see how readers have benefited from this publication and the community it has built, you can view their feedback here.

An investigation into the deployment of in-body monitoring systems, the COVID-19 catalyst, and the World Economic Forum's vision of "hackable humans"

Introduction: Beyond the Skin’s Boundary

We stand at an unprecedented crossroads in human history, where the boundary between our physical bodies and digital surveillance systems is dissolving. While most people focus on external privacy concerns—smartphones tracking location, social media monitoring behavior—a far more invasive infrastructure is being quietly deployed: Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) that monitor, collect, and transmit data from inside the human body itself.

This isn’t science fiction. It’s current reality, accelerated by COVID-19 and championed by influential figures like World Economic Forum advisor Yuval Noah Harari, who openly states that “humans are now hackable animals” and “surveillance is going under the skin”.

The implications extend far beyond healthcare. We’re witnessing the construction of a surveillance apparatus that operates at the cellular level, with profound consequences for human autonomy, privacy, and the very nature of what it means to be human in the 21st century.

The Technology Framework: Understanding WBANs

What Are Wireless Body Area Networks?

Wireless Body Area Networks represent “a wireless network of wearable computing devices” that can be “embedded inside the body as implants or pills, surface-mounted on the body in a fixed position, or carried in different positions”. These systems create what researchers call a “body sensor network” capable of continuous physiological monitoring.

The technology encompasses three primary categories:

1. Implantable Devices: Surgically placed sensors that “monitor heart function, detect abnormal heart rhythms,” and perform various sensing functions from inside the body

2. Ingestible Devices: Sensors that “resemble regular capsules and can be swallowed similarly to normal pills”

3. Injectable Devices: Microdevices “placed inside the human body via needles” for “sensing and neuro-stimulation”

A Survey on Wireless Body Area Networks for eHealthcare Systems in Residential Environments

The Communication Infrastructure

The sophistication of these networks extends far beyond simple monitoring. WBANs feature “a standard ZigBee compliant radio and a common set of physiological, kinetic, and environmental sensors” that can “perform real-time analysis of sensors’ data, provide guidance and feedback to the user, and generate warnings”.

More concerning is their connectivity: “Through gateway devices, it is possible to connect the wearable devices on the human body to the internet. This way, medical professionals can access patient data online using the internet independent of the patient location”.

This creates a pathway not just for medical monitoring, but for unprecedented surveillance capabilities that operate beyond traditional privacy protections.

COVID-19: The Perfect Storm for Implementation

The Coronavirus-Body Area Network (CoV-BAN) Model

The COVID-19 pandemic served as more than a health crisis—it became the justification for rapid deployment of invasive monitoring technologies. Researchers developed what they explicitly called the “coronavirus-body area network (CoV-BAN) model based on IoT technology as a real-time health monitoring system for the detection of the early stages of coronavirus infection”.

This system was designed to:

• Use “machine learning and the Internet of Things (IoT) to identify and monitor the human body for health-related information”

• Employ “wearable biosensors to examine the health status of the patient”

• Enable “continuous monitoring of COVID-19 infected persons”

Technical Implementation During the Pandemic

The CoV-BAN model incorporated sophisticated surveillance capabilities:

Multi-Sensor Integration: “Wearable or implanted biosensors (ECG, EEG, temperature, blood pressure) capture data through ZigBee and Bluetooth wireless technologies and transmit it to the body coordinator”

Cloud-Based Monitoring: The system uses “long-range (LoRa)-based IoT program to receive biosensor signals from the patient and transmit them to the cloud directly for monitoring”

Remote Healthcare Access: “Using the Internet, the sink nodes transfer the gathered data to a distant medical facility or doctor”

An Intelligent and Energy‑Efficient Wireless Body Area Network to Control Coronavirus Outbreak

The Normalization Strategy

COVID-19 provided the perfect cover for normalizing invasive monitoring. As researchers noted, “To prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from spreading, the regular identification and monitoring of infected patients are needed”. This created public acceptance for technologies that would have faced significant resistance under normal circumstances.

The pandemic established the precedent that public health emergencies justify extraordinary surveillance measures, setting the stage for permanent implementation of these systems.

The World Economic Forum’s Vision: “Hacking Humans”

Yuval Noah Harari’s Explicit Agenda

World Economic Forum advisor Yuval Noah Harari has been remarkably candid about the surveillance agenda. His statements reveal a comprehensive vision for human monitoring and control:

On Human “Hackability”: “Humans are now hackable animals”

On Under-the-Skin Surveillance: “Previously, surveillance was mainly above the skin; now we want it under the skin”

On COVID as Justification: “COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize, total biometric surveillance. If we want to stop this epidemic, we need not just to monitor people, we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin”

The Economic Transformation

Harari’s vision extends beyond surveillance to economic control. He explains that future generations will “learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds,” which will become “the main products of the 21st Century economy: not textiles and vehicles and weapons, but bodies and brains and minds”.

This represents a fundamental shift where human biology becomes a commodity, controlled and manipulated by those who own the technology infrastructure.

Data as the New Currency

According to Harari, “data is the most important asset in the world,” and “the few masters of the economy” will be “the people who own and control data”. When this data includes real-time biological information from inside human bodies, the implications for power and control become staggering.

The Technical Reality: How In-Body Surveillance Works

Read more