A very well explained and easy to follow piece. It fits into the wider reality of the corrupt system we live in, that weaves its tentacles into every facet of everyday life and every institution. Capitalism with its focus on evermore growth is unsustainable. And detrimental as you state. There’s a reason why there’s laws against monopolies. But it’s a two tier system as the puppet masters create but do not partake in these rules.
You're dead right Revealedeye. But this is old news. Go to rumble.com and look up the Video documentary - Monopoly who owns the world. They'll be Lots of sites showing that video. You can't miss it. Should be an hour and 3 minutes long. It explains everything and shows you how to research it and more. Or go to rumble.com and look up The Real Matrix Show. Also good info on a number of topics.
Excellent piece. Not surprised by anything you revealed. I was at an event just over a year ago and a man at the table said to just give all your money to BlackRock. They'll make you tons.
May add a layer to the influence cascade: if retail Stockowners vote on any company decisions they mostly do it via their Bank or custodian. As the Banks themselves are owned by BR and Co they also have the grip there.
The Norwegian Sovereign Fund, currently north of 2 trillion in assets publicly said that they often align their decisions with the big three. And we might add Fidelity.
“Evil” can name the moral shock people feel, but it can also obscure the more difficult question: what structural powers become dangerous when they are concentrated, opaque, and insulated from meaningful public accountability?
The issue is not only the intention of any one company. It is the architecture that allows financial institutions to shape housing, labor, food, media, policy, and resource allocation at a scale ordinary citizens cannot easily see or influence.
Naming that architecture precisely is how outrage becomes discernment, and discernment becomes democratic agency.
What does one mean when using the words "capital/capitalism/capitalist"? IMO Marx and Engels did the world great damage when by publishing their work "Capital" (Das Kapital). For, in doing so they separated chiefly inanimate (at least non human) reality, i.e. property (real, manufactured, and intellectual), money/credit, tools, natural resources, commodities and livestock) from people in the function of entrepreneurs/creators, tradesmen, merchants, marketers, investors, (the ownership class), regulators (government class) and workers/employees (the labor class). For them, the ownership class make up capital, which make them oppressors, and the labor class are the oppressed. The ideal duty of the government class for Marx and Engels is to confiscate the function and property of the ownership class and have the labor class work exclusively for the government class.
But in the real world, aren't capital and labor mutually dependent, like two sides of the same coin?
IMO there can be no capital without labor, nor labor without capital.
It appears that most commentators conflate capitalism with fascism. Ironically the same commentators are likely to see fascist regimes such as Canada, Sweden, Denmark, most of Europe as "socialist". I believe most nation states are predominantly fascist, simply because private central banks which emit their monetary supply, must, by definition, be fascist.
If, by capitalist, one means a market driven economy, perhaps Poland, Chile, and Burkina Faso may function as such, if we take their own relative proclamations as accurate descriptions.
The role of government should be, according to the U.S. founders, to maintain a level playing field, whereupon no individual or group of individuals can, obstruct the liberty of another. All endeavors must benefit the general welfare of all, but never benefit one interest at the cost of another. In that universe every man is his own capital, ("man" being generic to both sexes in this usage). And he can choose to use his capital as an occupation of common right, or he can choose to serve another as an employee and switch back and forth between working for himself or serving another.
But the government (Congress) abdicated its role as level field keeper when it sold itself to the Federal Reserve System and collaborating other central banks (e.g. The City of London) and their fiat currencies. Now the federal government merely enforces perpetual, irredeemable debt servitude to a monetary system with no standard of value since August 15, 1971.
BlackRock owes its power and influence to brokering that debt servitude to benefit its investors at the cost of those who don't or can't invest in it. Hence it functions quite well not producing any physical or intellectual product, or service other than placing its investors closer to the generator of the nation's money supply, and thereby benefiting by being top tier recipients in the velocity of money feed.
I'm still in two minds about the Trump admin's end goal. While their plans and actions appear to be aimed at dismantling the non-sovereign globalist empire, City of London, etc, their proposed system to replace the failing fiat monetary system talks about tokenisation of assets - as does Blackrock!
A very well explained and easy to follow piece. It fits into the wider reality of the corrupt system we live in, that weaves its tentacles into every facet of everyday life and every institution. Capitalism with its focus on evermore growth is unsustainable. And detrimental as you state. There’s a reason why there’s laws against monopolies. But it’s a two tier system as the puppet masters create but do not partake in these rules.
