From "owning nothing" to mind-control sound waves, we dive into the 10 most dystopian plans currently pushed by Klaus Schwab and the WEF. Is the Great Reset a roadmap for global control? Read the full investigation.
I am with you having a great degree of mistrust in the World Economic Forum. Although I feel your perception of a couple of things are missguided. The belief that capitalism is based on a "self-regulating" system of offer (supply) and demand is a false concept. If an economic system is not a well regulated system it devolves into a system where elites can control everything. Keynesian economics argued that demand from the consumer should lead what is supplied and government regulation and intervention is needed to ensure this. Today we have a much less regulated economy that allows the elites (suppliers) to manipulate the game. It was not the demand of the consumer that brought about planned obsolescence or the hostile takeovers that gutted the US manufacturing. Our globalist economy was created by the Trilateral Commission and the Bretton Woods elites. The economic regulations and taxes on the rich that existed prior to the 1980's were designed to support the Keynesian model. Today's capitalist models are secretive, they hide their externalities and are intensionally complicated. The only Economist that publishes the algorithms of their model, that I know of, is James S. Henry.
Free speech is not binary. It like everything else is nuanced. Binary refers to only the extremes, reality exists primarily between the extremes. An example; The US supreme court's ruleings in Citizens United that money is speech, and in New York Times v. Sullivan allowing corporations to make false claims with out "actual malice" are distortions that allow mass manipulation by the elites.
Thanks for publishing your article, keep up the good work.
Thanks for reading and for the thoughtful pushback. It’s great to see we agree on the core issue.
However, I have to disagree with the idea that the solution to elite control is more regulation. History shows us that "well-regulated systems" are almost always designed by the regulators to favor the biggest players. When you say the economy needs a "referee," I’d argue that the WEF is currently trying to be that referee—and they’re using "regulation" as the primary tool to stifle competition and force compliance.
On your points regarding economics and speech:
On Capitalism: While you see "self-regulation" as a myth, I see it as the only thing the elite actually fear. They want a complicated, regulated system because they are the only ones with the lawyers and the "Young Global Leaders" inside governments to navigate it. Planned obsolescence and hostile takeovers aren't failures of a free market; they are the results of a rigged corporate-state alliance that protects monopolies.
On Free Speech: You mentioned that speech is "nuanced" and not binary. That is exactly the language the WEF’s "eSafety Commissioners" use when they talk about "recalibrating" our rights. Once we accept that speech isn’t binary, we hand the power to the elites to decide where the "nuance" ends and "censorship" begins. In my view, as soon as you allow a "middle ground," the elites will occupy it and push the boundaries until your voice is effectively silenced.
The "Keynesian model" you mentioned may have looked better on paper, but it still relies on a centralized authority to manage "demand." My concern is that any centralized authority—whether it’s a 1970s government or a 2030 globalist coalition—will eventually be "penetrated" (to use Klaus Schwab's own word) by those who seek total control.
I appreciate you keeping the conversation going. The goal is to keep our eyes open to how these "nuanced" systems are being used to build a world where we own nothing.