You're dead right Revealedeye. But this is old news. Go to rumble.com and look up the Video documentary - Monopoly who owns the world. They'll be Lots of sites showing that video. You can't miss it. Should be an hour and 3 minutes long. It explains everything and shows you how to research it and more. Or go to rumble.com and look up The Real Matrix Show. Also good info on a number of topics.
Thanks
Pure EVIL and needs to be destroyed and the rest of their companies who want to destroy and impoverish the world
How do we do this?
I have an idea or two but it’s best not to say anything
Don’t forget the other massive stratum: Government.
Excellent piece. Not surprised by anything you revealed. I was at an event just over a year ago and a man at the table said to just give all your money to BlackRock. They'll make you tons.
Thanks for this.
If not they will try to tell you what you can do all the time but that’s not how I live
Larry I am a woman fink
"This entire affair did not strike me as just a simple business case study; rather, it was a chilling yet flawless reflection of modern capitalism"
This is out of the talmud. Only slavetraders build like this. It is all you can do when you are devoid of creativity!
May add a layer to the influence cascade: if retail Stockowners vote on any company decisions they mostly do it via their Bank or custodian. As the Banks themselves are owned by BR and Co they also have the grip there.
The Norwegian Sovereign Fund, currently north of 2 trillion in assets publicly said that they often align their decisions with the big three. And we might add Fidelity.
“Evil” can name the moral shock people feel, but it can also obscure the more difficult question: what structural powers become dangerous when they are concentrated, opaque, and insulated from meaningful public accountability?
The issue is not only the intention of any one company. It is the architecture that allows financial institutions to shape housing, labor, food, media, policy, and resource allocation at a scale ordinary citizens cannot easily see or influence.
Naming that architecture precisely is how outrage becomes discernment, and discernment becomes democratic agency.
What does one mean when using the words "capital/capitalism/capitalist"? IMO Marx and Engels did the world great damage when by publishing their work "Capital" (Das Kapital). For, in doing so they separated chiefly inanimate (at least non human) reality, i.e. property (real, manufactured, and intellectual), money/credit, tools, natural resources, commodities and livestock) from people in the function of entrepreneurs/creators, tradesmen, merchants, marketers, investors, (the ownership class), regulators (government class) and workers/employees (the labor class). For them, the ownership class make up capital, which make them oppressors, and the labor class are the oppressed. The ideal duty of the government class for Marx and Engels is to confiscate the function and property of the ownership class and have the labor class work exclusively for the government class.
But in the real world, aren't capital and labor mutually dependent, like two sides of the same coin?
IMO there can be no capital without labor, nor labor without capital.
It appears that most commentators conflate capitalism with fascism. Ironically the same commentators are likely to see fascist regimes such as Canada, Sweden, Denmark, most of Europe as "socialist". I believe most nation states are predominantly fascist, simply because private central banks which emit their monetary supply, must, by definition, be fascist.
If, by capitalist, one means a market driven economy, perhaps Poland, Chile, and Burkina Faso may function as such, if we take their own relative proclamations as accurate descriptions.
The role of government should be, according to the U.S. founders, to maintain a level playing field, whereupon no individual or group of individuals can, obstruct the liberty of another. All endeavors must benefit the general welfare of all, but never benefit one interest at the cost of another. In that universe every man is his own capital, ("man" being generic to both sexes in this usage). And he can choose to use his capital as an occupation of common right, or he can choose to serve another as an employee and switch back and forth between working for himself or serving another.
But the government (Congress) abdicated its role as level field keeper when it sold itself to the Federal Reserve System and collaborating other central banks (e.g. The City of London) and their fiat currencies. Now the federal government merely enforces perpetual, irredeemable debt servitude to a monetary system with no standard of value since August 15, 1971.
BlackRock owes its power and influence to brokering that debt servitude to benefit its investors at the cost of those who don't or can't invest in it. Hence it functions quite well not producing any physical or intellectual product, or service other than placing its investors closer to the generator of the nation's money supply, and thereby benefiting by being top tier recipients in the velocity of money feed.
I'm still in two minds about the Trump admin's end goal. While their plans and actions appear to be aimed at dismantling the non-sovereign globalist empire, City of London, etc, their proposed system to replace the failing fiat monetary system talks about tokenisation of assets - as does Blackrock!