Regarding regulations vs. no regulations. Regulations are the rules of the game, they are written down and therefore can be reviewed and challenged based on their merits. Removing the regulations means no rules, nothing written to review. I lived through the deregulations of Reagan, H.W. Bush, Clinton and so on, as well as numerous changes to our system by the courts. Jimmy Carter, H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton were all on the Trilateral Commission, remember H.W. Bush (ex CIA director) was Reagan's V.P. for 8 years. Jimmy and Regan did create some good environmental regulation unfortunately it is being undone by Trump. Our country's huge middle class was created with Keynesian economics. When I was studying economics in the 1990's an upper class mate approached me and said "If you would like a job in the CIA or NSA, get as high of a degree as you can in economics as fast as you can. Don't worry about getting good grades just pass. Most importantly know this Book." He handed me a copy of "The Art of Strategy" by R.L. Wing. It is a near direct translation of Sun Tzu's Art of War. With Wing's commentary on how to incorporate it into your life in 6 months. Combine that reading with "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins and "The Blood Bankers" by James S. Henry and you will get a good comprehension of Milton Freemans free trade economics. David C. Korten wrote an excellent book "When Corporations Rule the World" that provides some insight into many of the topics we disagree on. He is an insider of the globalist system and presents Ideas for how we might change the game. Our founding fathers, as we like to call them, actually understood the need to regulate business. It used to be that to run a business you had to obtain a charter from each State you wished to do business in. These charters had to be renewed every year, and were heavily regulated, usually with anti usury and proof your business benefited the common welfare of that state. The contracts of incorporation were either sole proprietor or partnerships for life. Under these rules if your business failed the debt was your familys. The Boston Tea Party was against the British East India Co. a Limited Liability Corporation or LLC, that meant the owners other assets and family were protected from incurring any debt. These were illegal in the US until the Wyoming LLC act in 1977 for an oil and gas contract, and not recognized by the IRS until 1988 when they became common practice. LLCs today allow the wealthy to take huge risks and operate with questionable ethics with several businesses and never endanger themselves beyond what they invested. In 2002 and 2003 corporations gained another layer of protection Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) and Non- Prosecution Agreements (NPAs) thanks to our DOJ. Without regulations written into law how are we to stop this? Keep in mind technically laws against fraud, grand larceny, murder, and rape ore all regulations that usualy are brought up against people rather than corporations. Our free speech does already have non binary aspects, It is illegal to scream bomb in an airport when there is no bomb. Public safety and libel and slander have long been reasons for restrictions on speech. I would prefer we had legal recourse against corporations or politicians that blatantly lie for gain.
As long as you use traditional banking which is hard to avoid, if you rely on shops again same problem. The only escape and that’s not guaranteed as the end game is a kind of feudal communism is self sustainability in a community that is pretty rural and definitely not in the west, though again this is a global plan. The only real hope for this civilization is humanity wakes the f up.
Hopefully this can be something that can be considered as well to overcome all that is going on which is wrong. We need to get it into people's minds that their land should be free, and always should have been that way. I hope you like this and it can resonate with the people.
I think the solutions need to be more ground-up, meaning people need to actually Start caring about liberty, freedom and privacy. You can vote someone in, that "says" they are anti-WEF, but if they aren't open to being bought out, they will be threatened. None of this agenda would have taken root in the first place if people hadn't been so demoralized and corrupted. The agenda is cause and effect. This might help.
I am with you having a great degree of mistrust in the World Economic Forum. Although I feel your perception of a couple of things are missguided. The belief that capitalism is based on a "self-regulating" system of offer (supply) and demand is a false concept. If an economic system is not a well regulated system it devolves into a system where elites can control everything. Keynesian economics argued that demand from the consumer should lead what is supplied and government regulation and intervention is needed to ensure this. Today we have a much less regulated economy that allows the elites (suppliers) to manipulate the game. It was not the demand of the consumer that brought about planned obsolescence or the hostile takeovers that gutted the US manufacturing. Our globalist economy was created by the Trilateral Commission and the Bretton Woods elites. The economic regulations and taxes on the rich that existed prior to the 1980's were designed to support the Keynesian model. Today's capitalist models are secretive, they hide their externalities and are intensionally complicated. The only Economist that publishes the algorithms of their model, that I know of, is James S. Henry.
Free speech is not binary. It like everything else is nuanced. Binary refers to only the extremes, reality exists primarily between the extremes. An example; The US supreme court's ruleings in Citizens United that money is speech, and in New York Times v. Sullivan allowing corporations to make false claims with out "actual malice" are distortions that allow mass manipulation by the elites.
Thanks for publishing your article, keep up the good work.
Thanks for reading and for the thoughtful pushback. It’s great to see we agree on the core issue.
However, I have to disagree with the idea that the solution to elite control is more regulation. History shows us that "well-regulated systems" are almost always designed by the regulators to favor the biggest players. When you say the economy needs a "referee," I’d argue that the WEF is currently trying to be that referee—and they’re using "regulation" as the primary tool to stifle competition and force compliance.
On your points regarding economics and speech:
On Capitalism: While you see "self-regulation" as a myth, I see it as the only thing the elite actually fear. They want a complicated, regulated system because they are the only ones with the lawyers and the "Young Global Leaders" inside governments to navigate it. Planned obsolescence and hostile takeovers aren't failures of a free market; they are the results of a rigged corporate-state alliance that protects monopolies.
On Free Speech: You mentioned that speech is "nuanced" and not binary. That is exactly the language the WEF’s "eSafety Commissioners" use when they talk about "recalibrating" our rights. Once we accept that speech isn’t binary, we hand the power to the elites to decide where the "nuance" ends and "censorship" begins. In my view, as soon as you allow a "middle ground," the elites will occupy it and push the boundaries until your voice is effectively silenced.
The "Keynesian model" you mentioned may have looked better on paper, but it still relies on a centralized authority to manage "demand." My concern is that any centralized authority—whether it’s a 1970s government or a 2030 globalist coalition—will eventually be "penetrated" (to use Klaus Schwab's own word) by those who seek total control.
I appreciate you keeping the conversation going. The goal is to keep our eyes open to how these "nuanced" systems are being used to build a world where we own nothing.
Regarding regulations vs. no regulations. Regulations are the rules of the game, they are written down and therefore can be reviewed and challenged based on their merits. Removing the regulations means no rules, nothing written to review. I lived through the deregulations of Reagan, H.W. Bush, Clinton and so on, as well as numerous changes to our system by the courts. Jimmy Carter, H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton were all on the Trilateral Commission, remember H.W. Bush (ex CIA director) was Reagan's V.P. for 8 years. Jimmy and Regan did create some good environmental regulation unfortunately it is being undone by Trump. Our country's huge middle class was created with Keynesian economics. When I was studying economics in the 1990's an upper class mate approached me and said "If you would like a job in the CIA or NSA, get as high of a degree as you can in economics as fast as you can. Don't worry about getting good grades just pass. Most importantly know this Book." He handed me a copy of "The Art of Strategy" by R.L. Wing. It is a near direct translation of Sun Tzu's Art of War. With Wing's commentary on how to incorporate it into your life in 6 months. Combine that reading with "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins and "The Blood Bankers" by James S. Henry and you will get a good comprehension of Milton Freemans free trade economics. David C. Korten wrote an excellent book "When Corporations Rule the World" that provides some insight into many of the topics we disagree on. He is an insider of the globalist system and presents Ideas for how we might change the game. Our founding fathers, as we like to call them, actually understood the need to regulate business. It used to be that to run a business you had to obtain a charter from each State you wished to do business in. These charters had to be renewed every year, and were heavily regulated, usually with anti usury and proof your business benefited the common welfare of that state. The contracts of incorporation were either sole proprietor or partnerships for life. Under these rules if your business failed the debt was your familys. The Boston Tea Party was against the British East India Co. a Limited Liability Corporation or LLC, that meant the owners other assets and family were protected from incurring any debt. These were illegal in the US until the Wyoming LLC act in 1977 for an oil and gas contract, and not recognized by the IRS until 1988 when they became common practice. LLCs today allow the wealthy to take huge risks and operate with questionable ethics with several businesses and never endanger themselves beyond what they invested. In 2002 and 2003 corporations gained another layer of protection Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) and Non- Prosecution Agreements (NPAs) thanks to our DOJ. Without regulations written into law how are we to stop this? Keep in mind technically laws against fraud, grand larceny, murder, and rape ore all regulations that usualy are brought up against people rather than corporations. Our free speech does already have non binary aspects, It is illegal to scream bomb in an airport when there is no bomb. Public safety and libel and slander have long been reasons for restrictions on speech. I would prefer we had legal recourse against corporations or politicians that blatantly lie for gain.
💯
As long as you use traditional banking which is hard to avoid, if you rely on shops again same problem. The only escape and that’s not guaranteed as the end game is a kind of feudal communism is self sustainability in a community that is pretty rural and definitely not in the west, though again this is a global plan. The only real hope for this civilization is humanity wakes the f up.
An asteroid couldn’t land quicker in Davos.
Hopefully this can be something that can be considered as well to overcome all that is going on which is wrong. We need to get it into people's minds that their land should be free, and always should have been that way. I hope you like this and it can resonate with the people.
https://theworldidreamof.substack.com/p/free-land-at-birth
Great write-up, Thank you!
I think the solutions need to be more ground-up, meaning people need to actually Start caring about liberty, freedom and privacy. You can vote someone in, that "says" they are anti-WEF, but if they aren't open to being bought out, they will be threatened. None of this agenda would have taken root in the first place if people hadn't been so demoralized and corrupted. The agenda is cause and effect. This might help.
https://on.soundcloud.com/oDVBuzBAcd1rtkDXOD
Peace!